User talk:DerHexer/archive05

Scuusa. --ZioPera 11:18, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your anti-vandalism work along-side me on Fernando Torres. 3 vandals working together is not an easy thing to deal with, but you dealt with it great and in good time. Thanks for helping me and blocking those vandals! → jacĸrм ( talk | sign ) 11:44, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) I've protected the page. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:45, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I use Twinkle, but unfortunately, it doesn't work when i request page protection, so I was just working quickly against the vandals, knowing they'd end up getting blocked if they continued. I love to give out barnstars also, especially when people are deserving of them. People don't seem to be distrubting them as much anymore, which is a shame! → jacĸrм ( talk | sign ) 11:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Users do have a right to blank their talk pages (it's discouraged but shouldn't be reverted), but IP talk pages CAN be reverted when blanked right? I've had confusion about this in the past and I'm hoping I understand things correctly now. :P -WarthogDemon 21:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not allowed to remove warnings. Exception: It's a mistake. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Thanks. :) -WarthogDemon 21:35, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Butting in here, DH, sorry) Warthog, technically, there is no policy that states a user cannot blank their talk pages (and in fact, Wikipedia:Userpage#Removal_of_warnings states a user may blank their talk pages, but archiving is preferred. I've had this discussion a number of times, and the consensus seems to be: A user can blank their talk pages of comments that are not current notices or warnings (like yesterday, I noticed a user blanking some warnings from Sept 2006, and I did nothing, that's fine), because they are considered a record of recent activity, that is needed to not only provide administrators information about how many warnings and what level have been given, but also to editors who may need to add warnings, the ability to know what level is appropriate. While technically it is allowed, the majority of administrators (DerHexer included) will revert blanking of current comments, for these reasons. ^Ariel♥Gold 21:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone's started a thread on you here. Thought you should know. Flyguy649 ^talk _contribs 16:08, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your information! :) Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:11, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was fast action atlast! ~ Peace keeper IIHow do I spell?... 19:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How come you always give a level 2 warning for first offendors? Like [1], it looked more like a test than vandalism. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2-4 is imho better than 1-4. I'm using that in my scripts. Regards —DerHexer (Talk) 16:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I noticed that you made the last warning to this person. He/she has since made another vandalism [[2]], and I don't the authority to block them. Could you do it, please? Thanks! Bouncehoper 17:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be better to report the IP to WP:AIV because I'm not always online. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my errors. I am a first time user and am gathering information for myself in regard to Autism. I deleted what I didnt want to copy. I am currently in the process of qualifying for a job working with Autistic children. My brother is an Autistic Savant~ 56 years old. He was originally diagnosed many years ago as retarded. I am trying to gain as much information as I can to better understand; finding that there are many forms of Autism.

I am not and have no intention of vandalizing anything.

Thank you,

Patricia S. Carnegie

I don't mind. Welcome on board! —DerHexer (Talk) 18:45, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ich war mal wieder böse und habe hier was zur Löschung vorgeschlagen. Mal sehen, ob sich die Müllhalde mal wieder durchsetzt ;). Marcus Cyron 09:21, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey DerHexer I was wondering if you could give me a bit of help, I need to find out the average amount of time it takes for the rollback function to execute. Could you do a few experiments for me you can use My sandbox? Just roll back a few changes and count how many seconds it takes from the time you click the button till it loads the page. Extreme accuracy like a stopwatch is not required, but would be appreciated. Thanks for the help if you decide to give it :) -Icewedge 17:45, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "admin revert" reverts in a fraction of a second. Afterwards my scripts close the tab/window (before the article has been loaded) or add a warning to the user's talk page. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:37, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just wanted to let you know about my last edit. User NKSCF undid one of the vandal's edits, but that didn't fully fix the article. The section about 1999 and 'early years' was still missing. Darry2385 14:55, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[3] - Thanks for that. Did you pick it up at AIV? I reported it there and am not sure if I should now remove the entry seeing as you blocked the user straight after me reporting him/her? But, yeah, thanks again friend! Scarian^Talk 15:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen it at AIV. Thank you for your report! Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 15:39, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking of becoming a Admin sometime in the future.(Probably not before two months time). Do you have any suggestions/tips/comments. Thanks,Thedjatclubrock :) ^(T/C) 18:45, 10 September 2007 (UTC).[reply]

My tip: Don't want to become an admin … you'll be asked. Or have a look at Wikipedia:Admin coaching. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:17, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks,Thedjatclubrock :) ^(T/C) 19:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Man, you're fast! I see a page, go to the edit history, do an Undo, and by the time I'm done, you've already caught it.  :) Corvus cornix 18:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ;) Have you ever tried WP:VF and WP:TWINKLE? Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:52, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't use a monobook and I think you have to have one to install those, don't you?

