User talk:Ceranthor/Archive 12

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ceranthor. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 10

Re: FAC

Was just on my way there! :) Politizer ^talk/_contribs 13:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Feedback

Sure, I'll take a look this afternoon. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 16:17, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Done –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 23:50, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

17:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Articles for improvement :)

Some action is coalescing around Ghost...Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:17, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

PR

Thanks. I wasn't concerned so much about three links as the idea that you might significantly raise the link density throughout the article. That didn't happen, though. I'd be happy to review Glacier Peak. Finetooth (talk) 01:32, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Mount Baker

You asked me to copy-edit more than a month ago. I kind of passed over it then, but now I am getting into the nitty-gritty of things. See my comments. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:28, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: GA review

Sure, I'll take a look at the 1968 one later. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 15:05, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

If I have time, I might be able to leave some comments there. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 16:28, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Actually, I might not be able to review it tonight, but I'll do it tomorrow. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 02:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

RE:Trojans PR

I'm going through them now. Serendi ^pod ous 18:42, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Urgent page protect

Pages usually aren't protected preemptively, but I'll add the article to my watchlist. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:43, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

GA review

Sure. I'm not an expert at earthquakes but I'll take a look later today. —TheLeft orium 16:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

How did you find that page? ;P I'm not done with the review yet. —TheLeft orium 17:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

OK. There's more here: Talk:2005 Qeshm earthquake/GA1. —TheLeft orium 18:07, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

No problemo, and I'll take a look at that later today or tomorrow. —TheLeft orium 18:35, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Nevado del Ruiz FAC

Sorry, I'm a bit busy lately, not sure if I have time. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 22:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

thank you

My RFA passed today at 150/48/6. I wanted to thank you for weighing in, and I wanted to let you know I appreciated all of the comments, advice, criticism, and seriously took it all to heart this past week. I'll do my absolute best to not let any of you down with the incredible trust given me today. rootology (C)(T) 07:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Congrats!

Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for valued picture status, Image:Augustine Volcano Jan 12 2006 edited-1.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Intothewoods29 (talk) 23:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Many hearty congratulations on your first Valued Picture! Intothewoods29 (talk) 23:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Heh, and not my last. Trust me on that aspect ;) Ceran^→//forge 23:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Break

:( Come back soon! –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 01:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Special Barnstar

		The Special Barnstar
		I am honored to award you this Special Barnstar for your input at the AfD for Naked Conversation and being willing and able to do a search and speak up in defense of a notable book. Such due diligence improves Wiki Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! Ceran^→//forge 11:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Another query

Sure.. If you review one of mine. ;) TheLeft orium 11:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Done! TheLeft orium 16:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Iranian earthquakes

Sure, I'm game. I'm currently working on bringing Sourou-Migan Apithy to DYK (and hopefully GA) status. I'm having a bit of trouble with Hubert Maga: it just failed GAR and GAN because a I'm ordering a book on the man (and his article is already 60kb long!) Are you willing to review it when the book arrives? ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 21:47, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Copyediting request

Hi. You signed up to my insane idea project a few weeks ago, and I was wondering if you could take a look at my latest work 2008 Chinese Grand Prix before I take it to PR. It's not too long, but any smoothing out there you do would be incredibly useful. Thanks in advance, Aptery gial 11:35, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination for 1848 Marlborough earthquake

Hi Ceranth,

Thanks for nominating this. Can I suggest an alternative hook that matches the sources better?

... that the 1848 Marlborough earthquake was the first earthquake over magnitude 7 in New Zealand for which written records exist.

I'm keen not to offend anyone, as there are plenty of earthquakes in New Zealand recorded in Maori oral history.
Not exactly sure why you included the other two earthquakes in the hook... Mikenorton (talk) 16:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Ceranthor, appreciated. Mikenorton (talk) 20:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Well I found out that it wasn't the first mag 7+ in NZ for which written records exist, which means I had to come up with an alternative hook and also that gives me another article to write (the 1843 Wanganui earthquake), for which I know the DYK hook before I start! Anyway it's going to be in the next update. Mikenorton (talk) 13:15, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

20:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by J Milburn, on behalf of the judges. 20:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Helen Keller pic

Probably should be cloned out rather than cropped out (already a tight crop as is), which is why I didn't do it immediately. You also could take a look at the original TIFF, which is slightly wider (though not much). I'd be glad to co-nom once it's cloned properly. I might have a go at it in the next day or two. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:18, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:39, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

2005 Qeshm earthquake

I did a PR yesterday (Sunday) that I hope will be helpful. Finetooth (talk) 05:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Cup COIs

Hi Ceran, you may not have spotted the various threads about FA and the Cup - but it looks like Sandy wants to know when a cup participant is at FA. See User_talk:Garden/WikiCup#Participating or submitting FAs etc. Hence I've declared my cup participation on Nevado even though we are in different pools, if you haven't already done so you might want to do something similar. Cheers Were Spiel Chequers 16:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Edgar Speyer - Thanks

Thanks for the support for Edgar Speyer which has now been promoted. Phew, that was hard work! --DavidCane (talk) 00:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Anopheles

