User talk:Ceranthor/Archive 10

Sorry, I missed your first question. I'll take a look at that tomorrow. On the other, no I'm not, but you can find more information on who is, and how to contact them, via WP:CHECKUSER. --Dweller (talk) 21:50, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You seem to have chopped and changed your mind about whether you might like to be an admin one day. Including very recently. Is there a reason for this? Are you now interested in being an admin? How would anyone know that you wouldn't change your mind again? --Dweller (talk) 11:15, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am fine with your looking at any pictures in any articles with an eye to possible FPs. Not having an FP, especially one where I took the picture, keeps me humble, but thanks for asking. ;-) Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 22:35, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ceranthor, feel free, although I imagine it's too late for the Wairarapa EQ article, sorry not to get back to you earlier, I've been away on a business trip. Mikenorton (talk) 09:35, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I answered your query on my talk page rather than yours, which was pretty dumb! Anyway I clarified on the DYK nomination page and it is now listed for the next update, so thanks for putting it forward. Mikenorton (talk) 17:50, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which recently passed with 126 in support, 22 in opposition and 6 neutral votes. Thanks for your support in my RFA!! •If you want to reply to this message please use my talk page as watch listing about 150 pages is a bit messy• ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 19:34, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:07, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Create 1970 Tonghai earthquake tomorrow. Ceran →(sing→see →scribe) 02:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Ceran →(sing→see →scribe) 13:34, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Be careful, though; Huggle is often addictive! –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 20:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I haven't taken a close enough look at your contribs to know exactly. Have you significantly contributed to any recognized content? –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 00:50, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok. In that case, what is your activity level in admin-related areas like AIV? –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 00:54, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, that should be a good place to start working towards adminship. Try to report a few vandals per week, so you can prove at RfA that you know when a vandal requires a block. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 00:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...for reverting the vandalism on my talkpage. ~Beano~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome. Ceran →(sing→see →scribe) 23:17, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There ya go, Please enjoy. --Tyler | Talk - Contributions | 15:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This Wikipedia Valued pictures project sets out to identify and encourage users' efforts in providing valuable images of high encyclopedic value, and to build up a resource for editors from other Wikimedia projects seeking such educational images for use online. The project also provides recognition to contributors who have made an effort to contribute enyclopedic images of difficult subjects which are very hard or nigh on impossible to obtain. The project will run alongside the existing Wikipedia Featured pictures and Picture peer review projects.

Please visit Valued picture candidates to nominate an image, or to help review the nominations. Anyone with an account on Wikipedia is welcome to nominate images, and also to take part in the open review process.

Elucidate ^{(light up)} 18:40, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C'est un plaisir. Elucidate ^{(light up)} 18:45, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm kind of curious why you chose to make the edit that you did in the Henry Cavendish article today? It appears to me that you were actually restoring vandalism. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 19:00, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Your revert was a mistake. Please take a good look at the difference. And remove the warning from the innocent IP editor. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 19:12, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As with above, appears that my Huggle links were misfunctioning. —Ceran^{(sing / see)} 19:30, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of 1855 Wairarapa earthquake at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed. There still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Politizer ^talk/_contribs 04:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful before unilaterally moving a page to a new title. The title mentions the month because in 1998 there were two earthquakes in Afghanistan. One in February, another in May. See the other article February 4, 1998 Afghanistan earthquake. So 1998 Afghanistan earthquake will be confusing title. --Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 09:08, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. You can join the discussion in Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 November 8 where one editor has suggested a disambiguation page which I believe is a good idea. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 13:29, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's 1015 charachters, with spaces. I can help you expand it to DYK status. ~the editorofthewiki ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 15:33, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at the article now. I hope the authorities aren't going to cover up another quake, thus making source-finding hell. :) ~the editorofthewiki ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 23:19, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how to, though I hear it's awesome. FYI I nominated the article for GAN. On the short side, but you can't really help the inability of a government to report on something that killed, say, 15,000 people. I was wondering if you could look over Hubert Maga for me - I'm not even close to nominating for GA, but I just want first impressions. ~the editorofthewiki ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 02:09, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded some pictures and added a cat. Generally I only work with earthquakes that injured/killed people. Maga will be my main focus for a bit. ~the editorofthewiki ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 03:08, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1337 charachters. ~the editorofthewiki ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 13:41, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1855 Wairarapa earthquake, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

