User talk:CREditzWiki

Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Please post new comments at the bottom of this page, not at the top.

Happy birthday! Hi CREditzWiki! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:34, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Thank you for sending this! Made my day :) CREditzWiki (Talk to me!!) 01:49, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Maxx Force, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:00, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the recognition! It's nice to be noticed. :) — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 01:06, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	For always being lovely and joining the amazing birthday committee! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 18:56, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CREditzWiki... Signed your guestbook and added it on a list on your behalf. See you around! Volten001 ^☎ 16:16, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Consolation for your hassles with blocks, AfC and more!

Earth605^talk 17:57, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A kitty? I wanted a pony! [1] CREditzWiki (Talk to me!!) 19:11, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2 October 2025
News and notes: Larry Sanger returns with "Nine Theses on Wikipedia"; WMF publishes transparency report This time "not merely negative". In the media: Extraordinary eruption of "EVIL" explained Wickedpedia wrangles post-truth politics. Disinformation report: Emails from a paid editing client Unexpected news! Discussion report: Sourcing, conduct, policy and LLMs: another 1,339 threads analyzed Fifty hot topics from fourteen noticeboards. Community view: The pressing questions of the modern WWW, as seen from the Village Pump Policy, politics, icons, captchas, and LLMs. Recent research: Is Wikipedia a merchant of (non-)doubt for glyphosate?; eight projects awarded Wikimedia Research Fund grants And other recent publications. Opinion: Some disputes aren't worth it When to walk away. Obituary: Michael Q. Schmidt Rest in peace. Traffic report: Death, hear me call your name Celebrities, deaths and software. Comix: A grand spectacle All invited!
Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives

CREditzWiki (Talk to me!!) 14:08, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, nice to meet you. I want to stay contributing and learning how the platform works. Where do you suggest I get started? --Mmmatheus (talk) 20:44, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heyo! Thanks for joining us. Some places to look are the Task Center, a newbie-friendly set of things that need to be done, check WikiProjects that cater to your interests or knowledge! Something I do when looking for something to do is use the Random Article thing on the Main Page and find something to fix there. Hope this helps, and happy editing! CREditzWiki (Talk to me!!) 22:32, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NSCHOOL, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. The school's website is a primary source and inclusion in tables/directories is not significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elkhorn High School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:38, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CREditzWiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:38, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for the birthday wish! Didlidoo (talk) 04:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]