User talk:Bonadea/Archive 32

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Bonadea. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Happy New Year!

Bonadea,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:41, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:41, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

HI

Why are you trying to delete an article that was voted to stay? Muamalq (talk) 23:32, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

It was not "voted to stay", and the rationale is presented on the deletion discussion page. --bonadea contributions talk 23:34, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

I will agree with you to put it to a vote, but return the article as it was so as not to affect the vote Muamalq (talk) 23:53, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Keep in mind that it is not a vote! I have added a link to the previous version. It would not be constructive to revert to that version since it was blatantly inappropriate, and I spent a lot of time improving it. --bonadea contributions talk 00:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you

I wish to keep an article, and for information, all talk about a topic is pinned on corporate websites, not a claim as I described it, and there are many characters on Wikipedia like this person Muamalq (talk) 00:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi. I am Twinkle. I have modified the Draft:Taaza Khabar as per WP:N. Can you please have a look and suggest me for further improvement? Also, if possible can you review it? Thanking you: Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:23, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Respected Sir. Please help me to improve this article. Draft:Sachidanand_Bharti Manish Panwar ^{(talk) |Contribs)} 13:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Bonadea,

Thank you for spending the time going through all of the sources in this article. I don't know if you read Arabic but if not, this must have been time-consuming. It's clear you tried to see if there was anything worth saving in this article and then decided to send it to AFD when you saw that it was a clearly promotional article. I think the deletion decision was appropriate and I appreciate you taking the time to work through this content for the project. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:53, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Prophet Muhammad don't have any real picture. I am respectful any art. But religion is not an art and this depiction can cause outrage. There is no need to being disrespectful to any belief, view and life style. This is not an art page and people are given false information. There is not a real proof. Prophet Muhammad did not want to people worship himself therefore he had restricted all of his images. People tend to worship images and tombs and it is not against art . Muhammad prevented all of this trading by image ban. The only trading comes through his words by books. IWikipedia is considered independent and respectful to all the beliefs. Muhammad picture is considered as insulting among muslims. It is known fact but they are insulted by a picture whether it exists or not. What is the value of this picture on global society? Nothing but misery Mfgl (talk) 21:50, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Responding on your user talk page. --bonadea contributions talk 21:52, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

I understand wikipedia has some process but I don't need confirmation beliefs. Configuring browsers for what I believe is non-objective information. Problem is not related what I wanted to see. The real problems come from suspicious informations. There should be a mark on these types of contents. It will more accurate Mfgl (talk) 22:09, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I saw you were good with dealing with hoax articles. Can you deal with this too? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Talib_Shah

Everything there and added by that user is fake 94.25.85.100 (talk) 00:45, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

DEAR BONAEDA I WANT TELL YOU THE MISTAKE YOU DO BY EDITING PAGE LIST OF MOON MISSION ON TOMMOROW IF YOU WANT TO KNOW THEN REPLY ABHIGYAN ANUBHAV SK (talk) 06:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

@ABHIGYAN ANUBHAV SK: Please do not type in all caps (LIKE THIS). As I explained on your user talk page, your edits to List of missions to the Moon had to be reverted for several reasons: it removed a reference, changed the text so it became impossible to understand, and added a category that doesn't exist. You have made several edits to various Wikipedia articles and other pages that have had to be reverted by your fellow editors. It looks like your command of English is not quite strong enough to edit English Wikipedia – but there are more than 300 different Wikipedia versions in different languages, and you are welcome to contribute to Wikipedia in your native language. Here is a list of Wikipedias. --bonadea contributions talk 12:34, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Lander chandryyan was not crash it hard landed Awesome23!?h (talk) 15:46, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

I have added a name but removed by you Jordocofye (talk) 11:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

@Jordocofye: Yes, because there was no reliable and independent source. IMDb cannot be used as a source; here is an explanation of why that is. Also note that cast lists in Wikipedia usually do not list every single person who appears in a film. More info here. Besides, you added the name as a "cameo" and "starring" part, which is clearly not correct since none of the sources mentioned the actor. --bonadea contributions talk 12:37, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

