User talk:Bonadea/Archive 11

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Bonadea. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

THANK you for that message. read my artical "people kepp deleting my hard work" please i just think its a good notice to some people.DAISYA2 (talk) 10:37, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately, because the article you created was not in fact an encyclopedia article, it has been deleted by an administrator. Please stick around and learn a little more about what belongs and doesn't belong in Wikipedia befotr you create any other articles. Thanks, and happy editing! --bonadea contributions talk 10:40, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Hey mate, thank you for your message on my talk page about Luke Chandler

I'm not quite sure how to quote, but I have sources that I would like to add. Can you let me know how I can do it? Cheers IPineappleNZ (talk) 14:00, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Why did you delete the topic on Riftforge I mean the time it the time before I tried to recreate it?Lordenki13 (talk) 21:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Replying on your talk page --bonadea contributions talk 21:38, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi you contested my page but I don't believe it was warranted. Please check the multiple references I have added. I am new to wikipedia and do not know all the terminology needed to add pages, but I want to contribute and feel this article on Anil Potti is very desperately needed by the community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alternateuniverse6457 (talk • contribs) 23:05, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi you contested my page but I don't believe it was warranted. Please check the multiple references I have added. I am new to wikipedia and do not know all the terminology needed to add pages, but I want to contribute and feel this article on Anil Potti is very desperately needed by the community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alternateuniverse6457 (talk • contribs) 23:05, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Replying on your talk page. --bonadea contributions talk 11:43, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for patrolling new pages. I'm just letting you know I deleted Bad Head as G3 (pure vandalism) and not G1 (nonsense/gibberish) as you had tagged it. Please be absolutely sure to get the criteria right because if you are using semi-automation such as Twinkle, it is essential that the creator receives the correct warning. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:14, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

I've just deleted Bad Head again, this time as a blatant G10 (attack). Please be sure to read the pages and use the correct CSD tag. Attack pages above all else must be deleted very quickly. The G10 makes a red alert on admins' control panels. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. Replied on your talk page. --bonadea contributions talk 13:29, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Can I suggest you remove the links to the IP block logs that you just posted for Porchcorpter? They serve to "out" him in that they expose where in the world he is posting from, and I don't think that's fair. (He might not have minded at the time, but he was very young then, and I don't think we should expose such information now) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Point taken, links removed. I did deliberate a bit before posting, because the outing angle had occurred to me, but then, having no diffs there might look as if I was throwing baseless accusations around... It's not difficult to find the connection if you look into P's older contributions (after all, I found it, which is pretty much the definition of "not hard to find" :-) ) but you're right, of course, that it's a bad idea to post it at ANI. Thank you for the heads-up. bonadea contributions talk 12:23, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Cool, thanks! -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:38, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

I understand why it was removed and I'm okay with it. I was definitely talking about my hobby/web-site and now understand that's not supposed be the Wikipedia's use.

My question is: I put a lot of time/energy into the content (even though there's not a ton of it that I posted) and would love to have that content for other users. Can you help me get it back please?

Thank you,

Jay — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpilk99 (talk • contribs) 12:30, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I wanted to know why did you tag my article 'conflict of interest'. I am sitting here with the director and she's very keen to maintain this article as it is on Wikipedia. please elaborate for me.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parnian.farnam (talk • contribs) 13:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. --bonadea contributions talk 13:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

I do know what a conflict of interest means so no need to define it in its literal sense but why did you consider it one in this case ( I did recieve an email saying you tagged it as conflict of interest) If a director is explaining her art work, that is not a bias opinion. We are merely writing it as it was done. and if i am reporting it while 'sitting with the director' then i am a reliable source. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parnian.farnam (talk • contribs) 17:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

No, I'm afraid that if you are reporting it while sitting with the director, you are not a reliable source according to Wikipedia's definition of a reliable source. And very, very few people can discuss their own artwork completely neutrally and without expressing their point of view. That is why there are guidelines in place concerning conflict of interest. Even though you know what a conflict of interest is -- and nobody claims that you don't -- it is still a good idea to read the relevant policy because sometimes Wikipedia's definitions are not identical to everyday usage of certain terms. --bonadea contributions talk 19:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Good spot on the speedy deletion nomination there. I didn't read the first paragraph all the way through. -- role^player 20:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

