User talk:DBD/Archive 32
The Duchess of Cornwall listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Duchess of Cornwall. Since you had some involvement with the The Duchess of Cornwall redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 17:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC) The Duchess of Rothesay listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Duchess of Rothesay. Since you had some involvement with the The Duchess of Rothesay redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 17:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC) The Earl of Wessex listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Earl of Wessex. Since you had some involvement with the The Earl of Wessex redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 17:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC) The Duke of Gloucester listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Duke of Gloucester. Since you had some involvement with the The Duke of Gloucester redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 17:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC) The Duchess of Gloucester listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Duchess of Gloucester. Since you had some involvement with the The Duchess of Gloucester redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 17:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC) HRH The Duchess of Rothesay listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HRH The Duchess of Rothesay. Since you had some involvement with the HRH The Duchess of Rothesay redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 19:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC) HRH The Duchess of Cornwall listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HRH The Duchess of Cornwall. Since you had some involvement with the HRH The Duchess of Cornwall redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 19:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC) HM The Duchess of Cornwall listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HM The Duchess of Cornwall. Since you had some involvement with the HM The Duchess of Cornwall redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 19:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC) HRH The Duchess of Cambridge listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HRH The Duchess of Cambridge. Since you had some involvement with the HRH The Duchess of Cambridge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 19:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC) HRH The Duke of Cambridge listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HRH The Duke of Cambridge. Since you had some involvement with the HRH The Duke of Cambridge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 19:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC) HRH The Duchess of Gloucester listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HRH The Duchess of Gloucester. Since you had some involvement with the HRH The Duchess of Gloucester redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 19:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC) HRH The Duchess of Kent listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HRH The Duchess of Kent. Since you had some involvement with the HRH The Duchess of Kent redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 19:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC) HM The Duke of Cornwall listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HM The Duke of Cornwall. Since you had some involvement with the HM The Duke of Cornwall redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 20:01, 5 August 2017 (UTC) Hi DBD, I didn't want to mess with your user subpages, so thought I'd just leave you a note that Andrew Radford is now a disambiguation page. It used to redirect to Andy Radford, the bishop. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 15:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello DBD, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
 Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Orders of precedence in the United Kingdom/Royal family (women) Hello, DBD. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Royal family (women)". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 02:57, 11 September 2017 (UTC) New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello DBD, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC) New formatting for Infobox Christian leaderHi DBD! Just to make you aware, the formatting of
Disambiguation link notification for October 2Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Blackburn (bishop), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Helens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 2 October 2017 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:BRoy Sidebar-mini
Disambiguation link notification for October 9Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC) Re: Who's Who linksHi Dan, I did not know that when you leave the comma after a Who's Who link: http://www.ukwhoswho.com/view/article/oupww/whowaswho/U######, it makes it not work. From now on I will use the Template:Who's Who. New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello DBD, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Re: Forenamese.g. Roy Sinker. Mate, I do the research on common names (and red link them in templates) so you don't have to. I find it incredibly frustrating when I then find you've reinserted an unused forename when I'd redlinked the common name for you! [1] Come on, mate. DBD 16:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC) Sorry old palA Barnstar for putting up with me! PS Have found some more obscure ones. Will do my level best tofind the common name but newspapers before about 1950 don't usually give Bill's Pete's etcBashereyre (talk) 17:20, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
|
