User talk:BJBot/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions with User:BJBot. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

It's not orphaned. Some vandal removed it and then whoever reverted the vandalism to LSHS did not put the image back. –Victor ^{(talk) (works)} 04:48, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Same here (for Image:Photoshop CS3.png). --Stephantom (talk) 01:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

The image that you are talking about is not used for the article that it was intended for. It is not removed from any article, by any other person, citing any reasons. I wanted a "JPG" format image to be used as the logo for the company mentioned in the article SunTec. This was in the "PNG" format. When I got a "JPG" image, I uploaded that image instead. You may please delete the image from wiki (Image:SunTec-Logo.png). Sorry for the inconvenience caused. -- Sreejith Kumar (talk) 08:40, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

My only involvement in this file was a reversion of it to an earlier version, and that was several months ago. This file has been revised several times since then. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 03:18, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Fixed I changed it to only upload the first and last uploader (if they are different people). BJ^Talk 03:35, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

I was going to use it on a page but have held off publishing the page. It's in my sandbox.

Andy.W.Ellis (talk) 12:13, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: the message on my talk page, I think there may be a bug in the bot as the image isn't orphaned. SP-KP (talk) 16:16, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

MediaWiki shows the image as orphaned, not a bot bug. BJ^Talk 16:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

I think that the system is going crazy. I don't know what I can do, if I cannot upload a file to discuss the design of a logo in the Graphics lab page Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Image workshop. I have put a link to it and not the image on the page so that the image does not appear. What can I do more. Please stop this integrism. Hektor (talk) 20:47, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

This File can be deleted as someone remove it from and place a different version of it on the page it was used on so just remove the file i uploads as its easier.

--Nez202 (talk) 21:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

These images are being used in a draft article in my user space, which will hopefully be moved to article space soon. Is there a way to prevent them from being deleted until then? Or should I just let them go and re-upload them once the article hits main space? Fire67 (talk) 16:38, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

If they get deleted before you move the article space leave me a note once you do the move and I'll undelete them. BJ^Talk 20:06, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

The article's already been moved, and the pictures have been added to the article. Thanks! Fire67 (talk) 04:03, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Please stop this bot from repeatedly tagging Image:Mainpageskinned1.JPG. A reason for keeping has been added by me (and repeatedly ignored by the bot), and the image is used to illustrate a technical problem on Wikipedia. DuncanHill (talk) 10:50, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

The image is in violation of WP:NFCC regardless, I suggest you crop it to make a free image. BJ^Talk 04:48, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

What needs to be cropped? I have already obscured the Wikipedia globe. DuncanHill (talk) 07:59, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

On second thoughts, forget it. I know it isn't your fault, but an encyclopædia with policies that actively prevent editors trying to improve it isn't worth the effort. DuncanHill (talk) 08:01, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi Bot, a message was placed in error saying the said image was not being used. The image is being used in the info box of the article Mobilinux. Please do not delete the image.--Jondel (talk) 05:44, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Your bot placed the {{di-orphaned fair use}} template in both these images, claiming that the images aren't used in any article. They ARE used in the articles Game Boy Advance and Game Boy Micro, respectively, so I suppose the template was placed in error. - Nmnogueira (talk) 07:46, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi. Your bot left me a message on my talk page about this fair use image being orphaned. While I applaud you for your efforts to keep Wikipedia out of legal trouble, this image is not orphaned, it is still present in it's namesake entry. Pacific Coast Highway ^{{talk • contribs}} 05:21, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Seems to be a bug; Image:Time_Warner_Cable.gif#filelinks shows nothing but the image on Time Warner Cable is that one. —Giggy 05:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

The same problem can been seen on a bunch of images at Cleveland Browns#Logo and uniforms. They're obviously in use, but the backlinks don't appear on the image pages. Has anybody identified a pattern to the bug? GIFs, JPGs, PNGs, and SVGs all appear to be affected. Should we temporarily shut off the bot? - Eureka Lott 05:51, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Just a wild guess, but could it be the infobox code not making it appear in use? Pacific Coast Highway ^{{talk • contribs}} 06:20, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

