User talk:Doc Strange/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Doc Strange. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, Doc Strange/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
• Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Simplified Ruleset
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Wikipedia Glossary

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango123 (talk) 15:09, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Hi Doc, Thanks for signing up for the review team. We just released our test CD, which received a surprising amount of press coverage - this indicates that there is a lot of interest in what we're doing. (It's also why it took us a while to contact you) Please help to make the next release even better! Let me know what you're interested in, or if you want some guidance. If you prefer, just take a look at the FAQ page and get started.

I also see that you're interested in things to improve Wikipedia's reputation. Would you care to elaborate on my talk page? Thanks! Walkerma 03:00, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to List of 2000s one-hit wonders in the United States included one or more links to the page Blur, which is a disambiguation page. This type of page is intended to direct users to more specific topics. Ordinarily we try to avoid creating links to disambiguation pages, since it is preferable to link directly to the specific topic relevant to the context. You can help Wikipedia by revising the links you added to List of 2000s one-hit wonders in the United States to refer directly to the most relevant topic. (This message was generated by an automatic process; if you believe it to be in error, please accept our apologies and report the error to help us improve this feature.) Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Russ (talk) 13:01, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah. I know. My bad. Doc Strange 13:02, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi,

I noticed that you added two chart positions to this page, stating that "Brianstorm" reached #56 on the Modern Rock Tracks chart and #114 on the Hot 100. I believe that the Modern Rock Tracks chart only contains 40 positions and that the Hot 100 only contains 100 positions (unless you count "bubbling under"). Could you explain what the positions that you added mean or indicate the source of the information? Thanks,

Acegikmo1 18:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

The #56 is from Mediabase, and i AM counting Bubbling Under, read the footnote, plz! Doc Strange 12:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. Perhaps we could specify Mediabase Alternative and Bubbling Under. What do you think? I think the footnote you're talking about is the one here, could we use the same kind of footnote on the "Brianstorm" page?

Thanks,

Acegikmo1 21:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah. It's my footnote. Go ahead. Doc Strange 12:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your recent contributions to la secchia rapita. Your changes, however, consisted of inserting a section of text that had been specifically excluded from the article due to lack of sourcing. Do you have a reliable source you can cite that this conflict actually happened, or even better, that the details mentioned in the paragraph you added are accurate? Thanks! [1] Jouster  (whisper) 14:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

I saw your edit on that article and just wanted to say thanks :-) Keep up the good work! - Ta bu shi da yu 07:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Those two will also be put up for deletion once that one is over. They weren't put together to avoid votes that had little to do with the topic at hand. If you feel that it should be kept, can you please revise your vote to speak about the article's own merits? TTN (talk) 13:24, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I can't realistically see the Master Shake one ending in anything worse than a "No Consensus," so it would be unnecessary to nominate Frylock or Meatwad. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 19:31, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I have nominated Moros Eros, an article you created, for deletion. Contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated. However, I do not feel that Moros Eros satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and I have explain why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the open discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moros Eros and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Moros Eros during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy (Help!) 18:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Advanced Theory, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Theory. Thank you. TheRingess (talk) 02:52, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your comment that you made at AfD, about the vandalism to that section, feel free to repair this problem, repeatedly, if necessary. Bring it up at the article's talk page, for reinforcement of the message. For additional help, A good place to ask might be Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music. Hopefully, more people will join you. -Freekee (talk) 19:54, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi. Work has gone into the article to make it more encyclopedic. If you agree, please update your afd accordingly. thanks, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 21:31, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I wonder if you would take another look at Western School of Health and Business Careers, please? I have rewritten it so it is now an article on the whole college, not just one campus, cleaned out the promotional content and added sources. TerriersFan (talk) 20:43, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi. You recently argued for the deletion of Michelle Leonard on the grounds that it is largely WP:BOLLOCKS. Since then, the page has been considerably re-written. Nearly everything in the original article checked out—there was little that was bollocks at all! So I thought you might want to re-consider your position in the deletion discussion. Bondegezou (talk) 18:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

• I just created this page a week ago Friday (Jan 25) and so far I have been the only editor of this page, but I would like to avoid having it deleted in the hope that other editors will collaborate on it with me.

• I want to let you know that many things have changed regarding this article since you voted to have it deleted.

