User talk:Cutlass/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Cutlass. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Thanks for your removal of the Michigan university rule not to use "Karen" as a tongue-in-cheek thing. It was placed in another section by someone else and moved by me without realizing it was a joke. --D.g.lab. (talk) 21:48, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your work on the Karen page as well. Cutlass^Ciera 21:50, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Nice username, and what is the oldest car you took a picture of? Ilikememes128 (talk) 19:50, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Probably a 1949 Chrysler New Yorker. Cutlass^Ciera 19:52, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi BlueCrabRedCrab! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fort Osage High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Truman High School. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Honestly, you gave me a bit of a panic attack. 😄 Chlod (say hi!) 01:50, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Cutlass, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Cutlass and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Cutlass during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:59, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

My apology. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:30, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

@Beyond My Ken: It's fine. You learn from each new editing experience, which makes you a better editor overall. I forgive you. Thanks, Cutlass^Ciera 02:32, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

This is the same guy that is blocked for a year because of persistent disruptive editing. He is using a new ip address 172.58.188.128. Oshwah and Wugapodes were of great help last time but it's better than more than one person complains about him. Just go to Wugapodes talk page and Oshwah talk page and just say what he is doing persistent disruptive editing. And it's the same person from last time. That was blocked for a year and has about 6 months to go. Anyway please do it, it's better that more than just one person complains about his nonsense. Thanks, Doriden (talk) 02:13, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

I could kind of tell that that IP knew that he was being disruptive and had probably done it before. They are blocked now; I reported them to AIV. Thanks, Cutlass^Ciera 02:16, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Mr.Cutlass, yes this guy has been doing this nonsense for a few years and keeps doing it over again. Another ip address that he was using is currently blocked for a year. Same subject matter and same kind of fixation thing with him. Now the ip address is blocked for 31 hours, what about the other ip address that he was using earlier 172.58.188.128? He'll be back at it in 30 hours. Oshwah and Wugapodes were very helpful getting him blocked on the other ip address that he was using, it was a long one. Thanks for your assistance, Doriden (talk) 02:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

If he starts again with the nonsense after that block (which appears to be likely), I will talk to them. However, for now, I will wait and see. Cutlass^Ciera

Cutlass, good evening, regarding the block on that persistent disruptive editing person, Wugapodes said that it's a range block and when the 31 hours expire it'll still be blocked along with the other 172 address for 6 months. Anyway, thanks for your assistance. Doriden (talk) 02:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi i need some information on some wiki’s update N singh 9 (talk) 16:34, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

@N singh 9: What needs updating? Can you elaborate what needs updating? Cutlass^Ciera 16:35, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Why it is supposed to be deleted? 196.156.7.94 (talk) 18:10, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

The article was created by a person that is now blocked from Wikipedia. Policy here is to delete these articles if they have been almost completely and only edited by that user. Cutlass^Ciera 18:11, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

User 65.93.217.175 acted in bad faith in their vandalism of the "Jean Charest" page (16:30 10 march 2022). Please issue a stage-3 warning and elevate page to semi-protected status. T.y. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.3.246.133 (talk) 04:52, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi 65.93.217.175, I'm not an admin, so I can't upgrade the protection, nor does it really need to be protected as the only vandal edit was the one I reverted. That vandal had only made a single edit there, so I only gave them one warning. Thanks, Cutlass^Ciera 12:56, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

On 12 March 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Rupiah Banda, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 21:33, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Michael Jackson's involvement has been confirmed by Buxer, Cirocco, and one other dude. Shouldn't we just add him as uncredited instead of completely removing his name. The only thing that says that his involvement was removed was Sega, Naoto Oshima and possibly others at Sega. Howard Drossin said he barely fixed Jackson's music and so I would still credit him as uncredited. Aalji (talk) 11:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

@Aalji:I reverted this because it explicitly said in a hidden comment to not add him as he was not credited and his involvment is subject to debate. Please take this to the talk page instead, as the last discussion of this was 2009, so it may be different, but the hidden comment still stands for now. Cutlass^Ciera 11:54, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

That persistent disruptive editing person 172.58.172.5. Doing this same thing. Doriden (talk) 16:17, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

@Doriden: Alright, contact an admin again and they should be able to deal with it. Thanks, Cutlass^Ciera 16:51, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

It would be better if you did too, the better it is with more than ONE person complaining about it. Thank you Doriden (talk) 16:53, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

@Doriden: Looks like they have been blocked by Ohnoitsjamie. Cutlass^Ciera 16:56, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Great, now they all have to be reverted. What does he get out of this? He has a long history of doing this nonsense. And its mostly useless stuff anyway. But he wants to have it in his own phrasing. OCD, or maybe he feels a sense of power. Can you please revert the Jersey city fire Department. I'm on a mobile device and it's a pain in the neck. Thank you Doriden (talk) 17:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

