User talk:DatGuy/Archives/2015/December

This is an archive of past discussions with User:DatGuy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Just got a death threat from here. What do I do?

Hey, I think the proper way of reporting it if you really are concerned is to email [email protected] -- I found this information in a note on the IRC bot "Helpmebot" (used in Wikipedia's channel) and I'm not sure how valid it is. I'll leave the help request up there in case someone more knowledgeable comes along. --BurritoBazooka (talk) 13:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Just saw someone reported him to Wikipedia:AIV. Don't really think it's valid though. Thanks.

Hello,

I am in the process of revising our page with information that is factual and up to date. The page I am editing was not created by us and contained incorrect information. Why did you delete it? Please help me understand. Officeofsaimaa (talk) 18:17, 3 December 2015 (UTC) Office of Sai Maa

@Officeofsaimaa: First of all, I don't get why you're saying 'us'. Wikipedia's policy is that usernames should not be shared between more than one individual.. Secondly, you need more sources to prove the up to date information.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dat GuyWiki (talk • contribs) 06:41, 4 December 2015‎ (UTC)‎

Just to say I've declined you CSD nomination of Roger Nkodo Dang. WP:CSD#G10 is very narrow in scope and while this article is very short it doesn't appear to disparage, threaten, intimidate, or harass their subject. Nthep (talk) 19:44, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lauren Haeger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:18, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

@SwisterTwister: Thank you, however the AfC submission isn't mine. It's User:Lauren mara's, and I merely formatted the AfC submission so it will work and did small edits. Regards, Dat GuyWiki (talk) 22:28, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Yes, in case you weren't aware, AfC sends it to the last user who submitted it for review. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 22:35, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Why did you put a re-assessment tag on this article's talk page? It passed GAN with few issues just a few months ago and there have been few changes to the article since then. And in any case, why didn't you first bring up the issues with me (the primary author) before tagging it? Biblioworm 22:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Henrik Ahnberg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:05, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Christopher sean requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 00:39, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

@Stefan2: When it is a redirect you can delete it, however the user recreated it. If you want, you can tag it for BLP PROD. Dat GuyWiki (talk) 09:11, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Tagged. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Sources cited and the guy is dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Feickus (talk • contribs) 17:09, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

@Feickus: Removed. Also, it doesn't matter that he is dead. Next time, please WP:SIGN your comments/posts. Dat GuyWiki (talk) 17:11, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi there,

The article Allées Jean Leroi Municipal Stadium is written in English because I just used the Content Translation system to translate it. It is a very short article (but that is not the reason you give for speedy deletion). I have also added a category of

Athletics (track and field) venues in France

to add more information to the article (see picture in infobox). The English of the article is readable.

Endo999 (talk) 22:02, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

@Endo999: It's great that you added the categories, I also mis-read the template. I will remove it now if you haven't already. Regards, Dat GuyWiki (talk) 22:04, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dynamic steady state, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dynamics. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Hey, I'm not done editing that Wikipedia page yet, and soon, you'll know why. I have done the exact same thing in Kim Kwang-Seok Fourth, where I translated the article first, then added the template after it was published. Thanks, User:andy5740 —Preceding undated comment added 06:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, DatGuy. You have new messages at User Talk:titusfox/RPG.
Message added 15:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TF ^{{ Contribs } { Edit Quest! }} 15:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Team Secret and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 23:34, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at User:titusfox/RPG. A New Turn has begun! Thanks. TF ^{{ Contribs } { Edit Quest! }} 15:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello. This article meets the GNG criteria at WP:POLITICIAN, specifically "members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature". Thanks. Gamaliel (talk) 22:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

@Gamaliel: That's the A7 out then. Still, please don't forget to perform the WP:Golden Rule! Dat GuyWiki (talk) 22:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Actually, Motorsport.com's page copied off Gordon. Scuderia Ferrari, among other pages, had the articles copied by a site editor and pasted into the site. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Formula One#Motorsport.com copyright violation for details. Zappa24Mati 23:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

@ZappaOMati: Very happy about that. I was very confused when I saw that 99% pop up on the copyvio detector and I myself thought it was wrong since it was protected and all but I didn't know anyone to contact so I just slapped the tag on. Thank you for clearing this up, and I've also removed a tag I placed on Jeff Gordon in popular culture. Dat GuyWiki (talk) 23:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Not a copyright violation as clearly stated. Kerry (talk) 09:09, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clement Ivanov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Dat GuyWiki, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 18:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black Friday (shopping), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annual. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks a lot!--D.mod.61 (talk) 13:39, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

	The 78.26 RFA Appreciation award
	Thank you for the participation and support at my RFA. It is truly appreciated. I hope to be of further help around here, and if you see me doing something dumb, you know where to find me. Again, I thank you. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 01:15, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Hey, I did'nt remove any content but was just swaoping the order of headings with the content. I can't remove any of the content of any page without any source. I just maintain them. Thankyou Seriouspastry (talk) 21:49, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

