User talk:Bunnypranav/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Bunnypranav. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Can you help to split this article. You can WP:BOLDLY split it with March 2025 Israeli attacks on the Gaza Strip as a breakthrough event as there is still no objection to Borgenland's proposal. So 18 March is the most suitable date to split it. Pachu Kannan (talk) 18:19, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

@Pachu Kannan I can do it in a few hours, thanks for the information! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 01:21, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

@Pachu Kannan Split done at Timeline of the Gaza war (18 March 2025 – present), edited the navbox template and main list page, and added an edit notice. Requested EC prot as well. Hope that helps! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:00, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. Pachu Kannan (talk) 12:33, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey i have a question. Can I or someone else copy and paste text into a page from another website. If not how can i report this. Thank you for your time and effort. --Averytiredturkey3 (talk) 00:41, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Averytiredturkey3, copying from websites is determined by Wikipedia:Copyrights policy. Copying a few lines from other sources is allowed, as long as it follows the guidelines at Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing.

To report it, have a look at WP:DCV. Hope that helps! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:13, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I wanted help regarding how I can automate my taxobox. --DrinkerBakker (talk) 02:48, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey @DrinkerBakker, I'm sorry but I'm not sure how a taxobox works and how to use it. If you want some basic guides on how they work and how to use them, have a look at Wikipedia:Automated taxobox system/intro and Wikipedia:Automated taxobox system/method. If you have any questions related to them, feel free to ask at Wikipedia talk:Automated taxobox system. Hope that helps! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:40, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

The ‘Origin of SARS-CoV-2’ page is outdated. It still claims the lab leak hypothesis is an unlikely scenario. A wikipedian with the name ‘Bon courage’ is not objective, still calls the lab leak hypothesis a ‘conspiracy theory’, ridicules it and seems to act like a watchdog so nothing in the article change in the direction of treating the lab leak hypotheis as a serious possibility, despite the fact that I sent some high quality sources that could make the article more objective, --ItIsAlwaysThere (talk) 06:11, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey @ItIsAlwaysThere, I unfortunately do not have knowledge regarding that topic. But I can sure point you to some right venues. Do discuss with editors on the articles talk page, and if you get Wikipedia:Consensus to change it, the content can easily be edited. Make sure the sources you mention for the change are Wikipedia:Reliable sources, Wikipedia:Independent sources and you convey only the text given in the source for the articles text. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:40, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Bunnypranav,

If you are going to close deletion discussions, please review, carefully, Wikipedia:Non-admin closure. especially this section on Inappropriate closures. Ordinarily NACs are not supposed to close discussions with a Delete outcome but I see there is a limited exception for CFDs. But please be careful with these closures as they might be contested and they are trickier than No consensus or Keep closures. If you have questions, ask HouseBlaster or one of the small group of admins who frequent CFD, okay? Thanks for all of your contributions. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:23, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Liz, before starting my NAC (especially delete) closures at CFD, I did ask some of my questions to HouseBlaster. I read the section you linked, and only close straightforward CFDs (leaving the complex ones to admins). Also, if I do (or did?) something wrong, please do tell me, and I will make it a point to fix it ASAP. Thanks for the message! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:28, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Is it ok to delete whole paragraphs that are irrelevant? --LordHanoverian (talk) 05:15, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey @LordHanoverian, without context it is hard to say, but generally it they are well sourced, and add encyclopedic value to the article, then we do not delete them. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 06:22, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Well there is a VM Jewelry company that I didn't find very successful. It's -7 on views. And I don't understand why Wikipedia should be their resource for expansion for their jewelry production. LordHanoverian (talk) 15:51, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

How do I download photos --LordHanoverian (talk) 18:26, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

LordHanoverian, just click Original file link below any image, and Ctrl+S to save it. If available, search for Download on the page and clicking it (maybe follow the additional steps if there) should do the same thing. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Whether present Indian politicians are PUBLIC SERVENTS or BUSINESSMAN NAGESHWAR RAO B (talk) 03:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey @NAGESHWAR RAO B, this seems like a question not exactly related to Wikipedia, so I can't answer that. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:52, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, it is a pleasure to meet you! Thank you so much; I hope you have a wonderful day. --Baerseven23 (talk) 12:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Welcome :) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:01, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

How do you make a new article? --CrazySmrt58 (talk) 23:24, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey @CrazySmrt58, have a look at Help:Your first article. It shows a detailed guide of how to start the process of writing a new article! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Bunny thanks for your help! I just created my 1st wiki page about my father, Rudy E Gallegos. Can you suggest any edits? Also, can I add a photo once published?

