User talk:EchoBlu

Hi EchoBlu, in the article on Project Eden you added a link to The Lost Vikings. Can I ask how the two are related? Is it because of similarities in gameplay (solving puzzles by switching between characters with individual abilites)? If so, it would be useful to state in this WP article, so the reader can judge why they might want to read the other article. What do you think? Thanks and best wishes Guffydrawers (talk) 11:57, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure that I understand you. Usually there are no additional descriptions in 'See also' section. When someone is interested in article on Wikipedia, he usually wants to continue reading, and in this case, learn more about genre or similar games. Especially if genre is not that big. EchoBlu (talk) 04:45, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Manual of Style says at MOS:SEEALSO
"articles linked should be related to the topic of the article. Editors should provide a brief annotation when a link's relevance is not immediately apparent, when the meaning of the term may not be generally known, or when the term is ambiguous." and includes examples. In this case it's not obvious to all readers why The Lost Vikings is being linked - there is no mention of it in the article. It looks like someone else has now removed the link, though. Best wishes Guffydrawers (talk) 07:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't cite the IMDb or other user-generated content on Wikipedia. These are not reliable sources and should never be used in a biography of a living person. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:22, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• @NinjaRobotPirate: Sorry, I didn't know for IMDb. I will remove IMDb sources. EchoBlu (talk) 05:44, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you're looking for something better to cite, BehindTheVoiceActors.com is probably OK, and it has a rather comprehensive database. Besides that, there are lists of sources that are generally considered reliable at WikiProject Film and WikiProject Video games. There's also this essay page, which links discussions about common sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:50, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey EchoBlu! I cleaned up some (but very far from all!) of the MOBA wiki page. I noticed your discussions on it with another user about the grammar and writing, and I think it still has some work to do before undergoing any evaluations. Thanks for bringing it to my attention, though! MochrieTV (talk) 07:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MochrieTV: Thank you for your work! I have worked on that article for a very long time. I did a lot of research, I tried to organize it in the best way possible, I connected reliable sources to the every part of the article, every sentence in the article is there for some reason (article was written very carefuly for a very long time). But at the end I was not happy, because I was aware that I will never be able to bring writting style to the same level. And you are doing it amazingly well. Both MOBA and Heroes of the Storm. So, thank you again. People will recognize quality of the article when you finish it. EchoBlu (talk) 15:25, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Satellite phone into Telephone. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Battle.net 2021 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:05, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please write more descriptive edit summaries. I'm trying to understand your edits to the page Voice over NR, but the only explanations you gave are "several updates" and "source updated", which are not helpful. An edit summary should describe what an edit changes and/or why, so that the edit can be more easily understood on review – for your own reference too. You might also want to break up large edits into multiple smaller edits, which also helps with writing edit summaries since you only need to describe one change at a time. Thanks! — W.andrea (talk) 16:20, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]