User talk:Enigmaman/Archives/2017

Happy New Year!

Enigmaman,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (talk) 06:16, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Good morning, Enigmaman. For the last two days, I've been in an edit war with user DorianGrey14 on the F-series page regarding whether or not the 2018 F150 is or is not a new generation.[1] I have posted several sources confirming it will be a member of the 13th generation and NOT a start of a 14th generation, including a post form Ford's official user account on the F150 Forum, but he keeps reverting the changes to incorrect information. Would you please help me with this issue? Thanks, sir.

It seems to me he's in the wrong. If he continues to revert as he has promised to do, he will be blocked. Enigma^msg 14:57, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I appreciate your review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaMartian (talk • contribs) 16:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

lol ahoy old friend! Feel free to e-mail me and I'll send you my facebook if you'd like to keep in touch. :) · Andonic ^contact 14:30, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK. :) Enigma^msg 17:54, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is in fact older than 2013; a campaign of POV attack edits against her began in 2007, within a matter of months of her being elected to the Ontario Legislature — and as soon as the article was protected, the editor in question started trying to use the talk page to make the same unverifiable allegations that they couldn't get into the article. The problem has been, however, that the user in question has always edited as an anonymous IP rather than a logged-in editor, making it impossible to use editblocks to stop them (we know it's been the same user, because the IP numbers have always resolved to Thailand and the tactics have always been the same.) As you can see if you go further back in the edit history, the talk page also had to be protected in 2009, 2010 and 2011 because of the user's sheer refusal to give up the stick. You can see User:Natalie Erin/Cheri DiNovo vandal if you need additional background on the situation — but the long and the short of it is that I don't see any valid reason to let either the article or the talk page be edited by an anonymous IP ever again. The risk of the attack editor coming back again is simply too high given that they were still persistently at it six years later — page protection is literally the only thing that has ever kept the problem under any control at all. Bearcat (talk) 21:48, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ok. I was just wondering because the talk page is the logical place to suggest an edit and that can't be done now. Enigma^msg 00:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IPs can use WP:RFED to make edit requests when other options are not available. RFED is a section near the bottom of WP:RFPP. EdJohnston (talk) 17:43, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know. I came across this in the first place from a suggested edit at RfPP when I was clearing a backlog there. Enigma^msg 20:26, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Enigmaman. I am asking specifically why was the article Erich Reimer given a speedy deletion when there was a clear controversy over notability as well as a high multitude of neutral mainstream media news sources indicating neworthiness and when other similar political figures and commentators have Wikipedia articles? It has also been 9 years since the previous AfD and all recent notability factors are quite recent. PepsiLord19 (talk) 00:42, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, regardless, would it be possible to receive the code of the page as it was before deletion? Thank you very much. PepsiLord19 (talk) 00:47, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There was already a draft created when your submission was declined. Enigma^msg 00:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the update! PepsiLord19 (talk) 01:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it not patently obvious that PepsiLord19 is Erich Reimer? Is that not itself grounds for deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.54.27.60 (talk) 17:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted. Enigma^msg 17:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Enigmaman, i have a question about the Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes process. "Reviewers do not take responsibility for the correctness of edits they accept. A reviewer only ensures that the changes introduced to the article are broadly acceptable for viewing by a casual reader. The reviewer checks the pending change(s) for an article and can then decide to either accept it, revert it or modify it then later accept it." So, imagine this situation: In a article, an stretch says that a car weighs 235 kilograms, and it is supported by a source. Some editor changes this information to 250 kilograms, and the source says 235 kilograms. So, the pending changes reviewer have to approve the edit because is not vandalism or other inappropriate edit, or the reviewer should not accept the edit because it´s a wrong information? Jasão (msg) 05:16, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, if it contradicts the source, the edit should be rejected. It doesn't mean that anything not clearly vandalism has to be approved. Enigma^msg 05:19, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help. Jasão (msg) 05:26, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be the last admin to run into UpsandDowns1234—can you see any grounds not to indef block him? I hate to go in hard like this, as he's clearly a young child out of his depth rather than someone acting out of malice, but his Wikipedia history as far as I can tell is literally mistake after mistake, and it's becoming a serious time sink—at a rough estimate 50% of everything he does (that isn't messing around in his own userspace or sandboxes) needs to be reverted. Do you want to see if you can talk him down before I show him the door? ‑ Iridescent 20:29, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I read through the last bunch of conversations and I have nothing to add. He doesn't seem to be able to learn. I had no reason to comment until he submitted yet another pointless RfPP request. It's been at least five times this month and enough is enough. I am prepared to block him if he submits another RfPP request. Do what you see fit. Enigma^msg 20:49, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Although I will say that his suggestion of a six month block is not a bad one. It's hard to predict when people will mature. Enigma^msg 20:50, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per my comment a bit further up his talkpage last time he pulled this stunt, I'm very reluctant to impose a self-reqested CIR block. It's not like Wikipedia is an addictive substance from which one has to be kept away—if he knows he doesn't know how to do things, why keep coming back? If he'd only stick to articles and stop trying to "improve" WP: space, there wouldn't be any issues. (If he doesn't stop, I'd be inclined to go with "indefinite as undefined" rather than with a time limit—that way he'd have to explain that he understood what the problems were and commit not to doing them again. I agree that kids that age can mature quickly and unpredictably, but experience has shown that when he's given a time-limited block, he immediately goes back to whatever he was doing before the instant it expires.) ‑ Iridescent 21:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ! I want to thank you for entertaining my request and protecting the Page of Abu Dujana (militant). Generally contributor's do not come on protecting admins page to leave a thank note, but as this is a volunteer project I believe we should support and respect each other's hardwork. While my visit to your userpage, I observe that you do your administrators task on Afd manually. I don't know whether you are aware of the userscript for Afd (it will save your valuable time), if you are not aware of the script then this is it - {{subst:iusc|1=User:Evad37/XFDcloser.js}}

