User talk:Comtebenoit

Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 15:29, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Please take a look at the recent edits to this article. - UtherSRG July 7, 2005 12:05 (UTC)

You added a referrence to Birth control of Riddle's 'Eve's Herbs: A History of Contraception and Abortion in the West', which sounds a very interesting title. However no reference is made to this in the article itself. Is the book a list of herbal preparations, historical discussion on herb use, or history of women's attempts at regulating their fertility? Whilst a discussion on an individual book is not required, would referencing '{{ref|xxx}}' at the appropriate point to the reference '{{note|xxx}}' help, else a brief descriptive clause in the Reference section? -David Ruben 12:18, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. Riddle's book covers most of the ground of the History of birth control section. Rather than pepper that section with citations, I've added a parenthetical description after the reference. The description is cobbled from my reading as well as reviews in JAMA, the New England Journal of Medicine and others. -- Comte Benoit

Really liked the turn-of-phrase you used - look forward to your future contributions.... (the edit was annon, wikipedia seems to log me off too if I've jumped between too many pages or take too long) -David Ruben 17:57, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Computational archaeology may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• //www.stadtarchaeologie.at/ "International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies" (formerly: "Workshop Archäologie und Computer" at Vienna]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:51, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Phum Snay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Two Layer Hypothesis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 19:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• We do not want readers of the encyclopedia to come upon empty articles, which is the reason for speedy deletion criterion A3: no content. Rather than delete this, I have moved it into the DRAFT namespace at Draft:Two Layer Hypothesis where you and your students can develop it until it is ready for the main encyclopedia. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you have not already, see WP:School and university projects for advice on how to register your course and a number of helpful links. JohnCD (talk) 21:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Apologies, I see the course is already registered - somehow I missed that on my first check. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• @JohnCD: - No worries, thanks for moving it to draft, I wasn't aware of that namespace until today. Would you be willing to offer some feedback on my students' articles as they become more complete? We could benefit from opinions from experienced editors. Comtebenoit (talk) 02:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:12, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Comtebenoit, I'm writing to ask for assistance as part of the Campus Ambassador program. I'm an archaeologist at the University of Wisconsin - La Crosse, and I'd like to use Wikipedia in one of my courses (African Archaeology) this fall. I'm still learning the ropes here, and trying to get approved for instructor user rights on the Education noticeboard. In any case, could I come to you with questions as they arise this semester? I'd very much appreciate the help from someone with more Wikipedia experience! Thanks so much. Ninafundisha (talk) 22:58, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Ninafundisha— Hi, yes, happy to help where I can. A few quick tips:

• I emailed a bunch of wiki admin in my region (Pacific Northwest) to get some attention on my instructor and ambassador requests and explain a bit more about plans and ask for advice. I think that sped things up a little. It seemed like having a good edit history (ie. on relevant topics to my class and spanning a long time) was also an asset in getting organised, in the eyes of the admin folks.
• I borrowed heavily from https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Education/Case_Studies & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Training/For_educators when designing my wikipedia assignment, I think a lot of that is very useful and practical.
• I went a bit further by being very exact in the editing requirements. For example, each week each student had to add one sentence to an existing article, and that one sentence had to include a properly formatted citation to the scholarly reading for that week. That gave them good practice with editing and using citations.
• For the article assignment I had students working in groups of 3 and had a list of requirements to ensure the final product was more than a stub. I also had specific criteria for extra credit (like adding an infobox, images, or going beyond the required number of wikilinks, etc.)

