User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2021/September

This is an archive of past discussions with User:ClueBot Commons. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Make sure that you do good

Bot Peyton dodson (talk) 01:42, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

i'm not adding false information

i'm not adding false information your just wrongly judging my edits, some people keep saying that Rupert Bear: Follow the magic... aired on smile when it never did and some of you do next-to-nothing about it

it's a bot lol -14:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Suggestion

Hello, bot creators,

As an admin, I frequently go to new editors (they always seem to be new) talk pages about problematic edits and see that ClueBot has already reverted some of their work and posted a notice on their talk page. It got me wondering if there is any way ClueBot could generate a list of frequently vandalized pages so that admins and editors could add them to their Watchlist and stop problems before they escalate. The list could be generated each week/month to take into account the changing nature of targeted articles.

But it could be though that vandalism is spread out over a great number of articles or that it happens when some news stories break and that this list wouldn't be that helpful. But if a Top 100 or Top 1000 vandalized articles list existed, placed on a ClueBot subpage so it didn't get a lot of attention, I definitely would be watching them more carefully. Just a suggestion. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

@Liz:, CBNG follows 1RR, so it won't (or should I say, shouldn't) revert the same page twice. This would mean creating such a list would be impossible as each entry would only get updated once every 24 hours if that page is reverted by CBNG again after the 24 hours. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 15:54, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Just saying

If we shave off the conspiracies, we would find that nothing is perfect in this universe, and that we ought to report such errors rather than come up with silly threads like this one. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 21:25, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I think this bot is overly suspicious. A more advanced bot would not have reverted it, seeing it as a serious addition. --91.210.176.104 (talk) 19:03, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Someone better explain why my last edit was reverted. --91.210.176.104 (talk) 19:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

I screwed up. Still not happy about the addition. But there we have it. Even humans screw up, every now and then, not just the bots. Kleuske (talk) 19:12, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Sigrit did sleep with Alexander in the movie, so it's obvious she was denying the idea that she had s*x with him and not that she had slept with him. --91.210.176.104 (talk) 19:15, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.