User talk:Editorfree1011

Hi Editorfree1011! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --Donald Trung (talk) 00:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming that you're the person that keeps inserting image galleries, wouldn't it be also handy to add informational texts accompanying the pictures to give more context for the readers? --Donald Trung (talk) 00:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Editorfree1011! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Nguyễn dynasty that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Changing a year, for example, is not a minor edit. — MarkH₂₁^talk 15:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you added "Feudalism" to most if Imperial Vietnam's infoboxes, at the Vietnamese-language Wikipedia one can easily link to "Feudalism (China)" but not here, no non-Communist historians used the term "Feudalism" to describe these societies before 1975. If you want a good way to identify historical negationism in Vietnam I would direct you to "Historiography in the Soviet Union#Theoretical approaches" "Chinese historiography#Marxism", specifically:

• Primitive-communism
• Slave society
• Feudal society
• Capitalist society
• Socialist society
• The world communist society

The official historical view within the People's Republic of China associates each of these stages with a particular era in Chinese history.

• Slave society – Xia to Shang
• Feudal society (decentralized) – Zhou to Sui
• Feudal society (bureaucratic) – Tang to the First Opium War
• Feudal society (semi-colonial) – First Opium War to end of Qing dynasty
• Capitalist society – Republican era
• Socialist society – PRC 1949 to present

Now project this onto Vietnamese history you get:

• Primitive-Communist society - Hồng Bàng dynasty (most of which is invented by North Vietnamese historians) until the Âu Lạc were conquered by Nam Việt.
• Slave society – Northern domination.
• Feudal society (bureaucratic) – Ngô dynasty period to the Nhà Nguyễn thời độc lập period.
• Feudal society (semi-colonial) – Pháp thuộc in combination with the Nguyễn Dynasty.
• Capitalist society – French Indochina and South Vietnam.
• Socialist society – Democratic Republic of Vietnam, Republic of South Vietnam, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, 1949 to present.

The same applies to North Korean historiography, notice how common the term "Phong kiến" (封建) appears in Communist Chinese, Communist Vietnamese, and Communist Korean historiographies, Joseon is called "Triều Tiên Phong kiến Vương triều" (朝鮮封建王朝) in North Korea. Meanwhile go over any South Korean history text book and look for the term "Phong kiến", it's simply much rarer.

I understand that the mainstream historiography in Vietnam uses this term, but the mainstream historiography in Iran denials the holocaust and we (thankfully) do not use these biased works. I don't think that it's wise to add a link to the English-language Wikipedia's page about "Feudalism" without redefining feudalism as "a system in which any (male) person regardless of birth can attain a high government position through education and competitive examination" which is the opposite of European feudalism. --Donald Trung (talk) 12:20, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All historians in Vietnam call this period is fedualism. When i made the edition, i never refer to non-communinst or communist aspects. If you feel hatred for the communist, i would like to say that you should stop managing the wiki pages You can check the page Tokugawa shogunate which also depicts the government as the feudalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editorfree1011 (talk • contribs)

Japan had a system where hereditary lords ruled over their own fiefs with all classes of society being hereditary, that is the definition of feudalism. Vietnam had a Confucian examination system which is a meritocracy, also these articles aren't even about Communism which didn't exist back then and Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral, that means that no ideology should go into making edits other than the ideology of "pure neutrality", adding feudalism simply links to a page that describes a completely different system of government, hence is incorrect. According to Islam all non-Abrahamic faiths are "paganism", should we add "paganism" to the religion of the Ngô Dynasty because Islamic scholars say so? --Donald Trung (talk) 14:47, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The term of feudalism are mostly applied for the old government of the east asian countries which is ruled by absolute monarchy. Before 1975, most of the historians from both sides use the term "feudalism" to refer the the govenment before the repbulican era. I always relate to the neutrality and neutral information and sources when posting or re-edit the page without bias. Trinh lords is also the system of hereditary lords take the power of the government back then. What is the differences here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editorfree1011 (talk • contribs)