Robb Gallegos --Robbtennis (talk) 20:12, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey Robbtennis! In your sandbox article, you have not added any sources to verify the claims. Do have a look at Help:Your first article for a tutuorial on how to create a new article. You will have to added reliable and independent sources to prove notability, basically a set of criterion for whether and aticle should be included in Wikipedia or not. If the subject does not have significant coverage by those reliable sources, then unfortunately it is unfit for inclusion. In addition to these, the article should be written from a neutral point of view, and you should declare your conflict of interest as you are related to the subject.

Do read through these policies and follow them while writing your article so that it is not nominated for deletion by the community. Hope this helps! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:44, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

How do I upload a photo --Gail Jantjies (talk) 22:00, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey Gail Jantjies, Have a look at Wikipedia:Uploading images, and make sure to follow Wikipedia:Image use policy! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:09, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar

Thank you so much for taking me up on my request and converting 30 newspapers.com links into accessible clippings! And thank you for all the other work you've been quietly doing quite well, from content work to NPP to AfC... four years and 10,000 edits and no one's approached you about an RfA yet? That's something I might have to change... no promises, though, I'm not sure I'm up for a full vetting. for now, though, I really appreciate you doing something small that's dear to me. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 08:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much! You have truly brightened my day (and probably my whole month) with your kind and thoughtful words. Thank you for your exceptional efforts as well. :D ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:36, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello!

You made a feature request for afcrc-helper almost 6 months ago to request the ability to specify rcats for an entire request at WP:AFC/R. As your request is now on an archived page I just wanted to let you know that I've finally completed this request, and there is now a "sync all requests with first" button to accomplish what you desired! Sorry it took so long! :) (cc @LR.127 as you "+1"d the request) ~ Eejit43 (talk) 17:30, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much Eejit43! Just tried it out and it works fabulously. No need to be sorry at all, and thanks again for your continued work on so many scripts. :D ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:12, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

This is so cool! Thanks for developing and maintaining this tool. LR.127 (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello how are you doing? --Miles Ormerod (talk) 03:19, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey Miles Ormerod! Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm good, thank you. :) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi, so im making this new article called "Minas Qarawany" so how can i make it public and when i search for the name it pops up --Faresqar (talk) 18:18, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Faresqar, for the draft to be public, it should be reviewed by Wikipedia:Articles for creation. If you are done writing the draft, click the Submit draft for review button on the first banner on the page. Though, before doing so, make sure you follow all the instructions and guidelines given in that banner. Hope this helps! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:59, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	For helping new users, and making consistently good edits across Wikipedia. SID 'Gingerfool' RAT ☎ 19:20, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you SID 'Gingerfool' RAT, appreciate your kindness! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:00, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

How do I make my own category --Noah Henkel (talk) 21:48, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey Noah Henkel, have a look at the information over at Wikipedia:Categorization#Creating category pages. Make sure that it does not violate WP:PERFCAT or Wikipedia:Overcategorization. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:16, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello

I am interested in how to add a link to an article on the web or to another Wiki entry into a page I am editing. --Cassiewikieditor (talk) 15:13, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Cassiewikieditor, for any tips, tricks or instructions have a look at Help:Link. A shorter version can be found in the first few rows of Help:Cheatsheet. If you are adding a external link (link to any non-wikimedia webpage), make sure it follows the policy on external links. Hope this helps! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:49, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

I wanted to comment on the Black Sabbath tour page that a 2025 reunion is scheduled in Birmingham England --GWOOD62 (talk) 21:04, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey GWOOD62, if you wish to add any information to any page, no need to ask someone. Just make sure the content being added is appropriately sources by verifiable and reliable sources. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:46, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I guess what I was asking is How to post the message on the subject thread 2600:8807:9140:9E0:748A:FFD2:4B49:C7C8 (talk) 11:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

If you want to post a message on the talk page (i.e. Talk:Black Sabbath Reunion Tour), just go to that link and click on Add topic on the above toolbar. Also, you are currently logged out (while posting the reply), which makes your IP address public :) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:24, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello bunny, I am Sarthi... I've come to Wikipedia again because my old 9-year-old account got lost. I've wanted to learn about 3 philosophy: absurdism,n nihilism, and stoicism --Absurddistsarthi (talk) 14:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Absurddistsarthi. I'm not sure of those topics, but do search for them on Wikipedia! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:54, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi I am trying to create a detailed Wikipedia page on myself. I am not good at linking all the info, etc. And think you could easily make it way better (including all the stuff on google on me). Just want it to come up when people google me as there is a lot of people getting misinformation, etc. So it would be ideal to get a wiki page that can have my story/info especially with crazy social media attention right now. Thank you for your time/help! --Adam Arroyo (talk) 18:56, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Adam Arroyo! Autobiographies are strongly discouraged on Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Autobiography. This is because most autobiographies are written from a non-neutral point of view, have a conflict of interest, have sources which are not independently verifiable, and contain original research, all of which are against Wikipedia policies. If you are in fact notable, then someone will eventually write an article about you.