@Doriden: I have went through and reverted all of their edits, including the Jersey City Fire Department one. If I missed any, please tell me. Thanks for bringing this up. Cutlass^Ciera 17:03, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you CutlassDoriden (talk) 17:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

casualdejekyll 19:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Cutlass, that persistent disruptive editing person is back again using a new ip address, his last edit was Jersey City Fire Department. Please assist, thank you, Doriden (talk) 14:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

@Doriden: Looks like he's been blocked. Thanks for notifying me about that. Cutlass^Ciera 18:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Yes, I notified one of the administrators. He's hell bent on his agenda, whatever that may be. Thank you, Doriden (talk) 19:35, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Yes, I notified one of the administrators. He's head strong on whatever messages he's trying to propagate. Thank you, Doriden (talk) 19:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, could you direct us to the consensus discussion you refer to? Cheers, Fettlemap (talk) 21:43, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

@Fettlemap: Talk:Tops Friendly Markets#Buffalo edit war Cutlass^Ciera 21:51, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Japan Air Lines Flight 123. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 2404:0:8021:A622:6511:5DEC:43B6:B1FD (talk) 06:28, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your edit @Cutlass in the article JAT Flight 367, you are right! It doesn’t make since on why the creator uploaded that photo into wikimedia commons even though it has all rights reserved on it in flickr, its original source. I really didn’t realize because when I was using the photo, it showed that some rights were reserved. Thank you very much and be safe! Javyriv (talk) 22:08, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

I also forgot to add that the user @NickEll61 claimed it to be his own work. Javyriv (talk) 22:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Gentleman (2020 film) users by name Asha98661 & Gopinath9645 is randomly editing this page Gopinath9645 is trying to create the page Draft:Murali_Mohan_Kasthala he is not the cinematographer of the movie only one cinematographer is there its arror sudhakar here is reference for that [1] block the users they are doing edits repeatedly Ntkn766 (talk) 07:56, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	For all your contributions... it's appreciated. Volten001 ☎ 16:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar! Cutlass^Ciera 20:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Most welcome and happy editing Volten001 ^☎ 21:24, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Hey Cutlass. To say the least, I was shocked to wake up to an AfD for the article which I was planning to GAN this morning… But nonetheless, I wanted to give you a quick reminder on WP:BEFORE since you AfDed the article, no discussion and no PROD less than 26 hours after it was created. Coincidentally, you used WP:LASTING as one of your arguments, but you somehow seem to forgot the event occurred 3 days ago? How on earth could there be lasting coverage when it occurred 3 days ago?? I wrote the article 2 days after the event occurred, giving it enough time to see some lasting-level coverage. Out of curiosity, I casually did a Google search and one hour ago is an entire news article about the tornado ([2]). All of that was to say you might want to check out WP:BEFORE and consider alternatives to deletion (in this case, merging into Tornado outbreak of December 9–10, 2023, the parent outbreak article OR Tornadoes of 2023, the parent of the outbreak article) or at the very least wait to actually see if there isn’t lasting coverage. Cheers! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 17:51, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

It's not notable. The tornado itself is an event that should be located inside of the outbreak article, as many other tornadoes are, such as the Bowling Green, KY one of December 10, 2021. I did outline in the AfD that the article, in my opinion, should not exist, because ideally this should be covered inside of the parent outbreak. In addition, WP:DEPTH also applies, a good amount of those articles are repeating the same points. Cutlass^Ciera 18:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

So you actually support a merge then…You did just prove my point that you forgot WP:BEFORE, since you are really in support of a merge, but choose to do a week-long Afd instead of a requested merge. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 18:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Alright, that was my bad, but my original point still stands. Cutlass^Ciera 18:10, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

I'd avoid dying on the "merge" hill since the way articles are structured, and the way the current summary on the outbreak page is structured, it is a given that after article deletion the tornado would be summarized on the outbreak page. I don't believe there is a problem with how Cutlass responded. I feel it's dissonant to both support the article under the reason of "planning to GAN it" but also recognize there are issues regarding WP:LASTING on it. I don't think this event is worthy of GAN nor of an article yet. Wikiwillz (talk) 19:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