	The Special Barnstar
	Wikilove to you ~Tallulah (talk) 20:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

I'm sorry if I made things hard for you and other members of the Wikipedia team. I'm going to stick to copyediting and bad link banishment from now on, so hopefully I won't be any trouble. I tend to learn better by experience, but I realize that there are places where you should really just read the user manual. Please accept this sweet dessert as a peace offering for you. ~Tallulah (talk) 06:14, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Mmmm... baklava! Thank you! And don't worry – we all make mistakes and Wikipedia's guidelines can be pretty complicated. bonadea contributions talk 09:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Hey Assalamualaikum. Kim bum setelah bff mulai kurang terdengar oleh internasional dan hanya terdengar oleh fans2nya. Br terdengar lg wkt 2020 lalu. (Silahkan translate sendiri ya) Akbar Alhadi (talk) 02:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Please do not communicate in Indonesian at English Wikipedia. --bonadea contributions talk 10:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Why was the draft declined? Draft:Pradip Adhikari the similar page 4K Gaming Nepal I added was approved having similar Sources and Links 202.51.80.152 (talk) 21:52, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. --bonadea contributions talk 22:03, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Bonadea. You have new messages at ApprenticeFan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 11:12, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Here is the edit that I made at The Bachelor (American season 27) before you reverted to blank as I am able to finish watching the first episode:

Could you check for the grammar fixes before I will re-edit the summary to make a better for MOS:TVPLOT in the popular American dating reality show? The one thing the summary is not made nonsense that I think it might be a good entry for the summary. ApprenticeWiki ^contribs 12:06, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

About the Kristy Scott article. 5 things I have to say

1. Removing citations that were gotten from cites that aren’t deprecated or blacklisted is bad practice, especially if the cites have their own Wikipedia page (which on its own is a sign of notability).

2. Obviously they were other citations there, but out of all the citations you removed you, the only citations from blue linked sources were Indian. Removing sites because they are from India and tagging them as “gossipy” is discriminatory.

3. There are several articles about the subject, but they were from deprecated sites like mirror and daily star of the UK and for that reason, I left them out because I know what I’m doing

4. I see you have been on Wikipedia for 16 years. You’re probably a millennial, with little appreciation for the fact that social media influencing have become a REAL thing. You must come to terms that social media personalities have become as REAL as any other branch of human professionals. The news they generate is in relation with the kind of content they create. It’s not one size fits all.

5. If my tone sounds rude, bear with me. I’m sleepy. Cheers

Amaekuma (talk) 22:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

@Bonadea:: Hi Bonadea, Thank you for taking the time to review the Draft:Caroline Klebl. I wanted to ask a few follow-ups regarding your feedback, especially as it relates to interviews as sources. I see a lot of the sources were flagged as promotional because they were interviews. I assumed an interview that is conducted and edited by an independent publication that fact checks its information, without the intent of promoting a subject but merely speaking to an expert in a subject matter, is considered independent. Would you mind clarifying why that is not the case?

1 is a trivial mention - this is a reference to the subject, which states her name and title. It is not meant to serve as anything else other than to verify who she is by an independent source. Is there a way to better do that so it is not deemed trivial? Or maybe a better place to put it? 3 is a profile on an organisation's website - this is profile on an independent, non-profit organization that certifies instructors. They are not paid to put her profile online, she is considered qualified under their guidelines. This will have been independently verified. 4 doesn't mention Klebl at all so is irrelevant - this is to verify that her guru was considered a "prominent yoga guru" (so as not to assume hyperbole). Happy to remove this, but that was the intention there. 5 is a profile on an organisation's website (more substantial than no 3, but neither independent nor secondary). - this article in LA Yoga was published in the both their website and print edition. It is not a promotional interview, but an article to discuss yoga using an expert as their source. Would you mind providing some clarity on why this would be considered an unreliable source? 7 and 8 are amazon.com links - this was just to verify that these books exist, not as a form of promotion. But definitely appreciate how that wasn't clear! Many thanks for your time. Cammur (talk) 05:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Can you help me? What do I need to add to Ulricthemerc? Alink to his music? He is a published artist on Itunes, Amazon, youtube etc. Eeubanksa (talk) 01:47, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi Bonadea.Hope you are keeping well. I have observed you reviewing this article and sharing your reasons for moving to draft. Thanks for your suggestions. I have understood your context and will follow them in future. Apologies for the same. Thanks. Gardenkur (talk) 06:48, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