You can Install the script on your common.js

The script will help you in relisting, deleting, keeping etc all in seconds

For other extremely useful userscripts please visit here. Once again thankyou, have a lovely day

Anoptimistix Let's Talk 08:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will try the script. Enigma^msg 15:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Enigmaman,

I created the Buchalter page on Wikipedia and noticed that it was deleted on July 31, 2017. I read the articles for deletion and it appears that the page was deleted due to sources that were not considered "notable." It seems like the main issue for the page was the Accolades/Awards section that listed various "top places to work" awards and sourced these awards to, what was referred to as, "clickbait lists."

I would like to suggest reinstating the Buchalter Wikipedia page with the stipulation that the "Awards" section be deleted. I believe the rest of the page should remain as it was since it did not break any of the Wikipedia content policies or guidelines. Thank you. Mhpineda72 (talk) 17:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing sources doesn't help. It needs to establish notability. The links did not do that. The discussion was up for over a week and not one person made the case that it established notability. Tagging AfD creator @BU Rob13:. Enigma^msg 19:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it seems really unlikely the company is notable (based on the sources available), which means Wikipedia shouldn't have an article on it. @Mhpineda72: Do you have a conflict-of-interest with respect to Buchalter, by any chance? Your account has been active on that page since mid 2016 and nowhere else. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 19:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For Guy Fieri's page can you please add a lock icon at the top as it isn't showing. Thanks. Hummerrocket (talk) 03:10, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will go look. Enigma^msg 03:23, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Enigmaman. As soon as you semi'ed Lee Hye-ri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) a ten-edit sock account appeared and started the edit-warring again. The sock made ten edits to their sandbox to gain confirmed status and then added the BLP violation. Please upgrade this to ECP. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Netizentown. Thank you. Dr. K. 03:04, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Upgraded. Enigma^msg 03:42, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Best regards. Dr. K. 03:47, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask why you elevated the protection on Adolf Hitler to indefinite semi? Looking at the talk page history, I don't see much (any) evidence of recent vandalism. --causa sui (talk) 16:21, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What? Adolf Hitler was already indefinite semi, and if you're looking at the talk page history, you're looking in the wrong place. I didn't protect the talk page. Enigma^msg 20:15, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to this diff [2] which isn't very informative, now that I look more closely. --causa sui (talk) 03:14, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was already indefinite semi. If you look at the article history instead of the talk page history, you'll see why. Enigma^msg 03:17, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I shouldn't have said 'talk page' -- I was looking at the article history. I suppose the reason I didn't see any vandalism was that it was already semi'd. --causa sui (talk) 23:01, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Causa sui: The reason for the upgrade wasn't vandalism. That must've been a misclick on the drop down. Three different users came to RFPP that day and requested an upgrade in protection. Enigma^msg 01:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I get you have protected the page but you might want to consider sorting the team column , the 2016/17 onwards was lincoln city not dover athletic , obviously i cant correct this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noobkiller13 (talk • contribs) 12:17, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it's been corrected. Enigma^msg 15:35, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for butting in like this, but I just happened to notice your concerns and would like to provide some input. Cyberbot has been giving you these issues because of this IP. I know because today, the same IP made this edit which made my own edit request for another article look like I was requesting protection for a different article. After checking their edit history, I noticed the IP made the same edits on the day you had your concerns. Is it possible that this IP tried to break the bot? I hope I've helped in some way. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 02:52, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, Enigma^msg 05:36, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