Thanks for the deletion. It was a typo on may part and I hadnt figured out how to delete the article. The proper article is under 'Anopheles: Taxonomy' now. BTW some one has put a notability notice on this. The taxonomy of Anopheles is a HUGE problem. Only a limited number of species are involved in disease transmission. Some species use rock pools; others use tree holes; still others use discarded tires and similar objects. If you want to deal with malaria and other nasties it is essential to know which species is causing the problem in your area. Which is why there has been such an effort in this direction. DrMicro (talk) 17:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Urgent PR

Doing... –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 16:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Dear Ceran/Lord Sunday, Many thanks for your support in my RFA and I look forward to our next opportunity to work together. There's a full glitzy version of my acceptance speech here. PS When are you going to run? Were Spiel Chequers 14:21, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

23:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Promoted Valued Picture Candidate

File:Rosaparks.jpg

Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for valued picture status, File:Rosaparks.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Zoo Fari 19:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for 1848 Marlborough earthquake

On 17 February, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1848 Marlborough earthquake, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 01:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thanks for your support in my RfA, which closed with 83 ayes to the right, one no to left and five abstaining users!
Sabre (talk) 20:39, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Copyedit (very urgent)

I'll take a look later this afternoon. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 15:11, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Copyedit (very urgent)

I'll take a look later this afternoon. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 15:11, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Copyedit (very urgent)

I'll take a look later this afternoon. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 15:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

1968 Illinois earthquake GAC

Hey I was just checking in to see if you were still working on my suggestions for GA? It's been on hold a week and I'd like to clear it as soon as possible. Let me know. Thanks. H1nkles (talk) 21:36, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

ping

You you mail. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 16:00, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

21:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 21:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Nevado del Ruiz FAC

Just about. I think there are just two items left to be addressed. JKBrooks85 (talk) 23:53, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Capella (star)/GA1

Do you plan to revisit the GA review? It is currently the article that has gone the longest at GAN without a review. Gary King (talk) 16:38, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks and a request

Thanks for signing up at Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers and for your work doing reviews. It is now just over a year since the last peer review was archived with no repsonse after 14 (or more) days, something we all can be proud of. There is a new Peer review user box to track the backlog (peer reviews at least 4 days old with no substantial response), which can be found here. To include it on your user or talk page, please add {{Wikipedia:Peer review/PRbox}} . Thanks again, and keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:58, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for 1962 Bou'in-Zahra earthquake

On February 25, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1962 Bou'in-Zahra earthquake, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 11:14, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Thanks

I'll try, but I'm a bit short on time as I'm leaving on vacation in a few days. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 18:46, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

1962 Bou'in-Zahra earthquake

To be honest, I (and some other people I asked on IRC) think it's too short to become a GA. Sorry. Maybe you should ask at WT:GAN? —TheLeft orium 20:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Steve Dodd DYK nom

Hi there. You flicked my DYK nom overnight (well, overnight in this bit of the world) - quite appropriately. I hadn't paid attention to what counted and what didn't re length. It is in any case now over the 1500 characters and I wondered if you'd consider revisiting it? Cheers. hamiltonstone (talk) 00:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Bradman in 1948

I've responded to your comments. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 04:48, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Sources?

Hi Ceranthor. I don't remember mentioning any sources for Glacier Peak, and I'm not finding any mention of them in the peer review. Can you give me something more to go on? Finetooth (talk) 21:35, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

I believe the note that reads, "I'll get back to this section, found a couple more possible sources" was your note to me rather than my note to you. Finetooth (talk) 22:13, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

17:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 17:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Pass1234567890

Not quite enough for a block ... but I might ask him to change his username. Blueboy 96 15:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for 1930 Salmas earthquake

On March 3, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1930 Salmas earthquake, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 05:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

ready to be drafted?

'Were Spiel Chequers' would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact me to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ceranthor. If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You also need to answer the ~~optional~~ questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

You might want to take a look at Wikipedia:How to pass an RfA... Good luck! Were Spiel Chequers 21:08, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

You Signed Into It

Thank you for being the first! ResMar 00:59, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

PS. Good luck on your RFA.

Knows-What-He's-Doing Input requested: Peer review for Loihi Seamount. ResMar 19:59, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

I've replied. Why thank you. Blame Black Tusk. ResMar 22:46, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Take all the time you need, the workgroup is a long-term thing. ResMar 19:09, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

RFA

I advise you to answer questions quicker (but thinking before answering them, of course), because some participant begin to lose patience. Ruslik (talk) 13:12, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

16:48, 15 March 2009 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 16:48, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

RFA closed

Your RFA was closed as not reaching consensus. Please work on areas of concern and try again later. Thank you for your interest. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Dank55/Admins#Advice after close but failed RFAs. If you don't already have 2 co-noms in mind for 3 months from now, I would consider it; if you're interested, ping me in about a month and I'll look at your recent contribs. (Watchlisting) - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 01:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

In my opinion your RFA was not very bad, as the opposes were not particularly strong. I think your second RFA will pass (in 3-4 months), but you need to learn some things from policy before reapplying. Among them are:

The difference between block and ban;
The significance of {{hangon}} tag;
Admins are expected to follow consensus, except in cases when this will violate a policy;

I advise you to think about other questions as well. The answers could be better, in my opinion. However, do not get much upset about this RFA, as I said above, the opposition was not strong. Regards, Ruslik (talk) 10:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Heh, I'm not upset at all. Ceranthor 10:48, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

POTD notification

Hi,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:MtCleveland ISS013-E-24184.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 23, 2009. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2009-05-23. howcheng {chat} 00:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

-down load | sign! has given you a bubble tea! Bubble teas promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!

