User talk:Ericorbit/Archive25

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

As the single is nearing its release, I was informed that you had filed for the deletion of the article. Rather than merely create a new one, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind undoing the erasion, so that further information of the article be added.

Sllewellyn7 12:16, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Response here: User talk:Sllewellyn7#Your request: In My System - eo (talk) 12:14, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there I have come to apologise for everything I have done in the past, I now realise that if I keep creating accounts I will just keep getting blocked and I promise not create another account ever again. I would love to work with you in the future, I will take six months off from Wikipedia to think about everything I have done and come back on the 5th February 2011 and try to sort everything out so that I don't create any more accounts and that I can get my original account back, stay on Wikipedia and listen to any of your advice in the future. Best Regards 80.1.183.44 (talk) 14:18, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am taking this deal seriously and will not go behind your back and create another account. 80.1.183.44 (talk) 14:20, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No deal, at least not from me. You're not supposed to be editing at all [1], yet you've spent the last several days editing anonymously [2]. I've reverted these edits and blocked. - eo (talk) 14:25, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you've converted To Kingdom Come into a disambig. Per WP:FIXDABLINKS, could you clean up these links that now point to a disambig? Thanks, --JaGa^talk 12:46, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Sorry for forgetting. - eo (talk) 12:58, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks for the quick fix! Cheers, --JaGa^talk 13:47, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ain't no thang. 99% of the links were fixed when I updated The Band's template. - eo (talk) 14:07, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This account was just left unblocked after the rename, and was taken back up by ItHysteria. I've indefed it.—Kww(talk) 22:17, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have a new message(s) at MOS:DISCOG#Accessibility issues --Lil-unique1 (talk) 17:14, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

heyaa, just wondered if you could do me a favour? Would you mind looking up annie lennox's chart history on the hot 100 on billboard.biz and/or the charts book please? allmusic and billboards archive agree on positions of some songs, but another editor pointed out that there was some info missing from both, and there are even articles on billboards site which have the missing positions. have found one but would take hours to hunt through hundreds of billboard articles. any help would be awesome! thanks :) Mister sparky (talk) 19:42, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! :) Mister sparky (talk) 20:14, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

oooh, and this may seem a very random request: but how do i archive my talkpage? Mister sparky (talk) 21:04, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks :) Mister sparky (talk) 14:37, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah man, I saw it. But you had the dates wrong. You wrote the issue of August 28, 2010 which is next Saturday. The correct date is August 18, 2010 so cheers. Kevon100 (talk) 21:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I checked there is nothing about the 28th of August, 2010. The issue is dated August 18, 2010. Kevon100 (talk) 14:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh nevermind man, I see the error. I've been taking this all wrong. Lol I'm sorry dude. Cheers! Kevon100 (talk) 14:47, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eric. In trying to determine consensus for (or against) a change of headings and links in music-related articles, I've managed to draw comments from exactly two other editors. I'd feel better about moving ahead (or not moving ahead) with the change if I knew how much (or little) support there is for it among more of the music-focused editors.

It's a teeny matter (and I thought the discussions would be simple, but this is ridiculous), but I'd appreciate it if you would weigh in at the Certifications column heading links discussion at MOS:DISCOG. (There's a similar one, sort of, over at WT:Record charts, but I'll be happy if I can just generate some activity at MOS:DISCOG). Thanks, — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 13:55, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

