Share to: share facebook share twitter share wa share telegram print page

User talk:AxG/Archive 14

 Archives
01 • 02 • 03 • 04 • 05 • 06 • 07 • 08 • 09 • 10
11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20
21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 • 26 • 27 • 28 • 29 • 30
31 • 32 • 33 • 34 • 35 • 36 • 37 • 38 • 39 • 40
41 • 42 • 43 • 44

My current time: 02:02 UTC+1

Getting Wikimedians to the Olympic Games

Hi. I am part of an effort to get Wikimedians access to the 2016 Summer Olympics as accredited reporters and photographers. Part of this effort includes covering the 2012 Summer Paralympics. Two Wikimedians have credentials to attend these games as reporters through Wikimedia Australia. As English Wikipedia does not allow original reporting, this is largely through Wikinews with a project page found at Wikinews:Paralympic Games. If you are interested in helping to get Wikimedians to the next Summer Olympics,I'd encourage you to assist with Wikinews efforts, and also to work on all language 2012 Summer Paralympic Wikipedia articles before, during and after the Games to demonstrate a track record of success. Thank you. --LauraHale (talk) 05:02, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 August 2012

The Wikimedia Foundation sometimes proposes new features that receive substantive criticism from Wikimedians, yet those criticisms may be dismissed on the basis that people are resistant to change—there's an unjustified view that the wikis have been overrun by vested contributors who hate all change. That view misses a lot of key details and insight because there are good reasons that Wikimedians are suspicious of features development, given past and present development of bad software, growing ties with the problematic Wikia, and a growing belief that it is acceptable to experiment on users.
The Core Contest is a month-long competition among editors to improve Wikipedia's most important "core" articles—especially those that are in a relatively poor state. Core articles, such as Music, Computer, and Philosophy, tend to lie in the trunk of the tree of knowledge; by analogy, featured-and good-article processes generally attract more specialist topics out on the branches.
In the Utah Court of Appeals this week, the majority opinion in Fire Insurance Exchange v. Robert Allen Oltmanns and Brady Blackner relied on Wikipedia for the basic premise of their legal opinion, and included a concurring opinion devoted solely to the issue of citing Wikipedia in a legal opinion.
Thirteen featured articles were promoted this week, including pelicans, which are a genus of large water birds comprising the family Pelecanidae, characterised by a long beak and large throat-pouch. They have a fossil record dating back at least 30 million years and are most closely related to the Shoebill and Hammerkop. These fish-feeders have a patchy relationship with humans: the birds are sometimes persecuted and sometimes feature in mythology.
New embeddable scripting ("template replacement") language Lua received considerable scrutiny this week when it began its long road to widespread deployment, landing on the test2wiki test site on Wednesday (wikitech-l mailing list). ... the fourth in our series profiling participants in this year's Google Summer of Code (GSoC) programme.
This week, we spent some time with WikiProject Korea. Started in September 2006, WikiProject Korea covers the history and culture of the Korean people, including both countries that currently occupy the Korean peninsula. This task has proven difficult with North Koreans notably absent from the Wikipedia community due to tight control over access to external media. The project is home to over 16,000 pages, including 15 pieces of Featured material and 66 Good and A-class Articles.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Parramatta High School   Readership: High Harry Enfield's Brand Spanking New Show
Readership: High M6 Music   Readership: High Brainiac: Science Abuse
Readership: High Entreprise nationale de télévision   Readership: High 1980 Summer Olympics
Readership: Medium Ciné+ Premier   Merge
Readership: High La Chaîne parlementaire   Readership: High List of Melrose Place (1992 TV series) episodes
Readership: High AB1   Readership: High Disney Junior (France)
Readership: High Virgin 17   Readership: High Sky Active
Readership: Medium Comédie+   Add sources
Readership: High The Ticket (The West Wing)   Readership: High Jimmy (TV channel)
Readership: High France Ô   Readership: High WOPR
Readership: High XXL (French TV)   Readership: High Yugoslav Radio Television
Readership: High OM TV   Wikify
Readership: High BFM TV   Readership: Medium Local TV channels in Hungary
Readership: High Outre-Mer 1ère   Readership: Low Lassie (season 7)
Readership: Medium Liuks!   Readership: Low Lassie (season 6)
Readership: Medium Ciné+ Frisson   Expand
Readership: High MCM (TV channel)   Readership: High Public broadcasting
Readership: High Planète+   Readership: High Geographical usage of television
Readership: Medium M6 Boutique & Co   Readership: High Canal J

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:06, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Postman has arrived

Hello, AxG. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Wesley Mouse 15:27, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Eurovision Newsletter (September 2012)

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 03:15, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 August 2012

Wikimedia editors have been debating a community proposal for the adoption of a new project to host free travel-guide content. The debate reached a new stage when a three-month request for comment on Meta came to an end, with a decision to set up the first new type of Wikimedia project in half a decade. The original proposal for the travel guide unfolded during April on Meta and the Wikimedia-l mailing lists, centring around the wish of volunteer contributors to the WikiTravel project to work in a non-commercial environment.
A monthly overview of recent academic research about Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, edited jointly with the Wikimedia Research Committee and republished as the Wikimedia Research Newsletter.
Developers were left one step closer to an understanding of the code review outlook this week after the creation of a graph plotting "number changesets awaiting review" over time. The chart, which also shows the number of new changesets created on a daily basis, reveals a peak in the number of unreviewed changesets in mid-July, followed by a short drop. The current figure stands at approximately 219 unreviewed changesets.
This week the Signpost interviews Mark Arsten, who has written or contributed significantly to ten featured articles; most have related to new religious movements, and some have touched on other controversial or quirky topics. Mark gives us a rundown on how he keeps neutral and what drives him to write featured content; he also gives some hints for aspiring writers.
This week, we hopped in a little blue box with a batch of companions from WikiProject Doctor Who. Started in April 2005, the project has grown to include about 4,000 pages about the world's longest-running science fiction television show, its spinoffs, and various related material. The project is the parent of the Torchwood Taskforce and a child of WikiProject British TV and WikiProject Science Fiction. With new Doctor Who episodes airing this week and a 50th anniversary celebration around the corner, we thought now would be a good time to inquire about the famed Time Lord.
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia.

Orphaned non-free media (File:Daybreak team.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Daybreak team.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daybreak (ITV), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Middleton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Our Greatest Team Parade

Thanks for gnoming the parade. Do you think you could look over the article and tell me if I need to change anything? Also I'm not used to putting quotes in articles. Simply south...... flapping wings into buildings for just 6 years 20:24, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Loose Women.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Loose Women.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 12:27, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 03 September 2012

Some of Wikimedia's most valuable photographs have been shot and uploaded under free licenses as a direct result of the annual Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) event each September. Last year, the project was conducted on a European level, resulting in the submission of an extraordinary 168,208 free images of cultural heritage sites ("monuments") from 18 countries, making it the world's largest photographic competition. Organising the 2012 event—which has just opened and will run for the full month of September—has required input from chapters and volunteers in 35 countries.
Developers are currently discussing the possibility of a MediaWiki Foundation to oversee those aspects of MediaWiki development that relate to non-Wikimedia wikis. The proposal was generated after a discussion on the wikitech-l mailing list about generalising Wikimedia's CentralAuth system.
Five featured pictures were promoted this week, including a video explaining the recent landing of the Curiosity rover on Mars. NASA called the final minutes of the complicated landing procedure "the seven minutes of terror".
Since May 2012 I've been a Wikimedia Foundation community fellow with the task of researching and improving dispute resolution on English Wikipedia. Surveying members of the community has revealed much about their thoughts on and experiences with dispute resolution. I've analysed processes to determine their use and effectiveness, and have presented ideas that I hope will improve the future of dispute resolution.

File:LocationSwitzerlandNew.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LocationSwitzerlandNew.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 11:30, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lithuanian National Radio and Television

You commented your revision: We don't use programs to mean that, it's a Radio station /TV station or TV channel. A program is what is made that people watch. I have questions:

  • We - who?
  • What's your reference to the claim that "We don't use programs to mean that"?

My usage of the word "Programme" is based on:

  • Wikipedia's definition of "Radio station".
  • Oxford distionary's of current English (1973) definition of "Station" as "place, building, etc. in which somebody or something is, or is placed".
  • Oxford distionary's definition of "Program(me)" as "list of items, events, etc. (e.g. for a concert, or to be broadcast for radio or television, or for a sports meeting)".
  • World Radio TV Handbook's usage of the word "Programme" for the purpose I used it.

Please reply here. Please, also, in future follow the procedure described in Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Thank you. - JohnnyWiki (talk) 01:12, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) - The term "we" may be referring to the "wikipedia we", or more commonly known as the "Majestic plural". And I have to agree with AxG's a programme is what people watch. A TV station/Radio station would be the correct terminology. And I think you may have misinterpreted the definitions of "programme" from the Oxford English Dictionary. English is a very complexed language, as we have words that hold so many definitions, as well as words that are spelt differently but sound the same (for example: were, where, and wear). If you look at this online dictionary the sixth definition for "station" reads "An establishment equipped for radio or television transmission." Also the third definition as shown on the Oxford online dictionary states "a company involved in broadcasting of a specified kind: a radio station". Like you rightfully pointed out, a station is a building. But its a building where a specified activity or service is held. So in this case, radio and television are the activities based in a "station". Hope this helps to clear up any confusion. Wesley Mouse 01:25, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
So why here the same things are called "services" and not "stations"? - JohnnyWiki (talk) 01:45, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
From the online dictionaries I see that "station" is either a company or an establishment. None of these apply to my case. Again, in LBC#Current services: is LBC 97.3 a company or an establishment? Is LBC News 1152 a company or an establishment? - JohnnyWiki (talk) 01:53, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) That's the complexity of the English language I'm afraid. Thankfully I know a friend who works at LBC so should be able to answer this one better. LBC Radio is a company name, which has two radio stations LBC 97.3 and LBC News 1152. If you check both of those articles they refer to them as stations. But for the sake of the parent article LBC, we (as in Wikipedians) may list them as services belonging to a company, but we could also list them as "stations" too. And again, you appear to be getting the definitions mixed up here. I've studied Lexicography, a station is a building where a specified activity or service is held. For the sake of the article you are relating to, Lithuanian National Radio and Television is a company that comprises of a radio and television network. The specified building they are based within is called a "station". In English we commonly refer to such companies as "radio or TV stations". A programme (as stated by Oxford English Dictionary)is an item broadcast between stated times on radio or television. Wesley Mouse 01:59, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've just corrected the LBC article as the section header "Current services" is a little vague and ambiguous. Stations would be the correct header for that particular section as it contains the names of the two radio stations owned by LBC. Wesley Mouse 02:04, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also, company/establishment mean the same thing in English. A company is a commercial business; an establishment is a business organization. Notice the common definition between both of those words - they are businesses. Wesley Mouse 02:08, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I see you put emphasis on "building" while I'd like to understand the "company" part. Oxford English Dictionary says that station is a company, based on this please explain whether LBC 97.3 and LBC News 1152 are separate companies with LBC as parent company? - JohnnyWiki (talk) 08:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that in my case LRT Radijas, LRT Klasika and LRT Opus are not companies, nor are they located in different buildings. - JohnnyWiki (talk) 08:51, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm starting to have concerns here, as you have on your user page that you hold a near native knowledge of the English language. Yet you are showing signs here that you clearly are not understanding that some words in the English language hold so many definitions and meanings. This is also more evident in the fact that you also asked on my talk page why I have listed Isle of Man as being part of the United Kingdom. Considering I was born in the United Kingdom, and of British nationality, plus the fact I have lived in the UK for 32 of my 33 years - I think I have an outstanding knowledge of the British Georgraphy and English language.
I use the emphasis to make specific words (the words to which you question) stand out more. It is better then to bold or underline them. As I have previously explained to you, a company/establishment are the same thing. They are words relating to a business. Even though both of the online dictionaries use either company or establishment in their definitions, they are basically stating that they are businesses. You used LBC as an example - LBC is the overall business name, which makes them also a company/establishment. However, LBC also have two radio stations/channels. Even though they are based in the same building, it makes both of those radio channels 'stations'. Take for example the BBC. BBC is the overall company, which has smaller departments within them, such as BBC 1; BBC 2; BBC 3; BBC Radio 1; BBC Radio 2 etc. Each of those are BBC Stations, which are part of the BBC corporation. ITV is another example, they have ITV 1, ITV 2, then there are ITV Granada, ITV Wales etc. ITV is the larger corporation which consists of smaller broadcasting departments and regional departments.
Now in your case you mention LRT Radijas, LRT Klasika and LRT Opus. Nobody has said they are different companies, nor has anyone stipulated they are located in different buildings. The fact of the matter is LRT is the larger business (also known as the parent business) which comprises of smaller departments (more commonly known as stations). LRT Radijas, LRT Klasika and LRT Opus are stations which belong to LRT. Wesley Mouse 11:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help Wes, however yet again the user has changed 'Stations' to 'Programme services', and quite frankly don't understand it. LRT Televizija is a television channel/station, with LRT Radijas a radio station. -- [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 13:10, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome AxG. I am quite concerned though as the user has stated they have a near-native understanding of the English language. If that be the case then someone with near-native skills wouldn't need to be asking for clarification on word definitions. He has quoted definitions from a dictionary dated 1973. We're now 39 years on from that, and the Oxford English Dictionary has been updated every year since with new definitions, new words etc. There is clearly confusing and a lack of understand of the English language and its complexity of definitions, that I personally starting to get frustrated with it all. And not only that, but to also check my own user space and then question me as to why I have listed Isle of Man as being United Kingdom. What has that got to do with the user? I'm British, and yet my nationalistic knowledge is being questioned by a user who isn't even British. Wesley Mouse 15:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have just looked up the word station on Wikipedia's very own dictionary site, Wiktionary. They too have station definitions that mention buildings or stopping places (such as bus station, railway station). And then definitions 10 and 111 both explicitly state "a place used for broadcasting" (for example, I used to work at a radio station) and "a broadcasting entity" (for example, I used to listen to that radio station). Wesley Mouse 15:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My reliable sources are World Radio TV Handbook and UK Broadcasting Act (Section 46(1) defines it as "programme service", btw). What are yours, apart from Wiktionary's "station"? - JohnnyWiki (talk) 19:16, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I can't believe you're asking for sources, on something that is common knowledge as this‽ Some questions for you to answer; 'What would you call BBC Radio 1, or RTÉ Radio One or CBC Radio 1?' -- [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 22:04, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well Johnny's choice of "reliable sources" says it all really. One of them is a booklet of TV listings covering all TV/Radio channels around the world. The other is a British Act of Law which sets legal guidelines for TV/Radio Stations in regards to programme broadcasting. This user is getting sources completely confused and this is worrying and boardline disruptiveness too. He also used a definition from a dictionary that is almost 39 years out of date. We're in 2012, not 1973 - so use the definition in the modern Oxford English Dictionary please. Oh hang on, I actually provided the definition for the words using the modern Oxford Dictionary!!! I also provided definitions from other dictionaries which all stated the same thing as the Oxford one. And then I provide the link to Wikitionary for the same words - and to no surprise that too collaborates the same definitions as the previous two. And then there are the two WikiProjects for Radio and Television - they too define them as Radio/TV stations. Now what part can we not understand here? Wesley Mouse 11:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Even other articles on Wikipedia refer to a Radio/Television network as stations.
  • Radio broadcasting - This article mentions the term 'radio station' a multitude of times, and provides a clear definition of what a 'radio station' is.
  • Television station - Oh look this article also states "a television station is a business, organisation or other enterprise, such as an amateur television (ATV) operator, that transmits (broadcasts) content over terrestrial television".
  • Television network - This too states "A television network is a telecommunications network for distribution of television program content, whereby a central operation provides programming to many television stations or pay TV providers". Notice it mentions a TV station provide programme content. When a programme is aired to the general public via a TV screen that TV network/station is providing a service - which is what the Broadcasting Act 1990 means by License programme services. A television network is required by law to license any content they wish to produce in order for it to be legally transmitted.
The Broadcasting Act 1990, replaced the Television Act 1954. Prior to the 1990 Act, the United Kingdom only had four television networks, BBC One, BBC Two, ITV, and Channel 4, and the law prevented a fifth television network being transmitted. When the new Broadcasting Act came into legislation it meant the old law was relaxed and that a fifth channel could be created - shortly after Channel 5 begin to transmit programmes on its new station. Wesley Mouse 13:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 September 2012

