User talk:Engineering Guy

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Intelligentguy89/Parshvanath college of engineering has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Parshvanath college of engineering, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 01:51, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Parshvanath college of engineering.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Callanecc (talk) 03:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Engineering Guy, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. Any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Parshvanath College of Engineering.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Callanecc (talk) 06:09, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Engineering Guy. You have new messages at Callanecc's talk page.
Message added 06:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Callanecc (talk) 06:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of Indian engineering college rankings. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 11:12, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Muhandes (talk) 11:12, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that if a page already belongs to a category (like Category:Engineering colleges in Mumbai) it should not belong to its father category (Category:Engineering colleges in Maharashtra in this case). It would therefore be appreciated if you stop adding these, like you did here and here. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 07:56, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Banner of the Parshvanath College of Engineering.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:46, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:GayRomeo login screenshot.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited University of Mumbai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swimming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ISRO official logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Intelligentguy89, Nice new graph on "Wikipedia" page. It was so nice I was wondering if you might have any way to make this into a graph for the same Page:Wikipedia.

All articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low ??? Total FA 1,623 2,579 2,460 2,070 185 8,917 FL 189 698 781 691 99 2,458 A 373 695 800 598 94 2,560 GA 3,383 7,730 15,486 21,236 1,831 49,666 B 17,742 34,749 57,670 77,679 25,454 213,294 C 17,632 57,135 144,879 346,721 99,422 665,789 Start 18,656 94,607 429,739 1,740,430 426,952 2,710,384 Stub 4,088 30,760 273,583 2,854,354 751,452 3,914,237 List 5,113 17,974 55,944 211,988 90,192 381,211 Assessed 68,799 246,927 981,342 5,255,767 1,395,681 7,948,516 Unassessed 111 396 945 17,270 384,450 403,172 Total 68,910 247,323 982,287 5,273,037 1,780,131 8,351,688 Articles in this table may be listed in multiple projects. The counts, especially the total article count, is not a count of the total number of articles in English Wikipedia. ' About this table

Basically, the subsection on "Internal Quality Control" on the same Page:Wikipedia could really use some graphics of this table since the numbers by themselves looks a little stale. Could you try to think of a way to turn this into a graph of some kind? Only the first 8 rows and first 4 columns would be needed. Cheers. BillMoyers (talk) 17:24, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Intelligentguy89, Nice graphs on "Wikipedia" showing up. There appears to be a "cut-off" issue over 500,000 count which you may already be looking at. There is a scale issue of "orders of magnitude" getting up to the max of 4.5 million. Also, there is a fifth column which appears unlabeled, what was intended there. BillMoyers (talk) 13:05, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Intelligentguy, Just received your useful message. The graph labels are still being mis-located on the axis, my screen show all the axis labels above the column graphs, displaced directly above them. The graphs look very good, yet they are printed with displaced axis labels about three to four inches off. BillMoyers (talk) 14:21, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

GRE Psychology Test (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sensation

Indian Institutes of Technology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to GATE

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kind of funny--I was going to stop by and say thanks for the good work on all the standardized test edits over the past few weeks, and just noticed you thanked me for a few changes at Common Admissions Test yesterday. So, this isn't related to that. Those infobox updates are really helpful, so thanks for adding them! Transmissionelement (talk) 16:21, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Yeah, I really thought there should be an infobox template for all the test- or examination-related articles. There wasn't any, so I created it:

Template: Infobox examination

I have added it in 12 examination articles so far, but there are many more that need to include it. Feel free to include the template in any more examination articles that you encounter.