Since you mentioned social media, Wikipedia is not a social media network, or a blog or resume for that matter. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:20, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

مرحبا اين صفحة المقدمة لكي ابدى التحرير --المعهد العام لللغات الرقمية للتعليم عن بعد (talk) 23:47, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey @المعهد العام لللغات الرقمية للتعليم عن بعد., unfortunately I do not know Arabic. If you want to help editing the Arabic Wikipedia, have a look here: ar:ويكيبيديا:بوابة_المشاركة ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:10, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello how do you edit a title of a page? The one I'm looking at doesn't have proper capitalization but I can't click on the title to correct it... --Col. J. W. Massey (talk) 02:17, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Col. J. W. Massey. Titles of a page can only by edited by moving the page. The previous link gives you the instructions on how to do that. But keep in mind, Wikipedia has a lot of policies on page titles and specifically their capitalizations. See Wikipedia:Article titles and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization) before you decide to move any page. If you think the page move can be controversial, create an requested move and wait for community consensus on the page move. Generally, capitalizations are not that controversial, as long as they follow the naming conventions on capitalizations. Hope this helps you! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:15, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

What am I supposed to use my user page for? --TdjuserU (talk) 06:05, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Hey @TdjuserU! User pages are for organizing the work users do here, speaking to other users and for any interpersonal discussion, notices, testing and drafts. If desired, they can have limited autobiographical and personal content, but are not a host for promotional content. See What may I have in my user pages? and What may I not have in my user pages? for more info. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

ok

thx TdjuserU (talk) 16:39, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi, you were assigned as my Wiki mentor. Will you please help me get an article published? I have had other articles published on Wiki using a prior account, but I can’t get access to the old account anymore.

My newest article was rejected but I was not told exactly why. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomasfromla2 (talk • contribs)

Hey @Thomasfromla2: I assume you are talking about Rafaela Covas? If yes, this was declined by jlwoodwa with the reason being lack of reliable sources and high probability of being written by an AI. If you want this article to get published, you can fix the article by adding reliable and verifiable sources along with cleaning up the language and grammer to sound professional and encyclopedic. Click the link in the banner here to learn more about our policies and make your article suitable for inclusion! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

So am I to assume that Wiki does not allow citations from IMDB? Are you saying that IMDB is not reliable and verifiable? Thomasfromla2 (talk) 07:52, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Ps. I am in the process of cleaning up the language to sound encyclopedic. Thomasfromla2 (talk) 07:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

IMDB is definately not a reliable source for most claims. It can act as a additional source for a statement, but not the only one. See Wikipedia:Citing IMDb for some info on why it is not considered reliable, and the two ways it is in fact appropriate. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Ok. I will look for other sources. Thanks. Thomasfromla2 (talk) 08:00, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello Bunny Pranav. Thanks for reading my page about Perskor. I see that you have chosen a speedy deletion instead of just moving the page. Sorry. I thought I had placed the page in drafts. I have been making sure that information therein is correct. Derek J Moore (talk) 12:57, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Derek J Moore, the deletion was for the Perskor, not the draft at Draft:Perskor. I just asked for the mainspace page to be deleted since it was a redirect after you moved it to draft (according to WP:XNR). You can continue working on the draft. This was just a technical deletion, and not at all a mistake of yours. :) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:04, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Ah. That explains it. I was wondering why there was no notice on top of drafts. Thanks @Bunnypranavfor cleaning up. I would, if I could. But I don’t quite know how to do this yet. Best Derek J Moore (talk) 13:11, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Welcome! Just so you know, you can not leave the redirect behind only if you have the suppress redirect userright, given to Wikipedia:Page movers and Wikipedia:Administrators. TBH, its not a big deal, if you need to move to draft again, you can leave a {{db-r2}} on the page (or use User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft to add it automatically). Eventually an admin will delete it. Again, this is a very simple and repetitive task, not a problem at all. Cheers! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:18, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Sri Chaitanya logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 13:31, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading the better version, requested G7 (author request for deletion) of this file. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:35, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I recently saw you adding tag in an article accepted by me in AFC. Would you plz guide me how to find such things. Do we have any tool available for us to find this. Thank you Rahmatula786 (talk) 16:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Rahmatula786, figuring out if some content is AI or not is mostly just reading to through it. It will have some lengthy and puffery type words for explaining basic stuff. It's mostly based on instincts. Some guidance may be available at Wikipedia:WikiProject AI Cleanup