@Bonadea: Dear Bondea, Good day,yesterday evening I got alarmed to one of the most painful news ever which was you were deleting the page of Jeff O. Ajueshi personally I really don't understand the reason for doing so.I am his son and I thought it deemed right to make a page for my father who is a leading and renowned art curator and gallerist in Nigeria.He has done so much for art.yet,he hasn't had a Wikipedia page.This pained me and motivated me to make a page for him.Mr.Bondea I respect your decision but I pleadingly ask for your mercy to forgive me for the disliked things you may have noticed on the page that I myself may have not noticed.So,I ask for you to give me a second chance and help in improving the Jeff O. Ajueshi page. Thank you. Mi1LORDE (talk) 11:21, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi, Mind having a 2nd look at the Affiliate marketing? the change was for the heading that had no relation whatsoever to spam section that is listed in another place. Regarding citation, it was asked to add citations, so the "reflink spam" was out of place as well. Avizaz (talk) 23:57, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

@Avizaz: No, there was no misunderstanding. Two or three of the many entries in that list are not websites, so it would make sense to remove them. But I had to look pretty hard to find them. One thing I did miss was the fact that "personal website" was already in the list. That entry shouldn't be there at all. But that hostadvice.com is not a reliable or informative source is obvious – in addition it doesn't even support the claim, which makes it refspam. --bonadea contributions talk 09:48, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

I understand why you changed the header back, but the addition of personal websites does add more than just "personal websites". Regarding the reference link, I added the link directly to the mentioned paragraph. If you consider the site unreliable, that's your decision.

Overall, please consider bringing back the text about personal websites that was added, with or without the citation. Avizaz (talk) 20:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello there - I submitted my first article and it looks like you declined it. No harm no foul - I assumed there would be some issues. I am hoping you can provide a little more direction. A few things:

1. I am quite certain the article's subject meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. So as far as I can tell, that is not an issue.

2. I am a related family member of the person the article is about. I understand that while "strongly discouraged", that doesn't necessarily invalidate the article. Is it ok to add a COI Disclosure on the talk page of the [draft] article, and continue with the submission process? Or will the COI cause the article to forever be blocked, in which case I shouldn't bother submitting the article?

3. I have since learned that Facebook and Amazon are not acceptable sources. I will remove them and replace with something verifiable. Are there other sources that are not valid?

4. I see the article was rejected for not using a formal tone. Because of the COI (as per above), I worked to make the writing as neutral as possible. I wonder if you could provide some specifics? What sections or sentences would be considered inappropriate?

Many thanks for any information you can provide. Squasha4416 (talk) 15:21, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your message, @Squasha4416:. I agree with you about his notability – many journalists and reporters are not notable even though they have written for notable publications, but Leland won a Pulitzer and it looks like there's quite a few independent sources talking about him.

As for your COI, you can definitely continue editing and submitting the draft! Thank you for posting the disclosure. Once the draft has been accepted you shouldn't edit the article directly but rather post edit requests on the talk page, but while it is still a draft there is no need for you to avoid editing it. This is in fact one of the reasons there is a draft process, so that editors with a conflict of interest can create a draft and submit it to be reviewed by an independent editor.