In Japanese and European society the term refers to an absolute system with little social mobility throughout society, you are right that the Trinh are hereditary lords, but their bureaucracy was meritocratic and most land was owned by petit bourgeoisie. Feudalism is a system, but I agree that most modern sources use the term "feudalism" so I didn't reverse your additions, it is just highly misleading. If the word "feudalism" means absolute monarchy then when not just use absolute monarchy? Vietnamese nobility were influential but they didn't have legislative or executive power like feudal lords do, this is the difference. At least the Vietnamese-language Wikipedia has this, specifically at "§ Phương Đông và phương Tây". The English-language Wikipedia doesn't have this nuance at the "Feudalism" page as it's "hidden" in several other pages. --Donald Trung (talk) 16:19, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Donald Trung: There is an article called Fengjian in English Wikipedia. Do you think it might be relevant? Ltn12345 (talk) 23:46, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you changed it, do you have a source for it? --Donald Trung (talk) 12:41, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please check that page in Korean and Vietnamese page, you can see it. I did not upload the image of the flag — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editorfree1011 (talk • contribs)

I couldn't find a source there either, I found a number of sources that claim that the Vietnamese had no concept of a national flag before the 1860's, so was it an Imperial standard or a battle flag? I know of one battle flag used by Quang Trung but that one doesn't look like any of the flags ever added to the article. So where did the flag come from? --Donald Trung (talk) 14:49, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the past I've seen many people remove image galleries and most of your additions tend to just be image galleries, why not add these to Wikimedia Commons? You can easily create image galleries there like "Cabinet of Thành Thái" or "Ministries of the Nguyễn Dynasty" with images that belong together. Usually images on Wikipedia exist to illustrate the information but you often add images without also writing about the illustrated subjects. --Donald Trung (talk) 10:10, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited North Vietnam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unrecognized state. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! — MarkH₂₁^talk 10:37, 7 December 2021 (UTC) Thank you for discouraging me in contributing the content for the page. I tired the best to contribute more details that i believes there is still lack of correct information. I have no intention for vandalism and u ruined everything.[reply]

Đề nghị nêu lý do lùi sửa? Greenknight dv (talk) 18:35, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Đề nghị nêu lý do sửa? Editorfree1011

Cờ đầu tiên không có cơ sở đáng tin. Greenknight dv (talk) 18:13, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi so please stop disrupting the List of monarchs of Vietnam i warn you if you continue to do this you will definitely be blocked because all the information in this site are accurate are base on our country historical records so yeah stop being annoying and false editing information here okay? Kimhanh1554 (talk) 17:35, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please prove that the monarch in the Hong Bang dynasty exsist? Or it is just Vietnamese mythology? Ban me? if you think you can Editorfree1011 (talk) 19:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i told you it have been proven in many historical records and also from archaeological evidences in my country of Vietnam and in many parts of China and you said that it's mythical then why in Vietnam there are tomb of Kinh Dương Vương and the Hùng kings people worship them as founding father of our country.Can the people actually made up a myth so that they could worship,build tomb and temple.Not only that in China there are account written about Đế minh split the land for both of his son and many other evidences you can search on the web ok? Kimhanh1554 (talk) 08:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi i think you are confusing about the legend and reality. The Vietnamese historians acknowledged that Hong Bang dynasty was semi mythical,just similiar to Xia dynasty of China. You said that the tomb of Hung Kings is the proof that they existed in the past which also show the ignorance and lack of knowledge from you. You still can differentiate between real history and myth so it is hard to debate. For example you dont know where the sites of Hung kings burial and then you claimed that there are their graves. Does it make any sense of human knowledge?

You said "Can the people actually made up a myth so that they could worship, build tomb and temple." .Oh ,that is happening everywhere..