It's the job queue, nothing can be done without a large change to Mediawiki. BJ^Talk 08:24, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

I didn't mean to imply that your bot was at fault. It's obviously a MediaWiki bug. Has it been noted anywhere? It's just that the bot will continue to incorrectly tag images as long as the bug persists. By the way, editing the article appeared to clear up the above problem for now, but I expect that it exists elsewhere. - Eureka Lott 18:41, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

It isn't a simple bug that can be fixed from what I understand. The job queue needs a major rewrite and I don't for see that happening for a while. In the mean time the bot checks for mistagged images daily and untags them, so there is no chance of a properly used image being deleted. BJ^Talk 04:47, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Stupid question: how can the bot tell that it has incorrectly tagged images as orphaned fair use images when the backlinks fail to appear on the image pages? - Eureka Lott 14:19, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

These have been in use since the day they were uploaded and are still in use. Your bot is broken. Incog88 (talk) 13:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

image not orphaned, incorrectly programmed bot. Chappy^T_C 17:50, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I created 3 pages in my sandbox for testing and demonstration purposes and added an image in each of them, taken from WP articles. The only change I made to them was resizing, so that they could fit into an infobox. One of these images was detected by this bot (but not the other two) and received the checked flag warning, about one day later (but noticed it only today). I cannot understand why, my understanding having been:

• Since the images are in published articles where they do not carry the same warning, I assumed their status was clear.
• Since I copied them into my sandbox, which is not intended for publication outside a few interested editors, I'd consider that this is fair use and should not be seen as copyright infringement. I think this bot should actually be rather lenient about sandboxes and if there is a reason why non-free images should be banned from testing beds, it should at least allow more time for testing, e.g. 2-4 weeks - what is deemed a reasonable time to gain consensus!
• I could not figure out why one of these images was flagged and the other two were not.

Thank you for helping. Clpda (talk) 22:11, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

The bot only removes non-free images, the other two images that were not removed are free and can be used in any fashion. You can read more about the non-free image policy at WP:NFCC. BJ^Talk 22:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your prompt reply - although you did not address the testing/sandbox issue. I've replaced the flag with an explanatory comment. Clpda (talk) 23:18, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I think I ran into the same or a similar problem... I'm putting together a page (for Desert Research Institute), but since it's still being built (and I'm a n00b) I'm building it in a sandbox. I uploaded a logo for the place and put that on the sandbox page, but it got nailed by this bot. (Sandbox page here) Can you put in an exception for Sandboxes? --Knockwood (talk) 08:48, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jonny Vang.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:17, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

It should not tag images uploaded in the last 24 hours. I'll have a look. BJ^Talk 23:23, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I was hoping you could clear something up. This image shows up in Sunday_Bloody_Sunday_(song)#Live_performances, yet it was tagged twice by your bot as being an orphan. I assume that your bot tagged it because its usage doesn't show up under the "File links" heading. Is this some sort of MediaWiki bug or something you've run across before? Thanks in advance, ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 22:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Yep, it is the job queue. A null edit to the using page fixes it. BJ^Talk 01:23, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Weird. Ok then, thanks ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 05:21, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

I see people with uploaded image galleries everywhere. If my image gallery is in vio of NFC#9, suggest how both can be accomplished. - Hexhand (talk) 06:12, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

It can't. You are not allowed to have non-free images in a gallery or anywhere else in your userspace. BJ^Talk 15:23, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

May I suggest Template:Orphaned short for very experienced users? The bot could simply check for total edits+date of first edit, or whether there is already such a template on the talk page. Just a thought. Chick Bowen 01:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

