User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2018/February

This is an archive of past discussions with User:ClueBot Commons. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

@K6ka: : I did report that false positive via the page to which you linked, and after that I commented here. I wasn't just reporting a false positive; I was identifying a general pattern. Michael Hardy (talk) 03:51, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

FYI, a vandal issued a physical threat against Oshwah and Cluebot in the comments of this edit here. I alerted Oshwah and the emergency email and they handled it by banning the IP address. I didn't think until today to alert the Cluebot crew, so here it is.

So, er, someone threatened ClueBot. The world's a weird place, no?

--KNHaw ^(talk) 18:05, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

@KNHaw: yup. The world has always been a weird place. We regularly get a glimpse of that weirdness on enwiki. That edit summary has been removed now btw. Thanks for pointing it out. :) —usernamekiran(talk) 18:40, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

I am fully realistic about the urgency of this.
Triggered by a steadily increasing level of intimidation by coralexiri (#meetoo) and specifically by the summary to this reversion, I suggest to change the summary from this almost blatantly offensive allegation of vandalism, and the pretense of being able to judge "possibilities" when strictly acting to given rules, possibly changing in the course, to some more realistic description, nearer to the canting good faith assumption.

My suggestion is

Automatically reverted, even when written in good faith by <ID> ...

AI is not (yet?) up to assume something. Purgy (talk) 08:11, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

See User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2017/December#Proposed change to standard wording -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 10:15, 22 February 2018 (UTC)