--Sarthak Sharma 11:23, 30 December 2013 (UTC) (User:intelligentguy89)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mars One, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oceana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Law School Admission Test, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Intelligentguy89 and I thought your new charts looked pretty good for quality-wise distribution on Wikipedia page. Only a very small question, as to why the color schemes are redone between the one chart and the bar chart right below it. They seem to be indexing the same material, with the same delineations, yet use an completely different color scheme? FelixRosch (talk) 22:09, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment on my Talk page. Your color choices are better than those in the numerical table. Actually, my question above was to ask why the colors in this quality-wise pie-chart did not match up with the bar-chart colors which you presented. The both look very high quality, yet use different color palettes for some reason. If you had a reason for this its all fine. What may be more interesting at this point is a new chart, if you can think of one, for this new table from Wikimedia on trends which you can connect to with this link: http://www.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/photo/29073061.cms FelixRosch (talk) 21:39, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Intelligentguy89; Your useful graphs from last January are being deleted by someone at the Wikipedia article. I was wondering if you knew your graphs were being deleted. They seem to be deleted by someone with an ANI now taking place. FelixRosch (talk) 14:40, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Engineering Guy; Those are nice updates to the graphs. You might want to let User:Retrohead know about what you said on Talk:Wikipedia. User:Retrohead is very experienced and recently reviewed the article in question. Nice updates to graphs. FelixRosch (talk) 16:37, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Engineering Guy; On the Talk:Wikipedia page, the other editor has answered your comment and awaiting your reply. There is no support for the other editor. FelixRosch (talk) 15:10, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Engineering Guy; Yes, the graphs look good there. It occurred to me that if you could tip the large graph over into horizontal mode (like the language distribution graphs), that this would save space and make it even more agreeable against criticism. Either way, the graphs look good there. FelixRosch (talk) 21:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Engineering Guy; Yesterday I noticed that the graph was reverted again, and again this was done without any consensus by the same person. You appear to be justified to file an ANI for reverts without support and without Talk. I would support you in such a filing and all you would need to do is let me know on my Talk when you file it so that I would know when to add my support to it. FelixRosch (talk) 16:56, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It occurred to me to add that if you can reformat the tall column graph into horizontal mode like the language graphs, that they would take up less than half the space. If you can do this then I would offer to either support you in posting them or to post them myself. FelixRosch (talk) 21:52, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Graduate Aptitude Test in Engineering may have broken the syntax by modifying 9 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | '''Total''' || '''> 7''' || '''> 3''' || '''> 133''' || '''> 321''' || '''> 33''' || '''> 32''' || '''> 30''' || '''> 25''' || '''> 584''' ||

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Graduate Aptitude Test in Engineering may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | '''Total number of posts''' || '''> 7''' || '''> 3''' || '''> 148''' || '''> 321''' || '''> 87''' || '''> 32''' || '''> 30''' || '''> 25''' || '''> 653''' ||
• In the above table, ">" is the "greater than" sign. The exact number of posts in each discipline can not be known, as

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:09, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your move to Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency. Please see Talk:JAXA#Proposed move on 1 November 2013. It is already a controversial move. Cheers.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 09:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that you publicly apologise to the three editors you've accused of WP:SOCK very, very quickly. The apology should be on that same article talk page. If not, I will open an ANI. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have merely pointed out an observation. The part that seems to be causing trouble to you is "By the way, the language, typing and presentation styles of User:Ohconfucius, User:Ms Sarah Welch and User:Iryna Harpy suggest that they are all one user who is resorting to WP:Sockpuppetry." I have used the word "suggest", and given my reason for it: language, typing and presentation of the 3 users. I have not said anything like "WP: Sockpuppetry is definitely at work here". I may be wrong, and if that is the case, then you can provide your own explanations, reasons and examples to counter my observation. If I am indeed wrong, then I will apologize. Though I do not think there is even any need to take this matter so seriously: it is not as if I have insulted or disrespected you or anyone else, in any way. --Sarthak Sharma (talk) 01:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, the part that is causing you trouble is that you do not even make such inferences on an article's talk page. Please read WP:SOCK properly (including how to handle matters if you suspect sockpuppetry). You are avoiding having to discuss the inclusion of content you want in the article by casting aspersions.

For me, personally, your allegation is amusing. Evidently, you're incapable of even checking user's special contributions in order to establish some sort of similarity in editing patterns. I'm suspect that User:Ohconfucius would be equally bemused. User:Ms Sarah Welch, however, is fairly much a newbie and may be intimidated or take affront at your inferences.

If you don't realise that you are violating WP:AGF in one of the worst ways possible, it is your problem. Even alluding to sockpuppetry is far more serious than you seem to believe. I will not be interacting with you on the relevant talk page until such a time as you issue a retraction and apology, and suggest to the other two contributors that they do the same. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 02:48, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. You even know how the other users will react. How convincing that this is not Sockpuppetry. --Sarthak Sharma (talk) 05:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I have not said anything like "WP: Sockpuppetry is 'definitely' at work here" – Not true. -- Ohc ^¡digame! 11:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Before moving please first discuss the necessity of the move on talk page and obtain consensus. Shyamsunder (talk) 08:12, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Council of Ministers of Narendra Modi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Council of Ministers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Ohc ^¡digame! 11:55, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 16th Lok Sabha. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Ohc ^¡digame! 01:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Your behaviour today has been rather objectionable. You need to rein yourself in somewhat. If you do not, someone else might. I've lodged a complaint about your behaviour here at ANI. Regards, -- Ohc ^¡digame! 04:23, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:16th Lok Sabha. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. You did it by this edit. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 14:21, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The edit you are talking about was in no way disruptive or vandalism. User:SpacemanSpiff had collapsed the section being discussed about, and had labelled that section as "clutter": clearly a negative label. My edit just replaced it with a more neutral indicator. But there is no need to even collapse the section like that on the talk page. Collapsed material like that is not visible on the mobile version of the website, and all editors must be able to view the section being discussed. It is only fair. --EngineeringGuy (talk) 17:53, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you understand the "do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments" part? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did understand that. And by that principle or logic, User:SpacemanSpiff's edit was the one that should be not allowed in the first place, as it changed (in a negative way) the presentation of information that I had entered. But I do not see you complaining about that.