Thanks to the initiative of Yuvi Panda and Notnarayan, the Signpost now has an Android app, free for download on Google Play. ... but would readers be interested in an iOS app for Apple devices?
Much like article content, the English Wikipedia's help pages have grown organically over the years. Although this has produced a great deal of useful documentation, with time many of the pages have become poorly maintained or have grown overwhelmingly complicated.
Philip Roth, a widely known and acclaimed American author, wrote an open letter in the New Yorker addressed to Wikipedia this week, alleging severe inaccuracies in the article on his The Human Stain (2000).
Three hip hop discographies were promoted this week, alongside seven other lists.
After a week's hiatus, the WikiProject Report returns with an interview featuring WikiProject Fungi. Started in March 2006, the project has grown to include over 9,000 pages, including 47 Featured Articles and 176 Good Articles. The project maintains a list of high priority missing articles and stubs that need expansion.
In dramatic events that came to light last week, two English Wikipedia volunteers—Doc James (James Heilman) and Wrh2 (Ryan Holliday)—are being sued in the Los Angeles County Superior Court by Internet Brands, the owner of Wikitravel.com. Both Wikipedians have also been volunteer Wikitravel editors (and in Holliday's case, a volunteer administrator). IB's complaints focus on both editors' encouragement of their fellow Wikitravel volunteers to migrate to a proposed non-commercial travel guidance site that would be under the umbrella of the WMF.
In its September issue, the peer-reviewed journal First Monday published The readability of Wikipedia, reporting research which shows that the English Wikipedia is struggling to meet Flesch reading ease test criteria, while the Simple English Wikipedia has "lost its focus".
The Wikimedia Foundation's engineering report for August 2012 was published this week on the Wikimedia Techblog and on the MediaWiki wiki, giving an overview of all Foundation-sponsored technical operations in that month (as well as brief coverage of progress on Wikimedia Deutschland's Wikidata project, phase 1 of which is edging its way towards its first deployment).
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia.

Post in my wall

Thank you, I wan't aweare we shouldn't delete things that were a non-issue now. :) 86.146.71.222 (talk) 20:17, 15 September 2012 (UTC) Also I'm 3930K now. 3930K (talk) 20:33, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HD Suisse logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HD Suisse logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:18, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Project Memorandum

Eurovision Mini Memorandum
16 September 2012

To discontinue receiving Eurovision newsletters and mini memorandums, please remove your name from here.

This mini memorandum has been delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 13:45, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Chesterfield F.C..png)

Thanks for uploading File:Chesterfield F.C..png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 September 2012

We now have a Facebook page at facebook.com/wikisignpost. We invite you to "like" the page and join the discussion there.
This week, we shine the spotlight on the Indian Cinema Task Force, a subproject that seeks to improve the quality and quantity of articles about Indian cinema. As a child of WikiProject Film and WikiProject India, the Indian Cinema Task Force shares a variety of templates, resources, and members with its parent projects. The task force works on a to-do list, maintains the Bollywood Portal, and ensures articles follow the film style guidelines. With Indian cinema celebrating its 100th year of existence in 2013, we asked Karthik Nadar (Karthikndr), Secret of success, Ankit Bhatt, Dwaipayan, and AnimeshKulkarni what is in store for the Indian Cinema Task Force.
Eight featured articles, six featured lists, ten featured pictures, and one featured topic were promoted this week.
The world's largest photo competition, Wiki Loves Monuments, is entering its final two weeks. The month-long event, of Dutch origin, is being held globally for the first time after the success of its European-level predecessor last year. During September 2011 more than 5000 volunteers from 18 countries took part and uploaded 168,208 free images. This year, volunteers and chapters from 35 countries around the world have organised the event. The best photographs will be determined by juries at the national and finally the global level.
1.20wmf12, the 12th release to Wikimedia wikis from the 1.20 branch, was deployed to its first wikis on September 17; if things go well, it will be deployed to all wikis by September 26. Its 200 or so changes – 111 to WMF-deployed extensions plus 98 to core MediaWiki code – include support for links with mixed-case protocols (e.g. Http://example.com) and the removal of the "No higher resolution available" message on the file description pages of SVG images.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Daybreak (TV-am)   Readership: Medium Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2006
Readership: High 40 TV   Readership: High List of mobile network operators of Europe
Readership: Medium Russia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2008   Readership: High Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2005
Readership: Medium Selecția Națională   Merge
Readership: Medium Andrej Babić   Readership: High Granada Productions
Readership: High Canal+ Fútbol   Readership: High Sky News
Readership: High Orthodoxy by country   Readership: High Beer and breweries by region
Readership: High Israel in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest   Add sources
Readership: High ITV Telethon   Readership: High Morning Glory (TV series)
Readership: High European Handball Federation   Readership: High Voting at the Eurovision Song Contest
Readership: High TV1 (Lithuania)   Readership: High Switzerland in the Eurovision Song Contest
Readership: High European Hockey Federation   Wikify
Readership: Medium European Pocket Billiard Federation   Readership: High List of countries by total renewable water resources
Readership: High European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization   Readership: High Carlton Communications
Readership: High Breakfast News   Readership: Medium Armenia in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2011
Readership: Medium Channel M Breakfast   Expand
Readership: Medium Azerbaijan in the Eurovision Dance Contest   Readership: High Occupy Wall Street
Readership: High Canal Nou   Readership: High 2012 Summer Paralympics
Readership: High Allan La Fontaine   Readership: Medium List of futsal competitions

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:43, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonian Radio-Television rebranding

On Saturday at 19:30 will occur rebranding of MRT.--188.47.114.33 (talk) 18:53, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

Oliver Keyes' (User:Ironholds) defense of Wikipedia against the recent Philip Roth controversy has drawn a significant amount of attention over the last week. The problems between Roth, a widely known and acclaimed American author, and Wikipedia arose from an open letter he penned for the American magazine New Yorker, and were covered by the Signpost two weeks ago. Keyes—who wrote the piece as a prominent Wikipedian but is also a contractor for the Wikimedia Foundation—wrote a blog post on the topic, lamenting the factual errors in Roth's letter and criticizing the media for not investigating his claims: "[they took] Roth’s explanation as the truth and launched into a lengthy discussion of how we [Wikipedia] handle primary sourcing."
A paper to appear in a special issue of American Behavioral Scientist (summarized in the research index) sheds new light on the English Wikipedia's declining editor growth and retention trends. The paper describes how "several changes that the Wikipedia community made to manage quality and consistency in the face of a massive growth in participation have lead to a more restrictive environment for newcomers". The number of active Wikipedia editors has been declining since 2007 and research examining data up to September 2009 has shown that the root of the problem has been the declining retention of new editors. The authors show this decline is mainly due to a decline among desirable, good-faith newcomers, and point to three factors contributing to the increasingly "restrictive environment" they face.
This week, we tinkered with WikiProject Robotics. From the project's inception in December 2007, it has served as Wikipedia's hub for building and improving articles about robots and robotics, accumulating two Featured Articles and seven Good Articles along the way. The project covers both fictitious and real-life robots, the technology that powers them, and many of the brains behind the robotics field
In the second controversy to engulf Wikimedia UK in two months, its immediate past chair Roger Bamkin has resigned from the board of the chapter. The resignation last Wednesday followed a growing furore over the conflict of interest between two of Roger's roles outside the chapter and his close involvement in the UK board's decision-making process, including the access to private mailing lists that board members in all chapters need. But the irony surrounding Roger's resignation is its connection with efforts by Wikimedians and collaborators to strengthen the reach of Wikimedia projects through technical innovation.
Late last month, the "Technology report" included a story using code review backlog figures – the only code review figures then available – to construct a rough narrative about the average experience of code contributors. This week, we hope to go one better, by looking directly at code review wait times, and, in particular, median code review times
Fourteen featured articles were promoted this week, including Dodo, along with six featured lists and five featured pictures.
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include...

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - October 2012

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 23:30, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sky Anytime+.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Sky Anytime+.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:BBCRadioScotlandlogo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:BBCRadioScotlandlogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Flora.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Flora.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Acht (TV channel) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to The Young Ones, Entourage, Last Man Standing, Life on Mars and Shameless

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:UK Demographics.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:UK Demographics.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:59, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:ABU TV Song Festival 2012.png)

Thanks for uploading File:ABU TV Song Festival 2012.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:25, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ceska televize rebranding

Yesterday, logotypes of Ceska Televize was changed.--31.63.15.13 (talk) 12:52, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

Does Wikipedia Pay? is a Signpost series seeking to illuminate paid editing, paid advocacy, for-profit Wikipedia consultants, editing public relations professionals, conflict of interest guidelines in practice, and the Wikipedians who work on these issues by speaking openly with the people involved. This week, a scandal centering around Roger Bamkin's work with Wikimedia UK and Gibraltarpedia erupted ... In light of these events, opinions on how to avoid future controversy are as important as ever. ... The Signpost spoke with Jimmy Wales to better understand how he views the paid editing environment and what he thinks is needed to improve it.
Following considerable online and media reportage on the Gibraltar controversy and a Signpost report last week, the Wikimedia UK chapter and the foundation published a joint statement on September 28: "To better understand the facts and details of these allegations and to ensure that governance arrangements commensurate with the standing of the Wikimedia Foundation, Wikimedia UK and the worldwide Wikimedia movement, Wikimedia UK's trustees and the Wikimedia Foundation will jointly appoint an independent expert advisor to objectively review both Wikimedia UK's governance arrangements and its handling of the conflict of interest."
Five articles, three lists, and nine images were promoted to "featured" this week.
The Toolserver is an external service hosting the hundreds of webpages and scripts (collectively known as "tools") that assist Wikimedia communities in dozens of mostly menial tasks. Few people think that it has been operating well recently; the problems, which include high database replication lag and periods of total downtime, have caused considerable disruption to the Toolserver's usual functions. Those functions are highly valued by many Wikimedia communities ... In 2011, the Foundation announced the creation of Wikimedia Labs, a much better funded project that among other things aimed to mimic the Toolserver's functionality by mid-2013. At the same time, Erik Möller, the WMF's director of engineering, announced that the Foundation would no longer be supporting the Toolserver financially, but would continue to provide the same in-kind support as it had done previously.
In celebration of the 50th anniversary of the James Bond film series, we spent some time bonding with WikiProject James Bond. The project is in the unique position of having already pushed all of its primary content to Good and Featured status, including all of Ian Fleming's novels, short stories, and every film that has been released. Work has begun in earnest on the article Skyfall for the release of the new Bond film later this month. The project could still use help improving articles about Bond actors, characters, gadgets, music, video games, and related topics

ABU TV Song Festivals 2012

AxG,

Remember when you fixed the logo for the ABU Radio Song Festivals 2012? Well the logo for the TV Festival is now available. Any chance you could sort this one out for me too, when you get a spare moment. I'm thinking of adding it into the main article itself, rather than in the infobox as the Radio Contest logo is in there. Or we could use the main ABU Seoul 2012 logo for the infobox, and then thumbnail the Radio and TV logos into the main article for the respective festivals. WesleyMouse 21:23, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're a star! Thank you. WesleyMouse 21:54, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to be a pain in the rear-end. Cooper has directed me this way regarding new participations maps for the ABU contests. The page in its current format is starting to become complexed, and there's more details being published that may cause it to become incomprehensible to even the biggest of fans. So we're looking into splitting the article into ABU Radio and ABU TV. But was wondering if you'd be able to set up a participation map for the Asia-Pacific region? The original one I found doesn't have Vanuatu or Fiji showing on it, so it could be a case of making a new one. Thank you in advance. WesleyMouse 15:07, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for doing that for me AxG, much appreciated. We have a problem though, 1) for some reason when I add the maps to the article infoboxes nothing happens. 2) The move for TV map has gone a bit tits-up and been moved to the file name which contained the TV logo, and thus the map has vanished. WesleyMouse 19:08, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:České televize logo.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:České televize logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

Wikipedia in education is far from a new idea: years of news stories, op-eds, and editorials have focused on the topic; and on Wikipedia itself, the Schools and universities projects page has existed in various forms since 2003. Over the next six years, the page was rarely developed, and when it did advance there was no clear goal in mind.
On this day five years ago, the WikiProject Report debuted as a new Signpost column with an overview of WikiProject Biography. Today, we're celebrating two milestone: five years of the WikiProject Report and the tenth birthday of our first featured project. WikiProject Biography is by far the largest WikiProject on Wikipedia, with over one million articles under the project's scope. As a comparison, WikiProject Biography is three times larger than Wikipedia's second largest project, and if WikiProject Biography were split into its 14 subprojects and work groups, it would still make the list of the 20 largest WikiProjects... four times.
This week the Signpost interviews Arsenikk, an editor of six years who has brought sixteen lists through our featured list process, mostly regarding transportation in Norway but also about the 1952 Winter Olympics and World Heritage Sites in Africa. Arsenikk tells us about why he joined the project, what moves him, and how editors can join the sometimes daunting world of featured lists.
The Wikimedia Foundation's engineering report for September 2012 was published this week on the Wikimedia Techblog and on the MediaWiki wiki, giving an overview of all Foundation-sponsored technical operations in that month (as well as brief coverage of progress on Wikimedia Deutschland's Wikidata project, phase 1 of which is edging its way towards its first deployment). Three of the seven headline items in the report have already been covered in the Signpost: problems with the corruption of several Gerrit (code) repositories, the introduction of widespread translation memory across Wikimedia wikis, and the launch of the "Page Curation" tool on the English Wikipedia, with development work on that project now winding down. The report also drew attention to the end of Google Summer of Code 2012, the deployment to the English Wikipedia of a new ePUB (electronic book) export feature, and improvements to the WLM app aimed at more serious photographers.
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include ...

A tag has been placed on File:Text Santa.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 17:34, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Text Santa.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Text Santa.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 19:12, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

There is wide agreement among English Wikipedians that the administrator system is in some ways broken—but no consensus on how to fix it. Most suggestions have been relatively small in scope, and could at best produce small improvements. I would like to make a proposal to fundamentally restructure the administrator system, in a way that I believe would make it more effective and responsive. The proposal is to create an elected Administration Committee ("AdminCom") which would select, oversee, and deselect administrators.
This week saw a front-page story in the Wall Street Journal on editorial debates in Wikipedia. The story focused on the title-naming dispute surrounding the Beatles article, and specifically the RfC on whether the 'the' in the band's name should be capitalized or not.
On the English Wikipedia, five featured articles, ten featured lists, and four featured pictures were promoted, including USS Lexington, a ship built for the United States Navy that, although ordered in 1916 as a battlecruiser, was converted to an aircraft carrier. It was sunk in the Battle of the Coral Sea during the Second World War.
The volunteer-led Wikimedia Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) and interested community members are looking at Wikimedia organization applications worth about US$10.4 million out of the committee's first full year's operation, in just the inaugural round one of two that have been planned for the year with a planned budget of US$11.4M.
A trial of the first phase of Wikimedia Deutschland's "Wikidata" project–implementing the first ever interwiki repository—may soon get underway following the successful passage of much of its code through MediaWiki's review processes this week.
This week, we experimented with WikiProject Chemicals. Started in August 2004, WikiProject Chemicals has grown to include over 10,000 articles about chemical compounds. The project has a unique assessment system that omits C-class, Good, and Featured Articles. As a result, the project's 11 GAs and 9 FAs are treated as A-class articles. WikiProject Chemicals is a child of WikiProject Chemistry (interviewed in 2009) and a parent of WikiProject Polymers.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Karen Hauer   Readership: High Battle of Aleppo (2012)
Readership: High Boomerang (Nordic)   Readership: High Modern Times Group
Readership: High TV R1   Readership: High 2012 Summer Olympics
Readership: Medium Czechoslovak Television   Merge
Readership: Medium RTL 102.5 TV   Readership: High Teetotalism
Readership: High Star! Scandinavia   Readership: High Television encryption
Readership: High PBS HD Channel   Readership: High Sky One Undun
Readership: High Z1 TV   Add sources
Readership: Medium OC Channel   Readership: Medium Supermax (TV channel)
Readership: High QVC Beauty   Readership: High John Peel
Readership: Medium Performance Channel   Readership: High Nova Sport (Czech TV)
Readership: High Cue TV   Wikify
Readership: High Slovenská televízia   Readership: High Ideal World
Readership: Medium Nova Cinema (Czech Republic)   Readership: High CFO (magazine)
Readership: Medium Peter H. Smith   Readership: High CNN Arabic
Readership: High Black Orc   Expand
Readership: High Prima Love   Readership: High Numericable
Readership: Medium Parliament TV   Readership: High Terrestrial television
Readership: High Offspring   Readership: High Media in Birmingham

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:15, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Eurovision

Hi AxG,

I've popped over to ask for some advice please in regards to Template:Infobox Eurovision, which I know you are very familiar with. Sang'gre Habagat (talk · contribs) has recently twice removed the "frameless" tagline from , stating that "1) they were unnecessary as frameless is the default, and 2) they were formatted wrong in the first place, so this edit makes no functional changes.".

I have posted on his talk page to refrain from making alterations without discussing it with the project first. Its not the first time that such edits have been made, and I'm now at the stage of feeling as though they are disruptive and uncooperative. Any advice on what I should do next, other than drag it to the project talk page? WesleyMouse 19:41, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:BeIN Sport.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:BeIN Sport.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:41, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 October 2012

Unlike the long-running disputes that have characterised attempts to reform the RfA process on the English Wikipedia, the German Wikipedia's tradition of making decisions not by consensus but knife-edged 50% + 1 votes has led to a fundamentally different outcome. In 2009, the project managed to largely settle the RfA mode issue in 2009 indirectly.
One clarification request concerns the civility enforcement case – specifically, Malleus Fatuorum's perceived circumvention of his topic ban. It has resulted in thousands of bytes spent in vitriolic discussions, multiple blocks, and "no confidence" motions against the Arbitration Committee and one arbitrator, among other ramifications.
Planning for Wikivoyage's migration into the WMF fold built up steam this week following a statement by WMF Deputy Director Erik Möller about what the technical side of the migration will involve. Wikivoyage, which split from sister site Wikitravel in 2006, is hoping to migrate its own not-inconsiderable user base to Wikimedia, as well as much of its content, presenting novel challenges for Wikimedia developers
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include...
It is well known that women are underrepresented in the sciences, and that high-achieving female scientists have often been excluded from authorship lists and passed over for awards and honours solely on the basis of gender. Also significant has been the underplaying in the academic literature, news reporting, and online, of women's current and historical contributions to science.
The WikiProject Report normally brings tidings from Wikipedia's most active, inventive, and unique WikiProjects. This week, we're trying something new by focusing on Wikipedia's dark side: the various regional and national WikiProjects that are dead or dying. How can some tiny municipalities and exclaves generate highly active, cross-language, multimedia platforms be successful while the projects representing many sovereign countries and entire continents wallow in obscurity? Today, we'll search for answers among geographic projects large and small, highly active and barely functioning, enthusiastic about the future and mired in past conflicts.
Eleven articles, including one on Franz Kafka, three lists, one image, and one portal were promoted to 'featured' status this week.

Orphaned non-free media (File:Virgin1 (2007-2009).svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Virgin1 (2007-2009).svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 October 2012

The first round of the Wikimedia Foundation's new financial arrangements has proceeded as planned, with the publication of scores and feedback by Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) staff on applications for funding by 11 entities—10 chapters, independent membership organisations supporting the WMF's mission in different countries, and the foundation itself. The results are preliminary assessments that will soon be put to the FDC's seven voting members and two non-voting board representatives. The FDC in turn will send its recommendations to the board of trustees on 15 November, which will announce its decision by 15 December. Funding applications have been on-wiki since 1 October, and the talk pages of applications were open for community comment and discussion from 2 to 22 October, though apart from queries by FDC staff, there was little activity.
This week, we're checking out ways to motivate editors and recognize valuable contributions by focusing on the awards and rewards of WikiProject Military History. Anyone unfamiliar with WikiProject Military History is encouraged to start at the report's first article about the project and make your way forward. While many WikiProjects provide a barnstar that can be awarded to helpful contributors, WikiProject Military History has gone a step further by creating a variety of awards with different criteria ranging from the all-purpose WikiChevrons to rewards for participating in drives and improving special topics to medals for improving articles up to A-class status to the coveted "Military Historian of the Year" award.
The TimedMediaHandler extension (TMH), which brings dramatic improvements to MediaWiki's video handling capabilities, will go live to the English Wikipedia this week following a long and turbulent development, WMF Director of Platform Engineering Rob Lanphier announced on Monday ... Wikidata.org, a new repository designed to host interwiki links, launched this week and will begin accepting links shortly. The site, which is one half of the forthcoming Wikidata trial (the other half being the Wikidata client, which will be deployed to the Hungarian Wikipedia shortly) will also act as a testing area for phase 2 of Wikidata (centralised data storage). The longer term plan is for Wikidata.org to become a "Wikimedia Commons for data" as phases 2 and 3 (dynamic lists) are developed, project managers say.
Thirteen articles, ten lists, nine images, one topic, and one portal were promoted to featured after peer reviews.
A paper in the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, coming from the social control perspective and employing the repertory grid technique, has contributed interesting observations about the governance of Wikipedia.

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - November 2012

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 10:35, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

J Milburn is a British editor who has been on the site since 2006. He is one of two judges of the WikiCup. Here, he uses an op-ed to explain the way the WikiCup works and to review this year's competition, which ended recently.
The results of most of the national heats for Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) have been published on Commons. A maximum of 10 images have been submitted by all but eight of the 34 participating countries, and the international jury for what is the largest competition of its type in the world is set to announce the global winner in four weeks' time.
Hurricane Sandy was the largest Atlantic hurricane on record and has caused millions of dollars in damage. Naturally, Wikipedia covered it. But was Wikipedia's coverage unbiased?
The Signpost's weekly roundup of topics for discussion on the English Wikipedia.
This week, the Signpost interviewed two editors. The first, PumpkinSky, collaborated with Gerda Arendt in writing the recently featured article on Franz Kafka and won second prize in the Core contest last August. The second, Cwmhiraeth, collaborated with Thompsma in promoting the article Frog, which was featured last week. We asked them about the special challenges faced while writing Core content and things to watch out for.
The Wikimedia Foundation's engineering report for October 2012 was published this week on the Wikimedia Techblog and on the MediaWiki wiki, giving an overview of all Foundation-sponsored technical operations in that month. TimedMediaHandler also went live.
This week, The Signpost sings along with WikiProject Songs which focuses on articles about songs of every generation and genre. The project initially began as a rough outline in October 2002 and was reimagined in March 2004 using its parent WikiProject Albums as a template.

The Signpost: 12 November 2012

Last week, media outlets reported a ruling by a German court on the problem of businesses using Wikipedia for marketing purposes. The issue goes beyond the direct management of marketing-related edits by Wikipedians; it involves cross-monitoring and interacting among market competitors themselves on Wikipedia. A company that sells dietary supplements made from frankincense had taken a competitor to court. The recently published judgment by the Higher Regional Court of Munich, in dealing with the German Wikipedia article on frankincense products, was handed down in May and is based on European competition law.
Thirteen articles, six lists, and five images were promoted to 'featured' status last week.
In late September, the Technology report published its findings about (particularly median) code review times. To the 23,900 changesets analysed the first time (the data for which has been updated), the Signpost added data from the 9,000 or so changesets contributed between September 17 and November 9 to a total of 93,000 reviews across 45,000 patchsets. Bots and self-reviews were also discarded, but reviews made by a different user in the form of a superseding patch were retained. Finally, users were categorised by hand according to whether they would be best regarded as staff or volunteers. The new analyses were consistent with the predictions of the previous analysis.
As promised, we're expanding our horizons by featuring projects that cover underrepresented areas of the globe. This week, we headed to WikiProject Brazil which keeps track of articles about the world's largest Portuguese-speaking country. The project has shown spurts of activity and continues to serve as a hub for discussions, despite the project's collaborations, peer reviews, and outreach activities being largely inactive.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Hustler TV (Europe)   Readership: High Astro (Malaysian satellite television)
Readership: High Phil Vickery (chef)   Readership: High Dot-com company
Readership: Medium Kanal Lokal   Readership: High History of ITV television idents
Readership: High Hannah Hobley   Merge
Readership: High Discovery HD   Readership: High Price comparison service
Readership: High Radio and Television Slovakia   Readership: High Channel 4 programming
Readership: High Kanal 9   Readership: High South African Formula One Championship
Readership: Medium TVNZ Sport Extra   Add sources
Readership: High Carlton Cinema   Readership: High Ukraine in the Eurovision Song Contest
Readership: High ETV2   Readership: High Abandonware
Readership: Medium Tweseldown Racecourse   Readership: High Filmnet
Readership: Medium TVNZ Teletext   Wikify
Readership: High Countesthorpe   Readership: High Shangri-La's Barr Al Jissah Resort & Spa
Readership: High TVNZ ondemand   Readership: Medium European Taekwondo Union
Readership: High The Big Deal (TV channel)   Readership: Medium Netherlands in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2011
Readership: Low Muž na radnici   Expand
Readership: High Prima Cool   Readership: High Television in the United Kingdom
Readership: High Discovery World   Readership: High Selina Griffiths
Readership: High Natalia Barbu   Readership: High Sveriges Television

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:06, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roberto Bellarosa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Morrison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 November 2012

The WMF's Funds Dissemination Committee has published its recommendations for the inaugural round 1 of funding. Requests totalled US$10.4M, nearly all of the FDC's budget for both first and second rounds. The seven-member committee of community volunteers appointed in September advises the WMF board on the distribution of grant funds among applying Wikimedia organizations. The committee, which has a separate operating budget of $276k for salaries and expenses, considered 12 applications for funds, from 11 chapters and from the WMF itself for its non-core activities. The decision-making process included community and FDC staff input after October 1, the closing date for submissions. Taken together, the volunteers decided to endorse an average of 81% of the funding sought—a total of $8.43M, which went to 11 of the 12 applicants. This leaves $2.71M to be distributed in round 2, for which applications are due in little more than three months' time.
This week, we spent some time with WikiProject Turtles. The young project started in January 2011 and has accumulated 5 Featured Articles, 3 Featured Lists, and 6 Featured Pictures. The project maintains a combined to-do list and hot articles meter, a popular pages ranking, and a collection of resources for turtle articles. We interviewed Faendalimas and NYMFan69-86.
WMF Executive Director Sue Gardner was forced to clarify this week that proposed structural changes to the Foundation's Engineering and Product Development Department were not a "done deal" and that it was "important that you [particularly affected staff] realise that ... your input is wanted". The reorganisation, announced on November 5 and planned for the middle of next year, will see its two components split off into their own departments.
Seven featured articles, four featured lists and ten featured pictures – including the photograph that spawned the Streisand effect – were promoted this week.
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include the question of ticker symbol placement and the notability of various types of creative performer.

TalkTalk have changed the colourscheme of their logo, so would you mind updating the svg you uploaded? Cloudbound (talk) 22:58, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, I'm not sure which colour scheme to use, they are using blue & purple, red & orange, and pink & red. :? -- [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 23:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

On November 24, a general assembly of Wikimedia Germany (WMDE) voted on the fate of the Wikimedia Toolserver, a central external piece of technical infrastructure supporting the editing communities with volunteer-developed scripts and webpages of various kinds that are assisting in performing mostly menial tasks.
An open-access preprint presents the results from a study attempting to predict early box office revenues from Wikipedia traffic and activity data. The authors – a team of computational social scientists from Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Aalto University and the Central European University – submit that behavioral patterns on Wikipedia can be used for accurate forecasting, matching and in some cases outperforming the use of social media data for predictive modeling. The results, based on a corpus of 312 English Wikipedia articles on movies released in 2010, indicate that the joint editing activity and traffic measures on Wikipedia are strong predictors of box office revenue for highly successful movies.
Six articles, one list, and six images were promoted to 'featured' status this week.
Wikidata, the new "Wikimedia Commons for data" and the first new Wikimedia project since 2006, reached 100,000 entries this week. The project aims to be a single, human- and machine-readable database for common data, spanning across all Wikipedia projects, which will "lead to a higher consistency and quality within Wikipedia articles, as well as increased availability of information in the smaller language editions" while lowering the burden on Wikipedia's volunteer editors—whose numbers have stalled overall, and continue to dwindle on the English Wikipedia.
This week, we uncovered WikiProject Deletion Sorting, Wikipedia's most active project by number of edits to all the project's pages. This special project seeks to increase participation in Articles for Deletion nominations by categorizing the AfD discussions by various topic areas that may draw the attention of editors. The project was started in August 2005 with manual processes that are continued today by a bevy of bots, categories, and transclusions. The project took inspiration from WikiProject Stub Sorting and some historical discussions on deletion reform. As the sheer number of AfDs continues to grow, the project is seeking better tools to manage the deletion sorting process and attract editors to comment on these deletion discussions.

Hi, as it seem to be different opinions about this articles current notability I think perhaps an AfD would be a better option if you got the time to start one. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:50, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:13, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - December 2012

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 22:12, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Price drop logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Price drop logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:39, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bid logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Bid logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:40, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 03 December 2012

The global jury of Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM), the world’s largest photo contest, announced its results on 3 December.
Three articles, two lists, and four images were promoted to 'featured' status this week.
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include...
Deployments of MediaWiki 1.21wmf5 cause widespread problems for users across wikis when HTML and CSS updates came temporarily out of sync. On the first wikis targeted for deployment, this was caused by the different cache invalidation rates for HTML (typically one month) and CSS (typically five minutes). The retrospective on the problem highlighted the fact that that the test wiki – the WMF's answer to a production environment that individual developers can no longer practically emulate themselves – actually demonstrated the exact problem that would later manifest itself on production wikis. It went unnoticed.
This week, we went searching for white roses in the lands of WikiProject Yorkshire. The project began in May 2007 as a way to improve articles about the historic English county of Yorkshire and its modern-day administrative divisions and cities. Since then, the project has accumulated 31 Featured Articles, 14 Featured Lists, 91 Good Articles, and a monstrous list of Did You Know entries. Despite all of the effort improving Yorkshire articles, the project has experienced waning participation in the last few years. The project still publishes a newsletter each month, monitors the popularity of and recent changes to its articles, maintains a portal, and collects resources for contributors to use.

Cyfra+

Ok, now I am understand, thanks for the information and sorry. Greatings. --The Polish (talk) 22:15, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 December 2012

At the time of writing, this year's election has just closed after a two-week voting period. The eight seats were contested by 21 candidates. Of these, 15 have not been arbitrators (Beeblebrox, Count Iblis, Guerillero, Jc37, Keilana, Ks0stm, Kww, NuclearWarfare, Pgallert, RegentsPark, Richwales, Salvio giuliano, Timotheus Canens, Worm That Turned, and YOLO Swag); four candidates are sitting arbitrators (David Fuchs, Elen of the Roads, Jclemens, and Newyorkbrad); and two have previously served on the committee (Carcharoth and Coren). Four Wikimedia stewards from outside the English Wikipedia stepped forward as election scrutineers: Pundit, from the Polish Wikipedia; Teles, from the Portuguese Wikipedia; Quentinv57, from the French Wikipedia; and Mardetanha, from the Persian Wikipedia. The scrutineers' task is to ensure that the election is free of multiple votes from the same person, to tally the results, and to announce them. The full results are expected to be released within the next few days and will be reported in next week's edition of the Signpost.
Eight articles, four images, six lists, and one topic were promoted to 'featured' status on the English Wikipedia this week.
The Visual Editor project – an attempt to create the first WMF-deployable WYSIWYG editor – will go live on its first Wikipedias imminently following nearly six months of testing on MediaWiki.org. A full explanatory blog post accompanied the news, explaining the project and its setup. Once a user has opted-in, the editor can handle basic formatting, headings and lists, while safely ignoring elements it is yet to understand, including references, categories, templates, tables and images. At the last count, approximately 2% of pages would break in some way if a user tried the Visual Editor on them; it is unclear whether any specific protection will be put in place beyond relying on editors to spot problems.
In celebration of Human Rights Day, we checked out WikiProject Human Rights. Started in February 2006, the project has grown to include over 3,000 articles, including 12 Featured Articles, 3 Featured Lists, 66 Good Articles, a large collection of Did You Know entries, and a few mentions "in the news". The project monitors listings of popular pages and cleanup tags. We interviewed Khazar2, Cirt, and Boud.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Smash Hits! Radio   Readership: High List of television networks by country
Readership: Medium CFEM-DT   Readership: High California Proposition 8
Readership: High U.tv   Readership: High Of Orcs and Men
Readership: Medium CKTM-DT   Merge
Readership: High Just What I Am   Readership: High Sky News Ireland
Readership: High Helen Flanagan   Readership: Medium WABW-TV
Readership: High Heat Radio   Readership: High BBC Archives
Readership: High U105   Add sources
Readership: High Crying Out Your Name   Readership: High Haymarket Media Group
Readership: High Movie Mix   Readership: High Channel 5 (UK)
Readership: High Hanne Krogh   Readership: High Grand Theft Auto (series)
Readership: High Nargiz Birk-Petersen   Wikify
Readership: Medium CIMT-DT   Readership: Medium Lassie (season 17)
Readership: High MATV (Quebec)   Readership: Medium Lassie (season 16)
Readership: High Astra 1N   Readership: Low Lassie (season 11)
Readership: High Eurovision Young Dancers 2013   Expand
Readership: High D8 (TV channel)   Readership: High Freeview (UK)
Readership: Medium Canal de l'Assemblée nationale   Readership: High Surrey Police
Readership: Medium OGAE Second Chance Contest 2013   Readership: High NTL Incorporated

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:02, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:ESC 1993 logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:ESC 1993 logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cyfra

You can not delete the source of the information specified in the right! --Handsome128 (talk) 20:53, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It seems English is not your first? Firstly Eurosong.be and Twitter are not realiable sources, second, the title contains a question mark (?) with text talking about negotiations only, so nothing is confirmed yet. -- [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 21:17, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 December 2012

Seven days after the close of voting, the results of the recent Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) elections have been announced by two of the four stewards overseeing the election, Mardetanha and Pundit. Of the 21 candidates, 13 managed to gain positive support-to-oppose ratios, and the top eight will be appointed to two-year terms on the committee by Jimbo Wales, exercising one of his traditional responsibilities.
In the past year, we've tried to expand our horizons by looking at how WikiProjects work in other languages of Wikipedia. Following in the footsteps of our previously interviewed Czech and French projects, we visited the German Wikipedia to explore WikiProjekt Computerspiel (WikiProject Computer Games). The project dates back to November 2004 and has become the back-end of the Computer Games Portal, which covers all video games regardless of platform. Editors writing about computer games at the German Wikipedia deal with unique cultural and legal challenges, ranging from a lack of fair use precedents to the limited availability of games deemed harmful for youths to strong standards for the inclusion of material on the German Wikipedia.
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include ...
This week's big story on the English Wikipedia is obviously the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting (which, by the time you read this, may be renamed 2012 Connecticut school shooting). Quickly created and nominated for deletion not once but twice, and both times speedily kept, the article saw the expected flurry of edits (a look at the history suggests an average of at least one a minute over the first day and a half) and more than half a million page views on the first full day.
Four articles, three lists, and five images were promoted to 'featured' status on the English Wikipedia this week, including a picture of a three-week old donkey (also known as an 'ass').
MediaWiki users (including Wikimedians) can now organise themselves into groups, receiving recognition and support-in-kind from the Wikimedia Foundation. The project, backed by new Wikimedia technical contributor coordinator Quim Gil, has seen five proposals lodged in its first week of operation. The idea of MediaWiki groups mimics that of Wikimedia User Groups.

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas
May your Christmas sparkle with moments of love, laughter and goodwill,

May the year ahead be full of contentment and joy,

May the good times and treasures of the present become the golden memories of tomorrow,

A Very Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2013 to you and your family.

WesleyMouse 14:49, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Televizija Slovenija rebranding

Yesterday, Televizija Slovenija changes their logos.--188.47.82.20 (talk) 08:53, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2012

As part of its new focus on core responsibilities, the Wikimedia Foundation is reforming its grant schemes so that they are more accessible to individual volunteers. The community is invited to look at proposals for a new scheme—for now called Individual engagement grants (IEGs)—which is due to kick off on January 15. On Meta, the community is once again debating the two new offline participation models—user groups (open membership groups designed to be easy to form) and thematic organizations (incorporated non-profits representing the Wikimedia movement and supporting work on a specific theme within or across countries). In a consultation process on Meta that will last until January 15, the community will be discussing WMF proposals for a new guideline on conflicts of interests concerning Wikimedia resources. The draft covers COI issues for both volunteers and organizations across the movement.
This week, we spent some time with WikiProject A Song of Ice and Fire, which focuses on the eponymous series of high fantasy literature, the television series Game of Thrones, and related works by George R. R. Martin. The project was started in July 2006 and has grown to include 11 Good Articles maintained by a small yet enthusiastic band of editors.
Seven articles and two lists were promoted to 'featured' status this week, including List of battlecruisers. The article covers all of the battlecruisers—which were a type of warship similar in size to a battleship but with several defining characteristics—ever planned or constructed. The last British battlecruiser built, HMS Hood, is pictured at right.
Efforts were stepped up this week to sow a feeling of trust between the major parties with an interest in the future of the Toolserver. The tool- and bot-hosting server – more accurately servers – are currently operated by German chapter, Wikimedia Germany, with assistance from the Foundation and numerous volunteers, including long-time system administrator Daniel Baur (more commonly known by his pseudonym DaB). However, those parties have more recently failed to see eye-to-eye on the trajectory for the Toolserver, which is scheduled to be replaced by Wikimedia Labs in late 2013, with increasing concern about the tone of discussions.

The Signpost: 31 December 2012

In the impersonal, detached Colosseum that is Wikipedia, people find it much easier to put their thumbs down. As such, many people active in the Wikimedia movement have witnessed a precipitous decline in civil discourse. This is far from a new trend, yet many people would agree that it all seemed somehow worse in 2012.
A recent, poorly researched and poorly written story in the Register highlighted the perceived "cash rich" status of the Wikimedia movement. ... The Telegraph and Daily Dot, among others, have alleged that there are multiple links between the WMF, Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales, and Kazakhstan's government, which is, for all intents and purposes, a one-party non-democratic state.
On 27 December the Wikimedia Foundation announced the conclusion of their ninth annual fundraiser, which attracted more than 1.2 million donors. The appeal reached its goal of US$25 million, even though fundraising banners ran for only nine days.
In the first of two features, the Signpost this week looks back on 2012, a year when developers finally made inroads into three issues that had been put off for far too long (the need for editors to learn wiki-markup, the lack of a proper template language and the centralisation of data) but left all three projects far from finished.
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include ...
Brion Vibber has been a Wikipedia editor for nearly 11 years and was the first person officially hired to work for the Wikimedia Foundation. He was instrumental in early development of the MediaWiki software and is now the lead software architect for the foundation's mobile development team.
At the beginning of the year, we began a series of interviews with editors who have worked hard to combat systemic bias through the creation of featured content; although we haven't seen six installments yet, we've also had some delightful interviews with people who write articles on some of our most core topics. Now, as we close the year, I would like to present some of my own musings on the state of featured content—especially as it pertains to systemic bias and core topics.
This week, we're celebrating the New Year from Times Square by interviewing WikiProject New York City. Since December 2004, WikiProject NYC has had the difficult task of maintaining articles about the largest city in the United States, many of which are also among the the most viewed articles on Wikipedia. The project is home to 22 Featured Articles, 7 Featured Lists, 32 pieces of Featured Media, and a lengthy list of Did You Know? entries.
Northeastern University researcher Brian Keegan analyzed the gathering of hundreds of Wikipedians to cover the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in the immediate aftermath of the tragedy. ... A First Monday article reviews several aspects of the Wikipedia participation in the 18 January 2012, protests against SOPA and PIPA legislation in the USA. The paper focuses on the question of legitimacy, looking at how the Wikipedia community arrived at the decision to participate in those protests.

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - January 2013

Delivered January 2013 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 12:36, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - January 2013

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:54, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Good work dealing with that copyright violation on Eurovision Song Contest 2013. They can be difficult to deal with if not spotted immediately. CT Cooper · talk 20:25, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Eurovision Network logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Eurovision Network logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on 2012 Summer Olympics. Thank you. The edit that the user made is not vandalism; it was a good-faith edit. Please consider being more careful with your rollback priveliges next time. Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 17:35, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My rollback was good faith restoring the article to the correct revision; 'programme' is British English spelling as used in the article, also 'Beach Volleyball' is included under 'Volleyball', as previous Olympic articles. -- [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 17:49, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I understand, but please note that rollback should not used to revert good-faith edits, because your use of it is misleading to the user who made that edit; he'll think it wasn't constructive since rollback is only used to revert non-constructive edits. Consider using the regular undo button instead and explain your reason of the revert with the edit summary. Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 00:44, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Splash!

Hi, where did you get the logo from as there is no official site? --MSalmon (talk) 21:39, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have a TV tuner card :) -- [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 21:48, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh ok, do you know if there is an official site or not? --MSalmon (talk) 21:49, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it has a standard website, the only sites I could find where the press centre and ITV News site -- [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 21:53, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Splash! (TV series).png

Thanks for uploading File:Splash! (TV series).png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Yukiko Kada   Readership: High M&M's
Readership: High Bledar Sejko   Readership: High TG4
Readership: High RSI La 1   Readership: High CBS News
Readership: High Rautakoura   Merge
Readership: High RTS Deux   Readership: Low Viva Schweiz
Readership: High RTS Un   Readership: High Young Money Entertainment
Readership: High Identitet   Readership: Medium Disney Media Distribution
Readership: Medium Couleur 3   Add sources
Readership: High Thanasi Kokkinakis   Readership: High List of digital television deployments by country
Readership: Medium RTS Info   Readership: High The Zoo (New Zealand TV series)
Readership: High Radio Télévision Suisse   Readership: High 3sat
Readership: High Árni Johnsen   Wikify
Readership: High HD suisse   Readership: Medium Suspension (dynamical systems)
Readership: Medium TeleZüri   Readership: Medium United Nations Road Safety Collaboration
Readership: High Radio Suisse Romande   Readership: Medium University Institute of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Panjab University
Readership: High Radio Italia Solo Musica Italiana   Expand
Readership: High Gravity (Zlata Ognevich song)   Readership: High Belgrade
Readership: High Boom Boom (Emmy song)   Readership: High Public broadcasting
Readership: High Adrian Lulgjuraj   Readership: High Thor 6

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:02, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

Meta is the wiki that has coordinated a wide range of cross-project Wikimedia activities, such as the activities of stewards, the archiving of chapter reports, and WMF trustee elections. The project has long been an out-of-the-way corner for technocratic working groups, unaccountable mandarins, and in-house bureaucratic proceedings. Largely ignored by the editing communities of projects such as Wikipedia and organizations that serve them, Meta has evolved into a huge and relatively disorganized repository, where the few archivists running it also happen to be the main authors of some of its key documents. While Meta is well-designed for supporting the librarians and mandarins who stride along its corridors, visitors tend to find the site impenetrable—or so many people have argued over the past decade. This impenetrability runs counter to Meta's increasingly central role in the Wikimedia movement.
The dawning of a new year offers both a fresh slate and an opportunity to revisit our previous adventures. 2012 marked the fifth anniversary of the WikiProject Report and was the column's most productive year with 52 articles published. In addition to sharing the experiences of Wikipedia's many active projects, we expanded our scope to highlight unique projects from other languages of Wikipedia, and tracked down all of the former editors-in-chief of the Signpost for an introspective interview ... While last year's "Summer Sports Series" may have drawn yawns from some readers, a special report on "Neglected Geography" elicited more comments than any previous issue of the Report. Following in the footsteps of our past three recaps, we'll spend this week looking back at the trials and tribulations of the WikiProjects we encountered in 2012. Where are they now?
The past 12 months have seen a multitude of issues and events in the Wikimedia foundation, the movement at large, and the English Wikipedia. The movement, now in its second decade, is growing apace in its international reach, cultural and linguistic diversity, technical development, and financial complexity; and many factors have combined to produce what has in many ways been the biggest, most dynamic year in the movement's history. Looking back at 2012, we faced a difficult task in doing justice to all of the notable events in a single article; so the Signpost has selected just a few examples from outside the anglosphere, from the English Wikipedia, and from the Wikimedia Foundation, rather than attempting to cover every detail that happened.
Over the past year, 963 pieces of featured content were promoted. The most active of the featured content programs was featured article candidates (FAC), which promoted an average of 31 articles a month. This was followed by featured picture candidates (FPC; 28 a month). Coming in third was featured list candidates (FLC; 20 a month). Featured topic and featured portal candidates remained sluggish, each promoting fewer than 20 items over the year.
Following on from last week's reflections on 2012, this week the Technology report looks ahead to 2013, a year that will almost certainly be dominated by the juggernauts of Wikidata, Lua and the Visual Editor.

Orphaned non-free media (File:TVE2 logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:TVE2 logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:ITV3 HD.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:ITV3 HD.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

After six years without creating a new class of content projects, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) has finally expanded into a new area: travel. Wikivoyage was formally launched—though without a traditional ship's christening—on 15 January, having started as a beta trial on 10 November. Wikivoyage has been taken under the WMF's umbrella on the argument that information resources that help with travel are educational and therefore within the scope of the foundation's mission.g
On January 16, voting for the first round of the 2012 Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year contest will begin. Wikimedia editors with 75 edits or one project are eligible to vote to select their favorite image featured in 2012. ... On January 15, the foundation launched its latest grant scheme, called Individual Engagement Grants (IEG).
This week, we set off for the final frontier with WikiProject Astronomy. The project was started in August 2006 using the now-defunct WikiProject Space as inspiration. WikiProject Astronomy is home to 101 pieces of Featured material and 148 Good Articles maintained by a band of 186 members. The project maintains a portal, works on an assortment of vital astronomy articles, and provides resources for editors adding or requesting astronomy images.
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include...
Comforting those grieving after the loss of a loved one is an impossible task. How then, can an entire community be comforted? The Internet struggled to answer that question this week after the suicide of Aaron Swartz, a celebrated free-culture activist, programmer, and Wikipedian at the age of 26.
Continuing our recap of the featured content promoted in 2012, this week the Signpost interviewed three editors, asking them about featured articles which stuck out in their minds. Two, Ian Rose and Graham Colm, are current featured article candidates (FAC) delegates, while Brian Boulton is an active featured article writer and reviewer.
The opening of the Doncram case marks the end of almost 6 months without any open cases, the longest in the history of the Committee.
The Wikidata client extension was successfully deployed to the Hungarian Wikipedia on 14 January, its team reports. The interwiki language links can now come from wikidata.org, though "manual" interwiki links remain functional, overriding those from the central repository.

Orphaned non-free media (File:Eurovision Song Contest 2013 logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Eurovision Song Contest 2013 logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Walkerslogo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Walkerslogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HMV logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HMV logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

You might already know this, but Russian singer Alex Sparrow (ESC2011) is in intensive care in LA after a serious car crash today. I have done some updates on his article but if you find some more info please add it. Thank.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:43, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

The English Wikipedia's requests for adminship (RfA) process has entered another cycle of proposed reforms. Over the last three weeks, various proposals, ranging from as large as a transition to a representative democracy to as small as a required edit count and service length, have been debated on the RfA talk page. The total number of new administrators for 2012 was just 28, barely more than half of 2011's total and less than a quarter of 2009's total. The total number of unsuccessful RfAs has fallen as well. These declining numbers, which were described in what would now be considered a successful year (2010) as an emerging "wikigeneration gulf", have been coupled with a sharp decline in the number of active administrators since February 2008 (1,021), reaching a low of 653 in November 2012.
This week, we spent some time with WikiProject Linguistics. Started in January 2004, the project has grown to include 7 Featured Articles, 4 Featured Lists, 2 A-class Articles, and 15 Good Articles maintained by 43 members. The project's members keep an eye on several watchlists, maintain the linguistics category, and continue to build a collection of Did You Know? entries. The project is home to six task forces and works with WikiProject Languages and WikiProject Writing Systems.
This week, the Signpost's featured content section continues its recap of 2012 by looking at featured topics. We interviewed Grapple X and GamerPro64, who are delegates at the featured topic candidates.
The opening of the Doncram case marks the end of almost 6 months without any open cases, the longest in the history of the Committee.
On 22 January, WMF staff and contractors switched incoming, non-cached requests (including edits) to the Foundation's newer data centre in Ashburn, Virginia, making it responsible for handling almost all regular traffic. For the first time since 2004, virtually no traffic will be handled by the WMF's other facility in Tampa, Florida.

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

On New Year's Day, the Daily Dot reported that a "massive Wikipedia hoax" had been exposed after more than five years. The article on the Bicholim conflict had been listed as a "Good Article" for the past half-decade, yet turned out to be an ingenious hoax. Created in July 2007 by User:A-b-a-a-a-a-a-a-b-a, the meticulously detailed piece was approved as a GA in October 2007. A subsequent submission for FA was unsuccessful, but failed to discover that the article's key sources were made up. While the User:A-b-a-a-a-a-a-a-b-a account then stopped editing, the hoax remained listed as a Good Article for five years, receiving in the region of 150 to 250 page views a month in 2012. It was finally nominated for deletion on 29 December 2012 by ShelfSkewed—who had discovered the hoax while doing work on Category:Articles with invalid ISBNs—and deleted the same day.
A special issue of the American Behavioral Scientist is devoted to "open collaboration".
When we challenged the masters of WikiProject Chess to an interview, Sjakkalle answered our call. WikiProject Chess dates back to December 2003 and has grown to include 4 Featured Articles and 15 Good Articles maintained by over 100 members. The project typically operates independently of other WikiProjects, although the project would theoretically be a child of WikiProject Board and Table Games (interviewed in 2011). WikiProject Chess provides a collection of resources, seeks missing photographs of chess players, and helps determine ways that Wikipedia's coverage of chess can be expanded.
New discussions on the English Wikipedia include...
To many Wikimedians, the Khan Academy would seem like a close cousin: the academy is a non-profit educational website and a development of the massive open online course concept that has delivered over 227 million lessons in 22 different languages. Its mission is to give "a free, world-class education to anyone, anywhere." This complements Wikipedia's stated goal to "imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge", then go and create that world. It should come as no surprise, then, that the highly successful GLAM-Wiki (galleries, libraries, archives, museums) initiative has partnered with the Khan Academy's Smarthistory project to further both its and Wikipedia's goals.
This week, the Signpost featured content section continues its recap of 2012 by looking at featured lists. We interviewed FLC directors Giants2008 and The Rambling Man as well as active reviewer and writer PresN.
The Doncram case has continued into its third week.
As reported in last week's "Technology Report", the WMF's data centre in Ashburn, Virginia took over responsibility for almost all of the remaining functions that had previously been handled by their old facility in Tampa, Florida on 22 January. The Signpost reported then that few problems had arisen since handover. Unfortunately that was not to remain the case, with reports of caching problems (which typically only affect anonymous users) starting to come in.

TV Biznes will be rebranded into Polsat Biznes

I read on wirtualnemedia.pl & noted that on 18 February 2013 TV Biznes will be renamed to Polsat Biznes.--188.47.92.253 (talk) 18:00, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

On February 12, 2012, news of Whitney Houston's death brought 425 hits per second to her Wikipedia article, the highest peak traffic on any article since at least January 2010. It is broadly known that Wikipedia is the sixth most popular website on the Internet, but the English Wikipedia now has over 4 million articles and 29 million total pages. Much less attention has been given to traffic patterns and trends in content viewed.
Article feedback, at least through talk pages, has been a part of Wikipedia since its inception in 2001. The use of these pages, though, has typically been limited to experienced editors who know how to use them.
This week, we took a trip to WikiProject Norway. Started in February 2005, WikiProject Norway has become the home for almost 34,000 articles about the world's best place to live, including 16 Featured Articles, 19 Featured Lists, and nearly 250 Good Articles. The project works on a to do list, maintains a categorization system, watches article alerts, and serves as a discussion forum.
This week, the Signpost's featured content section continues its recap of 2012 by looking at featured portals, a small yet active part of the project. We interviewed FPOC directors Cirt and OhanaUnited.
On 30 January 2013, Kevin Morris in the Daily Dot summarised the bitter debates in Wikipedia around capitalisation or non-capitalisation of the word "into" in the title of the upcoming Star Trek film, Star Trek Into Darkness.
Following the deployment of the Wikidata client to the Hungarian Wikipedia last month, the client was also deployed to the Italian and Hebrew Wikipedias on Wednesday. The next target for the client, which automatically provides phase 1 functionality, is the English Wikipedia, with a deployment date of 11 February already set.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Speed Freaks   Readership: High Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2005
Readership: High ITV Telethon   Readership: High Gareth Jones (presenter)
Readership: Medium Sarah Harrison (singer)   Readership: High Quiz channel
Readership: High Will Payne (actor)   Merge
Readership: High Montenegro in the Eurovision Song Contest 2013   Readership: Medium Poland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2007
Readership: Low National Olympic Committee of Lithuania   Readership: Low Mrzim spore stvari
Readership: Low France in the Eurovision Song Contest 1996   Readership: Medium Latvia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2007
Readership: High Greater Reykjavík   Add sources
Readership: Medium ATV Midlands News   Readership: High ITV Day
Readership: High Yorkshire-Tyne Tees Television   Readership: High Television South West
Readership: Medium Northern Life (TV series)   Readership: High ITV Nightscreen
Readership: High Angel (Mika Newton song)   Wikify
Readership: High Feel the Passion   Readership: Medium Duncan Campbell (musician)
Readership: High Really (TV channel)   Readership: High Eurovision Song Contest 2003
Readership: Medium TSW Today   Readership: High Gordon Honeycombe
Readership: High ITV Granada (Middle East & Asia)   Expand
Readership: Medium ITV News (late bulletins)   Readership: High London Heathrow Airport
Readership: High Vastus lateralis muscle   Readership: High Digital terrestrial television in the United Kingdom
Readership: High City College Coventry   Readership: High Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2009

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:06, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - February 2013

Delivered February 2013 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 12:35, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - February 2013

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 12:37, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

Wikipedia has a long, daresay storied history with hoaxes; our internal list documents 198 of the largest ones we have caught as of 4 January 2013. Why?
Six articles, one list, and fourteen pictures were promoted to "featured" states this week on the English Wikipedia.
This week, we got the details on WikiProject Infoboxes.
Foreign Policy has published a report on editing of the Wikipedia articles on the Senkaku Islands and Senkaku Islands dispute. The uninhabited islands are under the control of Japan, but China and Taiwan are asserting rival territorial claims. Tensions have risen of late—and not just in the waters surrounding the actual islands.
Wikimedia UK, the non-profit organization devoted to furthering the goals of the Wikimedia movement in the United Kingdom, has published the findings of a governance review conducted by Compass Partnership.
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include...
The WMF's engineering report for January was published this week.

Orphaned non-free media (File:La Une (Belgium) logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:La Une (Belgium) logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:La Deux (Belgium) logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:La Deux (Belgium) logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:SIC Portugal.png)

Thanks for uploading File:SIC Portugal.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, AxG. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 16:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Chip123456 16:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PeR (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Here We Go (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

This week, we put our life in the hands of WikiProject Airlines. Starting in July 2005, the project has improved articles relating to airline companies, alliances, destination lists, and travel benefit programs. WikiProject Airlines has accumulated over 4,000 pages, including 4 Featured Articles and 26 Good Articles.
As of time of writing, twenty wikis (including the English, French and Hungarian Wikipedias) are in the process of getting access to the Lua scripting language, an optional substitute for the clunky template code that exists at present.
On February 15, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) declared 'victory' in its counter-lawsuit against Internet Brands (IB), the owner of Wikitravel and the operator of several online media, community, and e-commerce sites in vertical markets. The lawsuit clears the last remaining hurdles for the WMF's new travel guide project, Wikivoyage.
Sue Gardner's visit to Australia sparked a number of interviews in the Australian press. An interview published in the Daily Telegraph on 12 February 2013, titled "Data plans 'unnerving': Wikipedia boss", saw Gardner comment on Australian plans to store personal internet and telephone data. The planned measure, intended to assist crime prevention, would involve internet service providers and mobile phone firms storing customer usage data for up to two years.
Two articles, nine lists, and thirteen pictures were promoted to 'featured' status on the English Wikipedia this week.

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

On 13 February 2013, PR Report, the German sister publication of PR Week, published an article announcing that PR agency Fleishman-Hillard was offering a new analysis tool enabling companies to assess their articles in the German-language Wikipedia: the Wikipedia Corporate Index (WCI).
"Wikipedia and Encyclopedic Production" by Jeff Loveland (a historian of encyclopedias) and Joseph Reagle situates Wikipedia within the context of encyclopedic production historically, arguing that the features that many claim to be unique about Wikipedia actually have roots in encyclopedias of the past.
The Wikimedia Commons 2012 Picture of the Year contest has ended, with the winner being Pair of Merops apiaster feeding, taken by Pierre Dalous. The picture shows a pair of European Bee-eaters in a mating ritual—the male bird (right) has tossed the wasp into the air, and he will eventually offer it to the female (left).
Current discussions include...
Six articles, three lists, and twelve images were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this month.
How can we measure the challenges facing a project or determine a WikiProject's productivity? Several prominent projects have been doing it for years: WikiWork.
Wikimedia Germany (WMDE) this week committed itself to funding the Wikidata development team, ending fears that phase three would be abandoned.

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - March 2013

Delivered March 2013 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 08:29, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:BNT1 logo.svg

Thank you for uploading File:BNT1 logo.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 02:27, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:ITV1 logo 1999-2002.svg

Thank you for uploading File:ITV1 logo 1999-2002.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 02:56, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Yorkshire-1999.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Yorkshire-1999.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Waterfall (Sopho Gelovani & Nodiko Tatishvili song)   Readership: High Daybreak (TV programme)
Readership: High Camilla Herrem   Readership: High Ben Kingsley
Readership: High Sports Tonight Live   Readership: High CityRail
Readership: High Kedvesem   Merge
Readership: Medium TeleG   Readership: High Channel 4
Readership: Medium Le Jardin Academy   Readership: Medium History of Rotherham United F.C.
Readership: High Really (TV channel)   Readership: High Munhwa Broadcasting Corporation
Readership: Medium Feel the Passion   Add sources
Readership: Medium Maersk Air UK   Readership: High Music of Kosovo
Readership: Medium Turin factory occupation of 1920   Readership: High Corpse paint
Readership: High Ljubav je svuda   Readership: High ITV Day
Readership: High Something (Andrius Pojavis song)   Wikify
Readership: High Lonely Planet (Gor Sujyan song)   Readership: High Eurovision Song Contest 2003
Readership: Medium With Love Baby   Readership: High Eurovision Song Contest 2006
Readership: High Andrea Demirović   Readership: High Urban Symphony
Readership: High Onesie (UK)   Expand
Readership: Medium Luděk Marold   Readership: High Despina Olympiou
Readership: High Ryan Dolan   Readership: High Freeview+
Readership: Low France in the Eurovision Song Contest 1996   Readership: High Digital terrestrial television in the United Kingdom

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

Recently I was having a casual conversation with a friend, and he mentioned that he spent too many hours a day playing video games. I responded with a comment that I, too, spent way too much time on an activity of my own – Wikipedia. In an attempt to reply with a relevant remark, he offered something along the lines of: "So have you ever written anything?" After a second, I quickly answered yes, but I was still in shock over his question. It seemed to be rooted in a belief on his part that using Wikipedia meant just reading the articles, and that editing was something that someone, hypothetically, might do, but not really more likely than randomly counting to 7,744.
"WP:OUTING", the normally little-noticed policy corner of the English Wikipedia that governs the release of editors' personal information, has suddenly been brought to wider attention after long-term contributor and featured article writer Cla68 was indefinitely blocked last week. This snowballed into several other blocks, a desysopping by ArbCom, and a request for arbitration.
Three articles, six lists, and three pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week, including the article on "Laura Secord", who was a Canadian heroine of the War of 1812 best known for warning the British of an impending American attack.
This week, we tuned to WikiProject Television Stations, a project that dates back to March 2004. WikiProject Television Stations primarily focuses on local stations, national networks, television markets, and other topics related to television channels in North America, the Caribbean, and some Pacific countries. The project has a fair bit of work ahead of them with over 4,000 unassessed articles and only one Good Article out of 626 assessed articles, giving the project a relative WikiWork rating of 5.262.