• I have fully read and responded to every Wikipedia guideline that I have been referred to,
• I have modified my plans for the article and changed the way I view the subject in order to fit within those guidelines,
• I have explained my position and my goals in detail on the AfD for the page,
• and I have completely blanked the talk page of the article since most of the concerns about guidelines involved the talk page and not the actual article.

• I am sure you will find that I have made a great effort to contribute to the usefulness and quality of Wikipedia, and that my actions are motivated by a desire to improve Wikipedia and to keep Wikipedia neutral.

• I believe that the only guidelines my article can still be accused of violating are those concerning "notability" and "lists of random facts" and being that this is such a young article, I urge you to revisit the article, the AfD for the article, as well as the article's talk page, and make sure that you still feel that the article needs to be deleted right now.

• Thank-you for your time, and I appreciate your efforts in keeping Wikipedia clutter-free!

Sincerely,

VegKilla (talk) 00:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Doc Strange. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. β^_command 17:23, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

I did not remove any speedy deletion notices from pages I have created myself. 203.194.7.100 (talk) 13:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Noooo. Hangons are ONLY for when contesting a speedy deletion of a page I created myself.

The article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion (because it has references that prove notabilty), and I intend to fix it further. Therefore I was allowed to remove the speedy deletion notice.

I win. 203.194.7.100 (talk) 14:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

It's a fair cop. Doc Strange (talk) 15:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Made up farce? Can you please not insult my intelligence (and yours) and do your research before labelling something as a made up farce. Thanks. Englishrose (talk) 19:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Regarding this AfD, I'm just dropping you a note to let you know that I have rewritten the article on Rhode Island Mall and have addressed notability concerns. I ask that you please reconsider your !vote in the discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Could you tell me your source of information for this edit you made on 20 May 2007? The Billboard website agrees with the previous entry. Thank you, indopug (talk) 05:30, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Actually, Billboard agrees with me: Here [2] and [3]. This shows that "Juicebox" by The Strokes hit #98 on the Billboard Hot 100. You see, "Juicebox" hit #65 on the Billboard Pop 100, which is a different chart from the Billboard Hot 100. When people talk about the "US Charts", they're talking about the Hot 100, not the Pop 100. In fact Billboard's own Artist chart page shows no entry on the Hot 100 for Juicebox, despite All Music Guide's insistence that it does Doc Strange^{Mailbox Orbitting Black Hole}Strange Frequencies 07:53, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Agreed, I've significantly reworked the article; and I've put #65 under Pop 100. Since Billboard itself doesn't list it, I'm not listing the Billboard Hot 100 entry. indopug (talk) 11:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey Doc, I've made a large revision to the Sexuality and Space article. It's very much not the article it was when it hit AfD and I'd like you to take a look at it and see if you feel differently about it now.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 02:26, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

You may wish to reconsider your opinion expressed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiener sausage. Consider:

• Jean-François Le Gall, "Fluctuation Results for the Wiener Sausage", Annals of Probability, 1988, volume 16, number 3, pages 991–1018
• M. van den Berg, E. Bolthausen, F. den Hollander, "Moderate deviations for the volume of the Wiener sausage", Annals of Mathematics, 2001, volume 153, pages 355–406
• E. Bolthausen, "On the Volume of the Wiener Sausage", Annals of Probability, 1990, volume 18, number 4, pages 1576–1582
• Uwe Schmock , "Convergence of the normalized one-dimensional wiener sausage path measures to a mixture of brownian taboo processes", Stochastics An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes, Volume 29, Issue 2 February 1990 , pages 171–183
• T. Eisele1 and R. Lang, "Asymptotics for the wiener sausage with drift", Probability Theory and Related Fields, Volume 74, Number 1 / March, 1987, pages 125–140
• Yuji Hamana, Harry Kesten, " A large-deviation result for the range of random walk and for the Wiener sausage", Probability Theory and Related Fields, Volume 120, Number 2 / June, 2001, Pages 183–208
• A. S. Sznitman, "Some bounds and limiting results for the measure of Wiener sausage of small radius associated with elliptic diffusions", Stochastic processes and their applications, 1987, volume 25, number 1, pages 1–25
• Isaac Chavel, Edgar A. Feldman, "The Lenz shift and wiener sausage in riemannian manifolds", Compositio Mathematica, volume 60, number 1, (1986), pages 65–84
• M. D. Donsker and S. R. S. Varadhan, "Asymptotics for the Wiener sausage", Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics, volume 28 (1975), pages 525–565