I uploaded photo Image:GPC Bldg 1982.jpg with the intent of replacing the one in the article titled "Georgia Power Building" but haven't figured out how to do it yet. The photo is scanned from one of many widely distributed marketing and promotional booklets from the early 1980s, produced by Georgia Power Company. They have no copyright restrictions other than acknowledgment. Please feel free to add the photo to the article and delete the crappy one that's in there now. --NameThatWorks (talk) 15:13, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Is there anywhere that it says they only require attribution? BJ^Talk 15:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I thought I'd notify you that the bot tagged Image:Markchapmanmugshot.jpg as orphaned when it is used in Mark David Chapman. Nothing comes up on the links to this page though, which is weird. Just a glitch I suppose. I'll get around to improving the fair use rationale now. --John (talk) 05:36, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

 Fixed BJ^Talk 06:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi there, this image for the 2point4 children page was wrongly removed by a user from the plot summary. Before uploading it I checked the image was in line with all wiki rule and found this was the case. In addition, the message you previously left me states it can be placed back into the article if relevant. Due to these reasons the image in question has been placed back into the article. Thanks.Edito*Magica (talk) 13:11, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

The bot tagged Image:Ebrso_units.jpg as orphaned and not used in any wikipedia articles. The image is linked to and used in East Baton Parish Sheriff's Office.(Ebr1413 (talk) 13:23, 4 August 2008 (UTC))

The same thing happened with Image:Madhk1.jpg. It is used in Mad (magazine) -- SWTPC6800 (talk) 15:08, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

User:Giano/Exploding Houses is obviously a draft article; the image Image:SAVEMentmore.jpg is thus only invalid there under a very strict reading of WP:NFCC#9. Just pointing out the obvious after wandering into the draft article while looking for something else. ^Thanks, _{Luc "Somethingorother" French} 07:19, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Standard practice is to link the image until the draft is moved into the article space. Or you can keep reverting the bot... BJ^Talk 08:06, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi, just delete that Fastoon.jpg image i uploaded, as i uploaded a better version known as Fastoon.PNG anyway. Moon Star X1 (talk) 07:21, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

 Done BJ^Talk 08:07, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

I have updated the image template. it is a scanned book cover that will be used as part of the article i am drafting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Extendon (talk • contribs) 09:34, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for deleting, Image:Amrita Sher-Gil (1913-1941).jpg, I have uploaded it to wikicommons, here: Image:Amrita Sher-Gil, painter, (1913-1941).jpg. (Ekabhishek (talk) 07:18, 9 August 2008 (UTC))

Stop removing Image:iCarly.jpg from this template! ICarly0246 (talk) 05:11, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

The image is in violation of policy, stop readding it. BJ^Talk 05:29, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for informing me, but the Disney Channel logo images have already got fair-use rationales, and they're not even orphaned. Plus, they were saved by Erwin85Bot.

I'm not saying this to offend you, but to make you understand. No hard feelings.
~~LDEJRuff~~ (talk) 22:56, 9 August 2008 (EDT)

What? BJ^Talk 05:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi BJBot, I orphaned the Image:Clavicle of Onychodus sigmoides.png because I didn't think it was necessery in the article. Liopleurodon93 (talk) 08:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Dear BJBot, thank you for your message. As it happens, end of last week someone changed the above-indicated photograph with a free one. This non-free photograph can therefore be deleted now. With kind regards, --BF 22:45, 11 August 2008 (UTC).

- It is copyrighted, but its holder allows it for FREE USE for LOW RESOLUTION USE ON WIKIPEDIA : "The image is low resolution and of no larger and of no higher quality than is necessary for the illustration of an article, and the use of the image on Wikipedia is not expected to decrease the value of the copyright" cited on the Image article. So don't revert my edits here. Greetings, --Vitilsky (talk) 14:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

About this edit [1].

Could the bot link the image rather than include the copyvio image. I.e. Leaving [[:Image:CrimsonTideAlogo.png]] in place to retain the link to the image. Taemyr (talk) 13:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

The image is copyright to the author (Russian state channel "Rossija", www.vesti.com). However, any use of materials on the website are free if the source is quoted. So my use of the image is legal. Could you please make a fair use tag? Thank you. Supernova (talk) 06:46, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

User:Chensiyuan took it off because he said it was to small compared to the rest of the images. Bballlova99 (talk)(My Contributions to wikipedia) 12:49, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi,

(I am reproducing this message from User talk:Bjweeks because I have not yet received a response there or at my talk page.)