Đã không hiểu lịch sử thì làm ơn tìm hiểu kỹ dùm. Nếu như chưa phân biệt được đâu là thần thoại ,bán thần thoại hay thực tế thì cứ tìm hiểu thêm . Những gì về thời kỳ hồng bàng là hòa toàn là truyền thuyết .Người VN chỉ thêu dệ hình ảnh triều đại đó để làm nổi bật hơn vể củ nghĩa dân tộc và cội nguồn mà thôi.Không lẽ cái thuyết Lạc Long Quân sinh ra bọc trăm trứng ,rồi trăm đứa con cũng là thật? Còn Đế minh vốn dĩ là trong thần thoại Trung Hoa và người VN dùng hình ảnh đó để hợp pháp hóa rằng mình vs người TQ có chung 1 cội nguồn hay thờ cúng tổ tiên giống nhau,suy rộng ra nó còn mang hàm ý chính trị. Bạn nói rằng những gì ở trên web là thật? Web là nơi mà raw data chưa được sàng lọc và ai cũng có thể post lên đấy cả.Ngay cả kênh wikipedia cũng là kênh các phần lớn thông tin vẫn chưa sàng lọc và không có đủ sự chính xác. Editorfree1011 (talk) 22:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Editorfree1011 Ồ bạn là người Việt hả? Bạn có thể giải thích tại sao Lý Nam Đế có chữ Đế to lù lù ra đó lại bị thay bằng Đinh Tiên Hoàng không? 2402:800:6172:1DDC:CD4B:6201:42F0:D14E (talk) 13:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vậy theo bạn, bạn đổi Triệu Đà thành Vũ Đế ,thế sao không để ổng làm hoàng đế đầu tiên lun đi? Editorfree1011 (talk) 14:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ồ cảm ơn bạn, tôi quên mất Triệu Đà đấy (bạn cũng thừa hiểu mà). Tôi không phải người đổi tên ông này và tôi nói thẳng là bài Việt Nam không có cái hộp này. Tôi không muốn tranh cãi thêm nên tôi đã bỏ cả hai vị sau đi. 2402:800:6172:1DDC:CD4B:6201:42F0:D14E (talk) 14:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Editorfree1011 Tôi cũng hiểu đại khái sao bạn bỏ tên Lý Nam Đế, nhưng không phải muốn nhét là nhét được Đinh Tiên Hoàng vào đâu. Bạn quan tâm tới lịch sử nước nhà và có tiếng Anh tốt thì hãy tự diễn giải cho cả thế giới hiểu. Trình độ tôi chỉ sửa có vậy thôi để khỏi tranh cãi (mà tôi còn chưa biết đúng ngữ pháp không nữa). Vậy đấy, chào bạn! 2402:800:6172:1DDC:CD4B:6201:42F0:D14E (talk) 14:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mông Đồng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red river.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Editorfree1011! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Fourth Era of Northern Domination that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Adding an image is not generally "minor", since images do not fall under edits that could never be the subject of a dispute (from H:MINOR). Thanks. — MarkH₂₁^talk 06:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Nguyễn lords

added a link pointing to Annam

Trịnh lords

added a link pointing to Annam

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nguyễn lords, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annam.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:03, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Da Nang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hàn River.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Editorfree1011, you are now engaged in an edit war with me on the Đại Việt page, and as I mentioned in my last edit summary, that is not the way to approach a disagreement on Wikipedia. The preferred protocol is WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, which I've followed, but you haven't. In addition, you should always include an edit summary when making changes to an article, which you've only done reluctantly after I prodded you. This is not a constructive attitude on your part, and I suggest you try a more collegial approach going forward.
I do not agree with you on the addition of more detail in the image caption, and this is why I've reverted you twice. The onus is now on you to demonstrate that the content you wish to add is an improvement. Please do so on the relevant talk page. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 13:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i never wanna engage in the edit war with you. Im just simply asking you of your satisfaction with my additional information. I did not distort any information in that page. Editorfree1011 (talk) 13:30, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so if you didn't want to edit war, you shouldn't have done exactly that. You reverted twice, simply because you thought your version was preferable to the existing one; this is a pretty clear case of edit warring. I'm telling you that I don't think the extra detail is an improvement, as it isn't necessary. If you feel strongly about this, I need you to explain (on the relevant talk page) why you think the detail you are adding should be there, otherwise it will be removed again. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Editorfree1011! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. — MarkH₂₁^talk 01:46, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bảo Đại, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prades.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]