I have declined your A7 speedy deletion tag of Leah Daniels, as I feel that a claim of importance is made. Some of these include winning the Durham Region Music Award, performing at a notable event (Havelock Country Jamboree), being in the new artist showcase on CCMA Music Week, and being featured on the TV channel CMT. Combined, I'd say that this is enough to satisfy the A7 requirement for an assertion of importance. You may still, however, take the article to PROD/AfD if you feel that it is not notable.--Slon02 (talk) 22:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

noticed you changed the Pearl anniversary from 30th to 35th. Wondered what your source was. Lots of places on the web trying to sell gifts for pearl anniversaries on the 30th. Can't find any authoritative reference.

I'm really only interested because this year is our 30th and was looking for ideas - I don't have any information one way or the other.

Cheers

Julian Gaffer206 (talk) 08:27, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for watching and catching nonsense changes! Meclee (talk) 18:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! You have no idea how much this cheered me up :-D --bonadea contributions talk 15:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

hey i just want to point out that in my artical Borbia that you listed for deletion, the article clearly says it is a ficional island. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AltairEzio (talk • contribs) 00:40, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Well, Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Didn't the article say "mythical"? I can't remember exactly, but even if it said "fictional", that doesn't mean there can be an article about it, unless it is a notable fiction. --bonadea contributions talk 15:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello Bonadea. I see you've marked Informer Technologies, Inc. for speedy deletion and left a standard template notice on my talk page. No, this is not the first article I have created, and I would appreciate some attention to the matter, since I took my time to create and reference the article, and I'm also taking time now to answer to you personally, instead of using a boilerplate template.

That said, I marked the article as a Company-stub. I'm perfectly aware that the article needs improvement; however, I don't have the time to improve it at the moment. By marking the article for speedy deletion, you deny me and others the opportunity to improve the article. Kindly consider removing the notice, and instead add a {{refimprove}} or other tags.

A website with an Alexa Traffic Rank of 449 is very likely notable. The company itself created at least two products that have articles on Wikipedia. Those of us who love to improve Wikipedia just haven't had time to put in all the references. Please let us do so.
- Dandv^{(talk|contribs)} 10:49, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello Bonadea,

I have just started to contribute to this beautiful project that is Wikipedia. I am not very aware of the subtleties that it requires yet and I count on experimented users like you to guide me through being a better contributor. This is why I would like you to explain to me why you deleted my entry in the "Comparison of free web hosting services" article. I undid the change you've made because I believe the information I am providing is neutral, verified and verifiable. If the problem is related to a formal matter I suggest you improve it as you seem to have the knowledge required. I'm also happy to receive comprehensive feedback so I do not make the same mistake twice. But please, do not just delete someone's participation. It is discouraging and frustrating, and I believe that casual editors also have something to bring to Wikipedia. Too much elitism might lead to a stale content and I believe it is more important to have an article that is up to date even if formally imperfect than sleek and outdated. In this concept lies the very strength of a Wiki.

Rominbayol (talk) 09:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello Bonadea. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Martin Billany, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 17:42, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Good day, could you please give me a time frame on the speedy deletion process? I have now a full understanding of where I went wrong. Thank you kindly. Necrosiz (talk) 12:25, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Dear User:Bonadea, I have amended/edited the article on [[Karlal] and reduced the list of 'Notable people' there, but you seem to have reverted this. May I please know why? I think its too long and needless and only those people should be listed therein pl who have separate Wikipedia articles of their own. Regs 39.54.104.80 (talk) 08:09, 13 March 2012 (UTC)Prof Asad U Khwaja

Hey, just wanted to check-in and figure out why the article was reverted .... thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tapdan (talk • contribs) 17:26, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Dear Bonadea, thank you for setting me right on the blog issue on this article. It should not be put anywhere on this article/page, as you rightly say, and I fully concur with your reasoning. Many thanks 39.54.60.236 (talk) 05:30, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Prof Asad U Khwaja

Also, regarding your previous comments, yes, I also think and believe that it would perhaps be best to include at this point in time only those articles of 'notable people' in the main Karlal article, who already have existing Wikipedia pages. 39.54.60.236 (talk) 05:34, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Prof Asad U Khwaja

I need your assistance in developing and spreading a wikiproject. Can you help me in developing and spreading this page in wikipedia: Wikipedia:Wikipedia for World Heritage

Thank you and Happy editing! Yasht101 :) 06:54, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Why you delete my edit ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_social_networking_websites — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ixacker (talk • contribs) 09:57, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Just say in my edits "I just made small changes. just that." because all the administrators and users (like you) always call me Vandal without justification, and absolutely NEVER I appreciate the issues here, just threaten me again and again with wicked pleasure.--OliverDF (talk) 17:38, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

1. That doesn't address the fact that "just made small changes" is uninformative and in some cases wrong. However, I see that you've stopped using those summaries which is the important thing. 2. Please show me where I've called you a vandal, with or without justification, or where I've threatened you in any way. I fail to find any such instance. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 19:26, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Vandalize which here are:

1. Most of the anonymous users, and here unfortunately not attempt to identify and differentiate those who vandalize, vandalize those who do not.

2. Some registered users, and again here unfortunately not attempt to identify and differentiate those who vandalize, vandalize those who do not like me (I've never vandalized here).--OliverDF (talk) 17:42, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Hummanaya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello Bonadea , please note I removed the this text from the article (he violated federal procurement rules. Jefferson was led out of the Frances Perkins Building by the FBI ) because the references links don't mentions that , thank you so much --Mohamed Ouda (talk) 22:01, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

However, your edits were not simply removing that passage. I agree that it does not seem to be in any of the existing sources (it may have been in the Kansas City Star source which is no longer available) so removing it with an explanatory edit summary would have been appropriate. But replacing sourced text with unsourced text that implies that the information is incorrect [1], removing all sources from a section [2] and, most recently, removing the sourced as well as the unsourced text together with the sources [3] is not appropriate at all. --bonadea contributions talk 09:37, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much I will but an explanatory edit summary --Mohamed Ouda (talk) 20:33, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

This article Bollywood Xplorer passes the importance or significance of the subject and have reliable sources I think. Please let me know why is article has not importance or significance of the subject? How to resolve this?--CrazyAboutBollywood 09:14, 29 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CrazyAboutBollywood (talk • contribs)

I have just posted to your talk page. The article has no reliable sources and there is no credible claim to importance. --bonadea contributions talk 09:19, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

...here. Your last comment there is even more funny/biting, considering you're a linguist :-) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello Bonadea, I welcome your thoughts here. Fanofbollywood (talk) 21:00, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Let me just say that based on the conversation on my talkpage, I think I agree (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Cirkeln, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Horror and Young adult (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Please add MegaSearches.Com to the list of Meta Search Engines — Preceding unsigned comment added by Takapoisa2002 (talk • contribs) 09:57, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, it doesn't appear that the notability for the website has been shown, since the article about it was deleted. You need to create an article that meets Wikipedia's notability criteria first, before it can be included in the list. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 10:22, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar! Though we may not be able to convert Paitalona into a terribly useful contributor, coca tea seemed to be an interesting subject - fun article to spruce up. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:22, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

That's the best thing about this place - getting to find out stuff about subjects we hardly knew existed :-) Cheers! --bonadea contributions talk 20:45, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for making the change back! Really appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clkim (talk • contribs) 19:06, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

My pleasure. I think the bot doesn't like the string "luv you"... --bonadea contributions talk 20:46, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thank you but do you want to right an artricle on shop4tronix.net? Tcsnam (talk) 16:17, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm afraid I'm not the right person to ask to write that article, however. You can request creation of the article here if you want. --bonadea contributions talk 15:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

I have nominated Search engine optimization for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Dana boomer (talk) 18:27, 14 May 2012 (UTC)