User talk:DavefaceFMS

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Nairn. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DavefaceFMS - I have reverted/re-edited a number of your edits at Nairn , for overlinking - so I have come to explain the reason.
As explained at ‎ WP:OVERLINKING we only link the first use of a term in an article. Please bear this in mind when editing our articles - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 12:27, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for letting me know - DavefaceFMS 12:38, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of accused witches and warlocks of Nairn, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:04, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, thank you for the detailed work that you have put in on the Nairn article.
Then comes the but - why it there always a but?
The history section now totally dominates the article - using the rough calculation of "pages" (which varies with your screen size and zoom settings), I see about 15 pages for the history and 6.5 pages for the rest of the article - i.e. the history is about 70% of the article.
The article has a "readable prose size" (click "Page size" in the LH margin) of 67kB (this excludes block quotes and lists, so the article is actually much longer) whilst WP:SIZERULE suggests that any article with a readable prose size > 60 kB "Probably should be divided". You may not be experiencing problems. but as the article grows, readers, especially those on smaller, older, devices, may not be able to read to the end of the article, or it may simply abort the download, so they can read nothing.
The solution, as explained at Wikipedia:Splitting is to split the article, so that History of Nairn is a separate article, with either just a simple link to that page in the Nairn article, or, preferably, the link and a (fairly) short precis of the history, in the article.
If the article continues to grow, I will bring this up at Talk:Nairn, but I wanted to raise the problem, and possible solution, with you beforehand.
Thanks again for your work - Arjayay (talk) 20:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate all the help you've been putting in there too. I've been actually thinking the same thing in terms of the growth of the page but specifically that section. History is where I started just because that's the section I looked at when I opened the page and thought surely Nairn has more history than this. As much as I have touched on religion, culture and sport in small ways history has remained the focus.

History does dominate and I expect will continue to do so. I'd been of a mind to reduce the content itself but that felt like cheapening the whole section by trying to cut down on the nuances of some complex issues, removing context. It's one of the reasons I modified the TOC and added in the Sub-TOC for the history section itself to try and reduce the visual load of so many headings. I hadn't thought on it as a technical problem of file size.

I wasn't sure the history of Nairn would be notable enough in itself as a page but I have learned since that it's rather a large topic. I've not even touched the 18th - 21st centuries yet so I'm sure it would continue to grow and I'm sure we will see significantly more sources and events documented in those centuries. It seems like it would be wise to think about splitting, I hadn't thought of that option. Not something I have much experience with. - DavefaceFMS 20:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Tattie Scone. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Finally, per the policy on capitalization in article titles, "Scone" should be lowercase. Thanks, HouseBlaster^talk 16:56, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much I wasn't aware of that process. - DavefaceFMS 17:01, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DavefaceFMS. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of accused witches and warlocks of Nairn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DavefaceFMS. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of accused witches and warlocks of Nairn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DavefaceFMS. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Hole In The Sleeve".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:42, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]