done! - eo (talk) 14:03, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've gotten you to weigh in on musical things before. Could you please help me with an ongoing issue here? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 14:59, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sasse MWTUSOH.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:27, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File may be deleted, article redirected a while ago. - eo (talk) 15:29, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This makes me consider issuing a topic ban against Petergriffin9901 that he cannot modify any sales figures or certifications. I'm tempted to do the same thing to Max24, just because I am tired of this constant useless arguing. Thoughts?—Kww(talk) 01:25, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to suggest something. Honestly, my issues have only been with book sources, and even though I stand by it being a good-faith mistake, I know I am responsible for my edits. May I suggest, since this problem revolves around a book source, that I have to run by any book I use in the future to you, if I want to use them for any sales or certification on any page. That way whenever I change a source (book source) for sales or certifications, Ill run it by you to take a look. I'm honest Kevin, but I understand we must stand by our mistkaes, so this seems to me the best and most fair thing to in light of recent events. As for Max, I don't know what, but he needs to learn to take things up with me or grow up.--PeterGriffin • Talk 01:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes. It seems that Peter has good intentions here, and in general, but I don't think it was a wise idea to use a non-internet book source when Peter is not even in possession of the book. Definitely some carelessness has occurred here, obviously Max's frustration is not helping the situation. What I do see, however, is that more than one person has a problem with Peter's edits, so I would suggest (to Peter) that you never use a book as a source unless you 1) own a copy or 2) know exactly where the info is located (e.g. page numbers) as well as any addition info that is available (e.g. ISBN number). Kww, you are obviously much more involved with this than I, and with your ongoing mentoring of Peter I will leave the final decision up to you. I do not oppose Peter's suggestion that all book sources he wants to use be approved by you. However, if you feel a topic ban is warranted then I would not oppose that either, as it was also suggested by another user (Frcm1988). I have not looked through Max's edits, I don't know if the Peter/Max arguments are limited to Mariah Carey certifications or if it extends further. If this situation cannot be resolved, then definitely a topic ban is the last resort — for both editors. - eo (talk) 12:21, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eric, I would like to explain a bit to you. I mean honestly, this topic ban would be unfair, unjust and totally unnecessary. My issue was placing a few sales figures from a book (which I did see in the book and offered to take photos of it). Also, the other issue Max brought up was a few different and inconsistent certifications on about 2 album pages from 4 months ago (May). Now for that I really can't answer, I don't remember, but I ask you to weigh out all the good I have done to Mariah Carey articles since I have been here (over 4000 Good faith edits) I have re-done 2 articles (of Carey) to about GA standard, and was in a project to to it to all of her pages. Additionally I work well with (most) editors and have been here for a year and a half with no problems (only relating to Max24). Understand that since I began here, Max24 has had a personal vendetta against me (other editors will tell you) I mean its not that difficult to find little certain 4 month old edits, and take them out of context and use them against me. Everyone screws up, and I feel I'm being judged in an unfair and overwhelming way, considering there are established editors that vandalize every day, and just get some lame warning slapped on their talk page. Do you think its fair that I edit over 5000 edits, stay for over a year and a half and work hard, and because of one incident get considered for topic ban? Ill be honest, if I get banned from "Mariah Carey" articles, you might as well block me, because that is the reason I am on Wikipedia. I mean I think its so unfiar, I watch established users vandalize daily, and do any of them get blocked or banned? Also, understand that because a few editors don't like me, everytime there is a mistake, instead of taking it up with me (I am reasonable, you can see that on my talk and work well) they invite 13 editors to a large scale article talk discussion, bringing up "evidence" that I deserve to be banned. Its all BS, and I honestly was really surprised at these considerations over an honest and hard working Wikipedian.--PeterGriffin • Talk 15:49, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I being warned for editing pages that I made myself. The Count & Sinden's "After Dark" page was only made a few hours ago by myself, so why I'm being moaned at for making a slight error by having "Chart Performance" rather than "Chart performance" is silly. It is a similar case with Chase & Status's "Let You Go" article, which I edited because of an error in the release date, which I'm sure I had put in the first place.

I would appreciate if you could tell me what I am doing wrong exactly so as to avoid further blockings on my account.