good nom Victuallers (talk) 20:33, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Venus globe.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 03:03, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hoo-ray! Thanks again, MER-C. —Ceran^{(sing / see)} 03:05, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion going on regarding the project's policy on how information on characters should be represented in articles on Shakespeare's plays. Please take part by clicking Talk:Romeo and Juliet#Character Analysis. Further context, if needed, can be found by scanning the two previous talk sections on the page as well. Sent by §hepBot (Disable) at 04:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC) per request of Wrad (talk)[reply]

Wikipedia dies when people are scared away. I know you've had some problems but don't let them get to you. I only ask, could you settle on a name please? It's getting hard to keep track of you. :-)

As regards volcanism: a few notes based on 5 seconds' reading:

• No mention of the volcanic "rivers" like Styx.

• No mention of the number of volcanoes

• No mention of the 500 my global resurfacing cycle

That's all I can think of now. Serendi^podous 10:13, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See:Geology of Venus#Global Resurfacing Event Serendi^podous 23:26, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:28, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1970 Tonghai earthquake, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cirt (talk) 13:45, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I don't know what I said that could've offended you, when did this happen, as I've not been online since last Sunday. Maybe you could come on IRC and discuss it. Thanks. Sunderland06 (talk) 01:36, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thats quite fine, but I really can't remember speaking to you recently. Sunderland06 (talk) 01:40, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its fine if you don't have IRC, if you wanted to get through to me privately, you could always email me. Thanks. Sunderland06 (talk) 01:48, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you really nominating this for GA? Didn't you say you had to go through hundreds of news and scholarly sources? BTW Hubert Maga is at GAN. I'm trying to bring this to FA so please be especially commentative! ~the editorofthewiki ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 02:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, all of the results were either about different earthquakes or just a repeat of what I already have. Most of them just had a mention of the quake. —Ceran^{(dream / discover)} 02:26, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you look over these scholarly articles? Are you going to review Maga? ~the editorofthewiki ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 02:30, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now, you don't have to review it, but please don't accuse me of something. According to WP:Canvassing, it is "sending messages to multiple Wikipedians with the intent to inform them about a community discussion. Under certain conditions it is acceptable to notify other editors of ongoing discussions, but messages that are written to influence the outcome rather than to improve the quality of a discussion compromise the consensus building process and may be considered disruptive." I've only swent messages to you since I'm closely acquaintanced with you on the wiki, and I'm certainly not trying to influence the outcome of the discussion. ~the editorofthewiki ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 02:46, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1968 Illinois earthquake, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thank you for your contributions! - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 04:51, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for supporting me at my successful Rfa! Hope to work with you in the future!--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 17:15, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Hubble2005-01-barred-spiral-galaxy-NGC1300.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 07:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ceranthor,