Could you look at User talk:172.206.116.36? I can see your final warning edit in the edit history, I can see your edit in the page when I try to edit it, but when I look at the Current version, your final warning isn't there. Corvus cornix 18:54, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should clear your cache to see the warning—on Firefox it's e. g. Ctrl + F5. WP:VF is an offline JavaScript tool. For WP:TWINKLE just add importScript('User:AzaToth/twinkle.js'); to your monobook. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:00, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So you can see it okay? That's the only page I'm having problems with, I did a Control-F5, but it still isn't there. Corvus cornix 20:10, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, everything's okay here. Strange. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:26, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings and thanks for devandalizing my personal pages and some other pages i have contributed to. I would like to ask you what the teplate for warning someone who has vandalised a page is since i will really need it. By the way i am so proud you can speak a little bit of ancient greek since i am greek myself! Many thanks. Sergiogr 19:01, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Χαίρε. You're welcome and thanks vice versa. Have a look at Wikipedia:Vandalism#Warnings and Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace where you'll find all types of warnings. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC) P. S.: I think I'm grc-2 now, I'm studying ancient greek at the university.[reply]

Hi again 69.19.14.38 just vandilized my talk page and i think it's time he got blocked. Check out what he did exactly. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sergiogr&oldid=156987073#You_stupid_ass_piece_of_shit

Sergiogr 19:39, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked it. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you!  — Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!)} 19:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! :) Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

and again! or not. someone played a cute joke that confused me.  — Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!)} 23:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, since you are sysop i would like to inform you that there has been a continued vandalism on pages i have contributed for. Plus pages have even been deleted for no apparent reasons such as Jeremiah Massey which i personally created. Veria was deleted in like some hours' time. Could you please restore these articles and possibly lock them? Thank you very much. Sergiogr 20:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Both articles have been restored. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please keep an eye on page Dimitris Spanoulis. It has been undergoing vandalism the last days and i'd like to ask you if you could block the vandals that remove the delete tag at once. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergiogr (talk • contribs) 21:10, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've semi protected the page for one week. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:12, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a million. You really relieved me. Έστω καλώς.

Thanks for the reverts, and blocking that vandal; evidently that person was annoyed that I had deleted their spam the other day. :) Acalamari 20:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 20:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, people are allowed to remove warnings from their talk pages. Doing so, in fact, verifies that they've seen them. See WP:USER#Removal_of_warnings.  — Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!)} 20:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A very interesting information. Thanks! —DerHexer (Talk) 20:44, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey genius you just reverted Spanoulis page BACK to the VANDALIZED version then PROTECTED it. Don't make me take your privileges away after such a ridiculously stupid move. Fix that or else. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.19.14.28 (talk) 21:17, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your postings. I've protected the wrong version so that you've to discuss it on the talk page. And not here. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:20, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another user filed a case of suspected sockpuppetry against an account that you'd already indefinitely blocked as a vandal-only account. I suspect that you meant to block him because of the inappropriate username since the user had made only one edit (I am, however, unable to view deleted contributions), but had listed the wrong reason in the block log. I made a comment on that SSP page to the effect that the over-warning and early blocking may have been a case of WP:BITE, and wanted to call your attention to my comments on that page if you wanted to add any comments yourself. Thanks! Neil916 (Talk) 23:31, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

this was my revert! I was only a few seconds off :) --Chris  G  10:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe. Hurry up. ;) Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:32, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

