User talk:Bhaskar sunsari

why are you reverting it again an again. Is there any more big evidence than whome you also worshiping Yadav Vasidev Shree Krishna. Though god have no caste in spritual world (where we all are sole of god ) but in this material world (brahma universe) he came in Yadava family. Dont revert it again ok. i have no hate with any brahman other caste too. you also know very well how krishna and sudama were. I know kushawaha i also from Solar dynasty so that its also belongs to ksytriya Varna. No fights on this regards Devid yadav (talk) 07:49, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

then why are you removing before kshatriya from kushwaha section ( caste system in nepal article) Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 08:01, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

...be so kind and read our protection policy, thoroughly. Regards. Lectonar (talk) 14:09, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have reached 500 edits here on the English Wikipedia, based on which the system automatically conferred the extended confirmed status on you. However, given that this in large part resulted from the 160+ trivial/dummy edits you made to your userpage in the past 24 hours, I consider that gaming the system, and have therefore removed the EC status from your account. I will restore the status, once your edit count reaches 650, assuming the additional 150 required edits are substantive or at least not blatantly trivial.

On a related but separate point, if you continue attempting to game the system, in this or a different manner, you may be blocked from editing. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:25, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok brother but you know are too strict i will do it will be easy na solving gramatical mistakes in articles to achive more 150 edits?? Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 13:29, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This, for one, was not "solving gramatical mistakes" (sic), it was introducing them. Don't do that. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:39, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any Wikipedia article that teaches how to edit and rules of Wikipedia?? Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 13:41, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is, for example this help page: Contributing to Wikipedia. But it, and all our help content, assumes at least basic competence, such as being able to recognise when you're introducing English grammatical errors rather than correcting them. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:58, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bhaskar sunsari, I have removed your edits in [[1]] as they are related to WP:CT/SA, which covers all pages about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. You may not have seen this recent change, as of July 18th, in which the Arbitration Committee placed this topic under extended-confirmed protection. Until you get your extended-confirmed status back, you're editing in this area should only consist of uncontroversial specific edit requests on the talk pages.

You are, of course, free to disagree and restore the content, though you do so at your own risk (though not from me). CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 22:59, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But the data i have added at bhokraha rural municipality are 100% sourced you can check that source??? Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 04:20, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the problem. Until you have your extended-confirmed status, you cannot participate in pages about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal, whether the edits are good or not. What you can do is make formal WP:EDITREQUESTs on the talk page, so long as they are constructive and non-controversial. I do not seek to get you in trouble, but to help you edit constructively without any problems as you work to get your extended-confirmed status back. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 04:36, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for your suggestion... Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 04:49, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following topic ban now applies to you:

You are topic banned from South Asia social groups, broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned per AE consensus by a group of uninvolved administrators.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Indian military history#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with this topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described at Wikipedia:Contentious topics § Appeals and amendments. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything above is unclear to you. Sennecaster (Chat) 19:46, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But you have blocked me totally not an topic ban what is an reason for that?? Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 19:50, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

Sennecaster (Chat) 19:38, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes"). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

What blocked for what reason can you explain?? Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 19:42, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked for concerns outlined in this Arbitration Enforcement thread, which included strong concern about your behavior related to South Asia social groups and lack of compliance with the extended-confirmed requirement after your Extended-confirmed role was revoked for cause. Sennecaster (Chat) 19:50, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But you have blocked me totally rather than an topic ban what is an reason for it?? Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 19:52, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have both a topic ban and a block. The consensus by uninvolved people at AE was to topic ban and indef you due to no response, editing South Asian topics without extended confirmed despite numerous explanations, and two previous ineffective blocks. Your comments were out of line with attacking social groups to begin with and would have earned you a block from someone else if not me. Sennecaster (Chat) 20:01, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok you enjoy Wikipedia that's why nobody trust Wikipedia nowadays i haven't added any unsourced data but the only thing is the status of any caste written wrong here won't change its status in real life and society and that's why nobody trust Wikipedia now... Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 20:11, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bhaskar sunsari. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Koiri caste of nepal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bhaskar sunsari. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Koiri caste of nepal".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:27, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]