User talk:Anarchyte/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Anarchyte. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

→

Archive 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ace of Aces (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Desert Fox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

 Done. Fixed. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:01, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I was watching your RfA early on but then got pulled away from Wikipedia these last few days and was curious what the outcome was. (I haven't added my comment yet.) You had a difficult RfA but it's clear that your chances are good next time around. I wouldn't fret about it. Things tends to go much better the next time around and my guess is that in a year's time you'll pass with flying colors. Jason Quinn (talk) 17:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi. I wish to object to your close at Talk:Was (sceptre). Yes, it was needlessly early. Worse, you didn't allow time for anyone to respond to my contribution. Worse further is that I raised an important point not touch by any earlier !voter and this means that your assertion of "obvious consensus" was not correct. Please revert your close. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:04, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

@SmokeyJoe:  Done. Taking another look, I actually agree with your name, I'm gonna leave a support vote there now. Anarchyte (work | talk) 03:22, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks.

Sorry to see your RfA not go straight through. Much of the community is ultra-conservative with RfA. I'm sure you'll fly through next time. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:37, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

It's a shame your RfA didn't go through, but hang in there. If not for your creation date, you would have passed. Since the only thing that prevented you from passing was time, the fortunate thing is that it's just a matter of time until you will pass. Content creation would also help. I'd like to reiterate the offer I made at your RfA to work with you developing some content. In particular, I created an article that is very close to meeting the GA criteria, and I have sources to expand it to meet the scope of a GA. What I don't have is the time to dig through those sources at the moment. I'd be happy to get you all set up with the offline sources and some suggestions on what needs expanding. It would likely lead to a co-credit for a GA. ~ Rob^Talk 02:30, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

@BU Rob13: I may follow up on that offer later, but at the moment I'm working on Fallout 4: Far Harbor. It's at peer review at the moment so I can get feedback. Not sure what a GA-Class DLC article looks like, which is an issue. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:35, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Anarchyte. I just came here with essentially the same message as Rob, which is to encourage you to continue to edit and work behind the scenes and then try again in a year or so. I felt unable to support your candidacy because of the relatively short time you have been editing for, and because of your relative lack of experience in creating content. Perhaps "relative" needs to be understood in the context that I have been around for more than ten years, but I certainly don't think you need to wait that long! Where I disagree with Rob is the point about the co-credit for a GA. Take him up on that offer by all means, but I think you also need to gain content creation experience yourself - just claiming co-credit for taking an article already close to GA status over that threshold is unlikely to satisfy editors who expressed concerns about your lack of experience. I hope that all makes sense. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:32, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

@Cordless Larry: The co-credit wouldn't just be superficial work. The article in question is Marv Allemang, and entire sections relating to his high school and college career as well as his personal life need to be written. It's substantial content creation. ~ Rob^Talk 07:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification, Rob. I was prompted by your comment that it was "very close to meeting the GA criteria", but anything involving substantial content creation would be good. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:41, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, the closeness lies in the fact that the entirety of the professional career is already at or near GA quality and I have the sources to write the rest. Someone just needs to find time to take the sources and write the actual prose. Maybe "close" isn't the right word for it. My point is that it wouldn't be starting from scratch with no direction. ~ Rob^Talk 07:46, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

It's not every day that one's unfinished work is noticed. Thanks. →Σσς. (Sigma) 07:44, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fallout 4: Far Harbor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Third-person and First-person. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

I'm rather mystified as to why you would move one page but not the other - this was part of the same move request, part of the same discussion (which, with only one !vote I had fully extepected to be relisted). Clearly there was either a concensus to move both or no concensus to move either. Can you please reconsider your close? PC78 (talk) 11:27, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

@PC78: I didn't relist it partly due to WP:SILENCE. As for not moving the dab page, there is no obvious reasoning behind the move. Googling Ladyhawk and Ladyhawke both come up with different results talking about different things, so I thought it'd be better to leave the disambiguation page at its long standing title and redirecting the other, instead of moving it. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:37, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

My rationale, which I think was clearly expressed, was that Ladyhawke is the the more likely search term and should therefore be used for the dab page. Do I need to take this to move review? PC78 (talk) 11:55, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

 Done. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Many thanks. PC78 (talk) 13:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry to see that you didn't make it in this round, but I just wanted to give you a bit of support. I do think it might be a bit too soon, but I think that with you adminship is likely going to be a "when" and not an "if". Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:42, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

• Garyallen262 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Gary Allen, runner (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I am relatively new to Wiki and don't really understand how to do the things you asked. I would be grateful for any help editing the post to include what is required? Thank you

Hi, I recommend you read WP:ILC. That will explain what you need to do. You have 10 references that aren't included anywhere inside the article. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:01, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