I would agree. By merge, I meant that having a summary of the tornado on the oubreak page would be good, but for sure not the way the current article is structured, which in my like would mean WP:TNTing the page and starting a new summary, mainly due to the amount of bloat that exists in the current form (e.g. intricate detail that serves no other purpose). Cutlass^Ciera 19:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Hey Cutlass. I wanted to ask if you could withdraw your AfD nomination for the 2024 Sumedang tornado. The AfD already has 2 delete !votes (plus yours). If you withdraw the AfD, I would be more than happy to bold merge/redirect that article. Due to past issues, I cannot and will not redirect/merge the article while the AfD is ongoing, meaning deleting it is being held up on the technicality of the seven-day AfD. So please, withdraw the AfD so myself or you even could merge/redirect the article to Tornadoes of 2024. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 03:01, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
149		Pittsburgh Light Rail (talk)	Add sources
150		Fifi and the Flowertots (talk)	Add sources
11		Allegheny station (Pittsburgh Regional Transit) (talk)	Add sources
231		General-purpose bomb (talk)	Add sources
56		Munhall, Pennsylvania (talk)	Add sources
83		Pittsburgh Regional Transit (talk)	Add sources
76		Berkeley High School (California) (talk)	Cleanup
8		Arts in upstate New York (talk)	Cleanup
192		Chittagong District (talk)	Cleanup
9,325		Pani (film) (talk)	Expand
337		Extreme poverty (talk)	Expand
9		Govind Ballabh Pant Social Science Institute (talk)	Expand
528		Oldsmobile Cutlass (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
161		Informal wear (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
79		Flying Tiger Line Flight 66 (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
105		Zabrze (talk)	Merge
1,848		Kargil War (talk)	Merge
46		Certified teacher (talk)	Merge
7		Sports in upstate New York (talk)	Wikify
402		Grandmama (The Addams Family) (talk)	Wikify
14		138th Attack Squadron (talk)	Wikify
4		Ray Story (talk)	Orphan
2		Numaish, Bijnor (talk)	Orphan
1		Skitter Creek (talk)	Orphan
2		Lindermer station (talk)	Stub
59		Magura District (talk)	Stub
24		Chittagong Government High School (talk)	Stub
7		Revenge of the Pirates (talk)	Stub
3		Latimer station (PAAC) (talk)	Stub
39		Keba Jeremiah (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello Cutlass and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• The project Academy has lots of useful information about editing and writing military history articles. One very useful introductory course to get you started is Writing a good stub.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
• If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:43, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi Cutlass, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi Cutlass. Thank you for your work on National Tube Works (McKeesport, Pennsylvania). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work. An image would be a nice addition.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:12, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! Cutlass^Ciera 18:10, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi Cutlass, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! – Joe (talk) 20:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

		The New Page Reviewer's NPP Barnstar Award
		This award is given in recognition to Cutlass for conducting 176 article reviews in 2024. Thank you so much for all your excellent work. Keep it up! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:20, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

I've histmerged /Archive 2 into this page, so the history of your talk page is all in one place. Since all the history is preserved, feel free to give me a shout if you want anything archiving-related deleted. Thanks, Giraffer (talk) 00:14, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! Cutlass^Ciera 01:17, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Sure, although it'd need a lot of cleaning up before the nomination. :) — E_F⁵ 15:47, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

May 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Cutlass. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Mz7 (talk) 00:00, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

You don't need to use warning level 1 on their talk page since their edits were clear vandalism. You should probably use level 2 instead. See WP:UWLEVELS. KnowDeath (talk) 02:49, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

I know, I'm still getting used to using Huggle. If I was using Twinkle I would've gave a level 3. Cutlass^Ciera 02:50, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

I see. KnowDeath (talk) 02:59, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

There isn't a way to give a higher level warning from the start using Huggle. In addition, multiple other users have told me that giving all four tiers of warnings is usually fine. Cutlass^Ciera 18:15, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

since he was hating israel so much at that time he got misguided due to neo nazi website and he didn't knew that they were neo nazi 2600:480A:4A51:9300:595E:BB45:D7C0:F3B7 (talk) 12:39, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Please provide a reliable source to prove that claim. Cutlass^Ciera 12:40, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for fighting back against vandalism on enWiki! Nahida 🌷 13:48, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! Cutlass^Ciera 13:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

You're most welcome. It was more than deserved. Nahida 🌷 13:52, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

I see where you reverted that troll a dozen times or more, but I don't see where you reported them. With such persistent trolls, reverting is no use: they get a kick out of it. Report them at AIV please. Drmies (talk) 19:54, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

@Drmies: I did report them at AIV here, and I assumed you were already watching the page (and blocking each IP), since you were the one who blocked the first IP. By the way, that IP range you blocked is literally all of Verizon Wireless's network in the United States. Anyway, thank you for your work on the encyclopedia, and I'll keep that in mind. Cutlass^Ciera 19:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

@Cutlass, I should have warned you that they like to post fake block notice etc. @Drmies I reported the ip as well, but as they had been article blocked the bot has removed them occasionally. Knitsey (talk) 19:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

who are you to choose which information is relevant or not? Censorship is the opposite of what the internet should be. 181.42.28.102 (talk) 02:46, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Articles aren't a place for your own personal analysis or opinion on things. Cutlass^Ciera 02:47, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Someone has been doing this for years. They know it will be reverted. They're trolling and I doubt your editor note will make the slightest difference. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 21:55, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Escape Orbit, I saw that it had been going on for a while, but I also noticed that it was from a variety of sources. Still worth a shot either way. Cutlass^Ciera 15:27, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Cutlass. Per your request, your account has been granted temporary-account-viewer rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

• You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
• Access should not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

• When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
• Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
• Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with an IP address or CIDR range.

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences. Happy editing! Salvio ^giuliano 08:11, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Nominations for the upcoming Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Voting for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on 29 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 15 September 2025 (UTC)