By refusing to unprotect Alcohol Justice's article, you are denying that the organization is being criticized at all. The "POV-pushing" bologna being used to justify not allowing criticism into the article is no excuse, since not all the criticism is coming from people connected with David Hanson. You can look at Alcohol Justice's Facebook page and see for yourself that a lot of people are criticism the organization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1002:B119:B1D8:2123:9BC8:67D5:632D (talk) 01:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

False. That is illogical and your request was illogical. I have no reason to unprotect it. Go to the article's talk page or go argue with the admin who protected the page. Enigma^msg 02:08, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).

Administrator changes

Nakon • Scott

Sverdrup • Thespian • Elockid • James086 • Ffirehorse • Celestianpower • Boing! said Zebedee

Guideline and policy news

• ACTRIAL, a research experiment that restricts article creation to autoconfirmed users, will begin on September 7. It will run for six months. You can learn more about the research specifics at meta:Research:Autoconfirmed article creation trial, while Wikipedia talk:Autoconfirmed article creation trial is probably the best venue for general discussion.
• Following an RfC, WP:G13 speedy deletion criterion now applies to any page in the draftspace that has not been edited in six months. There is a bot-generated report, updated daily, to help identify potentially qualifying drafts that have not been submitted through articles for creation.

Technical news

• You will now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device that has logged into your account before, you will be notified after five failed attempts. You can also set in your preferences to get an email when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address, which may be encouraged for admins and accounts with sensitive permissions.
• Syntax highlighting is now available as a beta feature (more info). This may assist administrators and template editors when dealing with intricate syntax of high-risk templates and system messages.
• In your notification preferences, you can now block specific users from pinging you. This functionality will soon be available for Special:EmailUser as well.

Arbitration

• Applications for CheckUser and Oversight are being accepted by the Arbitration Committee until September 12. Community discussion of the candidates will begin on September 18.

The school attended by Chris Simms was changed in this edit; the change was not backed by a source and conflicted with the reference already provided in his article. Adding him to a list of notable alumni in the article for Don Bosco Preparatory High School in this edit only passed the error on to another article. This is why *ALL* entries added to such lists *MUST* have a reliable and verifable source to show that there is a connection between the person and the school. Alansohn (talk) 02:51, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted it... Enigma^msg 03:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hello :) can you please protect this wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mocha_Uson

thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinoyverifiededits (talk • contribs) 16:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bitcoin Magazine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted, or merged with Vitalik Buterin. I notified you as you have contributed to Buterin's page.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin Magazine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 08:31, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That protection didn't go through. They're still editing.

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).

Administrator changes

Boing! said Zebedee • Ansh666 • Ad Orientem

Tonywalton • AmiDaniel • Silence • BanyanTree • Magioladitis • Vanamonde93 • Mr.Z-man • Jdavidb • Jakec • Ram-Man • Yelyos • Kurt Shaped Box

Guideline and policy news

• Following a successful proposal to create it, a new user right called "edit filter helper" is now assignable and revocable by administrators. The right allows non-administrators to view the details of private edit filters, but not to edit them.
• Following a discussion about mass-application of ECP and how the need for logging and other details of an evolving consensus may have been missed by some administrators, a rough guide to extended confirmed protection has been written. This information page describes how the extended-confirmed aspects of the protection policy are currently being applied by administrators.

Technical news

• You can now search for IP ranges at Special:Contributions. Some log pages and Special:DeletedContributions are not yet supported. Wildcards (e.g. 192.168.0.*) are also not supported, but the popular contribsrange gadget will continue to work.

Arbitration

• Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
• A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

Can you remove the 8 year old protection on this page. --RAN (talk) 04:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Enigma^msg 06:13, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).

