Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Salem al-Meslet, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timothytyy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Independent secondary sources are needed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Haytham Rahmeh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Syrianchessman!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Timothytyy (talk) 12:29, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Thanks for responding.
I understand that a wikipedia page needs multiple sources but I believe the official website for the Syrian Coalition is enough to back up the fact that Mr Rahmeh is the Secretary General of the Syrian Coalition. I also believe he is relevant enough to be mentioned in a small wiki article. If you can point out my errors with detail it would be a great help.
It isn't enough to show that this person exists and holds a position in some organisation. Unless he is a national-level elected politician and thereby notable under WP:NPOL, notability must be established per WP:GNG which requires independent secondary sources. That's the same whether you write a small or big article. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
As pointed out already, we need to see significant coverage of this person in independent and reliable secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Haytham Rahmeh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
I understand your concerns regarding a conflict of interest but I assure you I am not affiliated with the person I have written the article about in any way shape or form.
I am just trying to bring light to syrian politics in the english speaking world as there is almost no coverage with very outdated information.
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Salem al-Meslet, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Hello, I'm Shadow4dark. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shadow4dark (talk) 10:00, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi.
I was wondering why you changed back my edit on the Grey Wolves page. Things that I deleted were simply old or wrong information, the Grey Wolves no longer get funding through criminal activities and are not very secular anymore, the Grey Wolves are not racist as well, their philosophy states that to be a Turk you have to be a Muslim, there is no mention of any other race here. I also edited small bits here and there which don’t really matter.
If you are worrying about bias, I assure you there is none and I am only trying to help spread the correct information.
The claims of illegal drug trade and human trafficking have no real source, all you have is a newspaper, there are no police records and no court documents backing up these claims.
Racism is not one of their ideologies as I have told you before.
”Use (article)talk page” you literally said “you can leave a message on my talk page” earlier.
Could you please list the sources that have been peer reviewed and send the usernames of those who did peer review? I just want to resolve this issue :) Syrianchessman (talk) 17:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just looked at it, it is not a police record neither a court document. It's just a book. This is not enough evidence to support the crimes the Gray Wolves have been accused of, arms trafficking is arguable due to the circumstances of the situations they have been in and the rest of them are just complete nonsense. If you provide me with police records or court documents proving these accusations I would be happy. Otherwise deleting these should be in order. Syrianchessman (talk) 20:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
You have recently edited a page related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Hello, AverageTurk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Haytham Rahmeh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hello, I'm Marincyclist. I noticed that you removed topically relevant content from Grey Wolves (organization). However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Marincyclist (talk) 23:47, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Tips
