User talk:Danmichaelo/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Danmichaelo. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Thanks As you can see from the histories, I started a lot of the content, but as you can also see, I let it fall fallow a long time ago as well. It's always been in the back of my mind to increase the quality of these articles and I'm always glad for help on Western Sahara-related topics. Thanks for saying hi! —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:47, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, I noticed there is a lot to improve, but I still think the project is a very good start to work on. It seems like what is really needed is more editors, since it's a huge topic to be covered. I'll see if I can manage to lure some more into Wikipedia :) – Danmichaelo (talk) 09:17, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi Danmichaelo,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Thanks for all your reference cleanup work on Reactions to Occupy Wall Street.--Amadscientist (talk) 06:03, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

My pleasure, just couldn't leave the page like it was without doing something :) – Danmichaelo (talk) 13:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

The blackout came and I went on wiki break for vacation. When I got back to it the other day...I was thrilled to see someone else work on it!--Amadscientist (talk) 21:03, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

I just wanted to note that I agree with your edits at Bushehr nuclear power plant. It's always good to have editors who are able to notice WP:NPOV violations and correct them. Nanobear (talk) 16:51, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Much appreciated! I was actually a bit worried about touching the articles about the Iranian nuclear program, since I know there are so strong feelings about this out there, but I felt it was necessary. – Danmichaelo (talk) 09:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

You have edited the Norwegian article about the Women's University in the Nordic countries foundation. I have added info [1] from your version, to the English article.

Note that the both articles have issues related to edit warring and removal of references from national newspapers. (Less critical references from two local newspapers have not been touched. Agenda pushing?) --155.55.60.112 (talk) 10:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

I have just reverted a reference removal and external link removal in the English article, performed by an administrator from Norwegian wiki. --155.55.60.112 (talk) 10:14, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

I'm not really involved in this article, I just did some cleanup during patrolling. Regarding the grant story covered in Bergens Tidende, it's an interesting story worth mentioning, but it should be put in context, not added as an "external link" as you did. I'll add the page to my watchlist. – Danmichaelo (talk) 17:21, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Man, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Platon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

 Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:25, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Danmichaelo, Well done for reverting this edit in Western Sahara [2]. I'll add it to my watchlist from now on. Best regards. Tamsier (talk) 20:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

No worry, and thanks for all the interesting content you bring to Wikipedia! I didn't know about the Serer people before reading your work :) – Danmichaelo (talk) 09:59, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your edits at Vennesla Library and Culture House. Don't take the brownie inside the library though, lest the books become stained with chocolate! Eisfbnore (下さいて話し) 13:43, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Haha, thanks, I have some experience with chocolate stains in books – only my own ones though :) – Danmichaelo (talk) 14:18, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello. You have a new message at Template talk:Str index's talk page. BigNate37_(T) 20:44, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email [email protected] your Wikipedia username.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
• If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:27, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 05:28, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Jason Quinn (talk) 03:13, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:15, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello. You linked to Module:ScribuntoUnit from this page, but did not explain how those two modules are related to each other. Is one intended to replace another? Will one be more conservative and stable and the other bleeding-edge and feature-rich? I want to copy a "test framework" to an another Wikipedia and wonder which module to choose. Could you add a short explanation what's the difference between the two modules?

Btw, if you want to advertise ScribuntoUnit, please note how Wikipedia:Lua#Unit testing is written - it only mentions one module for unit testing. --Derbeth ^talk 21:45, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Added a short note now. I was actually in the same situation as you – I started transfering Module:UnitTests to nowiki, but then came across Module:ScribuntoUnit and happened to prefer the coding style of the latter. They are really very similar, so I think it's mainly a matter of preference. – Danmichaelo (talk) 23:14, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 14:39, Wednesday, September 17, 2025 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Books & Bytes recipients: The Wikipedia Library has been expanding rapidly and we need some help! We currently have 10 signups for free account access open and several more in the works... In order to help with those signups, distribute access codes, and manage accounts we'll need 2-3 more Account Coordinators.

It takes about an hour to get up and running and then only takes a couple hours per week, flexible depending upon your schedule and routine. If you're interested in helping out, please drop a note in the next week at my talk page or shoot me an email at: jorlowitzgmail.com. Thanks and cheers, Jake Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Perhaps you can answer this question for me. At Help talk:Citation Style 1/Archive 6#An ISO 639-1 language name test I discovered that mw.language.fetchLanguageName('no', 'en') appears to return the wrong value when given ISO639-1 code no. I think that it should return 'Norwegian' but instead it returns 'Norwegian (bokmål)', a variant of the official language name assigned to ISO639-1 code nb – code nb should be 'Norwegian Bokmål'; title case without the parentheses. The magic word which appears to use the same Wikimedia resources also exhibits the problem:

{{#language:no|en}} → Norwegian

Interestingly:

{{#language:no|no}} → norsk

{{#language:nb|no}} → norsk bokmål

{{#language:nn|no}} → norsk nynorsk

My question to you is: What, from your perspective, is the correct return value in English for code 'no'?

