User talk:Android79

This user may have left Wikipedia. Android79 has not edited Wikipedia since 12 December 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Android79 is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia after the holidays.

Hello. I saw that the page Fredo and Pidjin was deleted from wikipedia. I don't understant why. Could you help me with that? Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stash2001 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I deleted it as A7: Web content that does not assert notability. android79 20:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Could you undelete the page and give me one day to add all the references that will demonstrate its notability? Or if it is not possible, could I recreate the page in such a manner to demonstrate notability? Thanks. Stash2001 —Preceding comment was added at 18:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Certainly. What I will do is undelete the content and move it to a subpage of your user page (User:Stash2001/Fredo and Pidjin). There, you should be able to improve the article without anybody threatening to delete it. After you've made the changes you want (you won't be limited to a day to do so), you can move it back to its original location in mainspace by using the "move" button at the top of the page. If you have any questions, just let me know here, and I will answer ASAP. android79 23:49, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. The page is ready and moved. Please let me know if now respects the rules of notability. Stash2001 —Preceding comment was added at 01:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hello, i wasn't able to finish my editing of this page. i thought i had contested deleting and could have at least a couple of hours to work on it. could you undelete so that i may finish. also, could you offer reasons why it was deleted and advice or tips as to what will help rectify those reasons. --Aceznates (talk) 03:42, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Spam can be deleted on sight. Provide some evidence of notability for this person. Please don't use Wikipedia to promote yourself. android79 19:44, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Adroid,

I understand you deleted the "DITYPDS" page because it failed to indicate the relevance. DIT one of the largest universties in Ireland. The Young Progressive Democrats are the youth wing of the Irish Liberal Party, the Progressive Democrats (PDs). The DIT branch of the Young PDs (or YPDs) is one of the largest and most active branch and the wiki page is about the branch, it's history, successes etc.

I make a parrallel of this page to a similar page on Wikipedia. the NUI Galway (University) branch of Young Fine Gael (Irish Populist Party) which can be found here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_University_of_Ireland%2C_Galway_YFG —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dart22 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Yup, that's why I deleted it. Looks like this issue has been resolved. android79 19:46, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind undeleting this article and either tagging it for Speedy deletion or AfD so that improvements can be made to it? __meco (talk) 10:03, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not sure what you're asking for here. An undelete followed by a re-tagging for speedy deletion would almost certainly cause the article to be deleted again almost immediately. An undelete followed by an AfD doesn't make a whole lot of sense, either. I'm reluctant to undelete an article that was deleted for being an advertisement. You'd be better off re-writing a neutral article from scratch from reliable sources. android79 19:42, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• My point is that I would like to work from the basis of the deleted article as I have already done a good deal of work on it. __meco (talk) 22:03, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you at least copy it to my Sandbox so I can fix it there? __meco (talk) 04:52, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to signal 2 pictures with no correct (not verifiable) information about sources

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Interrogation_sovjet_partisan_1943.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Antisovjet_ukrainian_partisans_1943.jpg

Best regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.249.85.15 (talk) 11:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Haunter.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:35, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I began drafting an item awhile back which you speedy deleted (A7). Judge Chad Adams is an elected county judge (a bad one) in the State of Texas, without legal training or a law degree, who is plagued by allegations and evidence of corruption, nepotism, mismanagement, etc. Many members of his own political party voted against him unsuccessfully in the last election. He is a notable individual based upon the fact that he is a petty American political figure. Let's consider reposting his name and information. Thanks. Keep up the great work. Dr. B. R. Lang (talk) 18:28, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've returned to more editing on wikipedia and I'm excited to have a great admin back, who was so supportive to me. I don't forget that, and I never will. I'm sure Sarah_Ewart hasn't forget what a great guy you are either. Hope you're back from your short break soon! I have the best news ever: Michael Jackson - the article is actually now, two years later - FA quality. Check it out! It's on its way to being nom-d for it. Take a visit and give feedback dude. I'm mentioning this to you, because you believed in me as a new editor and that means a lot to me. --Manboobies (talk) 23:06, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Dan Burisch. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- Suntag ☼ 17:06, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Baseball WikiProject Newsletter Issue III – October 2008