Your bot recently tagged several images I uploaded for deletion (see my talk page for a full list). Several of these images were recently used in the Gunnerkrigg Court article but have been commented out for now (they are images of characters in the comic, and for the moment I have commented those characters out of the article because I decided they were not "major" enough for inclusion); I was planning on keeping the images there for future use, as the article is undergoing frequent updates and the plot of the comic (as well as different interpretations from different Wikipedia editors) may cause some of the images to be used again at short notice. Would this be reason to keep the images on Wikipedia? (I'm not challenging your judgment, I'm just asking, because I am relatively unfamiliar still with Wikipedia image and fair use guidelines.) Thanks, Politizer (talk) 05:54, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

HEY

That image is on plenty of other pages on Wikipedia. Why are you removing from my userpage and not leaving a notification. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sapperbdl (talk • contribs) 20:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Non-free images are not allowed to be used except in articles. See WP:NFCC for more info. BJ^Talk 22:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by BJ (talk • contribs)

Don't know if this has been brought up but if it has then feel free to ignore this. I was wondering if it would be possible to change the behavior so that non-free images that are inlined in the talk page are converted to links instead of being replaced with the image removed image. The benefit is that the context isn't destroyed completely. Mikemill (talk) 04:23, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

It has been mentioned before, at the moment the bot is just doing dumb replacement. I could have it try to link first and if it fails then fall back to dumb replacement. BJ^Talk 22:12, 15 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by BJ (talk • contribs)

You are right that there's no article with that picture. The problem is that I don't know why the SVG does not show. So you can delete it 'cause I've uploaded another in PNG.

Thanks,

Benedicto XVI | Talk 19:17, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi there, thanks for the notification about Image:KORD-image2.jpg. I'm a begginer in wikipedia and i don't know very well all the rules that i should do for uploading an image, but after your notification i search more info about uploading an image and i tried my best to give the truly reasons for non-free content. Please check it again and let me know if it's ok. If it's not, please can you give me some help, some support? thanks Drokstef (talk) 15:29, 16 September 2008 (UTC) --

This bot has been vandalizing my user page, by repeatedly deleting an image that belongs to me (and for which I explicitly granted unlimited usage).

The very same image appears in another Wikipedia page (as my contribution -- which is still there!), but when I also place it on my user page, this "bot" deletes it. I restored my image, but the 'bot again deleted it (altho the published image in Wikipedia was NOT deleted).

This 'bot is defective, and should be disabled until fixed (or retired).

I have decide to restore the image (and to add a dozen more copies of it) to my "user" page. If these are again deleted, I shall endeavor to create a bot to restores anything on Wikipedia that is erroneously deletd by this 'bot. Let the 'bot wars begin!

(Or maybe I'll stop bothering to contribute, since I have better things to do with my time than fight erroneous deletions by vandalbots like this one!)

bam (talk) 05:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

(Yeah, that's my sig. But feel free to email me at [email protected] since I expect to be finally dropping out of the increasingly-frustrating Wiki community, and removing my user page, as soon as I find that my contributions have been mindlessly deleted once again!)

[email protected]

I would really appreciate if you'd read my new description of Image:KORD-image2.jpg, before removed it again from the article, and before answering to the message that i wrote on you page talk. The message was kind of this... Orphaned non-free media Image:KORD-image2.jpg Hi there, thanks for the notification about Image:KORD-image2.jpg. [[I'm a begginer in wikipedia and i don't know very well all the rules that i should do for uploading an image, but after your notification i search more info about uploading an image and i tried my best to give the truly reasons for non-free content. Please check it again and let me know if it's ok. If it's not, please can you give me some help, some support? thanks]] So, i think it would be nice to let me know something about it, before removed again the image. Anyway, hope at least now you'll give a little attention to this message and be fair...and let me know which was the problem with the new description of Image:KORD-image2.jpg. thanksDrokstef (talk) 18:12, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I understand the reason this Bot exists. However, could I ask if it could pass over my page? I understand that the iPod Touch photo is limited to only the iPod Touch page, however, I am the original creator of the image, and I would simply like it to be a small memoir to anyone who visits my page. If that would be so allowed, that would be nice. Thanks, and good bot by the way. IT BE SPEEDY! Gyrferret (talk) 03:53, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

