User talk:CSMention269/Archive 15
Draft:Timo_NovotnyHi there, Thanks for taking the time to review my submission. I understand your concerns regarding the guidelines, but I’m also feeling a bit frustraded now as the entry seems to be fine in the german version and gets declined here. How might I improve the draft further? Would you have any concrete ideas of how to get this approved as the article is fine for Wikipedia in german? The subject of the article — a filmmaker and visual artist — has been covered in international media outlets such as Variety and Indiewire and won several prizes, his latest docu series has aired on multiple stations in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Czech Republic and Slovakia.There are numerous articles about him in other languages (including German, French, and Spanish). So it seems that i am doing something wrong here? What would that be? Please also consider that while he may not be widely known in English-speaking countries, English often serves as a bridge language in Central Europe — enabling dialogue between, for example, Austrians and Hungarians or Germans and Slovaks. So having this entry in English could help make his work more accessible and visible to a broader audience. Do you have any recommendations on how I might present this information more effectively to meet notability guidelines? I’d be truly grateful for any tips or feedback that could help improve the draft and make the entry available to the public. All the best, Michael MLachsteiner (talk) 11:13, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Your Articles for Creation review on 2025–26 Liga I Hello CSMention269. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation review on 2025–26 Liga I is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, 2025–26 Liga I will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft. If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place
Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:51, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Nasha jurm aur gangsterHi, bro. Pls checked out this article is 2 years old, please see- Draft:Nasha Jurm Aur Gangsters i checked its a very popular film in india, it was in wikipedia from 2 years, please see the history of the film, i have check bro you also edit this film in past. after the film release was redirect by @user:Grabup Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nasha Jurm Aur Gangsters where he stated no reliable critical reviews available. I also searched in Hindi using 'नशा जुर्म और गैंगस्टर्स' but found nothing. But i have found this critic review of abp here by amit bhatia- the film https://www.abplive.com/movie-review/entertainment/movie-review-nasha-jurm-aur-gangsters-review-rajkumar-patra-pan-india-movie-review-in-hindi-2942967 thats it! issue solved. this is a pan india movie & its have enough source to show notability. 2 times of india, one ndtv, one zee news as secondary sources and others sources. See Their are some articles which has reliable source regarding the article which address you well. This one times of india source about the film- https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bengali/movies/action-thriller-nasha-jurm-aur-gangsters-gearing-up-for-release/articleshow/99174921.cms Another Times of india source about the director who playing the lead role in the film. source: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bengali/movies/rupkumar-finally-fulfills-his-dream-of-playing-a-gangster/articleshow/100098330.cms Another times of india movie releasing date proof: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/movie-details/nasha-jurm-aur-gangsters/movieshow/113492052.cms This one abp news critic review by famous bollywood film reviewer Amit bhatia. https://www.abplive.com/movie-review/entertainment/movie-review-nasha-jurm-aur-gangsters-review-rajkumar-patra-pan-india-movie-review-in-hindi-2942967 Those source are enough for an article general notability in wikipedia, although it was in wikipedia from 2 years as i mentioned previously I belive its have enough notability for a film. Thanks. DivitNation (talk) 08:36, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Draft : Timothy HannemI see this draft was declined : Draft:Timothy Hannem But I don't understand, it says it needs : "in-depth sources" "reliable sources" "secondary sources" "independent sources" The majority of references at the end of the page link to french newspapers who are reliable, secondary and independant sources. Why are these references considered "not reliable", "not secondary" and "not independant" ? The newspapers mentionned in the references are very well known in France, just take a look : Le Parisien, L'Express, Le Monde, Libération, 20 Minutes (France). Thank you for your help. 147.161.152.126 (talk) 09:54, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Barry PittendrighHi. Thank you for reviewing Draft:Barry Pittendrigh. He meets criteria 5 of WP:NACADEMIC for holding a named chair at Purdue University. Right now, in the draft you have declined I have cited this as a reference for the chair. I was doubtful of the authenticity of the publication, but then I thought maybe a non-connected source would be better than a connected source. Specific criteria notes say that "for documenting that a person has held such an appointment (but not for a judgement of whether or not the institution is a major one), publications of the appointing institution are considered a reliable source." So a link from Purdue would be better reference for this. This news from Purdue confirms that he was endowed the John V. Osmun Endowed Chair at Purdue. I have added this to the article. Does it fix the issue? HRShami (talk) 10:32, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
June Backlog Drive is almost over! Hi! Thanks for participating in the Articles for Creation June Backlog Drive! We've done amazing work so far, dropping the backlog by more than 2000 drafts already. We have around 2900 drafts outstanding, and we need your help to get that down to zero in 5 days. We can do this, but we need all hands on deck to make this happen. A list of the pending drafts can be found at WP:AFCSORT, where you can select submissions in your area of interest. Thank you so much for your work so far, and happy reviewing! – DreamRimmer ■ 01:28, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi. Our conversation about this draft moved to your archives. If you are still not sure about the subject's notability, would it be okay if I resubmit the draft for someone else to take a look at it? HRShami (talk) HRShami (talk) 07:37, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
|