Also, while you're here, some of your recent AfC accepts seem to not pass notability: Shramdaan, Faraa. Those are sourced, but by unreliable sources, which do not count for notability. Please do not accept until the page has enough reliable sources to pass Wikipedia:SIGCOV and notability. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:42, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion. Will keep in mind. Since topics were important from encyclopaedia point of view, I was not very hard on it. Nevertheless your suggestions are valuable and well taken. Thank you. Rahmatula786 (talk) 09:10, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello Bunnypranav. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of American Manhunt: Osama Bin Laden, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: TV series and not not web content. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:52, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Understood, thanks for the notice! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:59, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello Bunnypranav:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in June!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 1 month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 June 2025 through 30 June 2025.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3200 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

• If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

How did you set up your AfC log page? Just noticed that I don't have that even though I also use AFCH :-). LR.127 (talk) 01:09, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Hey LR.127, this image should show you how to do so: File:AFCH with preferences.jpg. That interface is available in any draft page. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 05:06, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

just wanted to find that this june month back log will start from JUNE or from now itself. Rahmatula786 (talk) 03:41, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Hey Rahmatula786! It will start from June 1. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 04:00, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

thanks. i am willing to contribute in my part. Rahmatula786 (talk) 04:08, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! Any contribution is appreciated. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 04:09, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

I noticed from traffic logs that you have been experimenting with the new wikitech:Tool:Gitlab-content proxy. I wanted to let you know that I just deployed an updated version of the tool that adds support for a maxage={MAXAGE} query param that lets you set a cache duration in seconds. This can be helpful for keeping your browser from refetching content from the proxy on every request. You can set maxage to something like 86400 to only fetch from the proxy once per day. If you want to refresh things sooner than the cache expiry, browsers will generally reload everything from upstream when you ask for a hard refresh (Ctrl+F5 / Ctrl+Shift+R / Command+Shift+R). -- BryanDavis (talk) 22:06, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks BryanDavis! I'll implement this soon in my js files. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 03:11, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I see that you reverted my recent Amra 'stubbibg' and re-redirected it to Amra Choluim Chille. However, an Amra is a class, and Amra Choluim Chille is a instance. See also the Talk page.

Therefore, Amra deserves is own page. Certainly on the Irish wiki, I shall create a specific Amra page.

Does that make sense? Can we have a separate Amra page? Marcas.oduinn (talk) 15:26, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Marcas.oduinn, my primary reason for the reversion of edit was the unsourced stub that you created. Feel free to remove the redirect back provided you have gathered some reliable sources that can establish notability for the topic. If you want some help regarding this, do look into Help:Your first article. You can first create a draft of this article over at Draft:Amra, then following a review by another editor, it will be promoted to the mainspace article, replacing the redirect. Hope this helps! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 09:40, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Yes, very helpful, thank you, especially the notability criterion. Marcas.oduinn (talk) 09:57, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello

You signed-up to participate to the evaluation. Thank you for volunteering!

The feedback you share will help us assess and improve the performance of the Tone Check AI model.

The model is now ready to be tested, at this address: https://annotool.toolforge.org/projects/13

Annotool is the tool used by the Machine Learning team. You may be asked to log-in in order to start the evaluation.

Please read the instructions displayed on Annotool before beginning the evaluation.

If you have any question regarding the evaluation, please leave us a message on the project's talk page.

The evaluation will end on May 30. We really hope that you will enjoy working on evaluating the model!

Thank you again, Trizek_(WMF) 17:48, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for volunteering for this evaluation. We are leaving this message to let you know that the evaluation will end today, 30 May -- with a short extension over the weekend if you have not finished. --Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 21:44, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

I see you've reviewed one of my articles on the Dang states recently.

I'm having a problem because this one random person decided to flag several of my articles for deletion, based on declaring that official goverment records of the British Raj are "unreliable", and bases this on a literal essay that says it has not been vetted and does not represent a policy or a guideline. I pointed this out to him, but he seems just...unwilling to do respond or do anything.

Also the 3 pages affected are so relatively obscure I don't even know if anyone else will come take part here, and it is greatly impeding my projected project to standardize and expand coverage on the Gujarati Princely states, before a potential discussion on what should or should not be merged into an overarching article and what the criteria will be etc.

Do you have any idea what I can do in this situation ? Thank you.