No block evasion as the first IP wasn't blocked. Also, please remember to look at everything you're reverting back in. Sometimes a portion should actually be left out. In this case, "and wife beater" was inappropriately worded, positioned, and sourced. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:01, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

@NeilN: You know, it's really good knowing that someone's out there to help you. I appreciate all the work you put in for me. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi I noticed my change at the page of Suzuhito Yasuda was denied, would a forum post or an image do as a source explaining the reasons of the change, and would saying that it being noted by fans make it a more accurate description of this person’s art style? Can theories well known by fans be edited in? If anything I could easily link the source to an image or a forum post dedicated to discussing this real life person. - River Kauss, someone who really wanted to include the general graphical style of this designer.

The reason why I reverted your edit was because images need to be used in Wikipedia from commons and not any random place on the internet. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:51, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello DatGuy sorry for the edit error. Before I previewed what I added to the Hippodrome page I made a mistake and clicked save changes. However, the only dominate changes that I have submitted are up to date photos of the theatre and deleting one out of the two info box on the Hippodrome wiki page. For the Info box I didn't think that it made sense to have two info boxes on one page with the interior image of the Hippodrome Theatre all the way at the bottom of the page. See current hippodrome page for reference. I'm referring to the info box with the hippodrome exterior image and the one under it with the national register listing with location map. It looks more cohesive if one out of the two info boxes were consolidated to just one info box preferably the National Register Listing info box would stay. I say this because most of the information in the top info box with the exterior photo of the Hippodrome is already spelled out in the introduction paragraph of the Hippodrome. Whereas information in the national register info box such as the architecture style, the date it got added to the NRHP, reference # and coordinates are not listed in the introductory paragraph. Any information that was lost from deleting the first info box was then added to the detailed description of the hippodrome. See my edit for reference. In this case the only information that was lost from deleting the first info box was just the address and date rebuilt/renovated. Everything else such as the capacity, operator, owner, date built was already listed in the introductory paragraph of the Hippodrome Theatre page. I don't consider the website of the first info box lost information because the http://www.france-merrickpac.com/ website is listed in the reference section of the Hippodrome page. I hope we can come to some kind of agreement in the future. Thank you and happy holidays. Brlaw8 (talk) 12:56, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

@Brlaw8: When I am using WP:Huggle, it doesn't show the whole page, but just the part that was changed. I didn't see the other infobox, and if you want to revert my edit feel free to do so. Also, it is recommended for you to merge both infoboxes into one. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 13:01, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. I will merge both info boxes together.Brlaw8 (talk) 13:32, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi Dat GuyWiki. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Katie^talk 14:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

I'm okay with giving you rollback because of your counter-vandalism work, which I expect you to continue with common sense and good judgment, but don't use the admin templates at AIV unless you're 100% certain you're correct. It's inappropriate to tell someone who has reported an IP to take it to SPI because IPs are only tied to registered accounts under extraordinary circumstances (it's considered outing). At any rate, you're under a more highly powered microscope now, so rollback wisely. :-) Katie^talk 14:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

@KrakatoaKatie: Thank you very much for that! Anyways, I've seen administrators tell users who have reported block evasion to go to WP:SPI, so is there a specific time when you should go to SPI and when to keep it at AIV? Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 14:55, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

I'd rather see it at AIV first, personally. I block IPs for block evasion several times a week based on AIV reports. SPI sometimes takes a while because of their backlog, and if you link to the SPI investigation in your AIV report we can block quicker. Much if not most of the SPI process involves the duck test; if it's not completely obvious, we'll send it to SPI. Hope that helps. Katie^talk 15:04, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

(edit conflict) (talk page watcher) Obvious block evasion can be reported to AIV. Situations where you need to "connect the dots" should go to SPI. It also depends on the patrolling admin as some are, shall we say, more strict about processing "vandals or spammers" only at AIV. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

@NeilN: and @KrakatoaKatie: Thank you both for helping me. Also, how does the mass rollback script (here) work? Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 15:07, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

If you install it and go to a contrib page, you'll see a "rollback all" tab at the top of the page. Clicking it will require you to confirm you really want to rollback all the edits on the list that can be rolled back (i.e., the ones that are current). Be very, very careful when using this. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

@NeilN: I can't find it. Did I not install it properly? If I did, could you send a snippet or tell me about where it is? Regards, Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 15:25, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Never mind, I found it. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 15:30, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

• Thanks for your activity in counter-vandalism, but can I reiterate Katie's point not to use admin response templates? At RFPP, it's not urgent to decline something and it is good to have an admin look at it. By all means comment if you have a helpful thing to say but don't use a template because it will cause the bot to archive the request. BethNaught (talk) 22:23, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