		The WikiJaguar Award for Excellence
		For your recent efforts in stalking my talk page to help a new user in need of assistance, I award you the WikiJaguar Award for Excellence in talk page stalking efforts. Omni Flames (talk) 11:25, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

I've made a little proposal at Template talk:RMpmc#Appearance, and since all this is still so new, I'd like your input.  What's in your palette? Paine  16:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

You about a week ago relisted the move of Sport aerobics to aerobic gymnastics. The whole move request has been up for two weeks and I think its time we finally closed it. People have had two weeks to respond.-Rainbowofpeace (talk) 07:27, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

@Rainbowofpeace: It's only got one more day until it goes into the backlog for RM. I'll leave my vote and then wait for an uninvolved editor to close it. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:31, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you didn't mean to pressure you. I appreciate your help. :)-Rainbowofpeace (talk) 08:10, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:54, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Hey Anarchyte, thanks for reviewing my draft page. [1] The reason to reject was 'no reliable resources'. Apparently I didn't make it clear that all data are from English Wikipedia, namely the pages listed at the bottom of the article. The added value of the page is not new data, but reordering lots of existing data in a very concise format. The presentation method used is not original either, but very mainstream, at least in Europe, possibly less in the US. [2] Cheers, Erik Zachte (talk) 09:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

@Erik Zachte:Ah okay, I'll undo my review so that another person (whom hopefully knows more about this topic than I do) can review it. I'll add a comment linking back here. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:40, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

You seem to have been around long enough to know how to find your response, but here's a link anyway.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, I already saw it, though. I'd rather not use {{clear}} so I just expanded the collapsed infobox. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:51, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

hey can you help my on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#FC_Basel_File because i was a qwentions --Seescedric (talk) 10:09, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

@Seescedric: I've left a comment there. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:21, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

2 Qwentions : 1. I can nuse it right , 2. And can i nuse it in other Wikipedias --Seescedric (talk) 10:38, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

I've replied there. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:05, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

I belive i have make a mistake https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_FC_Basel.png , can you help me --Seescedric (talk) 11:43, 25 June 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seescedric (talk • contribs) --Seescedric (talk) 11:53, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

@Seescedric: I'm not that experienced in files, try contacting an administrator. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:53, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Realy i think you was saying its ok --Seescedric (talk) 11:56, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

@Seescedric: It should be fine if you did it correctly, but you uploaded it to Commons. I don't have that much experience dealing on that website. Please upload it onto en.wikipedia if you wish to use it here. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:00, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

And on witch place ? in the englisch wikipedia ? --Seescedric (talk) 12:07, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

This place https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard&?withJS=MediaWiki:FileUploadWizard.js sorry but the page is a litte bit hard , for this page is my englisch nood so good--Seescedric (talk) 12:16, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

If you want, I can upload it for you. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:22, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so much , you can uplord it --Seescedric (talk) 12:26, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

 Done. See File:FC_Basel_logo_with_star.png. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:31, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Coll thank and how i can make the new logo for the other Wikipedias like for the spanish Wikipedia. I mean how legal --Seescedric (talk) 11:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

@Seescedric: I have no clue how the other Wikipedias function. You'd be better of asking someone else, preferably on the Spanish Wikipedia or whatever Wikipedia you wish to add the logo to. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:42, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Ok because only the German , frence , romai≠an and english wiipedia have the new fc basel Logo all other wikipedias have the old logo --Seescedric (talk) 11:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

And something elsy Urs Fischer is not the manger he is the Coach from the FC Basel .--Seescedric (talk) 11:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Why was in this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dwscomet/My_userbox_creations/FCBasel the FC Basel LOGO makes away i mean i have make the new in this text !--Seescedric (talk) 17:16, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fragments of Him

added a link pointing to Minimalistic

Rust (video game)

added a link pointing to DayZ

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

 Done. Fixed. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Fragments of Him at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 16:46, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Y Fixed. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Hey Anarchyte, thanks for reviewing my draft page: [3] There is also a new http page that this project can be tested for other wiki projects: https://chipchaderez.github.io/Wiki-Link-Validator/

The reason I wanted to promote it in Wikipedia is since this project is focusing mainly on wiki projects. Rot links are also a known problem in wikipedia. Is there a way I can change my page to be more formal and compatible to the wikipedia project? Indigomontoya123 (talk) 14:58, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

@Indigomontoya123: Hi, read WP:GNG for the general notability guideline. Base your article on secondary, reliable, third-party sources that are independent of the subject. Also, try not to use Wikipedia as a means of promotion. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the answer, I've added the link on an independent wiki page called - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_rot#External_links, please let me know if that need any further changes Indigomontoya123 (talk) 08:40, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Fallout 4: Far Harbor has been completed.

I have one comment. The following sentence appears in the "Gameplay" section but makes no sense as it stands because it doesn't connect to anything else in the article. This should either be removed or clarified.

