User talk:CALGARY ROCKS

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to List of countries by intentional homicide rate, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Meters (talk) 05:35, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of countries by intentional homicide rate, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This is the third time you have been undone on this article. Meters (talk) 05:35, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CALGARY ROCKS! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Crime in China. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Meters (talk) 03:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CALGARY ROCKS, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Compare Special:contributions/NISSAN GTR 1088 and Special:contributions/CALGARY ROCKS Meters (talk) 04:16, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Category:Islamist terrorism in France. Meters (talk) 04:16, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Category:Terrorism in the Netherlands, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 18:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Category:Islamist terrorism in France, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 13:36, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ... discospinster _talk 15:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:30, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  ... discospinster _talk 15:56, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Crime in China. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Additionally, going right back to the article you got blocked for edit warring in is a bad idea. If you really think the material should be changed, discuss it at the talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 01:04, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, the relevant talk page for that article is Talk:Crime in China. —C.Fred (talk) 01:10, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Crime in China, you may be blocked from editing. This edit changes statistics and changes a valid source to an invalid one. I suggest providing the link to the source on the talk page; if it checks out, I can assist you with changing the page. (There's a separate issue with your edit to the introduction, which adds some clunky and unnecessary language. —C.Fred (talk) 01:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Crime in China. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You have already been blocked once for edit warring this addition on this article, and we have asked you to discuss it. Meters (talk) 17:10, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Crime in China. Meters (talk) 17:16, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]