Other sources to avoid – excellent question! As you probably know, a key concept is that sources should be reliable. "Reliable" in the Wikipedia context means that there's good reason to believe that the facts published in the source have been checked for accuracy. This is particularly important in a biograpy about a living person, and it is tied to the policy of verifiability. It's impossible to give an exhaustive list of non-reliable sources, but there are some types of sources that should not be used, and you'll find a list of such types here. You can also check this list of specific sources that are often discussed, with comments on whether they are considered to be reliable or not – but note that if a source isn't on that list, it doesn't mean that it is necessarily reliable or unreliable! A short summary of what a reliable source is in Wikipedia, with a quiz, can be found here.

The tone of the draft – well, it's not extremely promotional, but there are phrases such as "he has written countless articles" and "many other awards", and overall a kind of journalistic style that comes across as more persuasive than informative. The section on Information style and tone in the explanatory essay Writing better articles discusses this.

The section on the Spotlight Team could be compressed; the article is supposed to be a biography of Leland, and the focus on this team feels a bit undue (though some of it could perhaps be added to the article The Boston Globe). In particular, the unintegrated quote could be removed, and the many short paragraphs, another stylistic choice that feels more like journalistic writing than encyclopedic text, could be trimmed and combined. Meta commentary such as the last sentence in that section, pointing to the interview, shouldn't be part of an article. If there is information in the interview that might be relevant in the biography, such information could be included with the interview as a source – I'm not sure that is the case, though, because it seems to be very much about the team and not about Leland.

Finally, a point you didn't ask about but I wanted to mention because it is pretty important: please do write the citations in a format that helps the reader understand what they are, with at least a minimum of bibliographic information. I formatted the first two citations as seen here (I also removed the amazon ref) to give you an idea of what it should look like. You don't need to do this manually in the article code! (I mean, you can do that, but it's a bit fiddly.) I used RefToolbar, a tool that's built into the editing interface. This is a guide to using RefToolbar. Remember to remove the old url-only references, though!

Apologies for the very long response. I hope you can find some of it useful. Best, --bonadea contributions talk 12:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Fabulous reply and very thoughtful. I truly appreciate your tips and direction. Being my first experience, I was quite concerned that I would have one shot at submission and if declined, I would be banned forever. So I'm happy to learn that this is an iterative process, and my only goal is to work with you to get it right.

I would be VERY happy to let others edit the article in the future. My hope was to do the heavy lifting of the research and posting the initial article. But once it's "out there", I fully plan to back away and let others fill in the gaps.

One lingering question: I can find hundreds and even thousands of references to Timothy Leland in the Boston Globe. I am sure any of them would be considered a reliable source and it would be easy to use those articles as citations. But some - and even most - are probably behind a paywall. I have a subscription and can access the articles but I suppose others won't. Am I allowed to use them? Or should I only use them when other easily accessible sources are available?

Thanks again for your helpful note. I'll start on submission v.2.

PS. Are you "assigned" to this article? Will you be the one working on it until it gets published? Or is it randomly handled by any available editor? Squasha4416 (talk) 18:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

I went ahead and resubmitted. I hope we are getting closer! Please feel free to let me know if we are not on the right track and will make the necessary edits. Many thanks. Squasha4416 (talk) 22:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello I dont know why you decline draft . Can you tell me resone? 202.86.221.164 (talk) 20:35, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello sir. I have further improved my Draft:Om Murti Anil#. Please have a look and guide me what to do next since there was issue of COI with original creator.

Regards!!! Gauravs 51 (talk) 08:26, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Well, the draft is submitted for review so all you really need to do is wait for the review to happen. What you should not do is move the draft to article space yourself. By submitting it for review, you have asked for it to be moved, and so you don't need to request that in any other way. I notice that you claim to own the copyright of the photo you added to the draft. Is that correct? Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 09:07, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

@Bonadea Sir, I took the photo from the internet. That was probably a mistake, I accept. I will add something which doesn't have copyright infringement. Gauravs 51 (talk) 10:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

@Bonadea according to Wikipedia WP:PUBLISHED I'm added all sources in Draft:Sangramsingh Thakur Rajmama (talk) 20:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

