Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Filippo Biagioli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Autunno2022!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!10:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @SafariScribe, good morning. Thank you. They marked my draft as promotional. It is not promotional. I am Filippo Biagioli and as per the rules, I also wrote it on my page. I also included all the references and notes. But they continued to say that it was promotional. However, I will take your advice as a great help. As soon as I rewrite the draft, I will come and ask in your suggestion space.
Hello! When you add new information to Wikipedia articles, please cite WP:Reliable sources that specifically state the information you are adding to the Wikipedia article. For more information, please see WP:V. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:11, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the library at the Peggy Guggenheim Collection, the museum's own website is not an independent source. If you can find an independent WP:Reliable source that states that the library is a noteworthy (that is, very important) part of the Collection, then we can cite that source. Frankly, from looking at the collection's webpage about the library, it appears unremarkable to me, as museum libraries go. Also, to mention only your book in the description of the library implies that that book is the most important item in the library, which would, in itself, require a source to establish. If you think there are other noteworthy aspects of the collection that we do not mention, and you cite independent reliable sources about them, then you can summarize what the sources say in the article. Again, please review WP:RS carefully. All the best. -- Ssilvers (talk) 07:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. I see that you have disclosed that you are Filippo Biagioli. With that being the case, it is inappropriate for you to insert your own art as an example in the Ark of the Covenant article. It would be better to suggest the change in the talk page. -- LWGtalk15:47, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