...and a large number of others found by Google Scholar. Michael Hardy (talk) 01:39, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Gayelle (lesbian), I have added many new RS to the article and therefore I would like you to reconsider your vote that was based on a previous version that did not take your WP:NEO or WP:N and WP:RS and WP:V concerns into account.NewAtThis (talk) 04:01, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Nope, this is still a WP:NEO and you have still not produced the alleged CBS News article to prove that source's existence. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 13:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

This user turned out to be a sockpuppet and the page was speedy deleted after a discussion here. By the end of the discussion, the WP:NEO, WP:N, WP:RS and WP:V violations were not fixed. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 14:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

I appreciate your courtesy in the Flobots discussion, as some people were getting pretty nasty out there. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC) who didn't even have to look up the spelling of Cyttorak

Glad to see another Marvel comics-related Username. I'm an infrequent reader of the Doc, myself. I didn't see this userbox on your Userpage:

This user reads Marvel Comics.

But I encourage you to add it. Excelsior! - Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 00:31, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Right on. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 01:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

(Insert carrot munching here.) Seeing as you're a fan of The Doc, maybe you could help a tad with Cloak of Levitation, an article I recently rewrote. I pieced the Cloak's history together from memory, and with what I had from the references. Don't know how accurate it is. Thanks, Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 02:55, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the update. If the prod hasn't been removed already, I'll take it off now. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 18:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Are you sure it's a notable label? I couldn't really find anything about it aside from the official site; the WP article is hit #3. MSJapan (talk) 09:37, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Since you voted in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot100Brasil, can you give your opinion about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United World Chart? Tosqueira (talk) 21:41, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

In answer to your query posed in this edit summary, you were exactly correct in how you removed the request after you wrote the article. S. Dean Jameson 19:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

OK thanks. I've been using Wikipedia since 2005, but this my first time creating an article off the requested articles page. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 19:21, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey Doc, I've read and see your concerns and would like some guidance about how to clear up any claims and provide proof. Would not uploading album artworks (proving both the label (Sony/Epic) and sponsorship (Pepsi) be a copyright infringment? I was not sure on how this could be done. The same with the Comic Book issue. It would stand to reason that a picture/scan of the cover would be proof. But again would that be an infringment? Please provide guidance, as I am very new to article submission. Thank You. Dd studios (talk) 01:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

>>>My question was simply if you had any connection to the musician at all aside from being a fan. I need reliable sources to prove that this rapper is really signed to Epic or has a deal with Pepsi. We cannot got on your word alone. Examples of reliable sources (for music-related articles at least) would include Rolling Stone, SPIN, NME, Pitchfork Media or similar sources. Please read WP:RS and WP:MUSIC. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 01:13, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Okay Doc. Thank you for your response. My connection to this artist is professional. I am one of the American producers on her new album. The problem it seems with sources (especially the ones you had mentioned) is these are all American or US based Magazines/Media. The press and coverage for Chill were Pilipino counterparts of those companies and publications, IE (Sony/Epic Asia, FHM (Philippines), Pepsi and all the others. Sadly the Pilipino branches of those companies were/are not as well represented on the Web as the American counterparts. Thus, linking is difficult. Should every "claim" or source that can not be linked be deleted?Dd studios (talk) 00:34, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

a-ha, your right, sorry okay. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 09:31, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Here http://www.zobbel.de/cluk/CLUK_P.HTM, this site contains all chart information in the UK from the early 80s to 2006. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 14:11, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

You have a good eye, i'm gonna give you that. I'll do that.

Oh and i'd like to invite you to the Rock music WikiProject. Of before i forget, if you find anymore problems in the discography just say so cause i'm thinking of nominating the list when the missing directors and sources for them. :) --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 14:22, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

As a member of WikiProject Discographies, I thought you might be interested to participate in the collaboration. Hpfan9374 (talk) 12:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

I added some information to Sherman, Texas bus accident. You may want to take a look at my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherman, Texas bus accident. --Eastmain (talk) 21:43, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi there!  :)

As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next Wikipedia DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. Please see the WikiProject D&D talk page for more details. :) BOZ (talk) 18:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Blood Circus, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Circus. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Jasynnash2 (talk) 11:52, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Please stop adding useless information in this article, I am not asking for your help. You are depreciating my job! Cannibaloki 19:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes, but i'm merely trying to add information on Mainstream Rock Tracks peaks for the rock group Iron Maiden. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 19:54, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, but I will remove this column because is the "most without peaks" in comparison with others. And please, don't add again. Really don't need this. Cannibaloki 20:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