Ummunmutamnag (talk) 11:17, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Ummunmutamnag, ironically I reviewed your article because it was tagged for deletion. Anyways, as of now I do not have the time to assess the articles and give my say in the deletion discussions. Although, I would like to point you to Help:My article got nominated for deletion!. Do read through it and follow the instructions there, it will probably help you. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:20, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you.

The issue is, the user uses a literal essay as reaosn for why my sources are not reliable. Four different editions of Pfficial Goverment records from across 25 years ! And I can supply 9 other editions, not to mention two different editions of the Golden Book. And I easily found additional sources mentioning these on archive.org in two minute !

Sorry just rambling, but thanks for your response. Ummunmutamnag (talk) 11:24, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

No worries! Do put all of the sources you found in the article, and state the reason why you consider them to be reliable in the deletion discussion page. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:26, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

I found at least 14 other sources in addition to that ! Ummunmutamnag (talk) 12:58, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi Bunnypranav, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:44, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Can you help to split Timeline of the Gaza war (18 March 2025 – present) by using May 2025 Gaza offensive (May 26) as a breakthrough event. Pachu Kannan (talk) 08:12, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

@Pachu Kannan: I'm okay with doing it, but I'm slightly confused with the dates. May 2025 Gaza offensive says the cabinet approval was on 4 May, start of IDF advances on 16 May, and first strikes on 18 May. There seems to be no exact clear line on which is the breakthrough event. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:36, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

This proposal was made by Borgenland and it was supported by two users including me. The IDF also announced the start of this offensive on 16 May. Pachu Kannan (talk) 08:46, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Ah, 16 May is fine, above you said May 26, so I got a bit confused. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:48, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

That was my typing error. Pachu Kannan (talk) 08:55, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done Noted at Talk:Timeline of the Gaza war (18 March 2025 – 15 May 2025)#Timeline is far too long. Better to have monthly timelines as well. Protection is requested, should be done soon. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 09:20, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your editor

Yayatube (talk) 13:19, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Welcome! Happy to help :D ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for undoing the reuse/hijacking/repurposing of Islamo-leftism. Unfortunately this was not done for Bibliography of Eurabia. Now several Wikipedia editions (and their replicates) wrongly say that the text «A Neo-Nationalist Network: The English Defence League and Europe's Counter-Jihad Movement» is a criticism of Islam. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 13:55, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Visite fortuitement prolongée, sorry but is there anything you would like me to do? I'm not aware of the intricacies of the topic, so didn't catch your message. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:59, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

«I'm not aware of the intricacies of the topic» => You do not need to know the intricacies of eurabia/criticism of islam in order to look at Bibliography of Eurabia, compare its current title with its content, understand that «The new name does not correspond to the page content nor the cited sources» (quote of the edit summary of your diff 1290028474), conclude that the page suffered an hostile repurposing, similar to Islamo-leftism a few weeks ago. You do need to know the intricacies of Wikipedia in order to undo an hostile repurposing however, but you showed by Special:Diff/1290027616 and Special:Diff/1290028474 that you have this knowledge. If The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is listed in Bibliography of books critical of Judaism then any non expert can see the problem. If texts carrying titles A Neo-Nationalist Network: The English Defence League and Europe's Counter-Jihad Movement, The Anti-Muslim Environment, The West's Last Chance, are listed in Bibliography of books critical of Islam then any non expert can see the problem. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 17:31, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Gotcha, but is there anything specific I can help you with? (Like a move/swap) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 02:42, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for running WP:GENFIXES. I saw the edits on some articles I was watching, and they were useful. Bluerasberry (talk) 15:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Welcome @Bluerasberry! 🤗 I had been wanting to run it for a while, finally managed to get myself together. Now I can finally put a award up at the bots user page, yay! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:36, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed you added orphan tag to article Kaushala Prasad Mishra . This article was newly created any way now the page is linked with Nehru Gram Bharati. Can you help me how to remove this tag? Thanks in advance!

-PKM Prabodha K Meher (talk) 09:12, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! Prabodha K Meher (talk) 15:42, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I resubmitted without any changes because the previous reviewer was incorrect about the models not having been released yet. They have been, the last two references are from April and May 2025, and I believe sufficient to establish notability. I would really appreciate it you took a look at it again. Thank you. 117.195.138.126 (talk) 18:47, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Hey IP, based on the sources given, the models are still not yet announced? I don't see anything wrong in my decline? ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 05:19, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

The first three models were released and available in December already. The Verge source cited second says: "There are three “understanding” models available now". 117.195.138.126 (talk) 09:35, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Ah, my bad. I have resubmitted the draft and added a comment stating this. Please wait for another reviewer. Thanks! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 09:54, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Friend. Alana Felisberto is a Brazilian fashion model who has developed an international career, appearing in runway shows for brands such as Fendi, Oscar de la Renta, and Bottega Veneta. She has also featured in advertising campaigns for Victoria’s Secret and LaQuan Smith, becoming the first Brazilian model to lead a campaign for the latter. Her editorial work includes appearances in publications such as Vogue Mexico and Harper’s Bazaar. Coverage in reliable, independent sources suggests that she meets the notability guidelines for fashion models.