Sllewellyn7 16:01, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

I'll dig into the rest later, but he's not Greeenock125.—Kww(talk) 17:04, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, THANK YOU. I knew I had suspected that before and obviously I completely forgot I had taken it that far. Whew, ok so that's that. Let me know what you think of the rest, when you can. - eo (talk) 18:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think this piece of crap deserves any notability for another article space? In this way it won't be long before all of Gaga's songs are made to have separate articles. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:45, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, no. Don't think its notable, it look like almost complete WP:OR. May want to consider a WP:AfD nom? - eo (talk) 11:16, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Only Girl has been confirmed as the single to be released on 31, August 2010. Please check the article for references. If you make further changes we will take it as vandalism. Syedwaheedhussain (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism = removing AfD templates while the discussion is open. Don't do it again. - eo (talk) 14:25, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Mariah Carey albums discography#Possible_solution.—Kww(talk) 00:15, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see you're one of the main editors on the "List of best selling girl groups" page. I commented on your comment, but you never replied. I think we should sort the page out, as i agree, it is a bit of a mess! haha. Maybe we could put in the article "sales based on certifications" or something else, what ideas have you got? Write back! :D AtomicMarcusKitten (talk) 00:46, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to all the recent developments for discographies your comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Discographies/style#Time to update would be appreciated. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 (talk2me) 22:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eric. I've just removed another unofficial fansite link from the David A. Stewart page (each time I do so, some idiot puts it back). The current IP address that restored it (67.188.253.187) was apparently blocked by you some months ago for doing the same thing. I would have left a warning on their talk page, but the page is just a long list of existing warnings which have obviously been ignored. Can you block the IP address? 88.104.23.104 (talk) 02:07, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

done. - eo (talk) 15:06, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was just about to leave you a note about the further spamming going on, but it looks like you just saw it yourself. Thanks. 88.104.23.156 (talk) 19:56, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. Ya know, you may want to think about creating an account. Placing those articles under semi-protection prevents you from editing them too.  :-\ eo (talk) 19:58, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do actually have one, but I can't use it when I'm editing away from home because there's no way I can remember my password after all this time. 88.104.23.156 (talk) 20:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

heyyy, could you have a look at the above article? nymphowiki keeps insisting on spain's addition without joining the discussion on the talkpage, and i noticed on his talkpage you've warned him about this before. thanks! Mister sparky (talk) 21:49, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. Mister sparky (talk) 15:17, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