Hope that helps, feel free to write here or email me for more. I'm happy to share the details of my assignments that used wikipedia if that would be helpful. Comtebenoit (talk) 09:28, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I appreciate your suggestions; these are all hugely helpful. I'll be back in touch as I work on developing my assignments over the next few weeks. Ninafundisha (talk) 19:13, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hadley Wickham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adjunct. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just looked at your sandbox about writing scientific papers. I like "Me write pretty one day". Do you make it clear to students that wikipedia articles are very different from scientific papers? If I were to write a paper on archaeology I'd feel free to combine sources to make an argument. Here, my sources would have to directly discuss the subject of the article. That's a pretty major difference and one it took me a while to grasp. See WP:NOR. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 10:37, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops. I forgot. Please contact me if you want any advice. I'm a pretty experienced editor, an Administrator, and have a decent layman's grasp of archaeology both from reading and some practical experience. Dougweller (talk) 10:39, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Dougweller: Thanks for stopping by, yes my talk page was just to get the students familiar with wikiformatting, especially citations. You can read more about the class work on wikipedia on my current course page. They've all completed the student training and in this class we are not writing wikipedia articles, but just adding relevant sentences and citations to existing articles based on the students' reading of scholarly literature. They're expecting some interaction with other editors, so please feel free to engage directly with them if you see something they can do better. Most of them are first-time editors and are learning quickly about the ins and out of wikipedia! Comtebenoit (talk) 06:14, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great. I may not come across anymore but if I do I will try to help. Dougweller (talk) 13:08, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Comtebenoit. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Phum Snay".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Phum Snay}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:03, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Comtebenoit, this message is to inform you that If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask. Regards, Swarm ♠ 22:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WALL-E, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Jones. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot: Thanks, fixed, that's a wonderful bot! Comtebenoit (talk) 18:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Comtebenoit. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

Hello, Comtebenoit. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Comtebenoit. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Your account is currently configured with an education program flag. This system (the Courses system) is being deprecated. As such, your account will soon be updated to remove these no longer supported flags. For details on the changes, and how to migrate to using the replacement system (the Programs and Events Dashboard) please see Wikipedia:Education noticeboard/Archive 18#NOTICE: EducationProgram extension is being deprecated.

Thank you! Sent by: xaosflux 20:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Comtebenoit. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Comtebenoit. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

2018 in archaeology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Levallois

Guizhou (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Levallois

History of China (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Levallois

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Lodwick currently redirects to Wikipedia:Lisa Lodwick. Surely that's a mistake! --Slashme (talk) 19:51, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Slashme: Can you help me to understand why that might be a mistake? And how I might fix it? That would make your comment more constructive. Thanks! Comtebenoit (talk) 19:59, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia namespace, also called the project namespace, is for articles about Wikipedia. Articles about normal subjects, like this biographical article, should not have "Wikipedia:" before the title. I've put in a request for an admin to move the article accordingly, so you shouldn't need to do anything: it should get fixed soon. --Slashme (talk) 20:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Slashme: Thanks! The dialog box to move drafts into other namespaces is very confusing, that's how it accidentally ended up there. Comtebenoit (talk)

OK, good work on the article, by the way! --Slashme (talk) 20:14, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, that's the main thing; thank you for the article. The slight clean-up needed is trivial stuff which keeps the admins happy by making them feel wanted :) --Tagishsimon (talk) 00:39, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup is now done, but I see that the admin moved the article back into the draft space. From my point of view, there's no real reason for it not to go live. Articles don't have to be perfect to go into the main article space. --Slashme (talk) 08:20, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Slashme and Tagishsimon: Thanks to you both! I'll submit the draft now, then Comtebenoit (talk) 09:05, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well done on getting additional references; the article has been on quite a journey :). I'm afraid I'm completely allergic to the articles for creation process; in your position I'd remove all the AfC guff from the draft, and either cut & paste the entire contents here, or, if it's available to you, use the More / Move option to move it into article space. You are under no obligation, so far as I'm aware, to go through AfC. --Tagishsimon (talk) 09:14, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

done! thanks again! Comtebenoit (talk) 09:20, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No probs. Top work on linking the List of Fellows of the Society of Antiquaries of London, but always worth searching for & adding author-link doodabs to citations involving academics - e.g. [1], [2] and [3]. Keeps the orphan taggers at bay. --Tagishsimon (talk) 09:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you have a source that this person is dead? I can't find one in the references, or on Google or on social media. Blythwood (talk) 23:33, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, here is a death notice: https://www.westannouncements.com.au/browse/obituaries/view/lynn-eleanor Where is the proper place to add that to the article? Comtebenoit (talk) 00:46, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Openirony has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Original research and synthesis. Only one of the references even mentions #openirony and there's only a handful of tweets using this hashtag on Twitter. Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 08:56, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]