Vitorgpl4 (talk) 15:29, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Alana_Felisberto — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vitorgpl4 (talk • contribs) 15:30, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

I have reverted my decline. Please wait for another reviewer. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:56, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello I noticed you just accepted this article at AFC, but it seams to be still unreviewed/patrolled, maybe you could help out. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 05:36, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Chippla360:  Done this time, but generally you don't need to ask for it to be done. Since it was already AfC accepted, it will eventually be done quicker than other articles. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 05:40, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

@Bunnypranav That’s cool, I Personally draftify the article, I Just became a reviewer at AFC so I wanted the last article I created to also pass through a review process instead of leaving it on mainspace, also I wanted it evaluated by other editors. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 05:44, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

No worries :) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 06:00, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Regarding this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Redlands,_California&diff=prev&oldid=1293353794

"4th of July" is idiomatic and correct in American English, referring to Independence Day. "4 July" is not. Wanderer V8 (talk) 11:10, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Apologies for the mistake, the bot seems to not have caught it. Thanks for fixing it! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:19, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

@Bunnypranav: Your bot is breaking some pie charts, like on Special:Diff/1293565976. I'm tagging Exoplanetaryscience, who created that chart, and who seems to have used a workaround for the pie chart widget to function correctly that the bot isn't fond of. Renerpho (talk) 12:57, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

On Ennomos family, the bot is engaged in an edit war. I've also reverted it on Eurybates family, Hilda family, Hektor family. Renerpho (talk) 13:03, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Renerpho, sorry for the issues. This is caused as the bot is removing links to the page itself, which is expected behaviour. Unfortunately, this also seems to be breaking the pie charts. Thanks for all the reverts! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:18, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

@Bunnypranav: You're welcome. I hope you can do something about it? Renerpho (talk) 14:25, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Hmm. Ideally the page should not link to itself, that is the root cause (though I am not sure if/how that is possible with the charts). Since I am not running my own code, but this is in fact just Wikipedia:GENFIXES, one would need to update AWB code to add an exemption for the charts. For now, I can stop the bot running on the bot on CW Error #48, which detects a page linking itself. I would really appreciate if you and Exoplanetaryscience can find a better workaround. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

@Bunnypranav: I've just looked at Module:Chart, trying to work around the issue. For the chart to be displayed as intended -- that is, with wikilinks being displayed to some entries in the legend --, one must specify a link for every entry. For those entries that don't need a wikilink, the article itself is linked, which the module (correctly) interprets to display no link at all. This may be a design flaw, an oversight, which should be reported on Module talk:Chart; or a bug, in which case it should go to WP:PHAB.

In the mean time, I see no better workaround with how the module works right now. I believe this is basically the intended way. Renerpho (talk) 15:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

@Renerpho What about Special:Diff/1294096389? I just removed :: and following text. Taken from this particular section of Module:Chart. Granted, now that section links to Ennomos_family#noSuchAnchor, but I don't think that is a big issue. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:19, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Hey, I think that might actually work, and be easy to do. @Exoplanetaryscience: When you've had time to collect all the articles that are affected, you can implement that fix? Otherwise you know where to reach me, give me the list and I'll do it. Renerpho (talk) 15:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Some of the pages in this genre may be found at Category:Asteroid groups and families which are also in Special:WhatLinksHere/Module:Chart. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:43, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

That's such a stupidly simple fix, it's actually funny. Renerpho (talk) 15:33, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ReCAPTCHA&diff=1293560175&oldid=1292809552 49.97.26.50 (talk) 05:44, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

The bot made the formatting look worse, but it was not just because of it. The original formatting was also messed up, using span tags, multiple instances of italic and bold, and linking to the title in the lead. The title of a page should not be linked in the same article, and the bolding was there as it was a self-link, see Help:Self link. Regardless, thanks for the notification, and I have manually fixed the formatting. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 05:57, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

@Bunnypranav. Hi, im writing to you regarding the EuroDNS draft article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:EuroDNS In my second revision, I removed all peacocking terms, and I added more resources. I believe every single statement is backed up by an independent source. Can you please let me know how to proceed? Thank you very much. Fgarcia12345 (talk) 08:51, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