its because the the delay with Lupin's Anti Vandal Tool. --Chris  G  10:34, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at WP:VF. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:35, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a Linux version? --Chris  G  10:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Thanks to Java, it runs under Linux..." I think so. —DerHexer (Talk) 10:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That darn DerHexer, he's just got quick fingers! When I see him around, I know I'll be lucky if I get in on one out of ten reverts! (P.S. Hi DH!!! ~*Hugs*~) ^Ariel♥Gold 11:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got messages that said i had vandalized several articles here, when i have nopt edited them at all, this is my school's computer, so i assume it must have been someone who isnt too bright playing around on here —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.10.102.44 (talk) 11:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That edit was not okay. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't realise you were an admin here! You could look at the protection on ST47's page maybe - I've semi'd on Meta after multiple IPs attacked it - cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:32, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Riana has done it yet. Nevertheless, thanks for your information. I'm an admin since July. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:33, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting vandalism to my user page.--Diniz (talk) 14:24, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 14:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're awesome at vandalism-reversion, aren't you?  :-) Thanks so much for taking care of the vandalism on my user page. Have a cookie for your efforts! =David^(talk)_(contribs) 16:02, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Thanks! :) *eating* Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Keep up the great work! Tiddly-Tom 18:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you dont mind me asking, how do you revet so much vandlism?! About 750 edits so far today, keep beating me to the button! Do you regular recent changes, ip changes, newbie changes or what?! Keep up the great work, Tiddly-Tom 18:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar. :) I'm using WP:VF and my monobook (and used WP:TWINKLE). Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your keenness in reverting my blank of Rockbusters but I was in the middle of moving the content to the proper page, Rockbuster. We now have two pages with duplicated content! --Rodhullandemu 19:57, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to the GNU FDL you're not allowed to copy and paste articles. Have a look at Wikipedia:Copyrights. You should move an article, WP:MOVE and WP:Move. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have put it on the requests for move page but I am working on it when I can!--Rodhullandemu 20:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 20:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing a great job with anti-vandalism! Keep up the great work! What do you use to do this so quickly? You keep beating me! =D —Signed by KoЯnfan71 ^{My Talk} _{Sign Here!} 21:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I didn't read all of the post just above with the barnstar. But still, great job! —Signed by KoЯnfan71 ^{My Talk} _{Sign Here!} 21:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) I'm using WP:VF and my monobook. Btw., you're very fast, too. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are fast, compared with me. How can you do that? You made more than 10,000 edits in just April. You are so much like a bot. NHRHS2010 ^Talk 21:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote an admin monobook (based on PDD's monobook) and admin rollback script. All the other things are made by hard work. ;) … And I've got lots of experience on de:wp where we "battled" each other. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:51, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are just extremely fast. I am reaching my 8000th edit soon and I have been editing and reverting vandalism since March. I just see you every time I am on Wikipedia and just can't believe how fast you are. You are (too) fast, and I can't be as fast as you because my computer is sometimes slow at internet. NHRHS2010 ^Talk 22:08, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know User:Misza13? He blocks inappropriate usernames as fast as you revert vandalisms. Today, on Special:Log, I saw that someone created an attack account on you and within a second after creation of that account, Misza13 blocked it. NHRHS2010 ^Talk 22:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just found out that Misza13's bot is the one blocking the inappropriate usernames. NHRHS2010 ^Talk 22:22, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your information. I know Misza13 and his bot. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slakr's eBarn Award I dropped by to give you a barnstar for constantly beating me to reverting vandal edits, but I realized that you already have gazillions of barnstars already with no place to put them all. So, instead of just giving you another barnstar that will probably end up gathering dust in a closet somewhere, I instead decided to build you this extra special eBarn so that you'll have a place to show off all of those barnstars. Keep up the great work, and cheers =) --slakr\ talk / 17:54, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, thanks a lot! :) Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for supporting my recent successful RfA. I have been testing my new mop a bit and Wikipedia hasn't crashed yet! Cheers! -- Flyguy649 ^talk _contribs 04:05, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. —DerHexer (Talk) 11:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I edit conflicted with you on blocking User:212.85.1.3 - isn't 24 hours rather short for a persistent vandal IP that's just come off a 6th month block? WjBscribe 11:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's too short. Will you change it or shall I? Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it - its your block... :-) WjBscribe 11:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For always being there reverting vandalism. Too many times have you beaten me to it! Well done. Phgao 13:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danke. Du bist aber auch schnell! :) —DerHexer (Talk) 13:34, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tag! Achso, ich bin eigentlich ein schueler. Bis jetzt sind es fast 6 Jahre als ich mit Deutsch angefangen habe. Anyway, i seem to be having trouble with twinkle, and the tool you recommend seems very complicated, but trotzdem i'll have a look. Phgao 13:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC

Es ist bei mir auch noch nicht so lange her, dass ich Schüler war. Ich hatte sieben Jahre Englisch an der Schule, viel ist nicht hängen geblieben. Keine Angst, ich habe schon genug Leuten erklärt, wie man mit dem VF umgeht. ;) Und Twinkle ist eigentlich ziemlich einfach einzurichten. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 13:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've got twinkle to work, and it's nice. It wasn't working before because i was using damn IE. >.< Phgao 22:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fine! Now it's time to configure it. ;) Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:55, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... I think I'll pass there. Can I copy your js? But I'm not using TW at the moment as it doesnt work on IE and I dont like FF. Phgao 09:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. If you copy my monobook.js you'll just have some admin buttons. For de:wp I've scripted a non admin revert but imho it's not possible to use it here. Sorry, —DerHexer (Talk) 09:17, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like a copy. I need to get myself all buff and studly like you. Please, what's your secret?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.71.143.132 (talk) 13:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm using WP:VF and my monobook and rollback script. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey DerHexer, How've you been my friend? I was wondering if you could take a look at the message on my user page (the title of this message is linked to it) and tell me what the hell it means, if anything. Or if an admin might need to look into it. Thanks --Amaraiel 21:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DerHexer! How are you? I have created the biography of two German politicians - Markus Meckel and Wolfgang Ullmann. Most information about them are in German websites. I think there are biographies of Markus Meckel and Wolfgang Ullmann on German Wikipedia. Can you add some relevant information? Thank you! RS1900 03:23, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't that a little harsh? I usually do 1,2,3,4 or 2,3,4, not 1,4. —Ignatzmice^talk_contribs 16:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was 2,4, the IP vandalized four times. And up to now nobody complained about my blockings so far. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