Spread the bubbliness of bubble teas by adding {{subst:bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

2008 German Grand Prix

Hi, I am currently sorting out the 2008 German Grand Prix as part of MII. I was wondering whether you could copyedit for me, and generally point out anything that's wrong. Thanks,

Darth Newdar (talk) 15:21, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:COFFEELOUNGE

Hi Ceran, hope your keeping well. Just to say that I think Wikipedia:COFFEELOUNGE is the first page I've declined a speedy on under one criteria and then speedied after a second speedy nom. Ϣere SpielChequers 12:33, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Mt. Redoubt

On 24 March, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Mount Redoubt (Alaska), which you recently nominated and substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

List of earthquakes in Iran

Hi, I only just saw your message on IRC. A lot of those sortables don't actually work - fix them and then I'll take another look. :) — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 21:11, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Request for peer review for asteroid 243 Ida

Hi, I noticed that you're listed as a volunteer for peer reviews of articles about astronomy, and you have some expertise in the area of featured articles. Would you be interested in reviewing 243 Ida? Wronkiew (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Mount Thielsen

Done. I know, its been a while, I've been busy and by the look of your talkpage, you've been busy too. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, congratulations. :) Isn't it great having an FA to your name? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

I can't do the review today, cause I'm preparing for exams, but I guarantee you that I'll have the review done by tomorrow. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

A discussion

There's an ongoing discussion on my talk page regarding reaching some of the goals of the FA for the workgroup. It you're active, can you voice your opinion, too? Thanks, ResMar 00:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

21:27, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Delivered for the WikiCup by GARDEN at 21:27, 31 March 2009 (UTC). Queries to my talk.

Congrats on Nevado del Ruiz!

Congrats on Nevado del Ruiz! We really should be seeing more volcano-related articles at FA. ResMar 23:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Mount Thielsen reassessment

Mount Thielsen has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 20:20, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XI

Delivered for the WikiCup by ROBOTIC GARDEN at 21:24, 5 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

Happy Ceranthor/Archive 12's Day!

User:Ceranthor/Archive 12 has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Ceranthor/Archive 12's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Ceranthor/Archive 12!

Peace,
Rlevse
~

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Hayward Fault Zone

Greetings:

I restored text from your extensive deletions of Potentially impacted structures and features, which I assume were in good faith. It may take me some time to locate and add the appropriate references as I am quite involved with other work right now. If you consider the text itself unworthy of inclusion then that is a matter appropriate for further discussion.

Thank you, and best wishes, Leonard G. (talk) 16:17, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, that's fine. It was an attempt to remove the information that was not in any other sources I found. If you have them, that would be great if you could source them. Ceranllama chat post 16:21, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Actually, I do not have references at this time, other than a personal e-mail from a manager at BART, in response to my request to a BART director concerning the the Oakland Hills Tunnel. The writings are however based upon knowledge obtained through reading newspaper and magazine articles and material from radio and television shows and so references can be found but may take some time. I will assume that you do not consider the material doubtful at this point.

Note that the tag {{unreferenced}} is to be treated differently than the tags {{fact}}, which implies dubiousness, suggesting that if not subsquently referenced that the material should be removed.

If an article has no references, and you are unable to find them yourself, you can tag the article with the template {{Unreferenced}}, so long as the article is not nonsensical or a biography of a living person, in which case request admin assistance. If a particular claim in an article lacks citation and is doubtful, consider placing {{fact}} after the sentence or removing it. This will add a citation needed label. ... If a claim is doubtful but not harmful to the whole article or to Wikipedia, use the {{fact}} tag, but remember to go back and remove the claim if no source is produced within a reasonable time. (Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Unsourced_material) - Leonard G. (talk) 17:16, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: UAA

15:47, June 7, 2008 Malinaccier (talk | contribs) changed rights for User:Ceranthor from (none) to Rollbackers ‎ (Trusted user)

Thanks for the message on my talk page. Can you do me a big favor, Please stop acting like you’re a Administrator. You only have rollback rights. I know what I'm doing on here. If you want to be a Administrator, Apply at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship.. Thanks.--Michael (Talk) 12:30, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

You’re the one ho removed the user names from the list. Look Here your edit. How would you like it if I did this to you.--Michael (Talk) 12:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Ok, Have a great day. Happy Easter--Michael (Talk) 12:47, 12 April 2009 (UTC)