To save you some confusion, there is a workaround in place in Module:Citation/CS1/sandbox that 'fixes' this issue so the CS1 examples now show 'Norewegian' when |language=no so all of the citation examples at Help talk:Citation Style 1/Archive 6#An ISO 639-1 language name test that purport to show the problem don't actually show the problem now.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 18:09, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

@Trappist the monk: I guess there's actually no easy answer to that :) Historically 'no' has been used for 'Bokmål', which is the dominant of the two variants 'Bokmål' and 'Nynorsk', (which are btw. really similar). And it is still used as the site prefix for Norwegian Bokmål Wikipedia (no.wikipedia.org), while we have changed the content language code to 'nb'. Today, following ISO 639, 'no' is technically 'Norwegian' (meaning "unspecified variant of Norwegian; either Bokmål or Nynorsk"), but in practice 'Bokmål' since 'Nynorsk' has always used the code 'nn'. The situation is quite unfortunate, and causes a lot of confusion. Well, if I were to choose, I think I would stick with the default output from mw.language.fetchLanguageName() since 'Norwegian' is formally not a written language, only 'Norwegian Bokmål' and 'Norwegian Nynorsk' are. Another option would be to just deprecate the code. – Danmichaelo (talk) 20:01, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

That similarity between Bokmål and Nynorsk is, I think, undetectable by those of us who live in the great desert wastelands of North America. If we consult some source written in either variant, we won't go too far astray if we cite that source using |language=no and that renders as (in Norwegian); especially since we can't tell the difference. Of course, over here, I suspect that most of us haven't got a clue that there are variants; I didn't until I tweaked the code and got those unexpected results.

Your points are well taken; thank you for taking the time to enlighten me.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 21:59, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

@Trappist the monk: Hehe, that's a valid point that didn't come to my mind :) If you're not sure if a text is Bokmål or Nynorsk, it can surely be practical to be able to label it as just 'Norwegian' (using the 'no' code), that should be totally ok. – Danmichaelo (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

I came to that realization when I looked at Category:Articles with non-English-language external links and noticed the huge discrepancy between Norwegian‎ (2 C, 4,935 P), Norwegian Bokmål‎ (46 P), and Norwegian Nynorsk‎ (17 P). We at enwiki hadn't a clue. Wouldn't be the first time we were / are clueless

—Trappist the monk (talk) 22:53, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

i think ur opinion on little sisters getting blamed is good idea seeing that i am an older sister who always gets into trouble because of my lil sisters doing

    :) :) :) :} XD

United kingdoms my home (talk) 15:31, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Danmichaelo! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 05:07, Thursday, May 12, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/UKBot as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.

Your BRFA, [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/UKBot] has been approved. Please note this is limited to the specific use case you requested. Due to low volumes, a bot flag will not be added. — xaosflux ^Talk 15:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi.

I noticed you installed SearchSuite, and then two minutes later commented it out.

Just curious, did you find something wrong with it?

I'm interested in fixing all problems, bugs discovered, etc.     — The Transhumanist    09:47, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Template:UKB criterion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 17:18, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi Danmichaelo! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 20:55, Sunday, September 22, 2019 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to [email protected], so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at [email protected].

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello Danmichaelo. First of all, thank you for writing the Bibsys authority search tool. It's been really helpful in tracking down authority records thus far. One thing I've noticed though, and I'm not sure whether it's intentional or not, is that only the first 25 search results are ever shown, without the added possibility to see any results beyond these initial 25.

For example, this search result indicates there are 103 records found, but doesn't offer the ability to see any of the remaining 78 records. Assuming this isn't by design, besides Chrome, I've also tested it in Safari, and the result is the same. Would it be possible to tweak the tool so as to allow a complete overview of all authority records found through a search query? Thank you and take care! Jay D. Easy (t • c) 16:03, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

@Jay D. Easy: Hi Jay. That was just lazyness from my side. I added autopagination now, so it should automatically fetch more results as you scroll down (refresh the page if not). I also added a scope selector to limit the search to persons, corporations or conferences since that's something I've been missing myself. Let me know if you have additional ideas for improvements. By the way, the situation with the name of the authority file is a bit confusing at the moment. They still refer to it as "Bibsys autority file" in the API, but last time I asked they recommended the name "Felles autoritetsregister" (Common authority registry), which is what the National Library is also refering to it as. But I haven't seen an official English name yet. Norwegian authority file has been mentioned, but I'm not sure if that's really intended to be a common name or more a description, so I've sent them an email to clarify the name situation so I can also update the Wikidata entity. – Danmichaelo (talk) 23:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello!

When you crop a file in Category:All non-free media can you do so that CropTool automatically adds {{subst:orfurrev}} at the top? This would be really appreciated.Jonteemil (talk) 23:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Only if you choose the "overwrite" option of course.Jonteemil (talk) 23:43, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

@Jonteemil: Hi! It should do so now unless I messed up something. – Danmichaelo (talk) 23:27, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Wonderful!Jonteemil (talk) 02:24, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello again! The adding of {{subst:orfurrev}} works perfect. The only thing that's a bit weird is the edit summary: "Removed using CropTool", which perhaps should be changed to "Added {{subst:orfurrev}} using CropTool".Jonteemil (talk) 00:02, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

@Jonteemil: Oh, that's a bit odd, yes :) Could you share a link to a case? – Danmichaelo (talk) 15:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

[3].Jonteemil (talk) 15:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! This should now be fixed. – Danmichaelo (talk) 21:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you!Jonteemil (talk) 10:52, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:26, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)