User talk:Cameremote

A tag has been placed on File:Maritza Chan.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:F11: File tagged as permission received for more than 30 days, no further interaction ongoing

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:44, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clementy Schuman Legacy Foundation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vatican.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on House Committee on Justice requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:

• Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., "Here is your Wikipedia article on..."), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., "Up to my last training update ..."), self-insertion (e.g., "as a large language model"), and phrasal templates (e.g., "Smith was born on [Birth Date].")
• Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
• Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.

Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:47, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Maritza Chan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability (ambassadors are not considered part of NPOL), provided sources are exclusively primary non-independent reports with the exception of maybe two, both of which only include passing mentions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoelleJay (talk) 16:26, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your concern about the page Maritza Chan. However, the article meets GNG, as the subject has received significant media reception. I have already improved the references to include independent sources beyond primary publications. I would also like to note that another editor has since removed the PROD tag. When an article appears to meet GNG but has referencing or formatting issues, the preferred approach is to use an appropriate maintenance tag (such as refimprove} or more citations needed) and explain the concern on the talk page. This allows editors to work collaboratively to address sourcing problems without initiating deletion processes prematurely. Thank you for your work on Wikipedia. Happy editing! Cameremote (talk) 17:16, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]