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Grover Cleveland has been sitting around in the 'Suspended nominations' section for over a month now. Can it be either put back up in the 'live' nominations section or withdrawn until such time that the edit is done? There's not much point leaving noms on the page indefinitely. Cheers, --jjron (talk) 13:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok. Good luck! :-) –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 22:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. I just spend my entire afternoon on Wikipedia, so it's not a surprise... –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 22:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI it is considered impolite to edit another editor's comments, even to fix spelling errors. Not that this offends me in the least, just not with anyone else. ~the editorofthewiki ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 22:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've already asked you, how the heck do you do it? I know, I'm ignorant. :) Not that this has anything to do with this, but are you taking up vandal fighting to become an admin? I mean, there's already a whole lot of them out there. Put bluntly, Nevado needs work. I'm not in any way implying that you do, but do you still consider Wikipedia a MMOPRG that can be won? Adminship is not the next level up, I'd say regular editors like us are. True, I sometimes want those tools to block a disruptive editor or delete a page to make way for a move, but after my RFA I don't think it's worth it. You probably stand better chances, but I do not expect a pass. My quote at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fritzpoll is quite relevent here. And this is coming from a friend; please don't take this the wrong way. ~the editorofthewiki ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 22:38, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive criticism is actual criticism. :) Seriously though, are you only becoming involved in AIV and huggle for the adminship oppurtunities and artificially high edits? I have noticed this for a while, just not been brave enough to say anything. This may be an unpopular opinion, but I'm going to say it anyway: I think vandal fighting (especially using automated tools) is important, and there should be about 2-3 good fighters, but that should be about it. Whenever I go recent changes patrolling I see practically no vandalism because it was reverted 2 seconds after the act was commited. We do need more content builders, for sure. Everything else is subordinate to that. ~the editorofthewiki ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 23:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ceranthor, thank you very much for participating in my Rfa, which was successful with 80 Support, 5 Oppose, 6 Neutral. The comments were overwhelming, and hopefully I can live up to the expectation of the community. I would also like to thank my nominator Realist2 and my co-nom Orane (talk), and special mention to Acalamari and Lenticel (talk) for the kindness from the start. Regards, Efe

--Efe (talk) 04:57, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, I use the interlibrary system, even if it takes a few days. Also, do you have any news reports on the 1985 eruption? Oh, and Mount Pinutubo would never pass FA today. I think it is time for an FAR. ~the editorofthewiki ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 02:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yooou'vee got mail! J.delanoy^gabs_adds 03:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I replied. If you want, just enable chat with me. It might be faster that way, if you're planning on talking more. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 02:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. —Ceran ♦ (talk) 02:05, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And you have mail. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 18:14, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ceranthor. You have new messages at Otherlleft's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sorry to have not replied until now - I will be glad to look at the peer review in the next few days. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:50, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I have also reviewed Mount Baker. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Mizu onna sango15 Barnstar
		Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed, all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced. —Mizu onna sango15Hello!

And of course, congrats. —Ceran ♦ (talk) 23:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check out the PR page. I found abother source that may be useful, and at least back up when the first ascent was. ~the editorofthewiki ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 01:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have started commenting at Talk:1968 Illinois earthquake/GA1. After a week if you make some progress, I will give a more formal review.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, The article that you so kindly agreed to watch list Black mamba; as part of the Wikipedia AP Biology Project is no longer being actively edited by the student. We are calling it Scholastic Attrition or as I recall from my college days WP / withdraw passing. Thank you for your offer of assistance. --JimmyButler (talk) 16:29, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The RfA Barnstar
		Ceranthor, I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent Request for Adminship, which passed with 112 supports, 4 opposes and 5 neutrals. A special mention goes out to Stwalkerster and Pedro for nominating me, thanks a lot for having trust in me! In response to the neutrals, I will try to double check articles that have been tagged for speedy deletion before I CSD them and will start off slowly with the drama boards of ANI and AN to ensure that I get used to them. In response to the oppose !votes on my RfA, I will check that any images I use meet the non-free content criteria and will attempt to handle any disputes or queries as well as I can. If you need my help at all, feel free to simply ask at my talk page and I'll see if I can help. Once again, thank you for your participation, and have a great day! :) The Helpful One 22:17, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

design by neurolysis | to add this barnstar to your awards page, simply copy and paste {{subst:User:Neurolysis/THOBS}} and remove this bottom text | if you don't like thankspam, please accept my sincere apologies

You're welcome, and congrats! —Ceran ^[speak] 22:18, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for having updated the reference tag for the page on Lubos Perek. It was late (my time) and I didn't remember how to properly put up a reference list.

