User talk:AndreasJS/Archive4

Thanks Andreas for your kind comments, one quote is from the book in my possession, the other is from the internet. I realised that there must be several publications because the pages differ from one to the other. I will look into it. Politis (talk) 09:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good. I think the following book can be usefully to other Greek articles, namely Greece and Macedonian Region: History of the Greek Revolution compiled from official documents of the Greek government, New York 1829. It quotes on the first page: that "The present divisions of Greece, adopted by the [1829] provisional government, are the following: Eastern Hellas, Western Hellas, Morea, Epirus, Thessaly, Macedonia, Crete, and the Islands." I actually have that book (first edition) and will try to download that page on wikipedia. Politis (talk) 14:57, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't download the book, it is online anyway, and I already gave you the link before on your talk page. See here and here. ~The book is dated 1828, not 1829 (see title page), so how can it have information on a 1829 government? The provisional government must have already existed in 1828.  Andreas  ^(T) 15:18, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's it. In fact, I think my copy is even hand dated 1828, difficult to make out. But the names of the 'divisions' are in capital letters so that there is no mitaking how the Greek felt or how those western authors/scholars saw the situation. It's an interesting book. Politis (talk) 15:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have a nice reading

• Population exchange in Greek Macedonia By Elisabeth Kontogiorgi (from page 30)
• Macedonia and Greece by John Shea (from Page 101)

Makedonij (talk) 22:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fine but point is the same. Who will get Macedonia = Who will ocupied her? Do you dissagree? Makedonij (talk) 14:37, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

... my attempt at transwikiing. Perhaps you know whether I did it correctly or not? Or are the users at the Serbian end just uninterested? Just wondering, cheersSynchronism (talk) 09:19, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We're holding a preferential vote to decide what proposals should go forward to the community and narrow down the vast selection that we currently have. Since you've expressed interest in the above discussion, I thought you would appreciate the opportunity to participate. BalkanFever 13:05, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have in the past taken part in related discussions, this comes as a notification that the Centralized discussion page set up to decide on a comprehensive naming convention about Macedonia-related naming practices is now inviting comments on a number of competing proposals from the community. Please register your opinions on the RfC subpages 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

Shadowmorph ^{^"^} 21:12, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, there are two articles on the Swedish Wikipedia, Älvdalska (Elfdalian) and Dalmål (Dalecarlian language. I want you to look at these articles.

Posted by PK2 (talk). 06:24 AM, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

I am proposing the merge of Chameria into Cham Albanians here. Please feel free to weigh in. --Athenean (talk) 21:50, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AndreasJS, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of User talk:Xat xati - a page you tagged - because: Not an unambiguous copyright infringement, or there is other content to save. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Nja²⁴⁷ 21:50, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I saw in History(http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hanuman_Chalisa&diff=318261020&oldid=318238317 ) of Hanuman Chalisa(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanuman_Chalisa) at wikipedia that you have moved the entire text to wikisource. That's fine and I request to put the link to the moved text in Prominence section of the page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanuman_Chalisa so that reader knows where to find the text. Thanks and God bless... 121.241.127.25 (talk) 06:15, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a link to the original text at a prominent positiona at the upper right corner of the page. Also, you are welcome (like everybody else) to modify the article as long as your changes observe Wikipedia policies and guidelines.  Andreas  ^(T) 13:38, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eleuterio Soria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Simply a crime report. We are not a news aggregate. No assertion that this case had any enduring impact.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Scott Mac (Doc) 23:53, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Evliye –i Selase is a given name forth earea which Consists of Kars, Ardahan and Batum under The Otoman Empire. After The Russo –Turkish War of 1877-1878, this region has remained under the Russian administration during 40 years as the war compensation. This region was joined again to Turkey with the Treaty ofbrest-Litovsk which was done between Turkey and Russia. Evliye-i Selase is exist in the boundary of Misak-ı Milli which was formed in the course of Turkish War of Independence. But Soviet Russia had a tendency to get Again Batum at the first occasion. Batum had a great importance in the negotiations between Turkish Government and Soviet Russia. With the Treaty of Moscow 16 March, 1921, Kars and Ardahan were left in Turkey but Turkey had to leave Batum in Russia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.100.42.44 (talk) 21:50, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you can help w/the discussion here?--68.173.96.196 (talk) 16:59, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scheint mir die IP hat alle deutschsprachigen hier ange"pingt", was? Hekerui (talk) 20:44, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für genauere Erklärung, so gut bin ich darin auch wieder nicht :D lg Hekerui (talk) 19:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AndreasJS! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 358 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Augoustinos Kantiotes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Dragan Pavloviḱ Latas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Great picture. Thanks, Boatman (talk) 10:19, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That was one of the two possibilities I'd considered. Now I know which. - Jmabel | Talk 17:59, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pit_Bull

