User talk:Arjunagra

You have been trying to defame someone and are not doing any service by giving a one-sided view. If you want to represent a political party, and go write good things about Sonia and Rahul gandhi - do that - but do not spoil the life of an honest official, who has spent his life serving the country. I work in the government, and one needs to have a balanced view of a person before alleging something. My last change was balanced, and i took in some of your points. What you are doing is libel, unethical and downright pathetic.

Arjunagra (talk) 06:40, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not gratuitously remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nakon 06:16, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It has been observed that you have been making repeated edits to pages concerning one individual, Mr.Pradip Baijal. These attempts are considered as vandalism. Wikipedia is meant to present a neutral point of view and as such should reflect all segments of opinion.

Kindly desist from vandalism and help maintain the standard of Wikipedia.

Thank you

--Ashlonerider (talk) 06:35, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pradip Baijal. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Diannaa ^(Talk) 06:37, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Radia tapes controversy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Shirt58 (talk) 08:33, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will not make edits, other than those which are designed to defame honest officials, and express a certain point of view. I am sure you respect that.

Arjunagra (talk) 08:43, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dianna - i respect your commentary. I am also trying to make sure there is some balance in the writing, and not a motivated editing of the biography page, which is trying to damage the reputation of an honest official. I am a member of the government, and have been following this episode closely. Politically motivated edits have been made on the page - and I am trying to only revert it back to the original form.

Arjun - all articles should be neutral and cover all aspects of a person being written about without casting judgement. In the interests of neutrality and to ensure completeness of the article, it is essential to cover all aspects of Mr.Baijal's career including the part where he was raided and investigated. Your attempts have been consistently to edit out negative references to one individual, even in cases where they are backed up by valid references to media articles. These constitute clear vandalism. Kindly desist.

Ashlonerider (talk) 11:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]