According to the policies you presented, my behavior does not seem to violate them. I would also kindly ask you not to use policy references as a way of applying pressure.
Regarding the ANI matter, it has come to my attention that your name has appeared in some ANI-related discussions recently. This is concerning because, from an outside perspective, your recent actions may appear to be escalating tension and potentially contributing to an environment of conflict.
Specifically, by initiating deletion discussions on articles created by certain users, and those users subsequently facing blocks or their pages being deleted, it could give the impression of targeting or creating a battleground-like scenario. Please remember that this is not a war zone.
My goal is not to attack you but to raise genuine concerns that I believe should be addressed in the interest of Wikipedia’s collaborative spirit. I hope we can de-escalate and focus on improving content constructively... Dear @HistoryofIranHistoryofIran BEFOR01 (talk) 20:40, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'll be blunt. You're not following our policies. You were even told to stop WP:BLUDGEON by two users (yours truly being one of them), even an admin said "you've probably made sufficient comments here now", yet you still keep commenting. And I have already asked you to stop casting WP:ASPERSIONS thrice, and now for the fourth time (please stop). So by no means are you in a position to indicate that I am "escalating tension and potentially contributing to an environment of conflict." (more WP:ASPERSIONS). And again, if you think you have proof of me violating our policies, report away, but do beware of WP:OUCH. This is not a way of pressuring you, I am telling you kindly stop attacking me, otherwise I will report you to WP:ANI, and then you're welcome to try to convince the admins that your behaviour does not violate our rules. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:47, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't going to argue at first but I guess circumstances push people to do that?
Look, looking at the tone of your messages, it seems like threatening messages. A situation like going to ANI won't change the outcome. I think we are both wasting our time arguing with you. Because the officer warned you before she warned me. In the fourth incident you mentioned, you are considered to have slandered me because you thought I was slandering me. Your question has nothing to do with slander. Despite me giving you the right answer, you keep messaging me again and again and I am defending Wikipedia rules and we are forced to argue with you for no reason.
Please adjust the tone of your messages and don't attack me in your messages and make threatening statements
+We need to close the discussion on this topic because we are not getting anywhere. If I am seriously breaking policy and am making a threat to you, I apologize. BEFOR01 (talk) 21:08, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I’m not here to argue, I’m simply here asking you to cease the attacks, it’s really not that hard. Your last sentence also contradicts your whole comment. Feel free to have the last say, prefferably without any attacks. HistoryofIran (talk) 21:15, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
-(If I am seriously violating policy and posing a threat to you, I apologize.)- -There is no contradiction in this sentence. If you analyze it, you will see it. What I want to point out here is the sentence of ending a discussion by adding your thought and your idea.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Baghdad (1821) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Thanks for your contributions to Circassian Hafiz Mehmed Pasha. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
First of all, good morning! Thank you, I was actually working on the Turkish Wikipedia, but my aim was to quote the word, but I will do what you said when I develop the page. BEFOR01 (talk) 04:26, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You moved the page to draft, so I fixed it. The English version is finished. Can you connect the languages with the Turkish version? BEFOR01 (talk) 23:54, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know this page existed, but does the fact that it's outdated mean the information needs to be deleted? So, I need to paste the code I wrote into this page. As an addition, this language version merge category also includes Turkish and Russian pages. turkish page
+In the merged page, it is stated that this person is Turkish, but when we look at the sources, even this is wrong because the sources say that this person is a Circassian. BEFOR01 (talk) 00:31, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think there has been a misunderstanding :D because I think the person in the photo is Hafız Mehmet Pasha, but Circassian Hafız Mehmet Pasha looks like a completely different person and I think this change should be reversed. BEFOR01 (talk) 00:55, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. I'll explain the situation there, but I'd appreciate it if you could wait a bit. I normally use Discord for instant messaging, but feel free to use whatever you prefer. BEFOR01 (talk) 01:48, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Tips