"If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving a baby's life... she'll save the baby without even considering how many men are on base!" — Stephen King (The Dark Tower) News and announcements The Baseball Project promoted 13 lists to Featured status in August and 8 more in September. Amazing job! A combined eleven articles were promoted to Good Article status in August and September. Featured content In September, WikiProject Baseball has had the following articles promoted to: Featured Article status: Nashville Sounds Featured List status: List of New York Mets Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Colorado Rockies Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Florida Marlins Opening Day starting pitchers, Nashville Sounds seasons, List of Tampa Bay Rays Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Seattle Mariners Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Boston Red Sox Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Arizona Diamondbacks Opening Day starting pitchers, New York Yankees seasons Good Articles of August and September: All the Way (Eddie Vedder song), Cy Young, Dan Brouthers, Harmon Killebrew, Rickey Henderson, Billy Pierce, Kinston Indians, Three Rivers Stadium, Bill Lange, Calgary Cannons, Hugh Daily, Homer at the Bat This month's newsletter was designed and written by Wizardman, jj137, and Blackngold29. If you would like to contribute to future newsletters, please contact the Baseball WP outreach dept.

News from the diamond The 2008 opening round playoff matchups with be: Boston Red Sox vs. Los Angeles Angels Milwaukee Brewers vs. Philadelphia Phillies Los Angeles Dodgers vs. Chicago Cubs Chicago White Sox vs. Tampa Bay Rays Help to keep the articles of the postseason updated From the Editors We apologize for not sending out our August newsletter, we have tried to cover some events of the month in this issue. The playoffs have started! The Dodgers and Phillies have won their respective Division Series and will face off in the NL Championship Series. Both series in the American League have yet to be finished. Show your support for your favorite teams by keeping up with their season pages!

--  jj137 (talk) 23:49, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi... I have just recreated Karl Sabbagh, which you had previously deleted. So far as I can see it was just an anon-created blank before, so I assume you deleted it as void, not because of doubt of the subject's notability. Please reply here if you have issues with recreating the article though - I'll keep a watch on it. Thanks. seglea (talk) 16:07, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So many users in that page keep on putting false claims about Regine Velasquez' achievements and talent, to the point that they make up fake 'achievements' about her so-called 'reign'. Velasquez is not famous all over the world, she has not sold one million records all over Asia. They keep sensationalizing her page by writing over hyped and false claims such as having a 'palatial house', albums selling over 10X platinum, that Regine rejected the Miss Saigon role, and so much more. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.104.22.195 (talk) 22:49, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

	HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY!	from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE
	Wishing Android79 a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

--I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 22:14, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

18:46, 4 August 2007 Android79 (talk | contribs) deleted "Intrinzik" ‎ (content was: '{{nn-bio}}{{db-copyvio}}Intrinzik (Born December 16, 1977) is a rapcore/ metal/ rap vocalist....')

Hello Android79! I'm a representative of the musician in question and have been asked to create a Wiki page for him. I noticed durin a search that there had been a previous page that has been deleted probably due to lack of detail and information. Since deletion of his article he has been featured on a Billboard charting compilation album during the year of 2008. I believe that because of this a page for the artist should be either undeleted or recreated. I was wondering if you could bring the page back rather than I just making a new one. I have credible information straight from the artist that he has written himself including a background history, references, discography and more. Please let me know if this is possible. Thanks! Azfallguy21 (talk) 17:35, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, Android79, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 16:11, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michael Chandler (alderman) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability asserted

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Black Kite (t) (c) 18:58, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 20:06, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(delivered by mabdul 22:58, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bt-misluk.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:06, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You are now listed as missing. Should you ever return or choose not to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:01, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MULE is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MULE until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheAwesomeHwyh 18:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]