God, DerHexer, you need to get laid. NOW. 70.54.126.25 18:37, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:70.54.126.25. LOL, but that little kid's not allowed to, you know, law and stuff... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.144.78.102 (talk) 14:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you block him/her so they can't edit their talkpage? —Ignatzmice^talk_contribs 19:24, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've protected the page for one day. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:25, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see where I've copy/pasted content, please enlighten me? 81.153.169.5 19:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC) and going straight to vandal warning 4 for an attempt to be WP:BOLD is pretty bad. 81.153.169.5 20:01, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, first I saw that you've removed a lot of content -> warning four because you've received a warning before. Then I saw why you've removed it and gave you a note that you shouldn't do a copyvio. And you haven't done one. So everything should be fine. :) Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:15, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you beat me to fixing Missouri. Good catch. Capellan 21:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —DerHexer (Talk) 21:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think User:24.118.91.173 is playing around with the unblock template on User talk:24.118.91.173. Cheers. _{Hydrogen Iodide (HI!)} 21:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It was declined. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 21:57, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Much appriciated :)

well, .. not really because nobody wants to be banned, but hey, if you break the rules your going to get punished. I wont do it again :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.10.194.199 (talk) 22:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you won't do that again you're welcomed here to contribute. :) Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 08:51, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Click there to open your card! → → →

Dearest DerHexer,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 96 supports, 1 oppose, and 3 neutrals. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm a new admin remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them. I would like to give a special shout out to Hirohisat, Wizardman, and Husond, for there original co-nominations. Thank you once again and good day.

Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor

Credits

This RFA thanks was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunatly this is not entirely my own design.

You're welcome. —DerHexer (Talk) 08:49, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What happened? From 6:42 my time, to 7:02, there were no blockings, no removing usernames from WP:UAA, and I checked the queue log, and there were over 1 million things queued up! lol. Anyway, got a second to take a peek at something for me? ^Ariel♥Gold 11:12, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it has been over half hour since WP:UAA was updated... odd. Is WP choking? lol. ^Ariel♥Gold 11:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let us begin. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 11:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay this is really odd, I have never seen names sit in WP:UAA for an hour before. And other areas as well seem to be choking, I keep getting "waiting for tools.wikimedia.de" and the page never finishes loading. Do you know of any issues going on with the servers? Just seems really strange. ^Ariel♥Gold 11:35, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know anything about it. —DerHexer (Talk) 11:45, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

^Ariel♥Gold 13:38, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 14:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the prompt revert. Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 14:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 14:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Makin Republican National a disambig page since advent of Italian Republican National Guard --209.213.220.227 14:42, 15 September 2007 (UTC)a[reply]

You're not allowed to copy and paste content. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 14:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that direction (re moving/pasting/redirects etc). If you would like to rename the category page, that would be a real help. It is "2007 Twenty20 World Championship" but should be "2007 ICC World Twenty20" 88888 16:20, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved both articles. Which category do you mean? —DerHexer (Talk) 16:21, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is skating really close to WP:LEGAL it seems, to me. This editor seems to be unable to remain calm or civil, much less neutral, as evidenced in the constant shouting of all caps. He seems to be using two IPs: Special:Contributions/90.240.175.165 (some diffs: [4] [5]) and Special:Contributions/84.71.250.82. (diff [6]) If you compare the comments, both shout in all caps and both are the same type of veiled threats. Advice? This page has been really a source of contention, I've attempted to re-write it, added valid references, removed BLP issues and NPOV commentary, but the talk page is still just out of hand, completely. User:Absentis has been really helpful, but neither of us seem to be able to get control of these two warring parties. I would really appreciate any assistance you can give. Thanks dear! ^Ariel♥Gold 18:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, difficult. It seems to be the same user but I don't know what to do now. :( Sry, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:19, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The recent vandal you were dealing with uploaded two images: Image:N2362343812 2150.jpg Image:Vinnie paz.gif Both of which are probably copyright violations, are no used on any pages, and are un encyclopedic. Can you please delete them? -Icewedge 18:37, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted the second one because I've found it at the internet. The first one not. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you block for only 24 hours when the last block was for 72 and said "You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. When the block expires you are free to continue editing if you intend to make useful contributions. However, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, this account will be subject to a longer block and action could be taken against the individual behind this IP address?" KP Botany 20:04, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imho it's more important to stop the personen. Afterwards I'm still able to change the time. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't quite follow this? You can only block for vandalism for 24 hours? KP Botany 21:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. But it's my standard block time which is automatically added by my blocking script. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:39, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So, it doesn't matter that the user has been blocked before and warned that they will be subject to a longer block? I'm still not following the purpose of warning a user they will be subject to a longer block if they return to vandalism, then ignoring that warning and giving them a short block? KP Botany 21:53, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then I'm able to change it manually before or thereafter. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:55, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're assuming more knowledge on the issue on my part than I have. The user has been blocked three times. The last blocking admin said that if they "continue to vandalize Wikipedia, the account will be subject to a longer block." But, instead of subjecting them to a longer block, you actually gave them a shorter block. What I'm asking is why you did not give them a longer block for this additional vandalsim as the prior administrator said would happen, but rather gave them a shorter block? I have no idea what relevance there is to your being able to change something manually before or thereafter. All I see is they were told they would be given a longer block, not might be, but would be, and instead of giving them a longer block, you gave them a shorter block. KP Botany 22:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've not seen alle the other blocks and warnings before and blocked my standard 24 hours, okay? Now I'll or could change it. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please look in the future when you block after a request on AIV that says, "prior blocks." What did you think I was talking about when I said, "Why did you block for only 24 hours when the last block was for 72 ....?"[7] Well, I'm getting used to administrators not reading what I said, so no offense taken. I will stop looking at vandal edits, though, since most administrators seem to prefer vandals to regular editors who waste their time on crap like adding references to articles. KP Botany 22:19, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it was not reported on AIV. I'm fighting vandalism by myself and don't report vandals to AIV. And I don't think that it's needed to explain me how I should block somebody—it's not my first block. … I'm not able to find a mistake if you don't tell me which IP I've blocked—in your opinion—irregularly. Finally, I'm not a native speaker so that I maybe haven't seen your intention. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why not ask then which IP I'm talking about, if I didn't say, instead of assuming anything? I reported the vandalism to AIV, and I assumed you blocked the user as a result of that report since it was blocked and the IP removed from AIV right away. Whether you're a native speaker or not your English is up to my first sentence which said "Why did you block for only 24 hours when the last block was for 72...." Answering the question I asked might have alleviated quite a bit of the confusion. Or even reading it, instead of just assuming I was making a routine complaint that you didn't have to even read. But again, I'm used to being ignored by en.wiki admins, in preference to giving leeway to vandals.

User:68.111.80.179 KP Botany 22:37, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you're asking me a generic question—If you don't tell me what you want from me I'm not able to do something. I told you that my script has done it and I prefer a blocked vandal rather than an unblocked one. And I don't prefer IPs—that's a false accusation! I've blocked thousands of user, IPs and logged in ones, I don't prefer somebody. Btw, I'm talking to you since hours—why do you feel ignored? And, of course, I read your comments. Atm I feel offended! —DerHexer (Talk) 22:52, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a generic question, "Why did you block for only 24 hours when the last block was for 72 and ...." This is talking about a specific incident, namely, "the last block." When you don't answer the question asked, and treat it as a generic post, it's pretty straight-forward to assume it was ignored or not read. That's enough. The vandal's probably a 9-year-old kid, and this is way too much time. It would have been simpler to just answer the question I asked, though. KP Botany 23:07, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you add a link if you want to show that it isn't a generic question? I'm blocking so much people on de:wp and en: that this might happend twice or thrice in a short time. If YOU want something from me, YOU have to ask me in a way that I'm able to HELP you. The last block(=previous block) is imo the block before my block and not my last block because I think that you don't know what I'm doing at the same time in other projects. But you have arrived it—I'm taking a wiki break because I don't accept it that you are allowed to infantilize and insult me without any excuses. —DerHexer (Talk) 23:19, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't add a link because you answered every question I asked as if you knew which user I was talking about, and I didn't realize that I had not included the IP number. The questions I asked were pretty straight-forward, but your answers appeared as if you were just giving me a boiler plate answer to every question without even reading them. I asked questions. My questions were ignored, and given answers about some script you use. One of your supporters attacked me for asking you a question, saying that, "Why did you block for only 24 hours when the last block was for 72 and said ...." was a rude question. It wasn't. It isn't. And you still haven't resolved the issue of the user's block length. And, because you are the blocking admin another admin won't step in. You cannot "infantalize" someone else by asking them a question. You've done everything but address the issue at hand. I stand by my comments and will stop engaging you since it is clear you won't deal with the issue. KP Botany 23:38, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe what I'm reading here, but please. —DerHexer (Talk) 23:47, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. That was very well done, and you accorded the appropriate amount of additional time in relation to the pettiness of my last few comments. I'm assuming, of course, that nanoseconds were not available. KP Botany 23:50, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you slapped Kjd1704 quite so hard. It seems all they were trying to do was rename an article. Even in the case of blatant vandalism, aren't you supposed to start with {{blatantvandal}} before something like {{uw-vandalism4}}? --StuartBrady (Talk) 21:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He was warned before so that I added a final warning. Wikipedia:Copyrights is imho one of our most important pages. But it's true that it was a bit harsh. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I presume this was a warning on another wiki, in that case? (Only I can't see any other contributions.) --StuartBrady (Talk) 21:44, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I don't know. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:45, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like it's just a mixup, then? — thanks for clearing that up. --StuartBrady (Talk) 21:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		Touché KP Botany 23:51, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:P —DerHexer (Talk) 13:40, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

86.20.248.142, also know as my IP address. I was blanking my page for the time being, will update it later, but for now I want it blank.

Just clearing up any confusion. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tsaiight (talk • contribs) 20:28, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. —DerHexer (Talk) 13:40, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back! [8] ^Ariel♥Gold 13:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah! :) —DerHexer (Talk) 13:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Muraad kahn and User:71.107.72.205 looks like the same person, as their edits to Bangladesh War Of Independence 1971 and Bangladesh Liberation War are very similar. If you intend to monitor the recent bout of destructive editing to the later article, you may also wish to check this fact. Sorry to bother you, but I thought I should do this. Forgive me if I'm wrong. Cheers. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 14:37, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's reported to WP:AIV. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 14:50, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need a block on 129.42.208.182 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). —Viriditas | Talk 15:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked, the next time at WP:AIV, okay? ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 15:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Thanks for your help. —Viriditas | Talk 15:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. You just blocked IBM.  :-) Look, I don't want to get you into any trouble, so can you or someone else review the block? A user just left a message on the talk page. Thanks again. —Viriditas | Talk 16:14, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's not our problem. The company should find the vandal and penalize him. Btw. I've blocked 10,000 employees of Mercedes Benz on de:wp. ;) Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:18, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remind me never to get on your bad side. :-) —Viriditas | Talk 16:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

;) Well, I do not tolerate vandalism. :) But if a vandal apologises I will forgive him. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:23, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! Gscshoyru 15:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. It's included in the services offered. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 15:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is that a different tag to db-author? The general criteria 7 implies I can request deletion of some of my subpages? --Mcginnly | Natter 17:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't matter what tag. Policy is definitely flexible on these matters, and db-author works just fine. Your pages have been deleted, per your request. Though, certainly hope you will check back here sometimes and come back at some point. Your pages can always be undeleted later on (just ask me). If you don't come back, best wishes. --Aude (talk) 17:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ack! —DerHexer (Talk) 17:55, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :D --Moonriddengirl 18:32, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome.- :D —DerHexer (Talk) 18:32, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just FYI, the vandal at User talk:81.6.226.91 vandalized Roy Lichtenstein again just now here after you gave a final warning, in case you wanted to report. Best wishes; I detest vandals myself. --Tenebrae 19:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked him for one day. Please report him next time to WP:AIV. Thanks :), —DerHexer (Talk) 19:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was "indefinite." Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 21:56, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For MediaWiki it's the same. Some scripts don't accept "indefinite" so that I use "infinite". Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, when you go to bed soon, I'll be there watching Recent Changes for ya, and reverting vandalism. Don't worry, I've been doing it all day too. -- Floaterfluss ^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's very nice. Thank you, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:48, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How did you happen to notice that? This is the second time that my page has been vandalized since I tagged Edward DeVries with {{notability}}. I suspect sock puppetry. I hope your actions means that this person is being watched and will be blocked soon. Thanks again! Steve Carlson^Talk 01:54, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. The IP has been blocked for one day. —DerHexer (Talk) 10:18, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For your blocks today :-D Out of the 2 or 3 guys that I pulled out on AIV today you blocked them all. Good stuff, cheers! Scarian^Talk 15:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome and thanks vice versa for your reports. :) Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 15:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Metal is NOT a kind of rock

I left the computer without clicking save, and then it was edited when I got back —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.32.125.221 (talk) 16:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To add "horribler" is against WP:NPOV. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:33, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you check that IP out for me again? Thanks. It just left some rather creative vandalism on my talk page. Pats1 11:04, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should report the IP to WP:AIV. But now the IP is gone. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:30, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yo DH, just wanted to give you a heads up. I've been keeping an eye on ManlyMan94 (talk · contribs). Only two contribs, both vandalism, one is directed towards you, so I thought I'd let you know. Cheers, DBishop¹⁹⁸⁴ 14:14, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for you're information. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 14:27, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. DBishop¹⁹⁸⁴ 14:33, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to thank you for fixing my user page after it was vandalized. -- Scjessey 14:42, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —DerHexer (Talk) 14:45, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for a way to contact you and can't seem to find one so this will work. As I told your friend that post has little to no relevance to the Rizon network. Specially seeing as it is an ex member. I really do not feel like setting up a program to register a few hundred accounts on here using proxies to remove the post over and over. Your friend actually talked to me and we began to work it out. You butted in and decided you were making that post stick even if you had no clue what it was. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.247.231.105 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 16:20, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you stop when you're blocked one or two times, discuss it or even use the edit summary? —DerHexer (Talk) 16:20, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why would I not stop? Probably because you didn't stop. Why did you not stop after one or two times? I was attempting to discuss it and was talking to another admin. Your the one who decided they owned wiki and could make any change as me and the other admin were talking. Now I am locked out to make changes. But I am debating on designing a program to take care of that. I ask you to remove it for what I said many times was irrelevance and explained why. We can sit arguing about this for quite sometime or we can come to a logical agreement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.247.231.105 (talk) 16:25, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First you should discuss it and then you should change it using an edit summary that you have discussed it. Otherwise it looks like vandalism. The article is open now. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DerHexer: Flaring up again. Mind taking a second look? Same old shtick, so far as I can tell. MrZaius^talk 16:43, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please report it to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:09, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Masteryong has once again caused vandalism. This time to the Red Fox page. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 17:47, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked but please report a vandal to WP:AIV, I'm not 24/7 online. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 18:15, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I figured that, I mentioned it here because I saw you had given him/her a warning. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 23:46, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT I AM IN THE PROCESS OF DOING IS REWRITING THE ARTICLE "TRANSSEXUALISM" SO THAT IT IS MORE NEUTRAL... WHICH I UNDERSTAND IS IMPORTANT TO WIKIPEDIA.