If you are talking about Special:Diff/1294890847, then I can see only one source added, which also is titles on the founder, not the company. I do not think that is enough significant coverage. Also, the draft is still not according to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. An example: EuroDNS's business model centers on being a comprehensive provider for domain-related needs, especially for customers requiring many different international domains. The company's "one-stop-shop" strategy has been credited as a key to its growth, enabling clients to manage a diverse portfolio of domain names across various country-code and generic TLD registries via a single service provider. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:50, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Thankyou @Bunnypranav for the feedback. The domain industry competitor Gandi had their wikipedia page approved, I believe they have garnered the same amount of media covered. I will take a look at their sources and build a similar bibliography. I will also edit the langauge to maintain a neutral tone of voice. Thank you very much. Fgarcia12345 (talk) 11:28, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi Bunnypranav, the bot wrongly removed a wikilink to the article itself within an imagemap in Nodens with this edit. That broke the imagemap display (and caused an IP to helpfully delete the entire structure).

Imagemap entries (lines) are required to contain links, even if some of those are to the article itself. Each such entry is effectively a clickable region (box) and it has to contain a link target so that the click can be obeyed. This is mandatory.

In addition, imagemaps including this one are used in multiple articles, so it would be undesirable to have multiple versions of the same imagemap.

Please fix the bot so that it does not damage imagemaps. Many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:06, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks Chiswick for the notice, and the fix. Unfortunately, this seems to be a bug of AWB, so I think I'll have to stop the bot from doing changes with that checkwiki error (title linked in text). I'll also maybe file a phab task for fixing this in AWB some time. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:42, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:00, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

		The Special Barnstar
		Thank you for assisting me regarding my username. I value your feedback and appreciate that you took time our of your day to assist me. MWFwiki (talk) 02:58, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

No worries, happy to give my opinion! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:00, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi I wanted to discuss the article Relay Ball EliG233 (talk) 06:56, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

All the needed information regarding how and what to improve in the draft can be found in the links here. Another guide for beginners that I can recommend to you is Help:Your first article ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:16, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank is my Draft currently ready EliG233 (talk) 07:17, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Please wait for the review by me or any other reviewer since they are not reviewed in any particular order ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:20, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

I’ve been waiting and working on it to EliG233 (talk) 07:20, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

LTA evading a block. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:38, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I need to delete one of the images here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mosaic_of_Neptune,_Ostia_Antica.jpg because I accidentally uploaded the first one with private information in the exif data. How do I do that? --Justin Benttinen (talk) 09:03, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

@Justin Benttinen: I have requested the deletion at c:Special:Diff/1044566691 on your behalf, citing this message. It will be done soon by a Wikimedia Commons administrator. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:54, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

@Justin Benttinen: I am an administrator on Commons, and I declined the request on Commons, for two reasons.

1. The file is in use.
2. Commons deletion requests using the speedy deletion option G7 must be made by the uploader.

If I can be of any help with this, feel free to leave a message on my Commons talk page. -- Auntof6 (talk) 13:04, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks Auntof6 for the message, you beat me by a few seconds. Justin, please remove the image by undoing Special:Diff/1295862937 with the little undo button on the top. After that, add {{db-author}} on the top of the image's page one you are in the edit window. Hope this helps! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:07, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, is there a way to only delete the version of the file that has the unwanted exif information? The second version of the file has the information removed. Justin Benttinen (talk) 02:56, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

@Justin Benttinen: Maybe? I've never done it, but it looks like versions can be selectively deleted. If I try it and it completely deletes the file, can you upload it again? -- Auntof6 (talk) 03:04, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Absolutely! I happened to have made a panorama that was better than the original image used in the article about Ostia so I wanted to replace it. I'd just rather not have to go and describe and edit it again. Thanks a lot! Justin Benttinen (talk) 03:06, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

@Justin Benttinen: OK, but it's still in use, so I need you to remove it from the page as Bunny described above.

I need to go out for a bit, so I'll check back when I return -- should be less than an hour. -- Auntof6 (talk) 03:32, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm back, but I see that the file is still in use. If you still want me to help, ping me here when the file isn't in use. -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:28, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

I have reverted the change to Baths at Ostia is that what I need to do? This is my first time doing any of this stuff. Justin Benttinen (talk) 04:30, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

@Justin Benttinen: Yes, that's what I needed. I think I deleted the earlier version. Please check and let me know. -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:42, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Perfection. I am happy to contribute my work for free to Wikipedia but the world doesn't need to know the serial number of my camera and other stuff like that. Thanks! Justin Benttinen (talk) 04:44, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

@Justin Benttinen: You're welcome. I'm glad it worked and I learned something, so win-win! -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:50, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

hello , if i find commercial link inerted in the wikipedia page can i remove it ? --Nandha96 (talk) 09:57, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

@Nandha96: Feel free to do so, provided it is following the policy of Wikipedia:External links and WP:NOTPROMO ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:55, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Fine, thanks Nandha96 (talk) 01:02, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Bunnypranav, thanks for the comment.