My edits are simply to prevent unfair means of content presentation on that talk-page. If you can not understand the context, reasons and intentions behind others' and my edits, then I can not help. (Besides, you alone can not decide what should or should not be done on a talk page, or anywhere else.) --EngineeringGuy (talk) 21:25, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fine! Do as you please and get yourself blocked! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:University of Mumbai banner.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to University of Mumbai, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Warrenkychu (talk) 03:16, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have now included an explanation in the edit summary. --EngineeringGuy (talk) 03:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Intelligentguy89. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Department of Space (India), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is no need to Disambiguate this page if there is no other organization referred to as the Department of Space. We do not Disambiguate for the sake of it. Thank you. kelapstick^(bainuu) 15:20, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Intelligentguy89. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Department of Atomic Energy (India), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is no need to Disambiguate this page if there is no other organization referred to as the Department of Atomic Energy. We do not Disambiguate for the sake of it. . Thank you. kelapstick^(bainuu) 15:21, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:University of Mumbai banner.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:14, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Department of Space, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hassan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you are quite familiar with the ISRO article, so you can incorporate this new partnership/collaboration: US and India sign space agreement. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 16:44, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@BatteryIncluded: Sorry for the late reply, I was busy. Thanks for the news link. I had already included this information in the ISRO#International co-operation section, when the announcement was made in September 2014. I included the NASA announcement's link as a reference. You can add the BBC news link as an additional reference there, if you want. --EngineeringGuy (talk) 19:36, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Graduate Aptitude Test in Engineering page, your edit caused an archiveurl error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:39, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Engineering Guy; Your nice charts are being deleted at the Wikipedia page again, this time by "tag bombing". The process being applied by the troubled editor is to first tag bomb material and then delete after a few days or a week when the "tags" are not serviced. Perhaps you could explain to him how the charts were made and then remove the tags. LawrencePrincipe (talk) 02:41, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@LawrencePrincipe: Thanks for the message. I had a discussion with User:Chealer back in September 2014 (can be seen at Talk:Wikipedia/Archive 22#Distribution of article importances). That user's reasons for removing that content include "the data used is highly misleading" and that this content does not seem useful or valid, which all seems false to me. I have given my input at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Chealer reported by User:Dr.K. (Result: ). I have also removed those "Original research" tags (since it is all valid, encyclopedic information, and not original research), and updated the data. --EngineeringGuy (talk) 22:12, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Engineering Guy,
Your edit to User:WP 1.0 bot/Tables/OverallArticles was overwritten. Please read User talk:WP 1.0 bot/Tables/OverallArticles#Modifications_will_be_lost. --Chealer (talk) 02:45, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Chealer: I know. The bot is copying and pasting everything, instead of just the numerical values, so even the headers are affected. To permanently change the headers, the code of the bot may have to be changed. I am not a programming expert, but later if I have time, I may see what can be done about it. The User:WP 1.0 bot page mentions that this bot is operated by User:Theopolisme and User:wolfgang42, so you can try contacting them about this. --Engineering Guy (talk) 22:32, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Copying and pasting" is probably not quite correct, but yes. I would expect the bot operators to notice the changes to User talk pages of the bot, but if not, your simple mention of them here should alert them. --Chealer (talk) 16:15, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

pls see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Ban Chealer from Wikipedia altogether -- Moxy (talk) 16:13, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gays.com login webpage screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:16, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Engineering Guy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PlanetRomeo login webpage screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Engineering Guy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Engineering Guy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the nice diagrams you created for the Pinch analysis page. Unfortunately the first of these is incorrect. The hot stream should lie above the cold stream and to the left of it. As shown, you have a thermodynamically infeasible process. I'm afraid I don't know how to edit your diagram, and I am loath to simply delete it. Could you correct it, or contact me if you are not sure what the problem is, and I can explain in more detail. Kind regards, Hyperman 42 (talk) 01:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Excelacom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Excelacom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wikishovel (talk) 02:49, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]