User talk:Efe

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7  · 8  · 9  · 10  · 11  · 12  · 13  · 14  · 15  · 16  · 17  · 18  · 19  · 20  · 21  · 22  · 23  · 24  · 25

Welcome!

Hello, Efe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  --Isis4563 13:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. BritandBeyonce 05:11, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So I know you have everything up to 1999 up, are you gonna be able to do 1998? Arjoccolenty (talk) 02:25, 14 March 2012‎

.

Saw you've been "semi-retired" for a while, and haven't edited since December 2014. Because of this, I've added you to the above list. Remove yourself from it if you ever return. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:33, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SNUGGUMS: I still visit (log in) once in a while, but I really have not made edits since. I was wondering if my admin tools will be removed or something? Thanks. --Efe (talk) 07:25, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If an admin makes no edits for over a year, he or she will be desysopped for inactivity. Snuggums (talk / edits) 12:37, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SNUGGUMS: Thank you for the information. --13:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Photograph (Ed Sheeran song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thinking Out Loud. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article One (Ed Sheeran song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ed Sheeran composed "One" on a guitar made of a whiskey barrel? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/One (Ed Sheeran song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:47, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Efe,

Thank you participating in this Rfc . You forgot to sign your name, however. I've done it myself from time to time. KoshVorlon We are all Kosh 14:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@KoshVorlon: Hello. Thanks I didn't notice that. --Efe (talk) 14:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Efe. You have new messages at Melmann's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

On 18 September 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Photograph (Ed Sheeran song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Photograph" was the first properly finished record for Ed Sheeran's second studio album? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Photograph (Ed Sheeran song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:52, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've made the actions.  — Calvin999 18:40, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Calvin999: per FAC: "If a nominator feels that an Oppose has been addressed, they should say so after the reviewer's signature rather than striking out or splitting up the reviewer's text." (emphasis mine) Just a reminder, and a request to undo the striking out. It seems two reviewers are on it, so I guess I'm visiting after a while. Thanks. --Efe (talk) 00:25, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've unstriked them.  — Calvin999 09:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Efe (talk) 09:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps now you can revisit.  — Calvin999 09:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Will give feedback after reading the new version. Thanks. --Efe (talk) 09:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you're saying on Graham's talk. The current nomination received two supports, not one. And "we're on the second section yet" doesn't make sense either. I haven't asked anyone to take on the form of a peer review during FAC, editors willingly leave comments to help. I did have two peer reviews open this year. The first had 0 contributors and the second only two editors. Why were you disappointed at not being "invited" to the second peer review? This baffles me. Just like how I was baffled at how you was offended that I didn't ping you on the current nomination asking you to "explain yourself" when I told someone else that you had told me to remove a section, or whatever it was, I can't remember now.  — Calvin999 16:51, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Calvin999, Sorry for that. I only realized there were two long after I have logged out. At any rate, these two supports appear to have not convinced the community that there was a consensus to promote the article.

• 1st support - "Support per my comments in the last FA-review." Per verification, the support was based on a minor edit which most of it was undone anyway. It's "invalid" for the reason that the article has gone major changes since its last FAC.
• 2nd support - "Support I can see a lot of hard work has been put into this article. One thing I can suggest though..." At FAC, supports are made from evaluating the article against the criteria.

We willingly provide inputs because after all we share a common goal. But those inputs, which go lengthy, suggest that the article isn't ready to be FA yet. I suggest you take a break from the article. And by the time you come back to it, I also suggest resubmitting it to PR. Call the attention of Coolmarc for content and Laser brain and J Milburn for prose. You might as well request for Graham Beards to comment.