This image is a screenshot of a Wikipedia edit window in an article about how to edit Wikipedia articles Wikipedia:How to edit a page. Please explain why it keeps being tagged and removed? Thanks, Petersam (talk) 01:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

It has a non-free rationale. BJ^Talk 01:40, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

So, as a picture is worth a thousand words, what would be an alternative to show what the edit window and edit command buttons look like? thanks Petersam (talk) 06:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Just remove the template and the bot will leave it alone. BJ^Talk 06:28, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, did it once before on 17 Sept, but bot put it back 18 Sept. Will try again. Petersam (talk) 19:15, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again, I didn't think I could touch the Summary FUR template. Petersam (talk) 20:33, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi there, when a requester posts a non-free image for cleanup, vectorization, ect. they don't always read the How-to and end up posting the direct image onto the page. ie [[Image:Copyrighted.jpg]] instead of [[:Image:Copyrighted.jpg]] BJBot replaces [[Image:Copyrighted.jpg]] with the copyright notice image. This is very unhelpful as it sometimes makes it impossible for a graphist to know what image was posted without going back (sometimes through 100s of edits) into the history to find the image. It would be of much greater help if BJBot could replace [[Image:Copyrighted.jpg]] with [[:Image:Copyrighted.jpg]] so graphists still know which image is in need of repair. I know it's possible, just wondering if you'd be so kind to implement it? §hep • ¡Talk to me! 02:08, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

STOP REMOVING MY IMAGE!!!! I HAVE PREMISSION FROM THE AUTHOR!!  Sub!  21:15, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Now I know I forgot to blank my sandbox after finishing using it, but the bot went ahead and removed images from my user sandbox (NFCC9). I thought the reason we had sandboxes was there was so we could work on editing articles? Would it be feasible to exclude user pages with /sandbox? Thanks. edit Nvm, I learned about the bot template. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 23:18, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. The reason it is not being used is that I have not finished the page yet and I guess I should have waited until I was ready to launch the page with the image before I uploaded it. Is there anyway to avoice speedy deletion other than dropping everything and getting the page done in the next 6 days? Mpleasant (talk) 16:48, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Apropos http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:GoogleNewsTronixCountryConsumerReports.comHitsDisputeUserParanormalSkepticClaimOfNonexistence.png: for the reasons on the page and in the edit summaries, I've undone your edit. How do I make your bot stay away w/o turning it off? The image IS used in the article - as a reference; I don't see the need to put the image in the article, but there is a need to keep it, and I don't have a better place for it.--IReceivedDeathThreats (talk) 02:40, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Non-free images must be used at least once. See WP:NFCC for more information. BJ^Talk 03:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello? "The image IS used in the article - as a reference" --IReceivedDeathThreats (talk) 05:48, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Used, not linked. BJ^Talk 06:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content_criteria_exemptions !!! Read the page your bot edited and its edit history summaries. AGF! Read! --IReceivedDeathThreats (talk) 06:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm very aware of the image policy. "Exceptions can be made on a case-by-case basis if there is a broad consensus". BJ^Talk 06:09, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

OK, TOO MUCH FOR YOU SO JUST READ IT HERE: "If this image is removed from the 3rd page it's on (see page source!) it should be kept as an exception to the general rule (unless consensus is found lacking) under the exception described at Category:Wikipedia non-free content criteria exemptions"--IRDT (talk) 07:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Consensus doesn't work like that, it has to be formed first. BJ^Talk 08:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Given that the enforcement policy states images will be deleted 48 hours after uploading if there's no FUR, why was Image:DoD Copyright Fax.JPG deleted barely 12 hours after upload? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 03:43, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

It hasn't been deleted, merely tagged to be deleted in 48 hours if no FUR is added. BJ^Talk 04:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

My error, I read watchlist too quickly, however it was deleted from the sandbox page where I had it - I will be deleting it myself anyway shortly, it's just to show another editor something. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 07:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

My user page is filling up with notifications of imminent image deletions, none of which I contest or care about. Can the deletion process be accomplished without the bother of informing me? I'd be very grateful. Thanks--Hugh Manatee (talk) 16:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC).

Read User:BJBot#Disable_messages for instructions on stopping the bot notices. BJ^Talk 17:13, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

this bot posted a message on my talk page in error. Bob A (talk) 06:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Why the hell did you remove the image on User:Æåm Fætsøn/Archives and Drafts/Microsoft Office 2003 ? First, you're invading my privacy, because you did that on a subpage of a subpage of a user page, and second, you're ruining a draft of a page that I was going to upload. Well hard lick, you clunky twisted dumb metal turd, 'cause I added the image back and uploaded it with my article.

Will someone please ban or block this rogue bot? Æåm Fætsøn (talk) 08:34, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

This bot is currently malfunctioning: it states that the images Image:LTSPlogo.gif, Image:LTSSlogo.gif, Image:LutherSeminarylogo.GIF, and Image:LSTClogo.gif are orphaned images. However, all currently are being used in articles. Please correct the bot to ensure it does not tag images which are used by an article as orphaned. -- jackturner3 (talk) 17:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

All those images are in fact orphans. BJ^Talk 17:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Since the .gif image used for the FIS Nordic World Ski Championships 2007 has been replaced by a .png, I don't have a problem with it though I think it would have gone better if it were speedy. Chris (talk) 21:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Another bot is doing GIF -> PNG conversions. BJ^Talk 01:19, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Put speedy delete user on it and .gif was deleted. Chris (talk) 02:44, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the 122 messages you left on my talkpage this morning. Is this not a bit excessive just to tell me that all of the football logos I uploaded in 2006 & 2007 have now been changed to PNG files? EP 16:27, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

 Fixed, it should no longer notify the uploader when a {{PNG version available}} template is on the image. BJ^Talk 17:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your polite reply, It makes a pleasant change from the dismissive rudeness of another bot operator I crossed paths with a while back, regards EP 18:12, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Regarding this edit, are non-copyrighted, trademarked images considered non-free? From what I read at WP:Logos and WP:Trademarks, they are not and the only restriction is that they cannot be used commerically. If I am incorrect, please point me to the Wikipedia policy stating that non-copyrighted, trademarked images are considered non-free (i.e., cannot be used in userspace and require FURs). Otherwise, please modify the bot to prevent it from removing such images. Thanks! →Wordbuilder (talk) 14:04, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

The bot follows the non-free categories, this discussion would be better suited for the village pump. BJ^Talk 17:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. →Wordbuilder (talk) 19:00, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Actually, just remove the NFCC FUR template. BJ^Talk 21:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Regarding GIF images superseded by PNGs, the bot wasn't providing a replacement parameter when tagging superseded images. Could something be done to address this?--Paul_012 ^(talk) 13:56, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

My bot isn't the one doing the replacements. I figure I could have it copy the replacement name from the PNG replaced template but I don't see any real purpose to that. BJ^Talk 17:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

There's the small navigational benefit when someone might wonder why an image became orphaned, since the PNG available message may be buried down the page, but you're probably right; doesn't seem worth the effort. Thanks anyway. --Paul_012 ^(talk) 18:19, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Why doesn't the bot wait a couple minutes (so the user can add it back up as a former logo) so I don't get spam from BJBot? Ellomate (talk) 19:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

The bot only runs once a day. BJ^Talk 19:52, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

The orphaned .gif can be deleted. The logo is a television station logo so is not public domain, however its use on wikipedia is authorised by the webmaster of gbc.gi. If there are any additions that need to be made to clarify that, let me know as its me. --Gibnews (talk) 08:27, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your communication. Image is no longer an orphan. Bharathprime (talk) 10:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for informing me about my orphaned image for Ashura Blaster. The page was vandalised which explains the image becoming orphaned so I undid the edit and now it's back to normal. Raphie (talk) 10:44, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Please do not edit my page. It is considered as vandalism. Thanks: GreyMatterEchoUKfan (talk) 12:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

No, no it isn't. BJ^Talk 16:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much for bringing this to my attention. Image:Ghafurov 50somoni.jpg was originally intended for the article Bobojon Ghafurov. However, it has since been replaced with a better copy Image:Ghafurov 50somoni cropped.jpg and the original orphaned Image:Ghafurov 50somoni.jpg can be safely deleted now. Unfortunately, I do not know how to delete images. Could you do it, please? Thanks again. --Zlerman (talk) 06:54, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

 Done BJ^Talk 06:56, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi, your bot removed all the images from a gallery on my page. I had intended it to be a spot to display all of the images I had uploaded, but as I have come to understand, that does not follow Wikipedia non-free image protocol. Is there any way to still display these images (as it is only on my userpage)? Thanks! DARTH PANDA^talk 03:37, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

You can link to the images but no, you can't display them. BJ^Talk 03:42, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

So in essence, I cannot display a gallery, but I can display links. DARTH PANDA^talk 18:11, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

You were remarkably quick in finding this was orphaned! The article The History of the Bonzos was vandalised on October 13, removing the infobox with the image and adding some nonsense, and you listed the image for speedy deletion on 14th! It is just as well I am not on holiday, or I would have had to upload it all again. Anyway, the image and infobox are now restored, and I hope you will take no further action. Patche99z (talk) 20:57, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

The bot removed two images from User:Bubba73/Sandbox/Rules of chess. This is a sandbox version of Rules of chess that we are working on that is currently under GA review. I would appreciate it if you would not tamper with a file like this. Bubba73 (talk), 03:27, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Ummmm.....I didn't upload it. I just reverted it. SAVIOR_SELF.777 02:17, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

It's been replaced with a .png image, so it can be deleted.

Don't edit my page,that's not your bussiness!

--Мэн-1

06:00, 11 October 2008

Stop editing my page with your crap. It's none of your business. Marcus2 (talk) 13:49, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Marcus2 (talk) 01:18, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Non-free images are not allowed on user pages, see WP:NFCC. BJ^Talk 01:20, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Could you please explain the "Read this first" notice in plain English? What does "revert the edit" mean? Do you mean to press the undo key in the history? And what if the bot made no edit to the image page? As far as I can remember, all I saw for the impending removal of my image for an article regarding a music album was the impending removal notice in my talk page. Since the article the image was used in had been vandalised, there was no direct link from the image to that article anyway. Patche99z (talk) 14:33, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes, undo is a form of reverting. If the bot hasn't made an edit it didn't tag the image. In this case a bot already removed the the tag.[2] BJ^Talk 17:03, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from User:Æåm Fætsøn. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ÆÅM «(fætsøn!) 08:51, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

You indicated image was orphaned without taking the trouble to check that it had been unintentionally removed during vandalism of article. It has now been restored. Tony (talk) 17:27, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Tony

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Æåm Fætsøn. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please stop removing images and/or making vandalism on pages. ÆÅM «(fætsøn!) 06:10, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to User :Æåm Fætsøn, you will be blocked from editing. ÆÅM «(fætsøn!) 09:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

First you delete an image on User:Breadmanpaul/Hebraic_Roots_Version, then you mark the image as not being used. You've done this twice now. Stop it. breadmanpaul (talk) 04:38, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Are you a nice friend? Don't take this to serious, i just wanna know.. Pedrovip (talk) 20:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Pedrovip

leave my user page alone —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregor cox (talk • contribs) 14:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

that is a version of the same article, simply a more complex one that was changed to a simple version, i like to keep the more detailed version so i created my own ersion of the article, so stop removng it! Btzkillerv (talk) 16:11, 2 November 2008 (UTC)