"Since the player is in contact with the Valentine Detective Agency, the player must have met detective Nick Valentine.[3]"

I notice that the first citation is archived. You would probably be wise to archive the other URLs, as time allows, so that the article doesn't develop "link rot".

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:49, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: I've reworded it, is it better now? Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

@Anarchyte: Looks good. Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Nice job on the Wikidata ;) I saw where you took what I did for Far Harbor and flushed it out for Automatron too. :) If you want to try to keep an eye on Wikidata, you can enable it for the normal watch list in your watchlist preferences. It's not perfect but it works. -- ferret (talk) 12:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

@Ferret: Thanks, I've got one question, though. How do you add identifiers? The Metacritic ID is current a statement, not an identifier. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Try refreshing the page once you save it. I see it as an identifier on both items. Wikidata knows what "type" each claim is but it may not display correctly immediately after you add it. Don't forget you can add references too :) Especially for the scores. The reference fields the review template wants are "reference URL" (url), "published in" (work), "retrieved" (accessdate) and "title" (Title). There is also "publication date" (date) and "author" (author) but those aren't used for aggregators. We're still flushing out some of the details on how to map Wikidata references to CS1 fields. Swing by Template:Video game reviews if you're interested! -- ferret (talk) 12:50, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

@Ferret: Is there any way to wikilink Metacritic using Wikidata? Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:52, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

If you mean a link to the review site for External Links, Template:Metacritic video game would be what you want, however, it's never been Wikidata enabled. It would work similar to Template:Official website. If nothing specified, try to find it in Wikidata. The template already expects the same data that's stored in Wikidata, just needs updated. I may take a look at it later. -- ferret (talk) 13:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

I meant in the reference. So it says: "blah blah reviews". Metacritic. blah blah. instead of "blah blah reviews". Metacritic. blah blah. Anarchyte ([Special:Contributions/Anarchyte|work]] | talk) 13:59, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Ah ok, won't be today but I should be able to do that. -- ferret (talk) 22:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

@Ferret: Also, would it be possible for the Wikidata's archive url be used on here too? I just finished archiving every single link (besides 1 which has an age verification barrier, which archivers won't complete) but the Metacritic's don't have an archive url. I'd also like to do this on Fragments of Him. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:38, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Unfortunately not right now. We're aware of that, czar, Izno and I have been discussing. We might be able to get it fixed soon. -- ferret (talk) 13:08, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Whoops, sorry just woke up. There is an archive URL, which I see you found. What I was thinking was that there is not an archive date. -- ferret (talk) 13:10, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

I took a few minutes to add archive url but it wasn't working right away. I'll have to come back to it tomorrow or the day after, but I'll work to get it in. -- ferret (talk) 13:23, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Figured out what I did wrong yesterday and fixed it. However, CS1 complains if you have archive url without archive date. Until we have archive date in Wikidata, I won't be able to implement. We are pursuing it though so I'll come back later when we figure something out. -- ferret (talk) 11:19, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

@Ferret: Take a look at the WikiData proposal I made. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:35, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Edit: Didn't see that ping until just then. Guess that's what happens when you have a talk page tab open for a while. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:36, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

And now we wait... :) But as soon as they implement it, I can add it into my module. -- ferret (talk) 11:37, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

The article Fallout 4: Far Harbor you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fallout 4: Far Harbor for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rhain -- Rhain (talk) 15:20, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Monaco: What's Yours Is Mine you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Famous Hobo -- Famous Hobo (talk) 16:01, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:SecureLine Not Connected.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:SecureLine VPN Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

• Gray, Andrew (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Robert James Cromie (1887-1936), Publisher of the Vancouver Sun from 1917 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear 'Anarchyte',

Thank you for your review of 'Draft:Robert James Cromie (1887-1936), Publisher of the Vancouver Sun from 1917', my proposal for a Wikipedia page dedicated to the life of Robert Cromie, which submission you declined on June 6 with the following 'reason':

"This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources."

I note that most, if not all, of the claims in the draft are corroborated in the page dedicated to the life of Robert Cromie in the online Dictionary of Canadian Biography, at http://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/cromie_robert_james_16E.html

Is the existence of that page sufficient support for the proposed article and its contents to be approved?

Your frank advice would be welcome.

Yours truly, Andrew Gray

Gray, Andrew (talk) 03:13, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

@Gray, Andrew:You need to show where you got the content from. If you use that site, you need to reference it using the advice given on WP:REFB. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:50, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

I suddenly discovered that a page had been created under my name ("William Wear"), and thankfully, you declined it.

Specifically, I am the William Wear mentioned in the Fast Company article, but the rest of the material on the page does not apply to me. I was and am a hacker, but (a) I am (hopefully) not very well known, and (b) have never worked for, supported, or condoned any action of any government in the world, let alone the government of the United States.