CielProfond (talk) 04:24, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to help. However, I have other copy-edit requests to tend to, as well as reviewing FLCs and writing my own articles, so initial progress may be slow. I've already streamlined the lead a bit. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:37, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jclemens' RfA Thankspam

		JClemens' RfA Thanks
		Thank you for participating in my Request for Adminship, which passed with 77 supporting and 2 opposing. Regardless of your position, I thank you for the time you took to examine my record and formulate your response. Jclemens (talk) 02:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for recommending 1985 Mexico City earthquake for Good Article status. I was wondering what it took to for an article to be good after the peer review it got! I put in on the list and we will see what happens. thanks also for the Wikiproject:Earthquakes invite but my interest is in Mexico, where I now live and I write mostly about that.Thelmadatter (talk) 03:03, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there I am still kinda alive and kicking. Hope you are well. Danger^Mouse (talk) 09:45, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've got a lot on my plate right now, and since Sedna will automatically rise to the top of any list of priorities if and when it ever gets dwarf planet status (which could be as early as next year), I'm kinda keeping it on the back burner at present. Serendi^podous 13:46, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha, I'm all for that. —Ceran ♦ ♦ (speak) 14:22, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1915 Pleasant Valley earthquake, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:32, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to help, but I'm not sure if my schedule over the upcoming days/weeks will let me be of any assistance. If I have some free time, I'll definitely lend a hand, though. What areas still need improvement in your opinion? Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 07:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am getting a rename on Commons. —Ceran ♦ ♦ (speak) 17:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry,I only saw you image now,and the fpc has been closed. There are more image-literate people here that can help you with problems like these.Me,I can't edit an image to save my life XD --Fireaxe888 (talk) 19:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have an unyielding beer on me. Let the amber nectar flow all day and night. Let it run down the mountains and through the caverns and across the rich lawns to swamp the streets. Let it rain beer. Let the heavens open and shine forth beer. Let it all be beer. Wonderful beer. And let it be as deep as the heart of a lion. This is an acknowledgment of your participation in the RfA of: SilkTork *YES!. 19:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to take a moment to say "thank you" for taking the time and effort to participate in my recent RfA. As you may know, the discussion closed 66/0/1 and I'm now a holder of the mop. I will keep working to improve the encyclopedia and appreciate the trust which you have placed in me. - Dravecky (talk) 23:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		In appreciation of your all-around excellent work. Nevado really is a great article--you could still find a good book on it, but I honestly think I will be supporting the next FAC. ~the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 01:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am a bit confused about this FAR... Crab Nebula has 33 inline refs, not four like you stated and is of course not a solar system object (Notified WP:SOLAR...). Perhaps you meant some other article instead of the nebula? Regardless, I'll try to help with that after I have finished with Hale-Bopp. Random astronomer (talk) 11:54, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article is slowly improving. However I suggest expanding the lead. Currently it does not cover 1985 eruption, which was the most event in the history of the volcano. Ruslik (talk) 10:03, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll have a look. Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:23, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ceranthor.

I was wondering if you knew where I could find a copy-editor that would like to join in on the refinement of the river otter article. Should I file the request on the peer review page?

Thank you, --Wikitrevor (talk) 00:58, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for the referrals. Your assistance has been greatly appreciated.

