User talk:DatGuy/Archives/2024/January
Earl of Sutton ColdfieldHello, regarding the investigation request I raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr Hall of England/Archive#22 November 2023, I just wanted to note that the content of the user's deleted page List of peers retired and removed under the House of Lords Reform Act 2014, was taken from the edit history of House of Lords Reform Act 2014, including both Mr. Hall of England's edits as well as others with that list being removed following the talk page discussion Talk:House of Lords Reform Act 2014#Do we really need this huge list?. I just wanted to bring it up because, though I feel there is enough similarity between their editing patterns to suggest a link, I'm not sure the content of that deleted page alone is enough to determine whether they're a sock puppet. I just wanted to bring that up in case I accused something who may have been innocent of what I suspected them. Since you have better resources to determine whether or not this is the case, I trust your output on this, it's just something I wanted to get off my chest. 98.228.137.44 (talk) 19:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Season's greetings     Adapted from {{Xmas6}}. Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:User:Altamel/Christmas}} to their talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Happy New Year, DatGuy!  DatGuy, Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC) ThanksThank you for blocking (Redacted). Being the sock is using my real name, per WP:OUTING I would appreciate it if there's some way to change the account name permanently. oknazevad (talk) 22:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2024News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).
SorryHi DatGuy, I'm sorry about this one. I had already come to the same conclusion and was just going to revert my report. Usually the cases of this particular master are so straightforward, but here I failed to observe due diligence before reporting. Thanks for the quick response anyway! ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 14:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic. Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. I am sure you know this already but y'know, awareness and all that. Selfstudier (talk) 19:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
New message from Jo-Jo Eumerus
Why did you block me?I have just found out that you may have blocked me for no apparent reason. Why? 31.185.240.156 (talk) 19:25, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
|