@BethNaught: I try to highlight the part that says editors note and I thought that the bot won't archive the request. If you feel it isn't constructive, tell me and I'll stop it however if it's fine by you I will add the text, but not the template. Regards, Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 22:26, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

I don't know how intelligent the bot is so it would be better not to use the templates. BethNaught (talk) 22:28, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

@BethNaught: I feel like you misunderstood me. I said I won't use the template, but I will write text (with editors note as prefix of course) For example, this. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 22:31, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Ah, that isn't what I thought you meant. That's all good then. BethNaught (talk) 22:32, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Dat GuyWiki, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:56, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Hello Dat GuyWiki, I just want to let you know there was still have another IP 203.87.144.91 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) did the 2 vandalism edit at Zomboy article which you hasn't reverted it, so I reverted to last revision by ClueBot NG and please kindly take note on that, thank you. SA 13 Bro (talk) 14:27, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

@SA 13 Bro: Good job. I see there's been some vandalism recently so you might like to request it to WP:RFPP. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 14:37, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Yah, if the vandalism continue persistently, then have to make the report. SA 13 Bro (talk) 14:56, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Is there a deletion nomination option/speedy deletion template for an article that has been recreated by the same user after speedy deletion? For reference: Luperley Dat GuyWiki (talk) 12:42, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

If the original reason still applies, you can nominate it again for that reason. Otherwise, no, only articles deleted following a deletion discussion qualfy for "speedy deletion because they were deleted before" - that's so we don't have to repeat the discussion if it's basically the same article. See WP:CSD#G4. Huon (talk) 14:58, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Please don't use the admin response templates at RFPP. Cyberbot archives requests when it sees those templates, and it can cause a request to be archived without an administrator response. I appreciate your desire to help, but RFPP doesn't need to be clerked. Thanks. :-) Katie^talk 00:11, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

@KrakatoaKatie: I was notified of this before but didn't remove the template. See here. I wondered that if I make my custom template, will it archive it as well? Regards, Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 10:38, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

It also gives the impression that an administrator has acted on the request. I saw that on one of your template additions at AIV last night, and that request should have been acted on sooner – even the reporter seemed to assume you were an administrator. Please stop. Admins have to look at the page ourselves anyway, and you're only confusing the people you're trying to help. Katie^talk 14:21, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

@KrakatoaKatie: I was pretty sure that he realised that I am not an administrator since I had editor note, in my opinion and 'highlight on the editor and note pard', I'll assume bad faith and stop these apparently non-constructive edits. Regards, Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 14:41, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

@KrakatoaKatie: @BethNaught: A user that vandalized a talk page has just been blocked (Special:Contributions/86.180.206.149). Am I allowed to add 'user blocked' as either text or template or should I just leave it for the patrolling administrator? Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:16, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

To do so would be redundant as the bot removes blocked users from AIV almost instantly. BethNaught (talk) 16:19, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

@BethNaught: Not from AIV, but from RFPP. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:20, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

No, because it will cause the bot to archive it, even though page protection may still be appropriate as an additional measure. Like Katie said, using the templates implies an admin has investigated the situation, which in your case would not be true. RFPP is neither overly complex nor whack-a-mole and for that reason does not need clerking. BethNaught (talk) 16:27, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Dat GuyWiki, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...  YOU'RE WELCOME! It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! Poepkop (talk)

15:23, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Mmmmm... sounds sort of desperate lol, OMG I was thanked :-) Anyways, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you. Poepkop (talk) 15:23, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

@Poepkop: Thank you for your help. Personally it doesn't feel desperate at all. Thank you for watching out for vandalism on my user page! Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 15:27, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

No problem, yes, I just found out this "Because you thanked me" smiley actually exists :-) IP visited my page too after yours, and currently he is blocked. Poepkop (talk) 15:33, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

I have effectively declined your speedy deletion of Essam Hamad Salem. You were correct there wasn't a credible claim to significance inb what you tagged. The problem is the editor had overwritten an article about another person with their autobiography. You should always look at the history to see if something has happened to the article that you can fix before nominating it for deletion. -- GB fan 17:23, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

@GB fan: I apologize about that. I was using WP:Huggle and was still quite hyped about the fact that I recently got rollback perms, so I did somethings things un-necessarily quickly. Regards, Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 17:53, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

TheManchoMan reverted again after your warning, so what should I do now? 100.12.206.17 (talk) 22:21, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

@100.12.206.17: You could report him here. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 22:25, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks dude 100.12.206.17 (talk) 22:33, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Hey, I just wanted to give you a head's up after I noticed this diff: notifications only work if you add the ping and your signature in the same edit. There's more at WP:Notifications#Known bugs. Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 22:43, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