It is possible that the author confused me with someone else, my name is relatively common. 12.152.125.130 (talk) 19:32, 6 July 2016 (UTC)If you could please remove the article reference from the draft page, I would be very appreciative.

12.152.125.130 (talk) 19:32, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I don't quite understand what you mean by "remove the article reference from the draft page". Do you want the page to be deleted? If so (because your IP created the article), just add {{db-g7}} to the top of the page. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Didn't notice the common IP, but if that means I can delete it, I will. Thanks for pointing that one out! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.152.125.130 (talk) 20:44, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Hey, we really like the Article you made for G2A. Would there be any chance that you could also make a Wikipedia Page for leading video game seller, CJS CD Keys?

it's cjs-cdkeys.com

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.219.227.207 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 10 July 2016‎

Wikipedia runs off reliable sources. All I could find were [4] and [5]. Also, could you take a look at WP:CANVAS please? It seems like you may be affiliated with the company due to the way you wrote that message. Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Hey! So, this is just a really dumb question. I have been away awhile and getting back into the swing of things, this is a new thing to me. How does this work and is there a project page I can read on it? Rgoodermote (talk) 12:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

I don't know of any project pages that contain this information, but the best bet that I know of is Template:Video game reviews. What happens is the content is submitted onto the respective Wikidata page (Pokémon Go's is here) and then by putting "wikidata" next to the MetaCritic rating it uses that instead needing to edit the article every time. As for the reference, it's just <ref name="Wikidata name-MC(platform)"/>, i.e., PoGo on iOS would be <ref name="Pokémon GO-MCIOS"/> and Fallout 4: Far Harbor on PS4 would be <ref name="Fallout 4: Far Harbor-MCPS4"/>. If you're still confused, one of the gentlemen on Module talk:Video game wikidata may be able to explain it better. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:36, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

No, that was a pretty good explanation! That is such an awesome thing, thank you very much. Rgoodermote (talk) 12:42, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Rgoodermote: This is pretty much brand spanking new. We implemented it in the last couple of weeks. Template:Video game reviews has the basic documentation for it, search on "wikidata". I have not gotten around to writing a short guide on editing Wikidata yet, though I plan to do so. If you have any questions, Template talk:Video game reviews or Module talk:Video game wikidata would work. Note that this "MC=wikidata" is only for Template:Video game reviews. -- ferret (talk) 13:13, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

I've just completed a rough first pass guide to editing Wikidata. I would like to add some illustrations later but its a work in progress. See WP:VG/WD. -- ferret (talk) 13:52, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

You are both very awesome. I thank you so much @Ferret: for that guide and the links. Also, I can not get over that this is a thing that exists now. This was not possible a few years ago, it's absolutely amazing. Thank you both for your help. Rgoodermote (talk) 19:54, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

I just populated review scores for every Fallout game in Wikidata. I didn't do archive URLs though. If you're feeling bored and want to tackle it... :) -- ferret (talk) 14:47, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

 Done for all the games listed in the "has part" section of the link you provided. Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

The two versions were subsantially identical with just a small amount of extra-promotional wording removed from the second version, so I have blocked User talk:154.118.19.192 for evading the block at User talk:Ancilla Catholic Hospital Eye Centre. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:03, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

You have edited my answers with citations to multiple links and added them as inappropriate links.I have added the following links. These are highly credible links. I am not sure on what basis are you marking it as spam.

http://www.pickdup.com/pokemon-go-stats.html https://techcrunch.com/2016/07/11/pokemon-go-adds-9b-to-nintendos-value-global-rollout-continues-this-week/

If it is ok please undo your edits. Sushant.iiml (talk) 08:12, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

@Sushant.iiml: Hi, Pickdup.com seems a little spammy and other users have also reverted usage of that website. Instagram & Digital marketing as examples. Also, in the case of Pokémon Go, the extra reference isn't required as it's already referenced; we don't need to WP:OVERCITE things.

The Techcrunch link is fine and I'm pretty sure it's still in the article (I haven't removed it). Anarchyte (work | talk)

@Anarchyte: Fair point. Just FYI - Pickdup.com has verified data from Techcrunch and other sources like Facebook, and Twitter. It's mentioned on their website. The Instagram stat you are referring to is now not cited. It does not add value to the article. I agree that we should not add extra links or citations. However I would respectfully disagree with you on pickdup.com seeming like spam. It is a verified source on stats. I was using its data for my projects and it is quite credible and recommended by many.

Your contribution to the wikipedia community is certainly larger than mine. You are the best judge to take this further. I would leave this to you :-). In my personal opinion it should not qualify as spam. Thanks! Sushant.iiml (talk) 10:16, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Eh, either way, it still fails WP:RS and in the case of Pokémon Go, WP:VG/S too. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

@Anarchyte: I don't think it violates WP:RS. It's a verified source and seems to share verified data. