User talk:Axem Titanium/Archive 6

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Axem Titanium. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

That's pretty poor form on the tagger's part. I've restored the image and pushed back its due date three days. east.718 at 16:31, January 6, 2008

Just to mention that CSD#C1 requires the category to have been empty for four days before it's eligible for speedy deletion. Category:Roger Rabbit characters had been empty for less than 1 hour, so I declined to delete it. Feel free to renominate it in 4 days' time if it's still empty. Regards, Bencherlite^Talk 07:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove sections and categories, as you did to Cloud Strife here and Sephiroth here, without being explicitly clear in your edit summaries. Really, what is "DX"? I'd rather we discuss this on your talk page rather than battle. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

I did no such blanking; please WP:AGF. I removed a short sentence that was part of a stub section since it consisted entirely of unsourced and unsourceable claims. Also, the rationale for "powers and abilities" sections for comic book characters is that such characters often have long and complicated histories with many revisions to the extent of their powers, based on the current story writer for that character, justifying a section to document such changes. With video game characters, there is no such precedent and no such justification for that type of section. Hence, I removed it. The "DX" was an unintentional gag reflex that that type of website could be cited on anywhere, especially by an experienced editor such as yourself. Axem Titanium (talk) 00:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Explain this removal of categories below. I can't assume anything if your edit summary remains unclear. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Once again, WP:AGF. Wikipedia:Overcategorization. The categories I removed were not defining (superhuman speed, henchman, thief) or factually incorrect (mass murderer). Remember the definition of mass murderer is a person who kills a large number of people at once or over a short period of time. At no point does he do this; even the fire at Nibelheim doesn't count since we can't assume anyone died and this would fall more under arson (which is also not a defining characteristic). Axem Titanium (talk) 03:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for giving me a hand there. I asked a question on the talk there and was hoping someone could answer it. Regards, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh. For example, there's a June and October date that need wiki-linking. Should I provide a sample? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:53, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm currently doing the edits to Link's page (as well finishing other articles) and I was thinking if Ganon should be placed in the flight category (he flew in a couple of the games, I think). He's currently in the teleporting cat. so what to do? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 04:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I would take care of the categories, however, I'd rather leave it to you since your expertise on Zelda-related articles surpasses mine. *Saiyan Saga, Freeza Saga, etc., are official titles of the arcs, hence, the capitalization. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 05:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Axem, I noticed that you didn't remove the teleport cat.[1], is it because it is a trademark ability of Ganon? You were partially reverted, look here. Perhaps you should remark WP:OVERCAT in your edit summary. Just a suggestion. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Teleport, can't recall, but flying yes; in Ocarina of Time, Ganon possesses the Triforce of Power which allows him to do so, and access to other abilities like energy blasts and some form of sorcery. I don't know about the TV series and other games, what did he do there? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

So does his flying count as unique? I asked what his abilities were in the other games. Perhaps he should also be placed within the martial artist category (Melee, Brawl, can't think of Zelda ones). Reply? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Heh, guess you're right. One or two games don't count. I left a concern here and thought someone could answer it. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Afraid not, see Talk:Ganon#Overcategorization. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I asked you a question on that talk page. I'm considering that we remove all of the excess, unsourced cats. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Please weigh in on the merger proposal between Angel Moroni and Moroni (prophet). You are receiving this notice since you were identified as a recent editor on one of those pages. Thanks! --Descartes1979 (talk) 07:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been active in a dispute regarding evidence to prove the sentience of Cait Sith in the computer game Final Fantasy VII. A poll has been set up in order to find consensus of editors of the page regarding the evidence. Please post your opinions on the talk page. Cait's Sentence Poll. Gavin Scott (talk) 22:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Did you do a request or something for Finlandia? Please reply below. Thanks, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:53, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes. I moved it already. Axem Titanium (talk) 23:23, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I just noticed. {^_^} Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:34, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello. I'd just like to clarify something. When I made this change I wasn't debating that fact that a rationale was there or not. If you reread the warning, it was because at the time I tagged the image, it was orphaned. The rationale on the page at the time was for a different article which didn't use the image. So I had to remove the image from the one page it was on which didn't have a corresponding rationale. I hope this clears things up.--Rockfang (talk) 23:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Why did you remove content from it? I noticed this right when I was going to archive my talk page. You can reply below, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

You had archived the thread in the middle of the conversation so I rescued it and replied here. Axem Titanium (talk) 00:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, ok. The page was getting too big so that's why I did that. Cheers, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:35, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

No worries. Axem Titanium (talk) 03:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

• The exact dates are base off two things: one being the timestamp stored in the rom which shows the date of it being dumped, and is verified by the date stored in the zip files data (winzip stores the last date of creation no matter what). The blog, which is the earliest point found thus far of any news for it, has a clear date up top (I reuse the ref later because Baidu is both significant at least and they do make note of the similarity to FF3). Both dates are clearly verifiable by just looking by anyone, though if I absolutely need a third party to show the dates somewhere I understand that, and will do it.
• The second one about information based off disassembling the rom is something anyone could easily do with tools from zophar's domain or other sites. The CinnamonPirate.com article covers this as well, but I'm still iffy on using it as much solo as I have, though any sites that did go into great detail that could be used as alt references just copied his whole article (including GoNintendo.com). But still keeping an eye out. If the note is still too much OR, I'll remove it, but would rather some form to keep it there if at all possible.
• Square's reaction was pretty much a verbatim reference to their privacy policy. Should I just go ahead and cite that outright alongside the image of the email sent? It seems a bit odd to get their opinion on it but then be unable to use it. Nintendo's was worse, but understandable why I can't use it.

Look I know you think I'm trying to be disruptive with this and step a bit on your turf given you've worked heavily on the FF7 article, and we both know the most this page would get there is the footnote it already has with a merge. I'm trying though to make a good article out of this or at least Featured Article, and really do feel strongly as time goes on I can get more information for this and expand it.

Anyway thanks for your time.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 16:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Well it is awkward at the least to leave out the date when the rom was clearly dumped before news about it (and the only place I could cite for that info besides the rom file itself is the site to dl it from, which isn't exactly legal reference material. Guess I'll keep an eye out, see if the date shows up anywhere.

At least I took care of the reference issues with an admin's advice, though that doesn't seemed to have opened the conversation back up or stop the AFD that revolved around said issues...anyway wish me luck :P.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 02:51, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't know if you know or not, but a couple FF articles have been up at GA review. The two still going on are Final Fantasy Mystic Quest and Tidus; at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Final Fantasy Mystic Quest/1 and Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Tidus/1 respectively.

Anyway the Tidus article has been cleaned up some and expanded with more real world content. Though the plot info in the "Appearances" section is extremely long and it's been a while since I played FFX and I never played FFX-2. I don't know if you've played the two games, but could take a look at the article and give it a good copy edit? (Guyinblack25 ^talk 18:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC))

No worries man. You got to got do what you got to do. Hope you didn't miss the days because of something serious. Take it easy. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 12:40, 14 March 2008 (UTC))

http://www.1up.com/do/minisite?cId=3156908 Might be useful for various reception references to use, at least for FFVII. It's more your department than mine, hope it helps.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 22:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Final Fantasy VII has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. FightingStreet (talk) 13:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:FFIX characters.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

First, excuse my french but who the hell are you to delete things from the Discussion page? Second, thats not me complaining, thats me talking in a very long winded way about how Fon Rossenburg isn't supposed to be Von Rosenburg or whatever. And reminding people who don't need to limit ourselves, maybe I'm wrong but I don't recall reading that the references need to be in English, a german speaking person can find something in german, use parts of it for the English wiki and source the german bits. If not, delete all of the Japanese versions of characters names for Final Fantasy, they aren't mentioned anywhere in the English version, they exist in the Japanese version. I really do like the games even if they plots change slower thans the technical specs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 03:50, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

I am improving The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass to Featured Article status and noticed that you made substantial changes to the article recently. If you have time, I would be delighted if you could help out with this project. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 03:26, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cave Story characters.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:23, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:ShinraHierarch43y3.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 17:39, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi! With you starting the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of J-pop artists almost two years ago, I'd like to tell you that the list has now been nominated for a second time. Punkmorten (talk) 17:04, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Just compare:

• Galaxiki Alexa ranking: 565,443
• LyricWiki Alexa ranking: 15,060
• OpenWetWare Alexa ranking: 126,691

and

• StrategyWiki Alexa ranking: 12,273

If the alexa ranking cannot be a measure of notoriety from a website, what can be?

I think that the StrategyWiki website is sufficiently notorious to have a article about. But, please, reply. MRFraga (talk) 16:20, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

I have nominated List of Who Framed Roger Rabbit characters, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Who Framed Roger Rabbit characters. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 07:30, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

An article in which you have had an interest, List of bow tie wearers, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bow tie wearers (4th nomination). Thank you. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:01, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Ff8-edea.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Gummikh2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Ff8-rinoa.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

User:Axem Titanium/Yu-Gi-Oh: The Abridged Series, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Axem Titanium/Yu-Gi-Oh: The Abridged Series and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Axem Titanium/Yu-Gi-Oh: The Abridged Series during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:26, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Org XIII.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 25 May 2009 (UTC)