Best regards, --Wikitrevor (talk) 02:48, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I already know about it. Not to be direct, but why did you feel the need to notify? — neuro^(talk) 02:46, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A culmination of factors, but this seems to have been the final straw for him. — neuro^(talk) 02:50, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems that is the wrong link, finding. — neuro^(talk) 02:52, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Found it. — neuro^(talk) 02:56, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:00, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your careful consideration at my successful RfA. "Another awesome candidate!" was generous and appreciated. Please let me know on my talk page if you have any suggestions for me. - Dan Dank55 (send/receive) 17:12, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain this FAR (for the second time)? There is a red link at WP:FAR, and a redlinked FAR on the article talk page. If you requested that it be deleted, the job was only one-third done. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tony1 has nominated Lazare Ponticelli, an FA I've worked on, for featured article review. Just wondering if you could help save this article and/or offer comments toward its improvements. ~the editorofthewiki ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 16:41, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...regarding a potential RfA candidate is solicited at my talk page. Thanks!  Frank  |  talk  08:29, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:MtRedoubtedit1.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 02:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. —Ceran^{»^«} 21:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributions to the project, Great work, especially on Image:MtCleveland ISS013-E-24184.jpg - breathtaking. May you wear the crowns well. Cirt (talk) 00:58, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, the evil word was not intended at you but at the previous comment (not the user). I didn't even understand what you meant with your NPOV message. I have always tried to be straight and honest in my discussions and behaviour, that is why I reacted with such violence to an accusation which I found malicious and unfair. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 01:49, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed an inconsistency in the format of dates in references. Some of them are written as 13 November, 1985, while others are in ISO format (2008-11-12). This should be fixed, I think. Ruslik (talk) 04:45, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear AfC participant,

1. Msgj and Tnxman307 are organising the AfC challenge! It's a little competition to help improve some of the articles created through AfC and we are hoping that everyone will get involved. For level 1, you just need to bring a stub up to Start-class. Level 2 is improving a Start-class article to C-class. And so on. To get involved or for more information please see the competition page.
2. Those of you who haven't reviewed an article recently might not have noticed the new process that was implemented this year. Reviewing articles is now more enjoyable than ever :) You might like to give it a try. All articles waiting for review are in Category:Pending Afc requests. (Please read the updated instructions.)
3. Please consider adding {{AFC status}} to your userpage to keep track of the number of articles waiting for review. At the time of writing we are officially backlogged, so help is needed!
4. There is currently a proposal to bring the Images for upload process under the umbrella of WikiProject Articles for creation. The rationale is that both processes are designed to allow unregistered users to take part more fully in Wikipedia, and partipants in each process can probably help each other.

If you no longer wish to receive messages from WikiProject Articles for creation, please remove your name from this list. Thank you.

Sure, I'll take a look soon, depending on when the electricity comes back on at home. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 02:02, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I meant number 22. Keep up the good work, and if you have time, review Hubert Maga at PR. ~the editorofthewiki ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 22:12, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I celebrate both Christmas and Hanukkah, and my birthday is amongst the two, so it's a busy time 'round here. Happy holidays, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 15:18, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't object or anything, but may I ask why you chose to notify me about the FAR? I can't find any evidence that I've been involved with the article (maybe I missed it? After all, 2005 was a long time ago). While I'm knowledgeable in astronomy, I'm not a galaxies guy. Certainly I do know how to dig up and add references (now that I've decoded what 2(c) is) - so perhaps I can be helpful. I'm also not an FAC regular (my only serious forray there ended fairly unsatisfactorily). Anyways, just thought I'd ask. I'm just curious, is all. Certainly, if referencing is the main problem, I can do that at an FA level, and am willing to help. WilyD 17:23, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, guilty on both counts. I hadn't realised I was a member of the Astronomy Wikiproject. As I say, I am good at referencing, especially in astronomy, so I'll have a look (probably not until tommorow, though). Cheers, WilyD 19:44, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Andromeda_galaxy_Ssc2005-20a1.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Fir0002 08:07, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Fir. —Ceran [ speak ] 22:10, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		Thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which failed with 61/52/7; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral. Special thanks go out to Wizardman and Malinaccier for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for the trust the community has placed in me. A special Christmas song for you all can be found at the right hand side of this message! Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Dendodge TalkContribs, 17:21, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied on Talk:Mount Meager. Black Tusk (talk) 20:02, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]