@Woodroar: Thank you! Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 22:53, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	For keeping an eye on articles that need it. Thanks for your presence! MorenaReka (talk) 16:16, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

@MorenaReka: Thank you! My first ever barnstar! Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:34, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

I reverted this AFD close on an edit conflict. The editor who originally nominated the article seems to have blanked their rationale, but did not close the debate or revert their tag. So I posted the diff and paraphrased their rationale. They're clearly a non-english speaker, so I gave them the benefit of the doubt. And if the editor does indeed withdraw their nomination, it'll get taken care of quickly enough. Sorry for the confusion. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 16:09, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Turns out you had the right of it. I've closed it and put it to bed. And now am gonna get coffee, much needed it appears. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 16:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Why ban me from Wikipedia, all I did is change something in the Pristina article, and you warn me with ban, you put Serbian language in all cities of Kosovo, and when I edit them to the Albanian language like the names of Pristina to Prishtina, you threaten me to ban, are you pro-Serbs or what, stick this in your heads that every name of the Kosovar cities that are in Serbian language, must be re-written with the right names, that are in the Albanian Language and no the Serbian Language, Kosovo is not part of Serbia anymore since 2008, and why can't the birth place of Rita Ora not be Kosovo but it should be SFR Yugoslavia, she's is not from Serbia but from Kosovo, for every personality that I read in wikipedia, example German personalities, like Thomas Muller, his birthplace is in Germany and not France, why can't the same be applied to Rita Ora's birthplace, why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dardn2015 (talk • contribs) 16:30, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

@Dardn2015: Why did you remove proper links? That's what I reverted. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 17:03, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

@Dat GuyWiki: Those aren't proper links, anymore, because SFR Yugoslavia doesn't exist anymore, now it's Kosovo. Dardn2015 (talk 10:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I am now on the verge of exploding as this IP has returned with two new IPs. I am going to open an SIP complaint. Could you list all of the IP addresses from the user that you are aware of? Thanks, Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 20:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

@Callmemirela: What IP?

The ones you called out for wikihounding you and the ones that is wikihounding Snowded and myself. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 21:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

@Callmemirela: So far only one I am aware of is 2.100.9.156. Will look for more though. I found out that the possible IP range is 2.100.8.0 - 2.100.15.255. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 21:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. I've filed an SPI complaint here. Comment in Comments by other users if you feel necessary. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 22:13, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Why is it "out of tone"? Okay, so I deleted the word "finally", and I reread the entire article, but I certainly didn't see anything wrong with neutrality. Keep in mind that on Wikipedia, the neutrality rule can be slipped away if one side of the question is factually true, i.e., it is actually true that "the Clyde cancer cluster has affected many families in Clyde, Ohio and surrounding areas," and I think that's a good starting sentence because I couldn't find out from any of my sources as to whether "the cancer cluster" is considered to still be going on, so I used that sentence to slip away from saying that it was or wasn't still going on. I assume it is, because the people who had cancer still have cancer. I'm collecting more sources now at User:Philmonte101/Clyde cancer cluster/References in order to make a better article, with the help of possibly other people. Philmonte101 (talk) 21:41, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

PS: I almost deleted the tag altogether, but I thought it would be unfair to do that without discussing why it was put there first. I don't know, I just presented to you my opinions, and I was the writer, so maybe I should listen to your point of view also. So go ahead. Philmonte101 (talk) 21:44, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

@Philmonte101: It's fine. I just wanted to carry out what a user has wanted. I closed the AfD, but I just wanted to satisfy the want of one of the users (the one who started) the not-well done AfD. Regards, Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 21:51, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

I made a vote on Talk:Clyde cancer cluster. I encourage you highly to vote on whether Alexa should or shouldn't have a separate article. Thanks. Philmonte101 (talk) 03:15, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

When I was talking about Alexa Brown being its own article, I was talking about doing that during the process of rewriting the article and doing a massive expansion of the article's info. Currently, there is only one sentence about Alexa Brown on the whole article. Does that still qualify as needing a splitting tag? I reverted it for now, somewhat accidentally, but you can put it back if you feel it's necessary. Philmonte101 (talk) 09:04, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

@Philmonte101: If there is only one sentence in it, then you shouldn't discuss it on the article's talk page. I've just woke up and didn't have my cup of coffee yet, so I might be a bit slow or confused. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 09:07, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

It's okay, I know the feeling. Philmonte101 (talk) 09:08, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

That's alright I understand Chiemeka00 (talk) 09:58, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

@Chiemeka00: It sounds promotional. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 10:01, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Do not post links to personally identifying information in public fora. This causes the Streisand effect. Please go directly to Oversight who will take appropriate action. BethNaught (talk) 10:25, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Toby 'TobiWan' Dawson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:33, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Dat GuyWiki, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 17:33, 30 December 2015 (UTC)