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

I am pleased to announce that the Signpost and Wikizine have reached an in-principle agreement that will see Wikizine published as a special Signpost section at the beginning of each month.
During March, three of the Wikimedia Foundation's grantmaking schemes on Meta will reach important crossroads, which will shape how both the editing communities and Wikimedia institutions handle the distribution of donors' money across the movement.
Twelve articles, five lists, and eight pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week, including an image of the Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG, a front-engine, 2-seat luxury grand tourer automobile developed by Mercedes-AMG.
There are three open cases, and a final decision has been given in the Doncram case.
This week, we spent some time with WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court Cases.
The WMF has aborted a plan to deploy version 5 of the Article Feedback tool (AFTv5) rolled out to all English Wikipedia articles.

Orphaned non-free media (File:JESC logo 2008.png)

Thanks for uploading File:JESC logo 2008.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

Just two months into his second term as an arbitrator on the English Wikipedia, Coren resigned from the Committee with a blistering attack on his fellow arbitrators. At the heart of a strongly worded statement, posted both on his talk page and the arbitration notice board, was the claim that ArbCom has become politicised to the extent that "it can no longer do the job it was ostensibly elected for".
This week, we composed a tribute to WikiProject Composers. The project was created during the final hours of 2004 and finalized in early January 2005. It has grown to encompass over 8,000 pages, including 26 Featured Articles and 23 Good Articles. WikiProject Composers faces a difficult workload, with a relative WikiWork rating of 5.45.
Ask librarians what they think about Wikipedia and you might get some interesting answers. Some will throw up their hands about the laziness of the Google generation and their overdependence on Wikipedia. Some see it as the "competition". And some will tell you it's the greatest thing since sliced bread.
Nine articles, seven lists, eleven images, and one topic were promoted to "featured status" this week on the English Wikipedia.
On Thursday, arbitrator Coren resigned, following closely on the heels of Hersfold's resignation on Wednesday. There are two open cases. A final decision has been given in the Richard case.
The WMF's engineering report for January was published this week, giving an overview of all Foundation-sponsored technical operations in that month.

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - March 2013

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 04:10, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

Our travels have brought us to Pittsburgh, the American city known for steelworks and bridges.
Seven articles, one list, six pictures, and one topic were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week.
This case, brought by Mark Arsten, was opened over a dispute over transgenderism topics that began off-wiki. The evidence phase was scheduled to close March 7, 2013, with a proposed decision due to be posted by March 29.
Sue Gardner, executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation since December 2007, has announced her plans to leave the position when a successor is recruited. Ranked as one of the most powerful woman in the world by Forbes magazine, Sue Gardner is widely associated with the rise of the Wikimedia movement as a major custodian of human knowledge and cultural products.
Since its inception in May 2011, the Foundation's Visual Editor project has grown to become one of its main focuses. As the project nears its two-year birthday, the Signpost caught up with Visual Editor project manager James Forrester to discuss the progress on the project.
A paper presented at last month's CSCW Conference observes that "Mass collaboration systems are often characterized as unstructured organizations lacking rule and order", yet Wikipedia has a well developed body of policies to support it as an organization.

Looking for help to review new article

Hi AxG, I hope you don't mind me asking here but I saw that you're a member of WikiProject Websites and wanted to ask if you'd be available to review a draft article on a related topic? I've written a draft article for Rally.org, the online fundraising platform, on the company's behalf and would like to have editors review it to make sure it is neutral and meets Wikipedia's guidelines.

If you wouldn't mind helping, the draft is in my user space here: User:16912_Rhiannon/Rally.org Please leave any comments on the Talk page and make any edits in the draft as necessary. If you think it's ready to go live, feel free to move it into live article space. I won't move it myself as I follow the "bright line" rule of COI editing (no edits to live articles). Let me know if you have any questions at all. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 14:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Yalda Hakim   Readership: High Saorsat
Readership: Low Cyprus in the Eurovision Song Contest 2002   Readership: High Timeline of same-sex marriage
Readership: High BBC Food   Readership: High Fixed Service Satellite
Readership: High Really (TV channel)   Merge
Readership: High Nick Miller (weather forecaster)   Readership: High Channel 4
Readership: Medium Israel in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest   Readership: Medium Moldova in the Eurovision Song Contest 2007
Readership: High Israel in the Eurovision Song Contest 2013   Readership: High Sky Active
Readership: Low Macmillan Media   Add sources
Readership: High The 7 O'Clock News   Readership: High Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2011
Readership: Medium Russia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2007   Readership: High ITV News Tyne Tees
Readership: High City College Coventry   Readership: High Western moose
Readership: High BBC News Special   Wikify
Readership: High Albania in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest   Readership: High Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2007
Readership: High Netherlands in the Eurovision Song Contest 2013   Readership: High Mižerja
Readership: Low Denmark in the Eurovision Song Contest 2002   Readership: High Eurovision Song Contest 2003
Readership: High BBC TV Europe   Expand
Readership: High Anne Holt   Readership: High Eurovision Song Contest 2011
Readership: Medium Maersk Air UK   Readership: High Eurovision Song Contest 2005
Readership: Low Switzerland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2002   Readership: High Despina Olympiou

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:27, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

mongrels repeat

I've put the info back, it's being repeated fri 12 2013, i even included this so why you removed it puzzles me dont remove it again, you can even check Dave site itself and you'll find it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.34.254 (talk) 11:41, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Catch phrase UK.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Catch phrase UK.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

The Wikimedia Foundation has released its latest report card for the movement's hundreds of sites. The WMF has published statistics about the sites since 2009, but only recently have these been expanded in scope and depth to provide a rich source of data for investigating the movement and the world it serves. Dutch-born Erik Zachte is the driver of the WMF's statistical output, and he writes that the report card and accompanying traffic statistics comprise "enough tables, bar charts and plots to keep you busy for a while".
This week's Report is dedicated to answering our readers' questions about WikiProjects. The following Frequently Asked Questions came from feedback at the WikiProject Report's talk page, the WikiProject Council's talk page, and from previous lists of FAQs.
The Signpost interviewed prolific featured content creator and former Signpost "featured content" report writer Crisco 1492 about ? and Indonesian cinema. ? was the "Today's featured article" for 1 April 2013. 1 April is popularly known as April Fools' Day in many countries.
The first round of individual engagement grants (IEGs) have been awarded, disbursing about $55.6k (€42.7k) to seven applicants.
A case brought by Lecen involves several articles about former Argentinian president Juan Manuel de Rosas (1793–1877).
Users of ten Wikipedias got access to phase 2 of Wikidata following its first rollout to production wikis.

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

Numerous Wikimedia Commons editors have chimed in on the Wikimedia Foundation's deployment of a new feature to its mobile website. Allowing anonymous users to register and upload pictures for use in an article, the feature was placed prominently at the top of Wikipedia articles in multiple languages.
This week, we felt the world tremble in the presence of WikiProject Earthquakes. The project was started in May 2008 to deal with articles about earthquakes, aftershocks, seismology, seismologists, plate tectonics, and related articles. While the project has seen success building 14 Featured Articles, one A-class Article, and 21 Good Articles, a fairly heavy workload remains, with a relative WikiWork rating of 4.94. WikiProject Earthquakes maintains a portal, a list of open tasks, a popular pages listing, and an article alerts watchlist.
Last Friday, the Wikimedia movement awoke to news that one of their number—Rémi Mathis, a French volunteer editor—had been summoned to the offices of the interior intelligence service DCRI and threatened with criminal charges and fines if he did not delete an article on the French Wikipedia about a radio station used by the French military.
The arbitration committee is looking for expertise in Argentina and the Spanish language for a case involving former Argentinean president Juan Manuel de Rosas (1793–1877).
Four articles and two pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week.
The deployment of phase 2 of Wikidata to the English Wikipedia, originally scheduled for 8 April but delayed due to technical problems, may be rescheduled again as the result of community resistance.

ESC National Year

You are the top contributor of the template Infobox ESC National Year. The template is fine except that the missing years are not displayed or else I couldn't manage it. Suppose that the country has participated in 1978, but not in 1979. The template of 1980 still shows 1979 instead of 1978 for the previous entry. Any remedy ? Cheers. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 16:37, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have been working on it yes, with a discussion WP:Eurovision, unfortunately I've been busy in real life, but hopefully will fix it soon. --[[ axg ◉ talk ]] 18:46, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:RTÉ Two.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:RTÉ Two.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:31, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - April 2013

Delivered April 2013 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 06:35, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andy Burrows, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:02, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 05:02, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - April 2013

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 16:03, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

The RfA process is widely discussed here on the English Wikipedia and it has been well documented that less and less new Requests for adminship are being filed. There are an abundance of bytes devoted to the discussion and analysis of this situation and plenty of hands have been wrung over the matter. Various RfCs have attempted to find a way to fix the problem. Many proposals have been made offering solutions, some more potentially drastic than others, with the goal of making the changes necessary to kick–start RfA back into regular action. However, Wikipedia operates based on consensus and, to this point, there are have simply been too many disagreeing views for us to reach a consensus on how to increase RfA activity.
This week, we ventured to WikiProject South Africa. The project was started in February 2005 and is home to thirteen pieces of featured material, two A-class articles, and twenty-one good articles.
The most recent move to reform the requests for adminship process on the English Wikipedia has failed, after a complex and drawn-out three-step procedure for community input was subject to decreasing participation as time wore on and came up with no clear consensus.
Four articles, twelve lists, and seven pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week.

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

An article by John Sweeney published on 22 April 2013 on scnow.com, the website of the Florence, South Carolina Morning News, reported that Florence city officials have taken to monitoring and correcting the Wikipedia article on their city.
This week, we spent some time with a project that develops tools and methods for improving the user experience in the hope that new users will continue editing the encyclopedia. The project was started in July 2012 and has grown to include 124 members. The project's members partner with the Teahouse and the Welcoming Committee to spread WikiLove, welcome new users, encourage civility, and other related activities.
The Wikimedia Conference is an annual meeting of the chapters to discuss their status and the organisational development of the Wikimedia movement. For the first time it included groups that wish to be considered for WMF affiliation as thematic organisations and one of the three groups that was recently affiliated as a user group. The conference was also attended by members of the Wikimedia Foundation's (WMF) Board of Trustees, the Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC), the WMF Affiliations Committee, and a representative of the Wikivoyage Association.
Nine articles, four lists, eight pictures, and one topic were promoted to "featured" status this week on the English Wikipedia.
The Sexology case is nearing completion after arbitrators were unable to agree on a topic ban for one of the participants.
On Monday, the English Wikipedia became the 12th wiki to be able to pull data from the central Wikidata.org repository, with other wikis scheduled to receive the update on Wednesday.

London Marathon map

Did you make it? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:00, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The map is from OpenStreetMaps, and I put the route and numbers on myself with Inkscape so I could easily edit it. --[[ axg ◉ talk ]] 14:15, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's beautiful! Thank you. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar For You

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
For creating the much-needed London Marathon route map. Splendid work. Visitors will love it. Thank you!!! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Really (TV channel)   Readership: High Bitcoin
Readership: High BBC One Wales   Readership: High Terl Bryant
Readership: High ITV Choice   Readership: High Saorsat
Readership: Medium 23327 Luchernandez   Merge
Readership: High Israel in the Eurovision Song Contest 2013   Readership: High BBC News Special
Readership: High ITV Tyne Tees & Border   Readership: High Sky Active
Readership: Medium TV Canaria 2   Readership: High UK Prime Ministers timeline
Readership: High BBC Two Scotland   Add sources
Readership: High Yorkshire-Tyne Tees Television   Readership: High BBC Choice Northern Ireland
Readership: High Samer Tariq Issawi   Readership: High BBC Three
Readership: High TeleG   Readership: High Television network
Readership: High TVE Internacional   Wikify
Readership: High BBC TV Europe   Readership: High Eurovision Song Contest 2003
Readership: Medium Hertford Regional College   Readership: High Eurovision Song Contest 2005
Readership: High BBC One Scotland   Readership: High SimCity (2013 video game)
Readership: High BBC Food   Expand
Readership: High Sky Livingit   Readership: High T-Mobile USA
Readership: High I Feed You My Love   Readership: High BBC Kids
Readership: Medium Far Away (3+2 song)   Readership: High Dancing with the Stars

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:29, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

The Funds Dissemination Committee released its recommendations to the WMF board last Sunday. The news that the Hong Kong chapter's application for US$212K had failed was followed by a strongly worded resignation announcement by Deryck Chan on the public Wikimedia-l mailing-list.
On 24 April 2013, novelist Amanda Filipacchi published what turned out to be an influential op-ed in the New York Times; illuminating the unusual background of the Yuri Gadyukin hoax.
Nine articles, three lists, three pictures, and one topic were promoted to "featured" this week.
This week, we traveled to the Japanese Wikipedia's WikiProject Baseball for perspectives from a version of Wikipedia that treats WikiProjects as their own unique namespace (プロジェクト:) independent of "Wikipedia:".
The WP:TOP25 and WP:5000 reports chronicle the most popular Wikipedia articles on a weekly basis.
The Sexology case closed shortly after publication with no changes.
A report on an online service which was created to conduct real-time monitoring of Wikipedia articles of companies, and more.
This week saw the deployment of the Echo extension, also known as "notifications".