Honestly, I can see bits of myself in your behaviour when I was still new to the project. My prose was even lambasted like it was written by a Chinese girl in grade school!! I had 3 FACs with Déjà Vu (Beyoncé song) (content not to "compare"). Laser was critical of the prose on the second FAC. But in the end, on the third FAC, I got a support even from Graham! They support when the article is there already. --Efe (talk) 04:35, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Efe, I'm not new to the project. I've been active for six years.  — Calvin999 08:18, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying that you're new. It's me that was new then I had this FAC at that early stage and cannot easily see the point the reviewers had. I'm not saying though that you missed their points now. Anyway, just forget the last paragraph. Take a break. --Efe (talk) 10:41, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops. I hope you didn't read me as being bossy, ordering people around. Just a suggestion. --Efe (talk) 13:24, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Photograph (Ed Sheeran song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coolmarc -- Coolmarc (talk) 17:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Photograph (Ed Sheeran song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Photograph (Ed Sheeran song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coolmarc -- Coolmarc (talk) 21:01, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ping me if you need help fixing reference issues. I'd be happy to help. -- Chamith (talk) 12:55, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ChamithN, thanks!! It seems you're having great time. I'm halfway done with the issues raised particularly on the formatting of citation templates. What's left are the chart sources. Do you know how to mass update these? I get lazy sometimes. Hahahaha. --Efe (talk) 13:08, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You mean the date formats as in DMY and MDY? Yeah I do. I'll update the formats. -- Chamith (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ChamithN, if you have extra time, I'd be pleased to have it updated. I'm going home now. Office tomorrow. Thank you very much!!! --Efe (talk) 13:32, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Coolmarc, I'll try my best to update the GAN page on a daily basis. It's office week. --Efe (talk) 13:32, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Enjoy the rest of your day. -- Chamith (talk) 13:34, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I saw the changes. It's 9:30 PM here. Good night and thank you again. --Efe (talk) 13:35, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries Efe. Take your time, most of the issues seem to addressed in any case. Enjoy your evening. Regards. CoolMarc 13:57, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ChamithN, I had to revert some if not all of the changes made when you executed the script. The changes in the date format kind of broken the link to the website (charts). Thanks. ----Efe (talk) 13:25, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's quite alright. I'm actually glad you fixed them. Thanks -- Chamith (talk) 03:23, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, it was Coolmarc who noticed it. Thanks again for the help. --Efe (talk) 05:57, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article One (Ed Sheeran song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:One (Ed Sheeran song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 05:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article One (Ed Sheeran song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 14:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Efe. I have proposed to clear the air. I hope the review can progress drama-free, I will be posting my final concerns today and do a spot-check of the sources, and do some other fixes. I hope you don't feel discouraged by the distractions that has happened. Regards. CoolMarc 07:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I feel tired, Coolmarc. --Efe (talk) 11:14, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coolmarc, can we focus now? I'm sorry but I have only two hours more before I go and will probably be here next Saturday. Will be able to log in on weekdays but I cannot deal with suggestions any further. So that this will be closed once and for all (passed/failed, I won't care but thank you for the effort, I appreciate it much I will refer to this every now and then). And so you will not be bothered any further. Are you not tired? --Efe (talk) 12:13, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Efe, you are so close, please do not give up! And we have both gone through too much effort on this to give up now. I am willing to extend the deadline again, there are very little issues left for you to address. However, I am very tied up at the office tomorrow, so I'll only be able to get back to you on Tuesday. CoolMarc 12:20, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sure then. Last extension, please, Coolmarc. --Efe (talk) 14:10, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am very disappointed in your actions, Efe. You reported me to ANI without valid reasoning, and the discussion was archived quite quickly because multiple administrators disagreed with your accusations. Added to that, you created an edit war on my talk page by not adhering to me wishing that I did not want to keep the ANI notice there, and progressed to post diffs of my reverts on ANI presumably to show me in a bad light, when you was then told you was in the wrong for doing so as it's not your user talk. Two things which you should apologise for, but I guess you won't. As a result, I kindly ask that you do not get involved in my activities or interact with me again. It's clear how you feel if you are capable of reporting me to ANI under false pretences and willing to start an edit war to further consolidate your claim.  — Calvin999 11:05, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Calvin999, have I collaborated with you in the past? Only on FACs where anybody can actually comment. The ANI was closed because it didn't need, apparently, admin action. But should you continue talking to people like that, there's actually another venue where your actions should be discussed. Back at ANI, one user and another one who had the last comment actually agree on what your attitude was on this instance. i suggest you go back and read the comments there. And do no expect apologies from me, just because Coolmarc did. --Efe (talk) 11:13, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did read them, did you also read that one of them said you was wrong to do so? I said you should have apologised, not that I expect one. You haven't behaved that much better by filing a false ANI post and starting an edit war on my user talk. Anyway, I'm done with this. I won't look for a further reply here.  — Calvin999 11:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciated your help on my last music GA review and am hoping that you could assist me on another. I gather that there may be some bad blood between you and Calvin999, but I'm hoping that ya'll can both let that go so the article can get a thorough review by somebody who knows the standards for music reviews better than I do.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:38, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think that it would help to tell which one, wouldn't it? Talk:H.A.T.E.U./GA2--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sturmvogel 66, sir, I think Coolmarc is much more qualified to provide a thorough review as he did on my Talk:Photograph (Ed Sheeran song)/GA1, which is ongoing. Although he might not want to stoke the fire. Apparently sir, I decided not to communicate with the user unless its on FAC. And I don't mean to derail it; as we all know, anyone may leave comments on FAC. GAN is a place where every one is welcome, too, but really I wouldn't have you involved in another bickering. --Efe (talk) 13:50, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough; I appreciate your position and thank you for the referral.