@Rajmama: That a source is published does not automatically mean that it is reliable. Some published sources are reliable, others are not. And even if all sources are reliable and published, it does not automatically mean that the topic is notable. --bonadea contributions talk 15:22, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

@Bonadea even if all sources are reliable and published, it does not automatically mean that the topic is notable? Then when does he become notable? See WP:RS Rajmama (talk) 03:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

A reliable source that mentions a topic in passing does not show that the topic is notable. An unreliable source that discusses a topic directly also doesn't show notability. You should stop focusing solely on promoting this actor as it will just lead to frustration. --bonadea contributions talk 10:36, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

@Bonadea I'm not promoting him I'm just stared my contributions so I'm taking one topic. I'm just clearing my doubts which helping me to another articles.thats it.. and please guide me how can I add his name in Indian Predator: Murder In A Courtroom you said add source I'm also added but you removed his name. And you say I'm promoting him. The one of Actor Indian Predator: Murder In A Courtroom he also does not have significant Coverage so its that means he is not a actor of this series? I'm just clearing my doubts.. Rajmama (talk) 16:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

You added his name as a "starring" part in the infobox, with a non-reliable source which didn't say anything about starring parts (and which can't be used in Wikipedia.) It is a very common form of promotion to add actor names to articles about films or TV series they have appeared in, while claiming that they were "starring". Since you registered your account a couple of years ago, almost all your edits have been to add Thakur's name in Wikipedia articles or drafts. Please stop doing that. In addition, several other accounts, used by a paid editor, have also tried to promote him. --bonadea contributions talk 18:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

@Bonadea I'm not promoting anyone and I'm working on thakur's Draft because I'm created that draft. so that not means I'm promoting him..I'm also created indian predator page and also contribute in other articles. Every wikipedia user creat articles it that means they promoting that topic? You also created 67 articles so it that means you promoting them? Rajmama (talk) 21:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

I've seen you edit some difficult India-related topics. Jai Shri Ram has a new passionate editor (reminds me a little of certain SAQ-list discussions) since mid-March [1], your input would be appreciated. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

@Gråbergs Gråa Sång: How could I resist? :-) Thanks, I'll have a look. --bonadea contributions talk 15:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:07, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Hey Bonadea,

Thank you for reviewing my draft for "simon t****well", (name censored so this does not show up on search engines as a search result, out of respect for his family), regardless of the wiki page being declined. I knew this man personally and have created this Wikipedia page in honor of his work so if anybody stumbles across his old releases, they can become aware of the man behind the music.

There is not much proof online regarding whether or not this person was even real, which is why I will never be able to include enough citations for you to approve the page - but I would love you to approve the page. There is nothing more I can do to verify the content.

Kindest regards, Themastermind111 Themastermind111 (talk) 06:52, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

I am sorry for not including a subject title. Themastermind111 (talk) 06:54, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

WOW you are a bored dude - maybe this is the only place you have any power in your life? 2601:589:4102:122E:E1F7:F456:7AEF:A423 (talk) 12:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

It's as if you knew me. Or not. --bonadea contributions talk 12:17, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

The butt fumble has an article, and it is the exact same. The butt punt is way more famous now. The only reason you declined it is because you are from Sweden. You don’t like American football and that is why you declined it. I hope that Zlatan Ibrahimović gets injured, and you guys lose to the San Marino national team. Manny Manatee (talk) 20:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

If I could walk in to your house, I would keep my shoes on to annoy you. Manny Manatee (talk) 20:28, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

I would also talk extremely loudly, and sit right next to you on an empty bus or train. Manny Manatee (talk) 20:31, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

That wouldn't improve the draft to where it would meet any notability criteria, now, would it? --bonadea contributions talk 11:54, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

You just don’t understand American football. Manny Manatee (talk) 16:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

You declined Draft:Muzamil_Mahmood_Dar as it doesn't follow notability. Can you tell what is the notability criteria for Football coaches in India. isn't I-League , I-League 2 Indian Women's League considered for notability. KashmirValleyEditor (talk) 06:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

There are no special notability guidelines for football coaches. Why did you name the draft Muzamil Mahmood Dar? I can't see where any of the sources use that name? (That is not why it was declined, it's just something that struck me as odd.) --bonadea contributions talk 15:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Actually it is written as "Muzamil Mahmood Dar" on the official website of Indian football federation, this is the reason why i kept this name. Here is the link to that website: Muzamil Mahmood Dar.

If there are no notability guidelines for football coaches but you commented as "Submission is about a person not yet shown to meet notability guidelines" Can you mention those guidelines, i will try to meet those.

And one more thing, i wasn't aware that there is already a Draft available on Wikipedia, i got to know after i checked your comment on the draft.

Can you please merge that draft with this one.

.

I am currently working on few articles related to football and i guessed this Draft:Muzamil_Mahmood_Dar will qualify for wikipedia as the proper references are available and the person is notable.

.

Waiting for your precious feedback regarding improvement in this Draft. KashmirValleyEditor (talk) 15:52, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to you in regard to the Draft:Lukas O'Neall that I have been working on. I have made several edits and added sources to the draft, but it seems that it is still not ready for mainspace.

I appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia and your expertise in reviewing drafts. I have taken into account any feedback or suggestions you have provided in the past and have tried to incorporate them into my draft. I am committed to improving the draft and meeting Wikipedia’s standards.

I would appreciate it if you could help me fix the draft so that it meets Wikipedia’s standards and is ready for mainspace.ft.

Thank you for your time and assistance.

Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C56:6500:8C8E:949C:870A:400A:866A (talk) 01:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi, Primarily all information pertaining to the Operation comes from the Ministery of Defence extensive Record of Procedure, submitted to Commander-in-Chief fleet on the 8th of July 1983. The record is a comprehensive document which was subject to the Official Secrets Act for 30 years. I referenced the Record of Procdure and the author. Royal Navy Lieutenant Nick Hawkins. If you go to the wikipedia article on HMS Coventy you will see the entry mentions Operation Blackleg recovery , but does not link to a wikipedia entry on the dive and recovery of calsssified materials. regards Ray Sinclair ( Bachelor of Journalism from Queensland Univwersity of Technology @Bonadea Devargo007 (talk) 01:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Hey as you reviewed the page i made for my client it got rejected .Can you just help me out as its an important page and needs to be published Triman Ranvir (talk) 09:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

No, sorry. The reasons are outlined on your user talk page, and I am not interested in using use my own free time to help people make money from this volunteer project. Besides, if you are not Triman Ranvir you can't use his name as your user name – the user name represents the editor, and each user should normally have one account only. --bonadea contributions talk 10:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Hii Sir, thank u for suggestion. I removed all the four unreliable sources. hope now look like notable ... thank u again, 🙏 Wiki97828 (talk) 01:15, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

@Wiki97828: No, I'm afraid that is a misunderstanding. Removing those sources was important (although several of the remaining sources are equally poor – you have to check each of the sources carefully) but to show notability there must be multiple reliable, independent sources. Have a look at the information linked from the decline notices. --bonadea contributions talk 11:27, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Sir Please Convert My Sandbox In Live Article Sir I Need Your Help Sir Please

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fishk/sandbox

this Is My Article Sir Please Check It Sir You Are The Editor That’s Why Sir I Come To You Sir Please Help Fishk (talk) 19:08, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but the text in your sandbox cannot become an article, as it is against the purpose of Wikipedia. Wikipedia cannot be used for promotion or to "spread the word" about someone. --bonadea contributions talk 19:13, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

The recent edits on the CM article seemed interesting. Looking at []https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Ramahare&target=Ramahare&offset=&limit=500], some ECP gaming happening, with the very large number of edits to add categories and commons tags to articles? Ravensfire (talk) 20:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Singh, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I have a question regarding the draft being declined because it needs to be adequately supported by reliable sources. I have corrected the references and changed them. Could you please tell me if these sources are relevant and if there is anything else you recommend me to improve before resubmit the draft? Thank you in advance for your help! NikolettaYaneva (talk) 06:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

@Bonadea: You declined my recent article submission about Oliver Edholm, citing a lack of widespread media coverage in the submission. I agree that it was lacking in my submission, but it is definitely not lacking in reality. I have gone back and added articles from reputable international publications such as Business Insider, Tech Crunch, and ScandAsia. Please review the updated submission and if you feel it is appropriate accept the article/withdraw the denial. I am new to Wikipedia, so I ask for your understanding. Knowledgeforallintheworld (talk) 17:40, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

@Knowledgeforallintheworld: don't worry about it – many drafts are declined at first, and then improved to the point where they can be accepted. You have submitted the draft for review again, and it will be reviewed in due time. Previous decline notices and comments are not removed until a reviewer has accepted the draft. --bonadea contributions talk 17:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

	The Special Barnstar
	for making a proper report about sockpuppets of Ashishrawde16k in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ashishrawde16k. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 15:25, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

I have mentioned my response to the COI notice on draft:Sohan Pappu.

That's why I have submitted it immediately. Could you please help me out with the draft? Draft:Sohan Pappu Lakshmijourno (talk) 19:18, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

As explained in the decline notice, the reason the draft was declined is that there's no actual sign of notability. It was unfortunate that you decided to ignore the request not to remove previous AfC templates, btw. I could have saved a bit of time and energy I wasted on double checking all those references if you had not removed the info about the talk page discussion. --bonadea contributions talk 19:58, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

After you last 'decline' to the page Draft:Cadison, suitable changes have been made, keeping in mind conformity to Wiki guidelines.

Could you please check and advise accordingly? Anirvan.Basu.Wiki (talk) 18:24, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

@Anirvan.Basu.Wiki: You have submitted it for review successfully, so somebody will review it in due course – either myself or some other reviewer. What made you decide to write a draft about this product? If you have been hired or commissioned to write about it, you must make a disclosure – I'll post some information to your user talk page. --bonadea contributions talk 18:37, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Bonadea! I hope all is well. You've had an open SPI clerk application for quite some time now, and following some internal discussion, I finally have an answer for you : If you're still interested in becoming a clerk, Spicy and I would be happy to take you on as a trainee. This would be a co-training arrangement where Spicy would be your primary point of contact for day-to-day training, and I would act as the supervising checkuser and provide additional input. This training model makes progress less dependent on the availability of a single trainer, and would allow you to draw on input and perspectives from multiple people; we've had good experiences with it in the past. Training would take place off-wiki; chiefly for WP:BEANS reasons, but also because I think training works best when it takes the form of an open dialogue (and userspace subpages aren't usually a great place for establishing those). We're flexible on the precise venue.

Without wanting to put too much of a damper on things, I will give you a word of caution that I am glad to have gotten before I started clerking: SPI work sometimes involves dealing with trolls and harassers, and thus carries an elevated risk of being on the receiving end of nasty on- or off-wiki comments and – occasionally – doxing attempts. These are risks that can be managed and mitigated, but I think they are something that you should weigh and consider before committing to the gig.

If you're still interested in becoming a clerk, and this arrangement sounds acceptable to you, please let us know so we can discuss next steps. Please feel free to think it over for a few days, and to reach out to Spicy, me, or any other SPI regular if you have any questions. I'm also happy to answer any queries via e-mail if you prefer.