Do you know that on 26 June will unveiled logo of UEFA Euro 2016? --31.63.24.183 (talk) 06:49, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

Although not yet in great numbers, candidates are coming forward for Wikimedia Foundation elections, which will be held from 1 to 15 June. The elections will fill vacancies in three categories, the most prominent of which will be the three community-elected seats on the ten-member Board of Trustees (or the first Board meeting after the election results are announced, if sooner). The current two-year terms for these trustee positions ends on 1 September.
The Wikimedia Foundation will be receiving more than $100,000 worth of free developer time courtesy of internet giant Google, it was announced this week. The funds, allocated as part of Google's Summer of Code programme, will support up to 21 student developers through three months of coding time.
May sees the beginning of Round 3 of the 2013 WikiCup, with 33 of the original 127 competitors remaining. ... six articles, ten pictures, and two portals were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week.
The SOS Children's Villages news service advised on 3 May 2013 that Wikipedia for Schools 2013 is nearly ready for release. ... On 26 April 2013, the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation published an article reviewing Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik's edits to the English Wikipedia, where it revealed the name of Breivik's English Wikipedia account.
This week's English Wikipedia project, WikiProject Biophysics, is home to several experts in their fields and a collaboration with the Biophysical Society. The project is hosting a contest through July 15 with six contributors winning $100 in cash and given the opportunity to attend the 2014 meeting of the Biophysical Society in San Francisco. Other strong entries will be awarded barnstars online and everyone who contributes can receive a physical button mailed out to them.

May 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm Robert McClenon. I noticed that you recently removed some content from John Kennedy O'Connor without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:53, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ESC

Hi, [1] AFAIK SVT1HD & SVT2HD are simulcasts of SVT1 and SVT2. Do you have some different information about this? --Olli (talk) 15:10, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No that is correct, it's just that the section would be littered with standard channels, followed by their HD simulcasts making it longer than necessary. I'll open this up to the ESC 2013 talk page. --[[ axg ◉ talk ]] 16:48, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - May 2013

Delivered May 2013 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 09:46, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

The removal of administrator rights from all volunteers on the Wikimedia Foundation's official website sparked a highly emotional reaction on the Wikimedia-l mailing list—one of the largest off-wiki methods of communication for the Wikimedia movement.
This week, we spent some time watching WikiProject Mixed Martial Arts, which was started in August 2005 and has grown to include 12 Good Articles and a Featured List.
Fourteen articles, three lists, and three pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia, including Boletus luridus, seen above.
An article published on May 10 on Odwyerpr.com written by Greg Hazley documented a "spar" between Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales and public relations firm Qorvis partner Matt Lauer, who disputes Wikipedia's guideline discouraging public relations firms from editing articles on their clients.
The Race and politics case has been accepted for arbitration, and the evidence phase is now open. Two other cases remain open.

Help please!

Hi AxG, I could do with a helping hand in trying to explain to someone about proper nouns/proper names in regards to the Eurovision Song Contest, and why we capitalise the C in Contest when we merely mention "contest" on its own. I'm trying my best to explain it, but I feel I may be confusing the user with my complexity explanation. The thread is User talk:Puisque#Proper nouns. Thanks. WesleyMouse 22:17, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - May 2013

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AxG, as this information is missing from the description, did you create (render) File:2018 Winter Olympics logo.svg out of File:Pyeongchang 2018 Olympic official emblem.gif? --Túrelio (talk) 08:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done information provided. --[[ axg ◉ talk ]] 11:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 14:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:2018 Winter Olympics logo.svg

Thanks for uploading File:2018 Winter Olympics logo.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 13:06, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

Nominations closed last Friday for the three community-elected seats on the Wikimedia Foundation's (WMF) ten-member Board of Trustees—the ultimate corporate authority of the worldwide WMF. The Board has influential roles and responsibilities over one of the most powerful global information sources on the Internet.
This week, we traveled to WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome. The project was started in May 2006 and has 37 featured articles.
On 16 May, the Spanish Wikipedia became the seventh Wikipedia to cross the million article Rubicon, a symbolic yet important achievement.
Salon.com published another article detailing the ongoing incidents with Wikipedia user Qworty, who has identified himself as Robert Clark Young. It documents Qworty's role in the controversy involving Amanda Filipacchi's op-ed, which kindled a debate on Wikipedia sexism as it relates to categories, where Qworty was responsible for a series of revenge edits against Filipacchi in the days after she released her op-ed.
Nine articles, six lists, and eight pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week.

Orphaned non-free media (File:2018 Winter Olympics logo.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:2018 Winter Olympics logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
15 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Pilkington Committee on Broadcasting (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
441 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Moldova in the Eurovision Song Contest (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more sources Add sources
332 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Switzerland in the Eurovision Song Contest (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Add sources
449 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Serbia in the Eurovision Song Contest (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Add sources
871 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Italy in the Eurovision Song Contest (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Add sources
14 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C History of Freeview UK (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
34 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA SES World Skies (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more sources Cleanup
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Sport Relief does Glee Club (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Cleanup
45 Quality: High, Assessed class: GA, Predicted class: GA Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2005 (talk) Cleanup
913 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Radeon (talk) Please add more sources Expand
110 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: B Digital terrestrial television in the United Kingdom (talk) Please add more sources Expand
1,891 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Dancing with the Stars (talk) Please add more sources Expand
113 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C History of BBC television idents (talk) Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
2,428 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Delaware (talk) Unencyclopaedic
2,425 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA EastEnders (talk) Unencyclopaedic
940 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: B Channel 4 (talk) Please add more sources Merge
49 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Traumatic amputation (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Merge
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Mrzim spore stvari (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Merge
1,345 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Eurovision Song Contest 2005 (talk) Please add more sources Wikify
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Lesley Hinds (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Wikify
85 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Mižerja (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more sources Wikify
0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Channel Ten (UK TV channel) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub SC Lithuanian Radio and Television Centre (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Game in TV (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
3,071 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Zlata Ognevich (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Stub
293 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Et uus saaks alguse (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Stub
58 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Allez Ola Olé (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Stub
46 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Samer Tariq Issawi (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
29 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Angel (Mika Newton song) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Stub
23 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start BBC Vision (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more sources Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day
Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality
Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content
Is more content needed?
Headings
Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images
Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links
Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources
For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:29, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Would you be able to recreate File:NatWest logo.svg using the dark blue background and white text? Cloudbound (talk) 21:22, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Can't believe I uploaded the original, never seen them used the version without the background. --[[ axg ◉ talk ]] 21:57, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that. Looks good. Cloudbound (talk) 22:03, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

Alongside the Signpost's interviews with the Wikimedia Foundation's (WMF) Board of Trustees candidates, the Signpost asked the candidates for the Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) and its Ombudsperson position a series of questions relating to the positions they may be taking on. For the FDC candidates, this will include specific recommendations to the WMF on how to disburse over US$11 million in donors' funds to affiliate organizations, something which appears to have garnered little attention from the editing community at large so far.
In the continuing saga of User:Qworty's outing as author Robert Clark Young, several blogs and websites covered the now-banned user's anti-Pagan editing. In an article published on 22 May 2013, TechEye described Qworty's edits as a "reign of terror" and were pleased to find that he had not succeeded in removing several prominent Pagan biographies from the encyclopedia.
The elections for the three community seats on the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees start on 8 June. This second and final part of the interview explores two broad themes: Meta, the site that hosts movement-wide coordination; and offline entities—the chapters and the new thematic organisations and user groups.
This week, we plotted out the demarcations of WikiProject Geographical Coordinates, which aims to create a single standard of handling coordinates in Wikipedia articles.
Twelve articles, four lists, and twelve pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week.
An article in Library Review offers a much-needed comparison of data from a population of editors outside the English Wikipedia.
Second only to the technical track of Wikimania in terms of numbers, the Berlin Hackathon (2009–2012) provided those with an interest in the software that underpins Wikimedia wikis and supports its editors a place to gather, exchange ideas and learn new skills.

Hi AxG,

Quick question if I may. I've took it upon myself to do some major improvements to all the OGAE-related articles. Already the main OGAE one is completed, but the infobox looks as if it is missing something (can't quite put my finger on what). As I know that you're an expert on those pesky things, I was wondering if I should be using the "organisation" infobox on that article or would it be better to create one similar to the Infobox Eurovision and store the template on the project page? Plus, I'm going to start re-writing the other OGAE articles including the Second Chance Contest ones. Do you think a participation map for each of the contests would be a good idea? IF so, should we stylise them like we have for the Eurovision maps. And I'm also considering if we should include Second Chance information on the respective [Country] in the Eurovision Song Contest [year] articles too. I value your views on these matters. Regards, WesleyMouse 14:25, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm no expert in the OGAE side of Eurovision, the OGAE article is looking great, I think {{Infobox organisation}} works well and matches the EBU one, it does have a field for a map though. The Second Chance contests can use the same style of maps used for the ESC for consistency. As for the inclusion of the Second Chance information, I have no problem with this. --[[ axg ◉ talk ]] 15:54, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

I am excited to announce that a Portuguese-language journal, Correio da Wikipédia has been launched by Vitorvicentevalente. It has just published its third edition, and I encourage readers who speak the language to read and contribute to its already-expansive coverage of the Portuguese Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement.
Five articles, four lists, and thirteen images were promoted to "featured" status this week on the English Wikipedia.
This is mostly a list of requests for comment believed to be active on 4 June 2013 linked from subpages of Wikipedia:RfC or watchlist notices.
On 31 May, the Wikimedia Foundation's Legal and Community Advocacy team announced that the Wikivoyage logo would have to be replaced, because it has become the subject of a cease-and-desist letter from the World Trade Organization (WTO).
An article on TheNextWeb.com says that the Chinese Government has effectively blocked Wikipedia by cutting off access to the HTTP Secure (https) "workaround", almost completely cutting off access to those in China.
This week, we reflect on the anniversary of D-Day by storming the shores of Operation Normandy, a special initiative of WikiProject Military History.
Last week, the Signpost reported on a feeling at the Amsterdam hackathon that Toolserver developers were coming round to the idea of migrating to Wikimedia Labs.

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - June 2013

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 12:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - June 2013

Delivered June 2013 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 04:55, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:ABC3 logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:ABC3 logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:TalkTalk.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:TalkTalk.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:56, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

Late last year, the Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) awarded $8.4 million in donors' money to 11 Wikimedia entities, including the Wikimedia Foundation and 10 nationally defined chapters. Under this arrangement, these organisations are required to issue quarterly reports on how far they have progressed towards their declared programmatic and financial goals. The FDC has now announced that all 11 completed and submitted their reports by the 1 April deadline, and have responded to each.
Seven articles, two lists, five pictures, and one topic were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week.
In an article published by the Huffington Post's United Kingdom edition, writer Thomas Church asserts that the new VisualEditor will change history, literally. It says that Wikipedia's mark-up language has been to its advantage, as most people didn't bother trying to learn it
I've long thought that we should get rid of the Wikimedia Commons as we know it. Commons has evolved into a project with interests that compete with the needs of the primary users of Commons and the reason it was created. It's also understaffed, which results in poor curation, large administrative backlogs, and poor policy development.
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia.
Last week's most popular article list on the English Wikipedia was dominated by the massively popular TV series Game of Thrones, which claimed six slots in the top 25, including the top three. Its popularity was likely stoked by the most recent episode, The Rains of Castamere. Bollywood continued to increase its share of views as well, aided by the tragic suicide of star Nafisa Khan.
Two cases, Race and politics and Tea Party movement have been suspended. Argentine History remains open, and a proposed decision was posted on 12 June.
This week, we spent some time with WikiProject Computing. Started in October 2003, the project has grown to include 17 featured articles, 11 featured lists, 3 pieces of featured media, and 80 good articles.

Templates for ABU Festivals

Sorry to bother you AxG,

I've been trying to figure out how to make {{Esc}} and {{ESCYr}} style templates specifically for ABU Song Festivals, but I'm getting baffled at the complexity of them. What I thought may be simple seems to be more difficult than I anticipated. So I was wondering, when you get a spare moment, if you would be able to teach me the complex syntax for these, or maybe create them on my behalf. The templates could do with being adaptable for Radio and TV Festivals, now that those contests seem to be a regular thing. Thanks AxG, WesleyMouse 18:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding names, probably something along the same lines as ESC and ESCYr. Which would be ABU, and instead of j=Junior (as in ESC ones), maybe have r=Radio (for ABU Radio) and t-TV (for ABU TV). WesleyMouse 22:02, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Prefix: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia

Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya