User talk:David Fuchs/Archive 36

This is an archive of past discussions with User:David Fuchs. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi there! I'd like to invite you to WikiProject Apple Inc.'s collaboration! We're currently working on the project's flagship article, Apple Inc. There's plenty to do, and goals on the talk page—all members are encouraged to participate. Additionally, collaboration participants will receive a barnstar after the article reaches GA status. If you have a spare moment, please join in or tell your friends. Thanks! You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active participant in WikiProject Apple Inc.

Monomium (talk) 03:43, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

I have fixed most of what you brought up in the Pokémon HeartGold and SoulSilver review, and have comments on some of it. Thanks, _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 22:00, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Would you be interested in co-nominating User:PresN with me? I'll probably have the nomination draft up tomorrow. RfA has clearly shown the desire for more prominent content-oriented nominations, as they demonstrate raw ability to judge, deal with dispute and consensus building, and follow policy, thus making reasonable candidates as long as they demonstrate understanding of Admin-related policies/guidelines in the RfA. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 05:11, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

I'll let you know when I'm done with my nomination. You can write your co-nomination right under it or something. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 22:05, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

I just typed out my nomination. Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/PresN. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 23:42, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Alright, it's up. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 04:14, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Kk, here's what I ended up doing to Golden Sun yesterday: [1]. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 01:58, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Noticed you haven't posted your nominator support yet. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 04:25, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Per this, you're interested in looking at Everything That Happens Will Happen Today, and I'd appreciate your feedback. I'll work on for a third round. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:16, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks I've done a little of what you suggested on this talk page, but some of it is difficult for me. Generally speaking, I am weakest at prose--which is to say that I'm usually better at categorization, templates, citations, adding media, structure, etc.--and I've gone over this page so many times. It's honestly exhausting to consider going over it again, but I really want this to be FA work.

As far as the media goes, it was under review during both of the other FA nominations and passed those times. I'm not saying that your concern is entirely unfounded, but it's been defended already to others' satisfaction.

Anyway, I will be happy to amend the text as you require, but it will probably take a little hand-holding and the input of someone else at a peer review, because I've amended this text so many times that I honestly don't know what more to do here. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:19, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Sure I have no anticipations from you and you've already been helpful. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:26, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi, and thanks for taking care of the Template:WikiProject Biography move request. When closing move discussions, remember to also remove the {{movereq}} template from the talk page so that the bot knows to delist the discussion from WP:RM. Regards, Jafeluv (talk) 09:26, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

I also thank you for moving the template and its talk pages. You fulfilled my prediction at what became the end of the discussion of the move and made it almost mandatory that the discussion be closed as the move had been made leaving nothing to discuss. JimCubb (talk) 19:51, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

I think something went wrong when you moved the italic title template down. The last field of the infobox now has some additional blank space at the bottom. Prime Blue (talk) 13:21, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for nominating me for adminship! I'm happy to have been selected; any rumors that I'm working on ways to delete the main page and not leave an edit summary while doing so are greatly exaggerated. --PresN 07:28, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Dear David Fuchs, thank you for nominating yourself as a candidate in the 2010 Arbitration Committee elections. On behalf of the coordinators, allow me to welcome you to the election and make a few suggestions to help you get set up. By now, you ought to have written your nomination statement, which should be no more than 400 words and declare any alternate or former user accounts you have contributed under (or, in the case of privacy concerns, a declaration that you have disclosed them to the Arbitration Committee). Although there are no fixed guidelines for how to write a statement, note that many candidates treat this as an opportunity, in their own way, to put a cogent case as to why editors should vote for them—highlighting the strengths they would bring to the job, and convincing the community they would cope with the workload and responsibilities of being an arbitrator.

You should at this point have your own questions subpage; feel free to begin answering the questions as you please. Together, the nomination statement and questions subpage should be transcluded to your candidate profile, whose talkpage will serve as the central location for discussion of your candidacy. If you experience any difficulty setting up these pages, please follow the links in the footer below. If you need assistance, on this or any other matter (including objectionable questions or commentary by others on your candidate pages), please notify the coordinators at their talkpage. If you have followed these instructions correctly, congratulations, you are now officially a candidate for the Arbitration Committee. Good luck! Skomorokh 13:11, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

v t e Arbitration Committee Election 2019 candidate: David Fuchs Candidate statement Questions for the candidate Discuss this candidate

Hi. Best of luck in your upcoming trial by fire. As in previous years I have a series of questions I ask candidates. This year there are restrictions on the length and number of questions on the "official" page for questions, restrictions which I do not agree with, but which I will abide by. I nevertheless think my questions are important and relevant (and I am not the only person to think so, in previous years they have drawn favorable comment from many, including in at least one case indepth analysis of candidates answers to them by third parties). You are invited to answer them if you so choose. I suggest that the talk page of your questions page is a good place to put them and I will do so with your acquiescence (for example, SirFozzie's page already has them). Your answers, (or non-answers should you decide not to answer them), that will be a factor in my evaluation of your candidacy. Please let me know as soon as practical what your wish is. Thanks and best of luck. (please answer here, I'll see it, and it keeps things together better) ++Lar: t/c 14:55, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Hey Lar, stick the questions where you wish and I'll try to get to them as soon as possible. Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 15:02, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Done, and thanks for the quick answer. Sorry for the delay in actually posting them, I've just been flying home from SFO all day... ++Lar: t/c 03:57, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

I see yours are bigger than mine, by a considerable margin. --Andy Walsh (talk) 04:45, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Spreading the abuse around is always good. Well, good luck to you. --Andy Walsh (talk) 05:46, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi David. Could you point me to the comment of Kirill's described here? I'm not sure where to look. Thanks.--Chaser (talk) 17:10, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

I was mostly referring to the comments such as "An ever-increasing fraction of our workload consists of 'behind the scenes' work—hearing appeals, responding to questions and complaints, investigating allegations of sockpuppetry. Managing this is less visible and glamorous than case work." from the interview itself; I've tried to make my response a little clearer in that regard. Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 19:46, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Ah, the interview I linked. I feel a bit sheepish. Thanks for getting back to me.--Chaser (talk) 19:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Hey. Hate to bother you about this, but—following your suggestion about a week ago—I sent you an email request for LexisNexis sources. The most important one was a Boston Herald article about Looking Glass Studios audio; I believe the others were System Shock reviews. I just wanted to make sure you didn't, for example, miss my email due to the dissimilarity of my email address (johnadkins256) and Wikipedia name. No rush, though; just looking for a status update. Thanks. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 23:13, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

• I see that you're running for ArbCom; sorry about the above. There is no hurry whatsoever on this. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 01:29, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Many thanks! You have no idea how helpful these will be. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 15:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Populous-stage.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:01, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

I did quite a bit of copy-editing a couple weeks ago in preparation for today, but I don't have time to make further adjustments. It's already on the main page anyway! —Deckiller (t-c-l) 03:11, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

[2] What'll you give me if I bring Thomas Kinkade to FA? --Andy Walsh (talk) 15:06, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

In your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronology of the Harry Potter series (5th nomination) you didn't state whether you saw consensus, you restated one arguement that was made with a !vote to delete. Why do feel their was a consensus to delete rather than a "no consensus" close? You can reply here as I will watch the page. Thank You. Outback the koala (talk) 04:54, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Because that opinion was based in policies and was not refuted by any who supported keeping the article. Consensus isn't counting heads, it's about strength of arguments, and the delete opinions were far stronger than the keep's. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 14:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

I understand your position. In that case I was wondering if you would be open to userfying the article into my userspace, so I can work on it, trim it down alot, and hopefully reintroduce it to the project when it is ready, farther down the road. Outback the koala (talk) 04:51, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

David, I have not heard back from you. If you are not open to userfying the article could you explain your reasons why please? Outback the koala (talk) 08:05, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! it may take a while but it will likely help the project. :) Outback the koala (talk) 20:12, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

I understand, though disagree, with the reasons for the deletion. However, I wonder if someone who wanted this deletion so badly should revisit all the HP articles to remove references to birthdates and links to the page that was deleted? Or is this something that will be done gradually? Ccrashh (talk) 14:34, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Chronology of the Harry Potter Series. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Outback the koala (talk) 02:48, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Hey David, it's Hunter Kahn from over at the South Park (season 13) FAC. I was hoping you could take a look at the new comment I made over at that review and weigh in with your thoughts. I posted it because there seemed to be a growing movement to take a tally of the yes/no votes regarding the image, but I didn't want it to come to that because I felt it would be disrespectful to you and Fasach. In the spirit of compromise, I made two suggestions. However, I would like to add that I personally feel the FAC discussion does indicate there is a WP:CONSENSUS for the image, and hope that you will at least consider suggestion #1 and consider not opposing the article based strictly on the image, even if you disagree. After nearly a month at FAC, I'd hate for this one issue alone to sink the nomination. Thanks, and sorry to be a pest! — Hunter Kahn 17:07, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

As someone who commented on the previous FAC, perhaps you'd be interested in taking a look at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/.hack (video game series)/archive2? Thank you in advance, Axem Titanium (talk) 03:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

The WikiProject Film Newsletter Volume V, no. 11 - November 2010
Project news Looking for something to do? A large cleanup listing has been started for improving our project's articles currently tagged with cleanup banners. The list is updated weekly and covers over 20,000 articles under the project's scope. The list can also be viewed by the type of cleanup needed. With this many articles and the variety of cleanup categories available, there is something for everyone. Note that the list may take a while to load. Based on views, the top five most popular articles from our project this month were: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Harry Potter (film series), Inception, Internet Movie Database, and The Social Network. For a list of our project's top 1,000 most popular articles, see here. Consider helping to improve one of these articles that is seen by thousands to millions of people each month. Our project currently has over 77,500 film-related articles, with over two hundred unassessed articles, thanks to the assessment department! Remember to always add the {{WikiProject Film|class=}} template to a film article's talk page so the project can get a better idea of what work still needs to be done. If you believe that an article should be assessed at a certain class, feel free to follow the assessment scale and assess the article yourself (it's not too difficult to determine the basic classes such as stubs, categories, or lists). Below is a table showing a breakdown of our articles by class. WP:FILM again has another FAR for one of its older articles. Our Gang's FAR can be viewed here. Consider helping to address the issues raised to help the article maintain its status. Spotlight Update: Multiple films and film-related articles have reached GA and FA status in November. Dustbin Baby (11/03) 1st Academy Awards (11/24) Dhoom 2 (11/04) The Story of Marie and Julien (11/05) Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (11/05) Doppelgänger (11/12) Who's That Girl (soundtrack) (11/22) Inseminoid (11/23) Member news New members to the project since the last issue include: Clintong, Elizium23, Magic Lemur, MC RIDE, Pantera5FDP, & Zucchinidreams. Remember that any editor can give the WikiProject Film Award to another WP:Films member. If you do present this award, please make mention of it here or tell one of the newsletter editors who will then include it in the next issue. Please add your name to the member list if you have not already. Film pages by quality Quality Total FA 191 FL 499 FM 63 A 1 GA 1,481 B 1,721 C 12,060 Start 76,829 Stub 95,343 List 13,318 Category 60,889 Disambig 388 File 121,966 Portal 19 Project 244 Redirect 12,623 Template 9,851 NA 6 Assessed 407,492 Unassessed 97 Total 407,589 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 1,012,569 Ω = 5.40	Coming to theaters Opened last weekend (11/24): Burlesque Faster Love and Other Drugs Tangled Opening this weekend (12/03): The Warrior's Way I Love You Phillip Morris Black Swan Opening next weekend (12/10): The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader The Tourist The Fighter Other December releases: Tron: Legacy (12/17) Yogi Bear (12/17) How Do You Know (12/17) True Grit (12/22) Little Fockers (12/22) Gulliver's Travels (12/22) Did you know... ... that A Jewish Girl in Shanghai, an animated film set in and around the Shanghai Ghetto, has been described as "China’s first homegrown Jewish film"? ... that the 1915 film The Incorrigible Dukane is the oldest surviving movie starring John Barrymore? ... that film studies' are less concerned with filmmaking than with exploring the narrative, artistic, cultural, economic, and political implications of cinema? ... that Stan Brakhage's 1961 short film Thigh Line Lyre Triangular documents the birth of his third child? ... that Stan Brakhage's 1967 short film Eye Myth took about a year to produce, despite a running time of only nine seconds? ... that director Nobuhiko Obayashi purposely made the special effects in the Japanese horror comedy film House look unrealistic? ... that the upcoming film My Idiot Brother went into production unusually quickly for an independent film, with a first cut to be completed less than a year after the script was picked up? ... that studios release films in the fall, during Oscar season, to have a better chance at winning the Academy Awards? From the editors If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject Film. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 12 – December 2010). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing! Contributors to this issue Nehrams2020 (Lead Editor, Distributor) Peppage (Editor) Archive of past newsletters view talk edit 2006: Nov Dec 2007: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012: Jan–Feb
WikiProject Film announcements and open tasks [ view talk edit ] Article alerts • Articles needing attention • Assessment • Cleanup listing • Deletion sorting • New articles • Popular pages • Requests • Reviews Did you know 02 Oct 2025 – Friday the 13th (1980 film) (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Launchballer (t · c); see discussion 30 Sep 2025 – Tilly Norwood (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Launchballer (t · c); see discussion 28 Sep 2025 – Velký vlastenecký výlet (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Piotrus (t · c); see discussion 24 Sep 2025 – Calling Mr. Smith (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Piotrus (t · c); see discussion 19 Sep 2025 – All You Need Is Death (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Launchballer (t · c); see discussion 17 Sep 2025 – Charlie (goat) (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (t · c); see discussion 13 Sep 2025 – Life After Beth (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Kingsif (t · c); see discussion 09 Sep 2025 – Nejishiki (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Plifal (t · c); see discussion 05 Sep 2025 – The Shadow's Edge (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Prince of Erebor (t · c); see discussion Featured article candidates 07 Sep 2025 – Batman Returns (talk · edit · hist) was FA nominated by Darkwarriorblake (t · c); see discussion 04 Sep 2025 – Eating Out 2: Sloppy Seconds (talk · edit · hist) was FA nominated by PanagiotisZois (t · c); see discussion Featured list candidates 21 Sep 2025 – Sonali Bendre filmography (talk · edit · hist) was FL nominated by 25 Cents FC (t · c); see discussion 14 Sep 2025 – List of accolades received by Wicked (2024 film) (talk · edit · hist) was FL nominated by Birdienest81 (t · c); see discussion 13 Sep 2025 – Adaptations of Manon Lescaut (talk · edit · hist) was FL nominated by LEvalyn (t · c); see discussion Good article nominees 28 Sep 2025 – Fire (1996 film) (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by DoctorWhoFan91 (t · c); start discussion 20 Sep 2025 – Jawan (film) (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Gdshordy (t · c); start discussion 08 Sep 2025 – Hollywood Walk of Fame (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Gb321 (t · c); start discussion 05 Sep 2025 – Elastigirl (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Changedforbetter (t · c); start discussion 27 Aug 2025 – The Batman (film) (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Trailblazer101 (t · c); see discussion 24 Aug 2025 – Florence Nightingale (1915 film) (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Llewee (t · c); start discussion 24 Aug 2025 – Scandal (1950 film) (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Plifal (t · c); start discussion 18 Aug 2025 – Drunken Angel (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Plifal (t · c); start discussion 15 Aug 2025 – Dora and the Search for Sol Dorado (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by M.Billoo2000 (t · c); start discussion 15 Aug 2025 – The Missing (2023 film) (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by RFNirmala (t · c); start discussion (14 more...) Requests for comments 20 Sep 2025 – Wikipedia:WikiProject Film (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by RanDom 404 (t · c); see discussion Peer reviews 21 Sep 2025 – Golden Age of Argentine cinema (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Bleff (t · c); see discussion 08 Sep 2025 – Golden Age of Philippine cinema (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Loibird90 (t · c); see discussion 30 Aug 2025 – Kubrick stare (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Bremps (t · c); see discussion 25 Aug 2025 – Project A-ko (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Harizotoh9 (t · c); see discussion 27 Apr 2025 – High and Low (1963 film) (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Plifal (t · c); see discussion Task force requests American cinema Cleanup needed Runaway production Expansion needed Cinema of the United States Tagging needed Category:Cinema of the United States visit task force · edit this list Animated films visit task force · edit this list Argentine cinema Requested articles List of missing Argentine films • Iris Alonso • Carlos Belucci • Adrián Cuneo • Juan Carlos Desanzo • Despabílate amor • Pedro Escudero • Damian Zifron • Expansion needed Amelia Bence • Carlos F. Borcosque• Hugo del Carril• Libertad Lamarque • Cinema of Argentina • Víctor Laplace visit task force · edit this list Australian cinema Requested articles List of missing Australian films visit task force · edit this list Baltic cinema Expansion needed Cinema of Estonia • Cinema of Latvia • Cinema of Lithuania visit task force · edit this list Belgian cinema Requested articles Beyond the Steppes • Vanja d'Alcantara • François Pirot • The World Belongs to Us • Scouting for Zebras • Guillaume Malandrin and Stéphane Malandrin • Antoine Cuypers • Xavier Seron • Valéry Rosier • François Troukens • Jean-François Hensgens • Marta Bergman • Anne Paulicevich • Christophe Hermans • Emmanuel Marre • Julie Lecoustre • Eve Duchemin Expansion needed Cinema of Belgium Tagging needed Category:Cinema of Belgium visit task force · edit this list British cinema Requested articles Andy Medhurst • Cinema Theatre Association (22 references on en.wikipedia) • Category: British Mixed-Race actors/actresses Expansion needed Cinema of the United Kingdom Tagging needed Category:Cinema of the United Kingdom visit task force · edit this list Canadian cinema Requested articles List of missing Canadian films Expansion needed Cinema of Canada visit task force · edit this list Chinese cinema Requested articles List of missing Chinese Films visit task force · edit this list Christian films Expansion needed Christian film visit task force · edit this list Comic book films visit task force · edit this list Documentary films visit task force · edit this list Film awards visit task force · edit this list Film festivals Expansion needed Film festival • Moscow International Film Festival • Buenos Aires International Festival of Independent Cinema • Jakarta International Film Festival • Mar del Plata International Film Festival • Newport Beach Film Festival • Pusan International Film Festival •; International Film Festival Rotterdam • San Antonio Independent Christian Film Festival • Cork Film Festival • Anchorage International Film Festival; DisOrient Film Festival; Seattle Asian American Film Festival; Environmental Film Festival in the Nation's Capital visit task force · edit this list Filmmaking Requested articles Agfa Ansco • Alienbrain • Animo (redirect should be deleted) • Antimatograph • aperture plate • Argentine Society of Cinematographers • Arriflex 16BL • Arriflex 16M • Arriflex 16ST • Arriflex 235 • Arriflex 35BL • Arriflex 765 • Arriflex II • Arriflex III • Arriscan • Arritechno 35 • Association of Brazilian Cinematographers • Association of Czech Cinematographers • Austrian Association of Cinematographers • Avid Cinema • Avid Interplay • Avid MCXpress • Avid Mojo • Avid Videoshop • Avid Xpress • backfocus • backlit animation • Belgian Society of Cinematographers • Birtac • British Film Commission • Bulgarian Society of Cinematographers • casting agency • Champion Motion Picture Company • Chimera (filmmaking) • Cinema Camera Club • Cinema Products • Danish Society of Cinematographers • DeLuxe Labs • Deutsche Universal-Film AG • Digital Cinema Distribution Master • Dolby Digital Surround EX • DS Nitris • DVCPROHD • Elite Optics • film composer • Finnish Society of Cinematographers • fluid head • Fusion camera • geared head • George Kleine Productions • high-speed filming • Hungarian Society of Cinematographers • image plane (dab this to computers as well) • In-Three • Indian Society of Cinematographers • International Pictures • Isco Optic • Israeli Cinematographers Association • Italian Society of Cinematographers • Iwerks 70 • Japanese Society of Cinematographers • Joe Dunton Camera • Kinarri 16 • Kinarri 35 • Korean Society of Cinematographers • film lighting • Matthews Studio Equipment • Mexican Society of Cinematographers • motion judder • negative cut list • Netherlands Society of Cinematographers • Norwegian Society of Cinematographers • Obie light • Onation Studios • Pathéscope • Photo-Sonics • Pick-up shot • Polish Society of Cinematographers • Prizmacolor • production buyer • Rex Motion Picture Company • Russian Guild of Cinematographers • Schneider Optics • scratch removal • scratch test (dab needed) • scrubbing • Slovenian Association of Cinematographers • Society of Cinematographers in Estonia • South African Society of Cinematographers • Sovcolor • Spanish Society of Cinematographers • Spirit Datacine • Static Club • SuperScope • SuperScope 235 • Swiss Cinematographers Society • Unity Isis • Unity MediaNetwork • universal capture • Viper FilmStream visit task force · edit this list French cinema Requested articles Régis Arpin • Marc Barbé • Jean-Pierre Cargol • Pierre Champagne • Pierre Chatagny • Clara Choveaux • Charlotte Clasis • Garance Clavel • Laetitia Colombani • Jérôme Cornuau • Chris Delaporte • Nicole Félix • Charles Gerdes • Philippe Grimond • Jenny Hélia • Joseph Ivens • Albert Juross • Chantal Mercier • Celia Montalván • Lucien Nonguet • Nadine Nortier • André Paulvé • Marcel Pérès • Pierre Pradinas • Henri Roanne • Janine Ronceray • Catherine Sée • Luc Simon • Irene Starevich • Albert Stemler • Gérard Valet • Daniel Vigne • Ana Vladescu • Annette Wademant • Pierre Watrin • Mahmoud Zemmouri • Love Me (2000 film) visit task force · edit this list German cinema Requested articles Liselotte Eder • Karl Scheydt • Elisa Schlott • Das falsche Gewicht • Yoko (film) (de)(tr) and sources: [3] Expansion needed Cinema of Germany visit task force · edit this list Indian cinema Cleanup needed Bot-generated cleanup listing • Hindi films and plagiarism • Ramoji Film City • IIFA Awards • IIFA • Anand Bakshi • Ajay Devgan • N. T. Rama Rao Jr. Requested articles List of missing Indian Films (see also lists of Indian films for redlinks) • Beary Cinema • Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Requested articles#Cinema Expansion needed Draft articles: Tulu cinema • Anahat (film) • Filmfare Awards South • Kerala Film Critics Association Awards • Hindustan Photo Films • Sanskrit cinema Citations needed Central Board of Film Certification visit task force · edit this list Israeli cinema Requested articles Avigail Harari • Hila Saada • Ofer Hayoun • Maor Schweitzer •Karin Ophir • Oded Leopold• Ido Bartal • Dor Harari • Uri Banai • Dor Harari •Matchmaking (2022 film) • Shirat Ha'Sirena • After (1990 film) • The Stronghold (2023 film) • A Tramway in Jerusalem Expansion needed Cinema of Israel Tagging needed Category:Cinema of Israel visit task force · edit this list Italian cinema Requested articles Al limite • Tommaso Bianco • Catene (1925 film) • César Sforza; Cocco di mamma, Il • La fuga • Fuochi d'artificio • Hijos del viento • Il principe idiota • Elma Krimer • L’Immagine Ritrovata Laboratory • Yole Marinelli • Nino Martinengo; Medusa Film • Antonio Morabito • Adriana Novelli • Giacomino Origoni; Padre Speranza • Giulio Panicali • Su e giù per la scala • Tre per sempre visit task force · edit this list Japanese cinema Cleanup needed Kane no naru oka: Dai san hen, kuro no maki • Sunae Shibari Dai-nihen (verify, there are many similar titles) Requested articles (empty) Expansion needed Film stubs • Ninkyō Shimizu-minato • Kochiyama soshun (1936 film) • Onna Keirin-ō • Hitogui Ama • Yogoreta Nikutai Seijo • The Romance of Yushima • Yoru no kiba • Shirayuki-sensei to kodomo-tachi • Totsugu hi made • Paco and the Magical Book Images needed Articles needing an image • Love Is Strength visit task force · edit this list Korean cinema Cleanup needed Cinema of Korea Requested articles List of missing Korean films • Crossroads of Youth • International Women's Film Festival in Seoul • Seoul International Film Festival (currently a redirect) • redlinks in List of film festivals in South Korea Expansion needed Korean film stubs • List of Korean-language films • List of North Korean films • List of South Korean films • List of Korean film directors • Korean animation visit task force · edit this list Mexican cinema Expansion needed Cinema of Mexico Tagging needed Category:Cinema of Mexico visit task force · edit this list New Zealand cinema Cleanup needed Cinema of New Zealand visit task force · edit this list Nordic cinema Requested articles Denmark: The Early Years-Erik Nietzsche Part 1 • List of missing Danish films • Finland: Revolution • List of Jussi Award winners for Best Finnish Film • Iceland: Dís • Parents • Ahead of Time (aka, takt við tímann) • Norway: Films missing in List of Amanda Award winners • Sweden: Films missing in List of Guldbagge Award winners for Best Swedish Film Expansion needed List of Norwegian films • List of Swedish films • List of Finnish films • List of Danish films • List of Icelandic films visit task force · edit this list Pakistani cinema Requested articles List of missing Pakistani films (see also Lists of Pakistani films for red links) • Pothohari cinema (in Azad Kashmir) • Regional cinemas in Saraiki, Khowar, and Gilgit-Baltistan • Film industry in Islamabad Expansion needed Draft articles • Lollywood • Kariwood • Punjabi cinema • Pashto cinema • Sindhi cinema • Kashmiri cinema Citations needed Central Board of Film Censors • Cinema of Pakistan Tagging needed Category:Cinema of Pakistan  Doing... visit task force · edit this list Persian cinema Requested articles 12th Fajr International Film Festival • 13th Fajr International Film Festival • 14th Fajr International Film Festival • 15th Fajr International Film Festival • 16th Fajr International Film Festival • 17th Fajr International Film Festival • 18th Fajr International Film Festival • 19th Fajr International Film Festival • 20th Fajr International Film Festival • 21st Fajr International Film Festival • 22nd Fajr International Film Festival • 23rd Fajr International Film Festival • Coma • Gharibaneh • Hasan Kachal • Jazireh Ahani • Ransomer • Takhti Expansion needed Close-Up • Gaav • Smell of Camphor, Fragrance of Jasmine • Taste of Cherry visit task force · edit this list Romanian cinema Requested articles My Beautiful Dacia • Ryna • Marele jaf comunist • Marfa și banii (Stuff and Dough) • Tudor • Aur • Dragoste la mănăstire • Amor fatal Expansion needed Strigoi • Odessa în flăcări • The World According to Ion B. • The Autobiography of Nicolae Ceausescu • Silent Wedding • The Paper Will Be Blue • Tertium non datur • List of Romanian historical films; Child's Pose (Berlin International Film Festival Winner is a stub!) visit task force · edit this list Silent films visit task force · edit this list Southeast Asian cinema Cleanup needed Filipino Academy of Movie Arts and Sciences Award • LVN Pictures • Gabi ng Parangal • Crayon • Mr. Suave hoy! hoy! hoy! hoy! hoy! hoy! • Moments of Love • Natutulog Ba Ang Diyos • Now That I Have You • Ging • Once Upon a Time in Manila Requested articles SBM Golden Lens Awards • International Documentary Film Festival Jakarta • Chants of Lotus • Lucky 7 • List of missing Thai films Expansion needed Jakarta International Film Festival • Pontianak Harum Sundal Malam Merging needed Bituing Walang Ningning (split) • Natutulog Ba Ang Diyos (split) • Citations needed Waris Jari Hantu • Raja Bersiong • Deathrow • José Rizal • Muro Ami visit task force · edit this list Soviet and post-Soviet cinema Expansion needed Cinema of Russia visit task force · edit this list Spanish cinema Requested articles Álvaro Fernández Armeroes • • El bosque animado • Brigada criminal • La Busca • Mary Carrillo • Los chicos • La corte del faraónes • Dulces horas • • Hay un camino a la derechaes • Madregildaes • Moros y cristianos • El mundo sigue • Murió hace 15 años • Nacional IIIes • Nueve cartas a Berta • Terele Pávez • El Puente • Queridísimos verdugos • Roberto Salazar • Sevillanas • Luchy Sotoes • Tamaño naturales • A Toda Máquina • La trasiendaes • El último cuplé • Lo verde empieza en los Pirineos • Vida en sombras • visit task force · edit this list War films Attention needed ...to referencing and citation  • ...to coverage and accuracy  • ...to structure  • ...to grammar  • ...to supporting materials  Popular pages Full list Cleanup needed Add an article here! Requested articles Destination Death (1961 film) de Expansion needed 6th Marine Division on Okinawa • 25 April (film) • more... Images needed Add an article here! Merging needed Add an article here! Citations needed Add an article here! Translation needed Add an article here! Tagging needed Category:War films visit task force edit this list To transclude this list, use {{WPMILHIST Announcements/War films}}
We couldn't do it without you!
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

--Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:42, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

David- The images in the Lara Croft article are being discussed at the FAC. Hahnchen suggested a different main image. I also removed one image per comments from Fasach Nua, but other comments suggest that the matter could do with further discussion. I asked Fasach Nua to comment further on the removal rationale. Could you please weigh in as well? Full disclosure: I disagree with the removal, but will follow consensus. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 15:57, 1 December 2010 (UTC))

Hey, So, I figured it may be time to solve the debates with the Multiplayer online battle arena and Dota (genre). Will it be possible to provide administrative input or action for this debate, since it seems the creator of the latter feels ownership over his article and considering Valve and IceFrog's own words, the genre would be best described as an "Action RTS". DarthBotto _talk•cont 21:53, 01 December 2010 (UTC)

Well, neither of the primary editors vying between Dota (genre) or multiplayer online battle arena seem ready to see their contributions condensed into one page. Dotaveteran appears to feel ownership over the article he created and User:User:Immunmotbluescreen has been on a serious defense, reverting my edits, sending me warnings and spreading bad word about the fact that I quoted the genre from the Dota 2 blog, which he says is from an "evil corporation" and shouldn't be stood for. I appreciate both of their levels of enthusiasm and would be for seeing their original work remaining, but when we have two articles saying the exact same thing, something has got to give.

My proposition, which they have been both opposed to, is that we merge the information of both articles into "Action RTS". It has been stated by DotA's longest-serving, official and current developer, backed by the company that has a trademark that is in its final processing stages. I think it would be perfectly appropriate and would spark the least debate. There will be debate, but that's the way things go with this kind of forward motion. DarthBotto _talk•cont 00:57, 02 December 2010 (UTC)

We could use your input at the Roger Waters FAC. — GabeMc (talk) 04:19, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

I pinged all previous commentors who had not yet supported or opposed the article's promotion. — GabeMc (talk) 22:46, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Good job on this, the state of these articles a year ago was shocking and the improvements are appreciated Fasach Nua (talk) 21:18, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind comments. I saw you got Voyage Home to GA status. Keep up the good work! -Mabeenot (talk) 00:23, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

... David Fuchs condemned to serve on ArbCom. Film at 11 (and congratulations now). — Coren ^(talk) 01:12, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations from me as well! I look forward to working with you in the coming year. Kirill ^{[talk] [prof]} 01:37, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

• Congratulations from me too! Good to have you on the team. I was going to tell you that I'd sent you an email, but you've already responded. :-) Risker (talk) 05:01, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Congrats, just don't forget to find time to finish your Star Trek series so I can read them. :-) Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 10:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Well done, and I echo Ed's request. --Andy Walsh (talk) 22:48, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

*insert cabal joke here*
In all seriousness, I hadn't realized that the results were in. Congratulations! I'm sure you'll be an excellent member of the committee. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 00:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

To Fasach and David: I wanted to let you that I've restored the infobox image to South Park (season 13). It was suggested by one of the two objectors to the image that my compromise attempt was not the best way to go; that it circumvented the FAC, constituted forum shopping, made the article unstable, etc. etc. It was suggested that it would be better to either add the image or not, and then let the chips fall where they may with the FA delegate, so that's what I've done. I wanted to let you know so that you can weigh in and restore your oppose vote if you like, which I fully respect. (I also stated on the page that I expect this would lead to the restoration of that oppose vote, and that I'm sure it will be considered by the delegate.) Thanks, and please understand I mean no disrespect by readding the image despite your comments, nor did I mean any disrespect by proposing my compromise idea. I was simply trying to reconcile the conflicting comments about the image. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 18:15, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations from me as well. I look forward to working with you during the next two years. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:20, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

While I'd agree that almost everything looks great, the Reception section is extremely short given the amount of coverage it had. I just don't see any way of it passing GAN without expansion there, especially when it only talks about one aspect of the reviews. --Teancum (talk) 17:22, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

In your copious free time, before the rest of it gets sucked away at ArbCom, could you take a peek at Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/.hack_(video_game_series)/archive2? I'm not altogether convinced that it's been thoroughly research, but then I could probably be easily persuaded that is has if I get a second opinion from you. --Andy Walsh (talk) 20:04, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

You're a gentleman and a scholar. --Andy Walsh (talk) 22:53, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Master and Commander-The Far Side of the World poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:21, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi David, I wonder whether you'd mind reviewing the short blurb on you at The Signpost's "Election report", which is due for publication in not much more than 24 hours. I cobbled together the information from your RfA, your userpage, and wherever else I could, hoping it's not a plain repetition of the information about you that was part of the election process. Some of it might be a little out-of-date, and please check for balance, inclusion, tone, etc. We are happy if you edit it yourself, if necessary. Thanks. Tony (talk) 17:05, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

It's a rumour being passed around. I heard it the other day. If it's untrue, or you'd prefer to remain anon. on that count, please tweak it out of the blurb. Tony (talk) 17:12, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, reads nicely now. Tony (talk) 17:18, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Hye David, HMallison (talk · contribs) is (or more correctly will be) a first-timer at FAC with Plateosaurus and I am looking to different people to nag to give it the once-over before hand (nice to have a paelontologist get into the swing of things...). I think me and firsfron have looked at it quite a few times so a new set of eyes'd be good. Even a brief look-over would be good (I actually think it looks in pretty good shape). Be the first dino article for a while - have also reactivated the collaboration to see how it flies in Jan...Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:30, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi David, appreciate your rather thorough dealing with Plateosaurus! Thanks! Please go through all the way :) So far all you changed looks perfectly fine, but one of the inline questions leaves me with a reply question:

how much detail should be given in general for complex terms that are wikilinked? I think "taphonomy" is a pretty good example of a term that encompasses much more than can be summarized in less than five words (although I will try). Because there is a perfectly good article on the subject, I fear that giving an incomplete summary will lead to readers to whom the term is unfamiliar not clicking through, and thus "taking home" the insufficient explanation. This often may not be a big problem, but in biological sciences, where we fight the eternal defensive war against intolerant religion, this may be an unnecessary partial defeat. Essentially, we miss an opportunity to teach, and give an oversimplified, and thus potentially misleading answer instead. As you probably noted we tried to give many in-line explanations, and I will add those for cervical and caudal, too (because there is no potential for misinterpretation), but I still want to have the links in the text as an invitation to dig deeper, and go from "knowing about one genus" to "understanding an extinct animal".

I'll be quite busy and away for a few days now, but will try to address the issues you raise as quickly as possible. Please hammer me hard and ASAP if changes are not what you expected or wanted to trigger with your remarks! HMallison (talk) 20:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

I see your points and agree, thank you very much!

Another thing: when I formatted references I copied the style I found, then later someone altered it a bit. I never made sure it conforms to any guidelines, because on de.wikipedia I made the nasty discovery that they demand everything formatted in a style typical for language studies, but totally uncommon in natural sciences. I therefore closed both eyes and left things the way they are natural to me, and common in the discipline. When you get to the ref list, and find things not in order, please don't yell ;) HMallison (talk) 21:11, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Hey. You had weighed in at the first FAC for South Park (season 13), which got hung up largely because of the image. Now there is a second FAC discussion ongoing, where once again the image is dominating the conversation. At the FA delegate's suggestion, I am asking everyone who participated in the first FAC to weigh in once again, if it's not too much trouble, but please comment on the full set of FA criteria rather than just the image fair use rationale, so we can work toward a consensus on the overall FAC. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 17:48, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

		Happy Holidays
		Hope you have a lovely holiday season. I have one request: At least once this season, completely ruin someone's attempt to piss you off. If someone cuts you off in traffic or shits on you at work, just smile and wave and tell them Happy Holidays. Maybe they'll be less of an asshole, even if it's just for the rest of the day. Andy Walsh (talk) 20:30, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Hey. When Halo: Reach is reviewed and passed, could you give me a ping? This way I can note that on the featured topics list and I won't have to worry about that one. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 23:25, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Regarding this question, the user who made the edit was Space Commander Plasma (talk · contribs), seen here. They have also made other questionable edits([4]).— Dædαlus^{+ Contribs} 01:03, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

		Happy Holidays
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. (The image, while not medieval or equine, is by one of my favorite poets and artists, William Blake.) Ealdgyth - Talk 01:35, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

I could be a bit dense since I still could not figure out the statement about the panning (and I just re-watched the scene). Regardless, that may not matter in the grand scheme of things. What I am more concerned about (and makes me hesitant to support) is the un-sourced cameo list. Note: I am about to go on vacation in about 24 hours, so I might leave a "conditional support" (that the list be cited or removed) before I leave, just in case you have not the time to respond. Jappalang (talk) 03:23, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Cathedral of the Sacred Heart (Richmond, Virginia) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:10, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

I tried an alternative hook and would like to know if I understood. Please also look at the first line of the article, and I think to mention the hook fact twice in the article is enough. I found it three times. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:10, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Hey David. I need help. I noticed that Trent Reznor was at GAR for over a year and after being allowed to close it, I don't know to delist it or keep its GA status. Can you look at the article and give your opinion? GamerPro64 (talk) 02:41, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip, David. I delisted the article. GamerPro64 (talk) 04:28, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi, congrats on FA, didn't actually see that it was at FAC but clearly it didn't need my support to get the bronze star -- well done! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

On 30 December 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cathedral of the Sacred Heart (Richmond, Virginia), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that according to a diocesan official of Richmond, Virginia, the Cathedral of the Sacred Heart (pictured) was the world's only cathedral financed by a single family? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 14:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

How would you like to review TVC before I send it to FAC? If its not up to stuff, you can treat it as a GAC. :P « ₣M₣ » 01:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi David, congratulations on the election, can you check the OTRS on File:William Shatner.jpg, it seems too good to be true Fasach Nua (talk) 12:26, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Your work on the previous image is appreciated, and perhaps you could weigh in on the ST templates Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_January_2#Template:Star_Trek_Romulan_stories Fasach Nua (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)