User talk:Bento00

This user may have left Wikipedia. Bento00 has not edited Wikipedia since September 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

To Leave a New Message Please click here to start a new Section. Remember to sign your post with four tildes (~~~~). Thanks.

If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please click here and let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. (I will respond on my talk page unless you specify otherwise.) Thank you.

I prefer to maintain the continuity of threads by keeping them in a single location when possible. If you post a message here I will reply here and leave a {{Whisperback|Bento00}} template on your talk page so that you do not have to watch this page. If you wish me to reply on your talk page, post the message on your talk page and leave a {{Whisperback|your username}} template here. Thanks for your cooperation.

Archives

1, 2, 3

Just a heads-up, in case you missed it my my edit summaries, the IP that you reverted at List of Good Luck Charlie characters and The Suite Life Movie is a persistent IP vandal. See User:AussieLegend/Project 04#The Bell boy for more. --AussieLegend (talk) 19:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Y U REVERT MY EDIT?????????????????????????????????????????????????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.163.71.34 (talk) 01:35, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It made no sense to add a link to Hitler on this page. Your edit appeared to be vandalism. Bento00 (talk) 16:57, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

why do you change my changes back?

Your edit, "He is well known for his godly technical skills - a footballing legend" is editorializing and uncorroborated. See WP:WEASEL. Bento00 (talk) 00:24, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I see your point, but do you not think the page should have something about his reputation as a footballer? He is very well known for making terrible mistakes, but he also has one of the greatest premiership defensive records. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.175.252.65 (talk) 10:39, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please be sure to read pages before you tag them. I have just deleted Jonathan T. Samuel as a blatant G10 attack page. More help is available at at WP:NPP. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:10, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the recent LA Times article about the NCAA officially vacating 2 wins during the 2004 season (including the National Championship Game) and 12 wins during the 2005 season (including their bowl game).

The NCAA has officially stripped USC of the 2004 NC.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/sports_blog/2011/05/for-usc-football-loss-of-ncaa-appeal-also-means-loss-of-2004-national-title-.html?dlvrit=53285

Revert your edits back to my corrections and please don't do this again, especially when I provided a link of evidence in my original edit. You have been warned and if your biased editing continues, you will be reported.

The FWAA NC was stripped months ago: http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/2010/08/26/1244212/fwaa-strips-usc-of-2004-title.html

LSUsoccerbum (talk) 01:30, 26 May 2011 (UTC)LSUsoccerbum[reply]

Not a bias, but definitely my mistake, I'm sorry. You might consider the history of the editor's edits before you call him biased though. Bento00 (talk) 01:34, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

why do you keep adding a tag saying this article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carole_Bienaim%C3%A9) has no reliable sources? it has actually 8 notes and references, knowing that only one is enough as it is said :"Once the article has at least one reliable source, you may remove this tag. Please do not remove this tag unless the article has at least one such source". thanks in advance for the answer and for removing the tag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Santa monique (talk • contribs) 20:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, sorry for my overzealousness. User Shoushanne continually removed both the Lack of Refs template and the Orphan template, and I should have restored only the Orphan template instead of both. I removed the Lack of refs template. Bento00 (talk) 21:13, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i personally know kevin mench(baseball) and u keep changing it back and even he's tried to change it because he does not have a kid named kevin "woogie" mench he has twins, a boy and a girl and is married to scott podsednik's sister so i dont get why u guys changed it back! stupid!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thekyrsten (talk • contribs) 00:49, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whether you know him or not is irrelevant. I suggest you familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policy on sourcing your edits. See WP:SOURCE, WP:RS, and WP:BURDEN. Bento00 (talk) 00:55, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bento00,

You reverted as edit on Pogona ([1]) but I don't know why. I'm sure Bactria was just a typo of Bacteria, so it sounds like it was a good faith edit. For the sake of other editors, it's best to explain in the edit summary that you reverted vandalism, or a good faith edit, or something. Thanks, D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:21, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Keep up the good work Bentogoa (talk) 14:38, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The 20% figure is incorrect, and was not correctly cited in the first place. An accurate figure is 30%, which can be obtained from the government run Database of State Incentives: http://dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=CO24R&re=1&ee=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avoid the Noid (talk • contribs) 21:21, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know about the edit you reverted on Staphylococcus recently: the National Collection of Type Cultures is actually quite relevant to the field of microbiology and Staphylococcus in particular. It's a non-profit organization and NCTC bacterial strains are frequently used in published work, so even a brief mention of the organization in microbiology articles probably shouldn't be considered advertising. Thanks for your concern, though! Several Times (talk) 15:01, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How do i cite the location of that file?.... i didnt take the picture personally...however i can do so in the next few weeks if need be...the mountain is out the road...the image is from mountainviews.ie and was put up by a person from killorglan? any help with this is appreciated — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angealt (talk • contribs) 23:14, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]