could you also look at The Saturdays discography, i thought LittleGee was blocked for disruption... but keeps adding the same ref over and over again to various saturdays articles to verify scottish positions, but the ref only verifies 1 album and also adding sales from a very unreliable forum. removing stuff like this and then getting told i'm edit warring and vandalising is getting really taxing... Mister sparky (talk) 15:17, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I left a note and will keep an eye on it. That Scottish website is not the easiest to navigate, hopefully it can be used to source all the positions. - eo (talk) 15:48, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you :) but yea the OCC is a bit behind the times, it has proper 1 page archives archives of the main singles and album charts, but not the genre and regional charts, its annoying. Mister sparky (talk) 19:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You do not remove the albums commercial performance without first discussing on the talk page whether or not it needs to be removed. Removing a lot of information from a page without discussing it on the talk page and with no real reason is considered vandalism.Melody Prince$$ (talk) 00:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can't place him. With that attitude, I suspect he won't be around long.—Kww(talk) 14:31, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Further thoughts. Take a look at Texasmade2010 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Trilltexaslb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), ScottieAngelo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), and Khaledfooty (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). All socks per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tony254trill. I'm blocking as a sock.—Kww(talk) 00:14, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, good find! Thanks so much. - eo (talk) 18:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I read your comment at User_talk:Lil-unique1#Is_it_worth_the_headache.3F because i stalk his page. I think a redirect would suffice (maybe a page protection for a week so only admins can edit it) and maybe a couple day block if hes not listening, hes been warned countless times and im almost positive he's a sockpuppet, i just can remember the other accounts user name. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:07, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha you stalk his page? Do I even wanna know the story behind that?  :-P I saw that you redirected already... its on my watchlist so hopefully it'll stay that way til Def Jam or Rihanna's official website announces something. It was User:Dean0804 who recreated this time but User:Syedwaheedhussain has been warned several times about his "sources". And my suspicions are the same too, although I'm trying to assume good faith about that (about to run out). Thanks. - eo (talk) 22:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i do stalk his page. Read Wikipedia:Talk page stalker. It is quite common for users to do this :P. And it shouldnt be created until it charts, i dont see why he is finding this so hard to comprehend (probably an avid fan). And lol, i try to assume good faith but sometimes id rather punch them in the head :P Happy editing - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 02:52, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Eric, Yes I've added it to my watchlist too. SyedWaheedHussain is becoming quite an issue with his editing. He doesn't seem to understand WP:RS. I am starting to have doubts that there might be more to the user than first impressions appear. But that's another story. Haha! Yes CLK is a page stalker (but it was only supposed to be temporary while i was on vacation lol). but seriously he watches my talk page, I watch his and we interject wherever appropriate. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 04:30, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sometimes i edit pages without being logged in. i saw that comment u posted on my old ip. you should post your concern on my talk page. thanks. (RealityShowsRock (talk) 11:46, 6 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I AM NOT A SOCKPUPPET. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RealityShowsRock (talk • contribs) 11:53, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's what I stated in this edit summary [3]. Please also address the topic of what is on your user page. As I said, I can assist with subpage creation if that is a legit article-in-progress and you need help. - eo (talk) 13:33, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but I just dont want my charts of my favorite shows deleted. (RealityShowsRock (talk) 19:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Well, I'd like to get my tables subpaged. (RealityShowsRock (talk) 20:23, 13 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Ok, I read it, and its probably an article in progress because I have a lot of tables more that I've wanted to add. I guess if you'd like to subpage them, I guessing they'd be in different categories, Total Drama and Survivor, (RealityShowsRock (talk) 12:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Hey! I wanted to ask you a question. You seem to be well familiar with, and know about featured billing vs. co-billing, which is great. If a single has co-billed artists, the entry should appear under the regular singles [as lead artist] section of the respective discography, and not the featured singles section, correct? And same goes for the navbox? The reason I ask is a couple of weeks ago, I got some of my edits reverted for the song "Eenie Meenie" by Sean Kingston and Justin Bieber. Editors have told me that there can only be one main artist, and the other(s) are featured artists, but I countered with the songs "Swagga Like Us" (T.I. & Jay-Z ft. Kanye West & Lil Wayne), "Tell Him" (Barbra Streisand & Celine Dion), and "The Boy Is Mine" (Brandy & Monica), among many, many others. Billboard credits "Eenie Meenie" as a feature, as does The Official Charts Company and the Irish Recorded Music Association, and the single cover has no mentions of featured artists. But when I edited the Justin Bieber discography page to have "Eenie Meenie" placed under the Singles section and not the Featured singles one, my edits got reverted (twice, I believe). Thoughts would be much appreciated! Yvesnimmo (talk) 00:37, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've never heard the rule "there can only be one lead artist", but that's kind of ridiculous. People do duets all the time, your thought process seems fine to me (i.e. Streisand and Dion, Streisand and Neil Diamond, Streisand and Donna Summer, Brandy/Monica, McCartney/MJackson, MCarey/BoyzIIMen, etc., etc., etc.) My rule of thumb is to go with how things are listed in most major markets' official charts - usually the artist credits there are determined by artist management and record labels... I know that is how it is with Billboard in the U.S., for example. If two artists have co-billing, then I think that the title should be listed in both artists' main singles section in both discographies - no need to put it in "featured" for