User talk:Devadatta

A tag has been placed on Theoi project, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:28, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the above article because it failed to indicate the importance or significance of the website. If you feel that you can do that with sources, feel free to recreate it. Please let me know if you have any questions. KnightLago (talk) 21:25, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was looking over your article -- does that table come directly from the book, as the article seems to say? If so, I'm afraid it's a clear copyright violation. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 00:44, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it does. I thought it was OK since I saw a review, but of course that doesn't necessarily mean it's free to use. I have contact with the author of the book though, so I could ask her if it's OK that wikipedia publish it. Is that OK? --Devadatta (talk) 00:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked the author and it's not OK to publish the table on Wikipedia. --Devadatta (talk) 16:24, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I expected -- anyway I removed the table a couple of days ago pending a resolution, so nothing more needs to be done. Thanks for being so helpful and cooperative. Looie496 (talk) 17:34, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Better Angels of Our Nature: The Decline of Violence in History and Its Causes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mblumber (talk) 15:04, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert yourself. You are trying to get rid of a category in completely the wrong way. Dougweller (talk) 19:10, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How do you think I should do? --Devadatta (talk) 20:28, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I don't think the category should not exist, I just think it's wrongly applied to most of it's articles. --Devadatta (talk) 20:36, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.    Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 19:21, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you link to the discussion? I can't find it on the page. --Devadatta (talk) 20:30, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, now I can see it. --Devadatta (talk) 20:38, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]