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:18, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 October 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tenerife Sea, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the song "Tenerife Sea" was ranked 14th in Spotify's list of the most-streamed tracks in the "sleep" category? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tenerife Sea. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Photograph (Ed Sheeran song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Photograph (Ed Sheeran song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coolmarc -- Coolmarc (talk) 00:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Efe! It's nice to see you getting back at your (wiki)feet again :). Your job on Ed's articles so far is excellent I have to say. I just started some editing on "I'm a Mess", trying to clean up and nicely write it, so if you find some sources I didn't use or posted on the talk, please assist me :). Also, I am always open for a collaboration, so If you want to collaborate on some article(s) of his, It would be really nice. Cheers! — Tom^(T2ME) 14:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tomica, thanks! You surprised me, honestly! Sure. I'll check my list; I think I have saved it somewhere. Nice work on "Mess", too. I'm currently working on stuffs that might be heavily mentioned in books, offline sources that are great having in the very near future! --Efe (talk) 14:49, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you too! I haven't forgotten your favors on "Rehab" ;). Perfect, your check might be of a huge help. If you need me for something, I am gonna be floating around Wiki :) so don't hesitate to ask lol. — Tom^(T2ME) 14:52, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tomica. I left some links on the article talk page. These are not on the "list" I was referring to earlier. Don't worry, I enjoy researching. --Efe (talk) 17:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OMG thank you! A lot of useful stuff by a first look over there ;). — Tom^(T2ME) 17:07, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! --Efe (talk) 17:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the visit on my talkpage, today. Until then, Tomica. --Efe (talk) 17:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Awarding you this barnstar for your hard work concerning expanding Ed Sheeran-related music articles. Go on with the good work! All the best! Cartoon network freak (talk) 07:28, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cartoon network freak! Many thanks! It's always a pleasure working on something related to your music idol. LOL. --Efe (talk) 11:54, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Have you got time to look for the grammar and typo on Vanilla Chocolat and Dance? All the best! Cartoon network freak (talk) 15:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We'll see what can we have there. Will leave comments on the talk page. "Chocolat" first, as I don't have that much time. --Efe (talk) 09:58, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cartoon network freak, I left some initial comments. By the way, I'm not an expert in grammar, but can somehow spot sentences with glaring issue(s). --Efe (talk) 10:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for your time! Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:38, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ed Sheeran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gig. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you're one the nice editors, and not a rude one like RyanTQuinn. I've noticed that you did A LOT of editing on Ed Sheeran's page, but a lot the edits that you did we're unnecessary. But I didn't undo "everything" that you did. But read the article, and noticed some sentences that didn't make sense, so as a fellow editor, I fixed the sentences to make them proper, deleted some unnecessary sentences, like when you mentioned that Sheeran and his brother were born with red hair and have the same sharp facial features, I didn't think that was important enough to be on there, combined sentences like the two sentences that start with "In February 2010. But with every edit, I specifically and completely listed the reason why I edited the page, but this problem called RyanTQuinn, who said my edits were "weak", refuses to let me edit the page, as if he owns it or something. I understand that you're an administrator, but even administrators can make mistakes too. I mean no disrespect to you, but you stated you weren't a native speaker, but I would gladly still love to work with you to update and make Ed Sheeran's page the best it can be. Please tell RyanTQuinn to back off and stop trying to control Ed Sheeran's page. Thank you very much for your time. Kalope (talk) 19:40, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kalope. Are you an avid Sheeran fan? Me too! I can sense it, and I thank you for a specific thing you've done before that had me going home smiling. Anyway, my admin tools are irrelevant in content building, so I'd appreciate it if you and RyanTQuinn stop mentioning my being admin (when content building is the subject). While I can brag about the articles I have brought to FA status, it's not an assurance that I can get everything properly. Even professional biographers have editors! Okay, so let's move forward. Maybe we can start by providing clear edit summaries so we spare ourselves from having to discuss everything on the talk page. Also, when we disagree on something, let's discuss it on the talk page and provide link(s) to Wikipedia guidelines. I really really want the article to achieve GA status, and edit warring will prevent it from having the green icon! I'm on a research mode now, so I'll just check and do minor stuffs. --Efe (talk) 04:20, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I apologize for that, and I completely understand. And yes, I am an avid fan of Ed's, he's the best musician to ever grace the earth. :) Kalope (talk) 10:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Can you please take a look again at Talk:Vanilla Chocolat? I had a question which you did not answer. Cheers! Cartoon network freak (talk) 08:14, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the delayed response. --Efe (talk) 11:50, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1053 of
Precious, a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:27, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Thanks Gerda Arendt! --Efe (talk) 11:48, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were recipient no. 1053 of Precious ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Three years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:11, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Today, thank you for Déjà Vu (Beyoncé Knowles song)! Miss you. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:50, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Four years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:05, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy New Year!
	There are things that are sometimes left undone and there are things that can be left sometimes unsaid. There are things that can be sometimes left unsaid, but wishing someone like you can’t ever be left, so I take this moment to wish you and your loved ones a joyous and wonderful New Year. Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Avril Lavigne Don't Tell Me single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikipedia Library Users,