just one of them. - eo (talk) 12:19, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Since Billboard, The Official Charts Company, and the IRMA all list it as co-billing, I think it should be a main single for both artists' discographies. People have been reverting my edits, though. *sigh* Yvesnimmo (talk) 19:40, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Listen. If you say so not to make such an article then when should we? Because it is a single and has already been released. So tell me a proper time to edit the page. Syedwaheedhussain (talk) 18:37, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought you might like to take a look at the talk page: Talk:Only Girl (In the World) -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 00:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the article List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 23:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I saw you edited in the past Linkin Park discography. Well, I'm trying it now to be featured, I fix everything I could in the article and I don't know what else I can do about it. I think it's complete and finished for the moment. If you can vote or comment on here Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Linkin Park discography/archive2, or maybe improve the article so it can finally reach featured status, it will be appreciated. --Neo139 (talk) 01:48, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since you move the page without the capital "W", could you do the same for List of Sonny With a Chance episodes to compliment the main page. QuasyBoy 20:20, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, done, sorry I missed that. - eo (talk) 20:31, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem. QuasyBoy 20:34, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[4]. Vítor&R (talk) 20:33, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So? Is this supposed to prove something other than your ridiculous attitude? Whatever, dude - keep edit-warring and see where that gets you. - eo (talk) 20:35, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please block User:Vitorvicentevalente her reverted and changed sourced content again. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:45, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU!!! Can you revert his last edit. Ive hit 2RR. Rather save it for something more important. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:55, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will. I am also on 2RR but before going back I will begin a discussion on the talk page, as it looks like there are others who may have different ideas about genres. - eo (talk) 20:56, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well someone is going to get punched lol. I'll resource a couple things. Under the critical reception they use the the trem dance pop and euro pop. ill just add an extra source in composition. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:58, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well he's trying to get unblocked and being very rude and removing other admins comments cause he doest like them and that they wouldnt unblock him. May i suggest a range block of Rihanna if he gets unblocked to avoid this silliness again. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 21:20, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We'll see what happens. His actions and comments are saved in his edit history, as well as all of the past versions of his Talk Page. This is also his sixth block, so I'm sure if anyone investigates, they will take that into account. - eo (talk) 21:22, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HAH, oh dear i didnt know he had been blocked before. And thanks for all your help today. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 21:26, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi to the new album by Lady Gaga, there are enough sources, such as herehttp://16sixteen.blog.de/2010/09/13/lady-gaga-mega-abraeumerin-born-this-way-9370690/ http://www.celebritysmackblog.com/2010/09/12/lady-gaga-born-this-way-new-album/or in MTV.de http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1647696/20100913/lady_gaga.jhtml and are probably reliable sources Xxvid (talk) 16:51, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First two cannot be used. The MTV source simply says she revealed the title of a new album. Not enough to mention in an article, discography at this point. - eo (talk) 17:14, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you warn or block this goof or something. Edit waring fashion, and comments directed towards me such as "Moronic fan with a moronic username!"([5])", "Yes, kid. Diddy says two lines in the song. Learn to read links before removing them. Get over it and move on." ([6])" Just generally being rude. Has been warned for uncivilty before - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to leave so many comments but heres another "[7] ("The rules section of Wikipedia says I can remove comments whenever I want so screw off.) - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:50, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a note to inform you the article Best Behavior is currently up for deletion as part of wikipedia's deletion process. I am leaving this note to everyone who was involved in the AfD discussion of Best Behaviour, covering the same topic. You can find the AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Behavior. Thank you. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 12:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that minor edits like the one I did on the Cheryl Cole discography can be considered disruptive, but I honestly only adjusted the rowspan information so as to ensure the certifications fit on a single line each and from that improve the appearance of the page. Apologies if this was deemed disruptive, but I did it in the interest of the users of Wikipedia.SLlewellyn (talk) 18:08, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's disruptive because other editors have asked you to stop doing it multiple times on your Talk Page. - eo (talk) 17:49, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) ...beyond which, it does not "ensure the certifications fit on a single line". It also doesn't "improve the appearance of the page", but goes against WP:DISCOGSTYLE. Which is surely part of the reasoning behind the requests for you to stop. Which you've ignored. Which is disruptive. Which brings us back to the beginning. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 18:20, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it doesn't. No more warnings on this, seriously, I will have no problem blocking this user again. - eo (talk) 18:24, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ericorbit. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of White Blank Page, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Plausible redirect - is a M&S song I believe. Thank you. Nancy ^talk 18:41, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't nominate it. The speedy deletion was removed by another user and I put it back. - eo (talk) 18:44, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]