Evereadyo2 (talk) 13:49, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The "page deletion" notice on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pit_Bull was intentional - the page was listed at Miscellany for deletion as the AfD was created specifically by a disruptive editor. The AfD notice was removed from the Pit Bull article for the same reason. I am going to re-insert the MfD notice (you can find the conversation about that issue at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pit_Bull). Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 14:49, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please, explain me what is going on here. From what I understand, the article was first nominated for deletion by an anonymous user[1], then the afd tag was removed by you[2]. Your argument is that the AfD was malformed, but i could not find a notice about in which way it was malformed. If you have issued such a notice, please put a link to it into the afd page and into the new afd page that you created to delete the afd page. As an administrator, your actions should be as transparent as possible, because else your actions could be misunderstood and you could alienate other editors. Please, understand my concern as a long-standing editor of Wikipedia that is totally uninvolved in the dispute abut dogs.  Andreas  ^(T) 15:15, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. When I removed the original AfD notice, it was because the IP seemed to be being disruptive (if I remember correctly, the original AfD was called Pit Bull (2nd nomination) even though there had been no AfD prior to this. The AfD was (and is not) formatted properly - there is no link to the article, and it is not listed at WP:AFD. As the IP user then used a new account to do exactly the same thing, then it seemed liked just more disruptive editing to make a point. The IP put the same text on the article's talk page (the correct procedure in this case), but did not allow people time to comment.

The AfD gives no policy-based reason for the nomination (and as a rule, nominations only need to be a couple of lines long - there is no specific guidelines on this, but if you need to create a page to explain why you are nominating the article, then it is probably not a sufficient reason for the article to be deleted!)

If the user wants the article renamed, or re-written, then the place to discuss this would be on the talk page, not nominating the article for deletion.

I have nominated the AfD at MfD - but if the wish is that the AfD should remain in place, I am quite happy to ensure that the AfD is properly formatted, and listed at WP:AFD (and also to insert relevant DELSORT notifications.

I hope that this explains my reasoning - if you have any further questions, please feel free to ask! I am not trying to hide anything, and am happy to explain any of my actions (as an editor or as an admin) to anyone! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 15:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.  Andreas  ^(T) 15:35, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have SNOW kept the AfD, formatted it correctly, listed it at WP:AFD and re-inserted the AfD link in the article. I have also unblocked the creator of the AfD with an apology. Thank you for contacting me - although as I said above, I have nothing to hide, that does not mean I won't ever make mistakes (either as an editor or as an admin!) and if I am in the wrong, I am happy to deal with it! Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:21, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:46, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AndreasJS. You have new messages at Seb az86556's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Greek National Road 2. Since you had some involvement with the Greek National Road 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Dead3y3 (talk) 13:22, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Filip mitrovic has nothing to do with the link you said its a copyvio of, although I see you also correctly tagged Dusan borkovic with the same link? Did you mean to post Filip as a copyvio of a different source?--Jac16888^Talk 17:57, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake. No, I have not found a source for the Mitrivic artricle.  Andreas  ^(T) 19:58, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Andreas, may I ask what your sources for the vowels section are? I'm asking because I have no idea what sounds the diacritics used in this pdf are supposed to represent... --Mai-Sachme (talk) 14:53, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

O think it is quite obvious given the table 2.1 on page 24 of the Gramatica if compared with the IPA vowel chart in vowel. I did not bother with the unstressed vowels. Andreas  ^(T) 15:51, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, it's not obvious, since they don't use the IPA (and I'm very surprised about this, not to say bewildered), but quite obscure diacritics like the Ogonek and the Dot with a wide range of possible meanings. We could also assume that they meant e̞, œ, ɜ, æ, ɤ, o̞ or ʌ. And considering that they obviously don't care about proper IPA transcriptions, i and u could also be used instead of their respective -ATR equivalents ɪ and ʊ... I'm not sure about how to procede, but the section with its current content is at least questionable and just one potential interpretation of the source. --Mai-Sachme (talk) 16:28, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't speak any Ladin, so I cannot say anything from my own experiene. However, if you read the introduction of the phonematics section (Prinzips generai dla normazion, page 23), standard Ladin is a writing standard and the phonetic values of the phonemes depends on the native dialect of the reader. To find the actual sounds of Ladin words in various dialects see [3] (with audio samples), They use the Böhmer-Ascoli system, presumably identical with Teuthonista, [4] documented here. Although not documented I think the authors of the Gramatica used the same system.  Andreas  ^(T) 17:26, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your research, I was thinking about Rheinische Dokumenta, but Teuthonista is obviously closer. --Mai-Sachme (talk) 19:04, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, ɜ sounds more convincing than ə (but it's your original research, right?). But I removed it from the box, because it is not Standard Ladin. Otherwise we'd have to insert y, as well. --Mai-Sachme (talk) 19:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see these finally merged! --Macrakis (talk) 23:10, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I figured there was some syntax I was missing but couldn't figure it out. Hard Boiled Eggs [talk] 15:44, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear AndreasJS, check this move proposal Talk:Ohi_Day#Requested_move_2011 and tell us your opinion! Dimboukas (talk) 17:56, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Agia Paraskevi, Florina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Paraskevi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Spanish language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castile (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Italianization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sicilians (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andreas. FYI Seb was just removing a duplicate entry of your comments. If you check this permalink you will see two identical sections on the page, which you originally added in error. Seb was simply removing the excess one. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 17:27, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited GU24 socket, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Socket (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Αγαπητέ AndreasJS σε χαιρετώ.
Έχω μια μεγάλη απορία και είπα να την εκφράσω σε σένα καθώς βλέπω είσαι από τους καταχωρητές του βιβλίου "Μετά τα Φυσικά" του Αριστοτέλη και επίσης ακόμα διατηρείς επαφή με το αντικείμενο, ενώ άλλοι έχουν χαθεί. Η απορία είναι, γιατί ονομάζεται αυτό το βιβλίο: "Μεταφυσικά" την στιγμή μάλιστα που δεν υπάρχει τέτοια αρχαία λέξη; Οι ξένοι δεν μπορούν να καταλάβουν την διαφορά και λένε: "Metaphysics", αλλά αυτό έχει γίνει αφορμή για πολλές παρανοήσεις μέσα στο βάθος της ιστορίας της δυτικής φιλοσοφίας και όχι μόνο. Γιατί να τους ακολουθάμε και στα ελληνικά κείμενα; ¨οπου και να κοιτάξετε θα δείτε ότι το βιβλίο ονομάζεται: "ΜΕΤΑ ΤΑ ΦΥΣΙΚΑ". Έβαλα μάλιστα παραπομπή για το κείμενο του βιβλίου αυτού στο λήμμα "Ίππασος" της Βικιπαίδειας αντί του Perseus Project που είχα βάλει πριν.
(Orphiwn (talk) 14:23, 10 February 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Σου απαντώ στη s:el:Συζήτηση:Μεταφυσικά.