THE ARTICLE AS IT STOOD WAS NOT NEUTRAL AS IT SEEMD TO REPRESENT THE POINT OF VEIW OF A CERTAIN SEGMENT OF THE TRANSSEXUAL COMMUNITY. A SEGMENT THAT HAS MUCH POWER AND PRIVILLAGE. PLEASE STUDY THIS MATTER FURTHER. --DONT TASER ME BRO. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.168.46.149 (talk) 18:53, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't shout at me. You'be remove the entire Wikisyntax and removed a lot of content. Please discuss your changings at the talk page. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:56, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, DerHexer. What do you make of this? --Rrburke^(talk) 18:59, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Or this --Rrburke^(talk) 19:01, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Omg, yes, it's vandalism. I'll clear the history. Thanks for your report! —DerHexer (Talk) 19:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you have a look at this? I don't know if it's a Stephen Colbert-type thing in which listeners have been encouraged to vandalize the page, but I'm beginning to feel like the Little Dutch Boy. --Rrburke^(talk) 20:41, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been protected. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DerHexer,

I was just editing Bain and Company for Blatant advertising. It usually merits a speedy deletion, but instead I just cut article down to eliminate obvious advertising.

Noticed you reverted these edits. Please take a look and determine if it is indeed blatant advertising. If so, make due changes.

Thanks,

J —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.153.153 (talk) 21:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. —DerHexer (Talk) 11:37, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, are you having problems with Twinkle right now? Because it will not allow me to do anything right now. I am not sure what is going on. Tiptoety 23:52, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not using Twinkle anymore. Now I'm using DerHexer. ;) Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:34, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at this page Street Hacker, can you protect it please? And block the vandals? Phgao 17:10, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danke! Phgao 17:11, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:16, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why'd you revert my edit? --205.155.48.5 18:24, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To revert my one. :P —DerHexer (Talk) 18:24, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, nice. --205.155.48.5 18:25, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was a joke. ;) I've seen it too late so that I was not able to stop my revert. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:26, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I, AngelOfSadness, hereby award DerHexer for his endless patience with fighting vandalism . And for reverting vandalism off my userpage so many times that I've lost count. AngelOfSadness talk 18:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woo, thanks a lot. :) And you're welcome. ;) Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:52, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why haven't you emailed me back? GoaliesRUS —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoaliesRUS (talk • contribs) 19:23, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DerHexer, this IP (User talk:216.213.225.1) has already vandalized Spam (food) article again and got 2 last warnings. Further step is nedded. Thank you--NAHID 19:46, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same case with this IP (User talk:198.236.64.23) too. Thank you--NAHID 20:00, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Both blocked but please report them to WP:AIV. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:03, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is in regard to the recent revert on the Red Bull BC One page. The internal link for Physicx is accurate; there was no additional edit summary on your revert, so I do not know if there was another reason for it, but the edit in question shouldn't be considered vandalism. Please let me know if there were any other issues. --Sesameball 20:09, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the edits, blocked the IP and reverted all edits made by this IP today. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:10, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, looking at that edit list it looks like it was a good call ;) And err, I totally did not mean to just rewrite over your talk page. :P --21:29, 20 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sesameball (talk • contribs)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hypatia of Alexandria. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Floaterfluss ^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:12, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, whoops, nevermind. -- Floaterfluss ^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:13, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, I won't mind. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 20:13, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, normally I wouldn't bother pointing out a mistake like this, but I believe that admins need to be held to a higher standard than other users. Please note that your two reverts as seen here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ching_chong&action=history did not remove the entrenched vandalism. Please be more careful in the future. Thanks. dfg 20:25, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. You expect from me to remove vandalism? I saw this edit, made a mistake and reverted myself instantly. I've not seen another vandalism. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, that's my point. The edit you reverted to was also vandalism. The last safe edit was mine on Sept 19. dfg 21:16, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was not able to decide if it's vandalism or not. That's why I removed my edit so that an expert who is watching this article can fix it. I've made no mistake—I've made a zero byte change. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:23, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Either way, you failed to remove the vandalism. And yes, that is what I expect from admins, especially ones who state such on their userpages. dfg 21:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an idea how much vandalism can be found here? … Not even all admins together would be able to fix it immediately. Reflect what you're saying resp. expecting from us! —DerHexer (Talk) 22:03, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Btw.: Have a look how much vandalism I remove.[reply]