I’d like to respond to your concern about the sources not demonstrating significant coverage or lacking independence and reliability.

I’ve cited several references that I believe do meet the bar for notability and independence, including:

• A detailed technical review by Tim Mangan (2006) originally published on BrianMadden.com and now archived at TMurgent — Mangan is a respected industry expert in EUC and application virtualization, with no affiliation to LoadGen. His write-up goes beyond a mention and evaluates LoadGen’s capabilities directly.
• Several blog posts by Ingmar Verheij, an independent EUC consultant, which analyze LoadGen’s components (e.g., Analyzer and LoadBots) in depth.
• LoadGen is also featured in research articles by GO-EUC.com — a community-driven EUC testing group — as a key benchmarking tool used in studies from 2021–2025 on Windows 10/11, hardening, and policy performance. These are reproducible test setups, not vendor mentions.
• A 2023 article by Chris Twiest published in TechTarget, where LoadGen is directly named as a recommended benchmarking tool in the context of Citrix VDI sizing.
• Additional market listings in Tracxn and Capterra confirm LoadGen’s presence in software testing tool directories, though I recognize these aren’t sufficient on their own.

If there are specific sources you find insufficient or concerns you’d recommend I address (e.g., replacing weaker refs or adding inline attribution), I’d really appreciate your input. My goal here is to make this article better and ensure it aligns with WP:N and WP:RS.

Thanks again! Moh216 (talk) 13:41, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

There is absolutely no point of adding AI comments on talk pages of users. I will not reply to such comments. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:44, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Just to clarify — the comment was written by me. I did use minimal AI to help with structure, but the content and intent were entirely my own. I’m genuinely trying to engage in good faith, so I was a bit surprised to see it dismissed outright. I’d still welcome any feedback on the sourcing if you're open to it. Moh216 (talk) 14:18, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the (hopefully truthful) clarification. I'd point you to Help:Your first article which is a detailed guide on how to write an article, keeping in mind policies of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for your particular article. You can go through these three links which give a beginner's guide (first), and a detailed policy guide of writing such articles (latter two). ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:17, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello - I have just submitted my first Wikipedia article. I'm unclear on the next steps. Do you need to review it? Or do I have to wait for someone else to review it? Any insights would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! --JazzyOxygen (talk) 20:08, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Hey @JazzyOxygen, I assume you are talking about Draft:Cyan Ta'eed? It has been reviewed, in any case this reviewing is done by Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants (AfC reviewers, NPPers, and Admins). Since you highly above Wikipedia:Autoconfirmed, you can move the draft yourself once you think it is ready. Keep in mind if you have a conflict of interest with the topic, then going through AfC reviewing is highly advisable. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:57, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

What can I do to improve my draft page about Sharky? Monazarm (talk) 14:15, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

@Monazarm Have a look at Help:Your first article. You should add sources that show significant coverage of the subject, and are independant and reliable. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:36, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

• Merged account (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Correns Corporation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello @Bunnypranav, thank you for talking your time to read my article and giving a hint regarding improvement, since you`ve pointed out that the sources need to be improved regarding "significant coverage". May I get a bit more from your time? What I wonder is, if I can understand your reply in a way that you would judge the other sources as sufficient reliable and independent? With other words: could you please let me know which source you judge as insufficient? And I would like to add the following source, but am not so sure if this judged as "sufficient coverage". How do you think?https://www.industrysourcing.com/article/dry-molded-fiber-for-the-japanese-market

Merged account (talk) 07:52, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

As far as I can see, only the second and third mention the subject. I can't see any mention in 5 (hope that is not because of translation though), and 4 and 6 are not independant and reliable. This does show notability per Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). You can go through these three links for a guide as to what is reliable and considered for significant coverage. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:31, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for participating in the Articles for Creation June Backlog Drive! We've done amazing work so far, dropping the backlog by more than 2000 drafts already. We have around 2300 drafts outstanding, and we need your help to get that down to zero in 5 days. We can do this, but we need all hands on deck to make this happen. A list of the pending drafts can be found at WP:AFCSORT, where you can select submissions in your area of interest. Thank you so much for your work so far, and happy reviewing! – DreamRimmer ■ 01:28, 25 June 2025 (UTC)