User talk:CycloneYoris/Archive 10
This week's article for improvement (week 21, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 22, 2020)
The Signpost: 31 May 2020
Or will it be meltdown June?
Many of these accounts now blocked on the English-language Wikipedia.
Worth Every Goddamn Second!
It's no April Fool's joke, but we discuss those, too.
Cultural context, diversity, and the future of languages.
Battles, bombs, wars, and more storms.
Sanctions of multiple flavors, and a non-decision on the breadth of discretionary sanctions.
Time to bring on the Bulls.
Straight down the tubes.
Birds, insects, elephants, a macaque and more.
Enacting new standards to address harassment and promote inclusivity across projects.
New results from academic research
Hello Columbus.
Community harnesses new technologies for remote participation in events and gatherings
Can our energy be turned into long-term change?
A selection of good news and encouraging stories from the Wikiverse.
Rest in peace. This week's article for improvement (week 23, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 24, 2020)
I’m so sorry. I will not add false information without verification to an article again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophie Montano (talk • contribs) 00:14, 11 June 2020 (UTC) Old Pay Per View WWFThanks for cleaning that up, for some reason XfDCloser has been acting up a bit today. signed, Rosguill talk 01:05, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 25, 2020)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC) Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC) Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:32, 16 June 2020 (UTC) Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 26, 2020)
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
Plus Swedish biographies and the big oops!
Reacting to the WMF's rebranding proposal.
Protests and photos from around the world...
Racial justice, Facebook, LGBTQ+, Ryan Merkley, and a woman.
Many Wikimedia community members are upset about the WMF's plan to rebrand. Plus, a discussion of Fox News's reliability.
Battles, music, and animals feature prominently in this month's best content.
The RfC should keep everybody busy.
Plus Rajput, Musk, Epstein, Maxwell, Owens and Anonymous
On these issues, there is no neutral stance.
And other new research publications
Four signers of the open letter explain.
It's amazing what one can do.
A scientific scandal and the Ronaldo of investment banking.
A selection of good news and encouraging stories from the Wikiverse.
The history and impact of LGBTIQ+ contributions to Wikimedia projects.
How Wikipedia is covering racial injustice, both in the outer world and on-site This week's article for improvement (week 27, 2020)
This week's article for improvement (week 28, 2020)
/* Stealth techniques */Hi sir, Why did you found my link inappropriate for the subject specified. May I know the details? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atuls93 (talk • contribs) 09:52, 8 July 2020 (UTC) 2020 chronologyHey, regarding your edit to Telemóveis, those entries were removed from the infobox with no consensus and we've been slowly adding them back as we move some of the 2020 articles to WP:GA status. Not including them ruins the chronology and somewhat orphans the 2020 entries. If you want to start a discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision to discuss whether this is good practice or not that might make sense. I might want to just change the wording in the Infobox to be "entry chronology" instead of "appearance" if it ends up being a problem. Until then, it should remain with the 2020 entries, as the removal was contested and is not common practice. This is the first canceled edition, so there isn't a precedent other than the normal practice of having the "next selected entry". Grk1011 (talk) 01:58, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 29, 2020)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Daily Mail on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 15 July 2020 (UTC) Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Brightest Blue on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 17 July 2020 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, CycloneYoris Thank you for creating Tropical Storm Beatriz (2017). User:Whoisjohngalt, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) Whoisjohngalt (talk) 20:05, 17 July 2020 (UTC) Hey CycloneYoris, I am a bit concerned with your closure of the above discussion. Most of the redirects listed in that discussion had a majority to delete, with the only keep !vote lodged by an ip who reminds me of a sock that has been trolling the RfD boards lately. Besides that, the ip vote is problematic for a couple of other reasons, mainly because they did not explain why these redirects are useful and that SNOW definitely does not apply. What do you say about backing out of that close, relisting, striking the sock, and leaving it for an admin to close unless an actual consensus to keep develops? -- Tavix (talk) 22:11, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 30, 2020)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment![]() Your feedback is requested at Talk:Daily Mail on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:33, 26 July 2020 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 31, 2020)
2018 Pacific hurricane seasonHey, just wanted to let you know that I should have the 2018 Pacific hurricane season article ready to nominate for good article tomorrow! NoahTalk 22:55, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
Comparing Wikipedia to similar projects.
And thanks for the photo, Ghislaine!
Plus lots of affiliations!
Pandemic, politics, and possibly paid editing.
Plus a proposed massive invasion of privacy!
soldiers, sports, and actors feature heavily this month.
Death and Alexander Hamilton.
Sometimes you just have to ask.
Privacy is critical to sustaining freedom of expression and association, enabling knowledge and ideas to thrive.
And other new research publications
Some editors aren't.
Rest in peace.
Making Wikipedia the encyclopedia that anyone can review. This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2020)
NeovenatoridaeNot too sure these edits are in bad faith. Could you please explain why. Thank you. ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.65.107 (talk) 00:14, 5 August 2020 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2020)
|