You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you. 20:35, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi there! My mean is not to bother you, but I was wondering if you could find time to comment on my FAC above and even support or oppose to it. Best regards, Cartoon network freak (talk) 11:49, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Cartoon network freak:, sorry I'm not active at the moment. Hope it gets the approval of the community. --Efe (talk) 14:58, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Efe. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Could you weigh in on this RfC? It involves whether a sentence should be removed, one that states that a certain album "received generally mediocre reviews from critics". Dan56 (talk) 19:51, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Dan56: I had prior encounter with that guy. I might be biased. LOL. At any rate, I hope this was proper. Hope it ends well. --Efe (talk) 08:27, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Efe.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Efe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Charles R. Knight, 1922)

Thank you for all you did for this project in 2016, Efe. May your house be safe, and may you and those having the privilege of your company enjoy good health in a Happy New Year 2017! Kind regards, Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:56, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply] Pass on! Send this greeting by adding {{subst:User:Sam Sailor/Templates/HappyNewYear}} to user talk pages. Automatic level-2 heading and auto-signing included.

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Efe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that I've scheduled Baby Boy (Beyoncé song) to appear on the main page as today's featured article on 3 August 2018. If you need to make tweaks to the blurb, it is at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 3, 2018. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:50, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the song! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:28, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. Further, following a community discussion in March of 2018, administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — JJMC89 bot 00:03, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that Déjà Vu (Beyoncé song) has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 7 November 2018. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 7, 2018. Thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 15:37, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. Further, following a community discussion in March of 2018, administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — JJMC89 bot 00:02, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. Further, following a community discussion in March of 2018, administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:57, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Everything You Need To Know. Since you had some involvement with the Everything You Need To Know redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Richhoncho (talk) 15:07, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Beyoncé Experience Live.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

Precious

Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:00, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Carlos V Francisco First Mass in the Philippines.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Destiny's Child – No, No, No (Maxi album cover).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:You're Beautiful.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:19, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Hello Efe!

I was looking to update Don Felipe Agoncillo's page. I found that you were the primary contributor. A lot of the sections are needing citations, as I do not have access to the references used I concluded that as the primary contributor you would, and would be able to update the citations. Salamat Pare SanLeone (talk) 17:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article First Mass has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to just be a dictionary definition.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gimme More has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Brachy08 _(Talk) 01:23, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Usher (musician) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:36, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rightwhereyouwantme.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ne-Yo has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:19, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]