I see; you're more concerned with quantity than quality. That's fine. Cheers. dfg 18:35, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removing vandalism is not a type quality protection? Interesting, —DerHexer (Talk) 08:02, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

how many revisions of each article do you expect an admin to check? 10? 50? 100? all of them? -- ∂ 22:20, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful to see a concerned third-party. Merely one minute of time spent looking at the string of edits by unregistered users reveals the entrenched vandalism. In addition, when an admin reverts to a version, most inexperienced and novice users will fall victim to the argument from authority fallacy regarding its legitimacy. My point is that Wikipedians invested with extra authority should also be a bit more cautious and responsible. dfg 18:35, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are so good and fast at reverting vandalism and editing that I even posted a comment about how fast you are on the 'Build Me Up Buttercup' video in YouTube. NHRHS2010 ^Talk 20:45, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ehm, wow, thanks. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 21:12, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Whatever Eaomatrix said on YouTube, don't listen to him. He claims to be a banned user on Wikipedia and his post is an attack post on you. NHRHS2010 ^Talk 21:17, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't have it read without your last comment. :P —DerHexer (Talk) 21:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Special Barnstar
		DerHexer, have this barnstar for all your hard work deleting unnecessary redirects! Keep the good work up! Cheers, Solumeiras talk 13:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks a lot. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 13:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Why are these redirects being created, and by who?? Should they be listed on WP:PT?? --Solumeiras ^talk 13:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They generally come up when a page is moved. Its talk page is moved, too, but that redirect is unnecessary. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 13:35, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...for that. Not sure what that was all about. --Rrburke^(talk) 15:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —DerHexer (Talk) 15:52, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check this out: Special:Contributions/66.30.170.133. =) BrokenSphere^{Msg me} 03:51, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your information. —DerHexer (Talk) 08:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For keeping an eye on my talkpage and userpage. Thanks very much! :) ~ Riana ⁂ 12:26, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, Riana, and thanks for the brownie. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 12:27, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For keeping an eye on Riana's talkpage and userpage. Thanks very much! :) --D_arkF_alls ^talk 12:30, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you thicken me! I just took one brownie and now I shall taste a sachertorte? I won't be exorbitant and bite a piece off. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 12:36, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting vandalism to "my" article at Adrian Lamo, and for your overall efforts to support EN, DE, and Wikipedia in general :)

—Adrian~enwiki (talk) 2007-09-23 01:02Z

You're welcome. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 09:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This edit here: [9]. That plus the IP in question could potential point out an actual person. I blanked it but wondered if it should be deleted as well. -WarthogDemon 18:49, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted it. Thanks for your report, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Despite a block of one year, apparently applied by you, User talk:62.6.160.99 managed to edit Twitch today. Curious... WLU 15:59, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was a mistake [10]. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:04, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well that makes much more sense. Anyway, they're at it again, though the last warning I put up may have stopped them. WLU 16:06, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(if my Latin still serves me correctly) for reverting vandalism on my userpage. Kevin McE 16:10, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Gratias ago." ;) You're welcome. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 16:11, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		How come I always see your name on every article's history? Your edit summary is usually "Reverted edits by ___ to last version by DerHexer"... Leave some reverts for me too, you're too fast. :-) · AndonicO Talk 15:02, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's WP:VF and my monobook. ;) Thanks for your barnstar, —DerHexer (Talk) 15:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You gave me a vandalism warning at 24.85.246.143. I'm not sure which edit this was for but I can guess it had to do with a revert. I've been working on the solar power page lately. Recently I've been dealing with a IP address troll at 199.125.109.134. This guy has been reverting the lead paragraph and header pictures over and over again. He's also been harassing me directly which is a new to me on Wikipedia. His behavior is passive/aggressive, very frustrating and very time consuming. I think a comparison of edits on the page bears out my points. If I am in the wrong please tell me.24.85.246.143 16:40, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you I've reverted myself within seconds because I made a mistake and was not able to stop my script. I hope you don't mind. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:48, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at Doctor Banana (talk · contribs) --84.61.37.254 16:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you recently reverted some vandalism on Engineering. However, as this diff shows, you accidentally reverted it to another bad version. Don't feel bad...I've done it too! Thanks you. —Signed by KoЯnfan71 ^{My Talk} _{Sign Here!} 21:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing! :) —DerHexer (Talk) 21:12, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]