Γεια σας.

Εχω ανεβασει καποια κειμενα στην βικιθηκη οπως π.χ τα ασκητικα του ισακ του συρου. Θα ηθελα διπλα απο το αρχαιο κειμενο να τοποθετησω και την μεταφραση στα νεοελληνικα. Πως θα μπορουσε να γινει αυτο?

Ευχαριστω. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evagelosvar (talk • contribs) 11:39, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Εχω ανεβασει καποια κειμενα της καινης διαθηκης με ερμηνευτικη αποδοση Ι.Θ Κολιτσαρα εκδοσεις Κουμουνδουρέα με χρονια εκδοσης το 1981.

Πειτε μου εσεις τι πρεπει να γινει σε αυτην την περιπτωση διοτι δεν γνωριζω.

Να συνεχισω την προσπαθεια η να αφαιρεσω τις μεταφρασεις ? η μηπως μπορω να τα μεταφερω καπου αλλου π.χ στο wikiversity χωρις να υπαρχει κινδυνος να δαιγραφουν?

Ευχαριστω Evagelosvar (talk) 19:11, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Απάντηση εδώ: s:el:Συζήτηση:ΚΔ-Πέτρου-Α.  Andreas  ^(T) 19:31, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Andreas. Please take a look at this pair of diffs: [5] and [6]. --Omnipaedista (talk) 14:29, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Είδα σε μήνυμα ότι ο χρήστης AndreasJS ακύρωσε/διέγραψε κάποια δική μου καταχώρηση που από ότι είδα έλεγε: GREEK RAT η οποία φαίνεται ότι ήταν δική μου, ενώ αυτό δεν αληθεύει. Εγώ δεν έγραψα ποτέ κάτι τέτοιο σε αυτή την σελίδα, και δεν θυμάμαι και ποια φορά εχω ξαναεπικοινωνήσει με τον χρήστη AndreasJS (το όνομα κάτι μου θυμίζει. Ίσως από την Βικιθήκη(;)).
Φυσικά αυτό αποτελεί παραβίαση ασφαλείας αφού κάποιος μπόρεσε να γράψει κάτι τέτοιο και να αφήσει να φανεί ότι το έχω κάνει εγώ. Αν βγει κάποιο συμπέρασμα παρακαλώ ενημερώστε με, με κάποιο τρόπο. Φιλικά Orphiwn (talk) 02:02, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andreas. FYI, I raised this matter at ANI. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 03:21, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dothraki language, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Case and Digraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Komitas may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * The [[Komitas Museum]] will open in 2014 in [[Yerevan].<ref name="urlKomitas Museum-Institute will open its doors to visitors in September |

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:00, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Children kept in captivity, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BDD (talk) 18:43, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AndreasJS, I am Qi Wu, a computer science MS student at the University of Minnesota - Twin Cities. Currently, we are working on a project studying the main article and sub article relationship in a purpose of better serving the Wikipedia article structure. It would be appreciated if you could take 4-5 minutes to finish the survey questions. Thanks in advance! We will not collect any of your personally information.

Thank you for your time to participate this survey. Your response is important for us!

https://umn.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_bvm2A1lvzYfJN9H