We look forward to hearing from (and hopefully working with!) you. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

@Blablubbs: Thank you! This is just to confirm I've seen your post, and appreciate it – I'll respond properly in a couple of days' time, possibly by email (if so I'll notify you on your talk page, otherwise I'll reply and ping you here :-) ) --bonadea contributions talk 11:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Just wanted to drop by and say thanks for volunteering. I'm sure that, if you decide to become a clerk, you'll make an excellent one. :) Spicy (talk) 23:11, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, @Spicy! :-) --bonadea contributions talk 09:23, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

@Spicy and Blablubbs: Very sorry not to get back to you more promptly – I ATE'NT DEAD, just been a bit overwhelmed with work this week. Will respond properly tomorrow. --bonadea contributions talk 21:37, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Added multiple salted pages to the nom, along with a history of the nom under so many name misspellings and title casings I'm frankly shocked we haven't caught them all by now. Nate • (chatter) 00:08, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi! I don't know how I've come here, but an article I've created does not exist. I do not understand how this project works now, but I worked hard on it. Having read some of the policies, it's up for some review. Can you review it for me? דפישולץ (talk) 12:34, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

I fixed the citations as per your suggestions (comment). Kindly have a look and provide any other instruction if needed. For Draft:Muzamil_Mahmood_Dar KashmirValleyEditor (talk) 09:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Dear Bonadea. Please pay attention to the fact that there is one user who has distorted the page and made extremely biased against her, with criticism and controversies filling up the page. I would not revert to that version as it also contains a number of innacuracies, and the criticism comes first. Miamor2 (talk) 07:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, brand-new editor. How did you happen to find this article and become so unusually invested in it on your first day as an editor? Ekman is primarily known for the controversies surrounding her, and your preferred version does not only whitewash her image butis also rather promotional (AB described as a "leading daily" which is certainly not neutral, a long euologistic quote from a prize ceremony added in the lede, etc). --bonadea contributions talk 07:07, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I have been a member since 2014, not brand new. Ekman is not primarily known for the controversies surrounding her, if you see her Swedish page for example. She has been a journalist and author for 20 or so years. The controversies all date from the previous year. They should be placed after neutrally referencing her work. Miamor2 (talk) 07:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

You made your first edits to English Wikipedia today. How did you happen to find this article out of the six million or so articles? Wikipedia versions in other languages are not sources. Why did you restore the Swenglishisms throughout the article and the promotional text in the lede? --bonadea contributions talk 07:33, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I saw this thread and got curious, so ran some checks. Miamor2, Guccibelucci, and Alinsky1 are  Confirmed to each other. Perhaps you could be so kind as to create an SPI for them and ping me so I can apply the blocks? -- RoySmith (talk) 00:36, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

See discussion on the AFCH talk page. Elected Statewide in Idaho, so meets WP:NPOL. Naraht (talk) 13:21, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Not a politician, and the sourcing is incredibly weak in any case. --bonadea contributions talk 14:32, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Yes, she is a politician. She was elected to a statewide position. Sourcing is not weak, and her predecessors had pages. Petjayso (talk) 03:15, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Also Naraht has been on the site longer than you and has a point. Petjayso (talk) 03:17, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

I checked. The definition of a politician includes someone holding elected office, which Debbie Critchfield did achieve. Petjayso (talk) 03:34, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback on the draft page for Debendra. Can you help with what changes we would need to get this moving forward? Rahlvers (talk) 19:44, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Hai Bonadea

Sorry to bother you. But can you please expedite this sockpuppet investigation process? Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MovieBuffIndia

(BangaloreNorth (talk) 11:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC))

Hi, I hope you're doing well. This is regarding Draft:Abhishek Nigam, since you were last reviewer of the page and it was rejected more than a year ago, I want you to know that more notable work and reliable sources have been added up plus I've tried to improve the draft since last submission. I would like to ask you if you think I should submit it for review now or any changes/development should be made? Your suggestions are welcomed, thanks. ManaliJain (talk) 11:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Hey Bonadea, a quick reminder, just circling back on this draft, any chance you could take a look when you get a moment? Thanks!— Preceding unsigned comment added by ManaliJain (talk • contribs) 07:05, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

@ManaliJain: You have improved the draft a lot since May 2022 and you should submit it for review. Also pinging Scope creep who last reviewed this in 2021. Jay 💬 17:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)