I added some references to Washington Mall. You may want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Washington Mall. -- Eastmain (talk) 05:35, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello,

Since you've edited the lists of 1990s and 2000s one-hit wonders articles a lot, I just wanted let you know that I've started on a little project to ref the top 40 chart positions of the songs to Billboard's database. The could help us weed out errors. Since the database gives readers 20 years of data free, I finished the 90's and then I'll get to the 2000's soon. If you have any queries or ideas, let me know. - Thanks, Hoshie

There is a wikimedia meetup in Providence on Dec. 13. --mikeu ^talk 21:17, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

I have rewritten this article and fully cited it. I hope you can read over it and share your thoughts. • Freechild'sup? 16:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello again,

When I was working on the One-hit wonders page, I saw a reference to this book: Whitburn, Joel (2004). The Billboard Book of Top 40 hits. Do you have this book and if so, what edition do you have? I recently got this (I like it so far!) and was interested to use it for refs and such. I want to be sure we are working off the same copy. - Thanks, Hoshie 23:03, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

I did some major trimming to the article and added sources. And have now just found and added multiple awards from various organizations... 2005: Aegis Awards Winners and finalists recognition[4], 2006: two awards at the 27th annual Telly Awards[5], 2007: they won a Radio-Television News Directors Association of the Carolinas (RTNDAC) Award for "Best Student Television Newscast".[6], 2008: Three awards at the 29th annual Telly Awards[7], and the 2009 Broadcast Education Association awards[8][9]. I think it has enough independent notability after being trimmed and properly sourced to exist as a stand-alone. Best regards, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:07, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi Doc Strange. Per the stipulations at WP:CANVASSING, I've pinged your talk page to "appropriately canvass" you wrt the deletion discussion currently taking place at "WP:Articles for deletion/Home and family blog." (Note that I've also pinged the talkpages of all of your fellow participants at last years deletion discussion at "WP:Articles for deletion/List of blogs," to ensure that my notifications are to are small number of wiki-contributors that have been neutrally selected.) I hope you'll consider taking part in our discussion. Thanks. ↜Just me, here, now … 07:22, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Very confused why you added Newport and Warwick to the cities line of {{Providence County, Rhode Island}} — they're not in Providence County. Nyttend (talk) 05:19, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

It was an oops moment. Mentioned this on your talk page. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 16:37, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I apologize, but I posted what you had asked me not to before reading your message, if you insist I will gladly remove it. However, I want to add that the current amazing baby page is being manipulated by someone affiliated with their record label. The reviews for their album were not very good and the user derflude continues to post only positive reviews. The current article is deceptively positive, and while music is highly subjective Amazing baby have received scathing criticism which the current article conveniently leaves out. Wikipedia should not be used for advertising or building a bands buzz, and this is clearly what is happening with their current page.

Please help so we can reach an understanding and build an honest page for this band, one that does not omit the truth.

I saw from here that it's been exactly four years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 14:36, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi. I just noticed that in your revisions to Daniel Glass you deleted some sourced material (along with some unsourced material). As to the sourced material, I was wondering as to your thinking. It looked as though it could be better worded, but the sources seemed reliable to me. Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:55, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey Doc. I was looking over this page and noticed you made a comment without signing it. I have signed it thanks to the revision history of the article, but please remember to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~), for I am not SineBot. Thank you. --ҚЯĀŽΨÇÉV 13 ^{other crap} 18:54, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

No problem: I've run in to several people who don't sign their comments, and wasn't positive you knew how. Don't take it personally, that was my only form of judgement haha. --ҚЯĀŽΨÇÉV 13 ^{other crap} 18:59, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I was about to remove this - I looked at the translated article and it looks like a hoax. Hekerui (talk) 21:06, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

The article Freak scene, to which you have contributed, has been proposed for deletion.

--wayland (talk) 06:59, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello, you recently participated in an AfD for Assassin's Creed III which closed as "speedy redirect". I have created a redirect discussion to gain consensus on whether a redirect is suitable at the time, or whether it would be better to remain as a red link until more concrete information is available. Please feel free to contribute here: Wikipedia:RfD#Assassin.27s_Creed_III. Hope this helps, --Taelus (talk) 14:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Why did you delete my article? You could have googled the words and there are plenty of sources. Like http://www.romanduels.com/game/players/alliances/S_P_Q_R__LEGIO_NOVA_INVICTA/_symbols.html

I am a very active contributor to Wiki and you could have known that I am not a hoaxer. Now the article on the Romans is lost.. That is sad. Why didn't you check?

