This is an archive of past discussions with User:CSMention269. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
An RfC was closed with consensus to allow editors to opt-out of seeing "sticky decorative elements". Such elements should now be wrapped in {{sticky decoration wrapper}}. Editors who wish to opt out can follow the instructions at WP:STICKYDECO.
An RfC has resulted in a broad prohibition on the use of AI-generated images in articles. A few common-sense exceptions are recognized.
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in June!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 1 month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 June 2025 through 30 June 2025.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3200 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
An Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in June 2025, with over 1,600 drafts awaiting review from the past two months. In addition to AfC participants, all administrators and new page patrollers can help review using the Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
Hi. No problem with the lead sources I will add these. But for the Early life section I am unsure what sources I should have for this when it says “ Details about White’s early life, education, and career prior to his advocacy work are not publicly available”
Kindly remove the section, when you do not have those information, don't need to mention that. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)11:51, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Lindsay Levin
Hi CSMention269, thanks so much for your review. Please excuse my ignorance, but I don't understand what is wrong with the citations? Please can you advise. Viljowf (talk) 08:44, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
If you have any link to the book references (such as those in Google books), put the links using Visual Editor and the citations will automatically be formed. Also using the Visual Editor you can create and edit the citations if you want, by clicking the citation no./icon and click "edit" next. Read WP:REFBEGIN ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)09:55, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
ANI
No need to waste time at ANI with that thread. My issue is separate than that so carrying on here. Hoping you can take accountability for your statements. Otherwise, I will need to start a new ANI thread. Your accusation, insinuated or direct, is not acceptable in Wikipedia. CNMall41 (talk) 15:47, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
@CNMall41, I didn't accuse you or the admin, in ANI, or in my AFC comment. Although I made some incorrect phrases which it created a confusion. I got my point that it does not matter whether your nationality or ethinicity matters (for expertise), while reviewing a draft. We need to state facts here and follow Wikipedia policy. The sock user created mess. And later other users did mess, causing the page and its' disamb SALTed. I got that as well.
I tried to appeal in removing the move protection in ANI. I tagged you for one reason, to inform you. Guess that my replies did backfire. I will be responsible next time, and be very careful to ensure that such akward incidents do not repeat again, otherwise it would challenge my competency in this project I'm working here. However I withdrawn my request for appeal so I won't talk about this particular subject further. Thanks. --☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)04:20, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
I believe that is my issue. You state "incorrect phrases which it created a confusion." You then avoid and go right to why you filed the ANI. I am on the subject about you insinuating that myself and others are incompetent because of our race/nationality/etc. It did not create confusion, it was a direct statement about other editors. I will drop the stick but we live in 2025 where judging people is not acceptable. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:29, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
I appologise, for this disrespect, that I should not have used "I" word in the first place. I didn't expected that I would make offence indirectly. I take that responsibility as I realise this issue could lose my privileges of editing in Wikipedia. Frankly speaking, I was suddenly influenced by that user who called you the "w" word during a conflict. And I thought why would CN do this, not realising this is not who am I. I judge based on facts, that the subject is notable per NFF. But this "I" word caused more trouble. Don't you worry, you won't expect this irrational behavior from me next time. Have a good day CNMall41. --☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)04:37, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your review but forgive my ignorance but you said non-notable. But he's the leading expert in constitution law in Nepal and is one the top lawyers in the country with very significant contributions. Also, he has published so many books, I believe just based on those publications he is veryu notable. on top of that he's been involved in some of the most landmark cases as described by the supreme court. I believe I have also included enough references to show he's a very notable person in Nepal. Please could you let me know what I am missing so that I can include those too. Thank you for your help. EditEnigma7 (talk) 06:10, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
I see, then you had others declined your draft, same reason. Most of the sources you gave includes only passing mentions of the subject and one event references with no significant coverage or in-depth detail of the subject, and less secondary sources, causing the decline in your draft. Read WP:INDEPENDENT, WP:REFBEGIN, WP:RS and WP:SIGCOV for more details. In case for attorney, read User:Bearian/Standards#Notability_of_attorneys. Thanks. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)06:25, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your response. I believe it was rejected previously because my references were not as detailed. I have since updated it. I have included the sources directly from the supreme court nepal's website. also for the books i have updated all the references from google books and other reputed sources. Also included the reviews of the books as references. Also, with regards to the once specific case i have included more sources. All of them are from reputed national newspapers. also, for the remaining cases those are directly from the supreme courts landmark cases which was published by the supreme court itself. The details of these cases are also included in the references. Also, regarding the passing mentions I have included more sources which directly address Dr. Acharya. Regarding the passing mentions in other sources, since he's a lawyer the story headlines makes a mention of the actual case then it mentions Dr. Acharya as the attorney who helped achieve the result. Also, I was very surprised to hear he's not notable when a google search will show 100's of articles and his accomplishments which i have tried to also include in the article. I have submitted the new draft with updated references and I would really appreciate your help. Thank you. EditEnigma7 (talk) 06:51, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