Administrator changes

Longhair • Megalibrarygirl • TonyBallioni • Vanamonde93

Allen3 • Eluchil404 • Arthur Rubin • Bencherlite

Technical news

• The Wikimedia Foundation's Anti-Harassment Tools team is creating an "Interaction Timeline" tool that intends to assist administrators in resolving user conduct disputes. Feedback on the concept may be posted on the talk page.
• A new function is now available to edit filter managers that will make it easier to look for multiple strings containing spoofed text.

Arbitration

• Eligible editors will be invited to submit candidate statements for the 2017 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 12 until November 21. Voting will begin on November 27 and last until December 10.
• Following a request for comment, Ritchie333, Yunshui and Ymblanter will serve as the Electoral Commission for the 2017 ArbCom Elections.

Obituaries

• The Wikipedia community has recently learned that Allen3 (William Allen Peckham) passed away on December 30, 2016, the same day as JohnCD. Allen began editing in 2005 and became an administrator that same year.

You said 'Please don't create this again. Thank you, Enigma^msg 22:17, 17 July 2009 (UTC),' and that you 'politely asked,' but it didn't feel that way, rather than one of the most negative things on my talk page, as no reason was given, rather than some implied (demand and) agenda perhaps of deletionism or disliking Goa trance. I've given up editing articles on that (or usually anything else... trying to avoid editing for at least a year, lately, maybe unless I get a message about a science/mathematics or philosophy article) anyway, but am still wondering about that comment, and note, since then, there have been many trance articles that refer to Cosmosis & Laughing Buddha as major trance stars newer ones worked with, though the two associated musicians/groups no longer have articles of their own (did several times in the past.) The point is, perhaps (as later articles seems to show) articles on the two could've been done right, regardless of your unexplained opinion that they shouldn't be... and that, assuming that could be done, I'm still wondering what the reason would be you'd never want those articles to appear again (if they could be done right.)--dchmelik (t|c) 04:58, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That was in 2009. I communicated in polite English. I don't know what your problem is, but the article kept being created improperly. You need to look at yourself here. Enigma^msg 19:20, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).

Administrator changes

Joe Roe

JzG

Ericorbit • Perceval • Thingg • Tristanb • Violetriga

Guideline and policy news

• Following a request for comment, a new section has been added to the username policy which disallows usernames containing emoji, emoticons or otherwise "decorative" usernames, and usernames that use any non-language symbols. Administrators should discuss issues related to these types of usernames before blocking.

Technical news

• Wikimedians are now invited to vote on the proposals in the 2017 Community Wishlist Survey on Meta Wiki until 10 December 2017. In particular, there is a section of the survey regarding new tools for administrators and for anti-harassment.
• A new function is available to edit filter managers which can be used to store matches from regular expressions.

Arbitration

• Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is open until Sunday 23:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC). There are 12 candidates running for 8 vacant seats.

Miscellaneous

• Over the last few months, several users have reported backlogs that require administrator attention at WP:ANI, with the most common backlogs showing up on WP:SPI, WP:AIV and WP:RFPP. It is requested that all administrators take some time during this month to help clear backlogs wherever possible. It should be noted that AIV reports are not always valid; however, they still need to be cleared, which may include needing to remind users on what qualifies as vandalism.
• The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative is conducting a survey for English Wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works (i.e. which problems it deals with well and which problems it struggles with). If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be emailed to you via Special:EmailUser.

Hello, Enigmaman. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you protected Randy Quaid back in July, you placed extended-confirmed protection on the page. Did you mean to do that? I think semi-protection would probably be a better option there. —MRD2014 ^{Happy Holidays!} 02:14, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. If you look at the edits or the talk page, you'll see why I had to. Enigma^msg 03:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many people are eager to vandalize the page, including autoconfirmed users. Enigma^msg 03:24, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see now. Thanks for clarifying. —MRD2014 ^{Merry Christmas!} 04:08, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Enigmaman: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, —MRD2014 ^{Merry Christmas!} 02:03, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Enigmaman|'''<font color="blue">Enigma</font>''']]<sup>[[User talk:Enigmaman|''<font color="#FFA500">msg</font>'']]</sup> : Enigma^msg

to

[[User:Enigmaman|<b style="color: blue;">Enigma</b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Enigmaman|<i style="color: #FFA500;">msg</i>]]</sup> : Enigma^msg

—Anomalocaris (talk) 19:43, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Enigma^msg 03:16, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 09:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]