Just because you may not have heard of it doesn't mean that is does not exist! Can you restore the damage? It is after all your mistake! These thinngs only happen in the English Wiki, see Order of Jehova. I think it is sad....

Robert Prummel (talk) 02:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Apparently it was because one of those three fans I mentioned created a singular infobox for just that show with the information called "Infobox Sit Down Shut Up", which was broken beyond belief (and I took to TfD because of that), so I had to replace it anew with Infobox Television. I don't know what it is but I seem to have the most cleanup issues not with the biggie articles, but shows like this one (which I incredibly loathed; you don't create a new series from a failed overseas project), Brainsurge and other Nick and Disney shows. It takes the patience of a saint to keep those articles vandalism and cruft-free. Nate • (chatter) 08:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Doc Strange. You have new messages at Millahnna's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for removing the vandalism from that page after I semi-protected, it was happening way too fast for me to handle.

As far as I can tell, the review from "Pitchfork Media" was also vandalism, so I removed it. -Frazzydee|✍ 19:43, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Good call! [link removed, was on the blacklist] -Frazzydee|✍ 20:46, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Update: I blocked a bunch of them, and they seem to have gotten bored. -Frazzydee|✍ 21:17, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Not really a big deal, IMO. Doesn't take much to be an internet tough guy. The problem resolved pretty fast after you directed me to the thread and I blocked every user who vandalized a page posted there. The three-strikes-before-you're-blocked rule is good for encouraging newbies, but pointless for organized vandalism. I think the best way is to make it not fun, and it's not fun if you can only edit once per IP before you get blocked. -Frazzydee|✍ 21:56, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Doing it again? Where? -Frazzydee|✍ 21:10, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Oh, yeah there was another thread on /mu/ this morning. Don't worry, they stopped. They might start again when the page gets unprotected...seem to have something against that band. Thanks for the heads up :) -Frazzydee|✍ 21:16, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Hey, yeah, sorry about all of that, it got funny pretty fast. If you want, i can link you the thread where they planned everything. Edit: That is the only time i edit something i knew was wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kira-182! (talk • contribs) 20:16, 3 April 2010 (UTC) -Kira-182! —Preceding undated comment added 19:56, 3 April 2010 (UTC).

heya, thanks for clearing that up, my apologies :) Mister sparky (talk) 19:43, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I keep forgetting the other wiki language articles are now hidden (why???)! Thought it was strange he didn't have even 1! Doh!! DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 23:11, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello Doc Strange. Thanks for adding columns to the BBC America‎ programming section. I doubt that the section would need three columns for now. It might have back in the late 90's and early 00's when they had more programs on each week - boy I miss those days. Between you me and a couple of anon IP's I think there are enough eyes keeping things up to date that the section won't fill up with items that aren't currently on. Having said that should things change in the future I know that you will be there to take care of things. Thanks again and happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 21:09, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi again. Thanks for your note. Yeah, listing past programs doesn't add much to the article. Most other articles about television channels do not have them and that is part of the reason that I edited them out - I appreciate your understanding on that. I noticed that you added some upcoming programs. At first glance these have some problems with WP:CRYSTAL. You have taken care of some of that by providing proper references and dates. However, we still have to be careful about this. Those that work for this network can change there minds. As I remember it the 2nd season of Life on Mars (one of the best things of the mid 00's by the way) was announced and then got pushed several months away from that date (I think that the popularity of Torchwood had something to do with that but I could be wrong). I will rely on you to check on them from time to time and if something changes please update the page. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 21:51, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

In addressing the nominator's good faith concerns, the article has now been edited, cleaned up, and sourced, and contains no original research. I believe this Walt Disney produced classic short from early animation history now meets WP:NF for standalone notability and merits an article on Wikipedia. I invite you to revisit Music Land and offer suggestions toward further improvement. Thank you, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:16, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Helpful One 12:03, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

In the wiki article on Heather Zurich, you removed the statistics tables and noted "(these tables cause the page to become one of the largest in size on Wikipedia, please add them back in a correct form)". Could you advise me or point me to the correct form for entering tables? I'm more than willing to correct my mistakes :) Jrnhoops (talk) 17:05, 1 August 2010 (UTC)