User talk:CREditzWiki

Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 1.5 days may be auto-archived by ClueBot III if there are more than 5.

Hello, I'm Yamla. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Elkhorn South High School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 23:29, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CREditzWiki! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Sources for books, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:28, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CREditzWiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:28, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. You failed to complete the steps to nominate the article at AfD by properly formatting the page and transcluding the nomination to today's list of AfDs so other users can see it. I have done this. You also failed to notify the page creator, although that's moot since the page creator has commented. I would ask that you carefully review the instructions, including WP:BEFORE and WP:HOWTOAFD, before you nominate any additional articles. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:52, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for letting me know! I have not yet read those, but I will before I nominate another article for deletion. As I said on my user page, I have only been involved in two AfD's, this one I created, so I am not entirely well versed in the subject. I guess I just nominated it because I thought it should be discussed, and I believed I was well versed in AfD ( I am FAR from). Thank you! CREditzWiki, editor (talk) 20:08, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Life.Church, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rogers and Fort Smith. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]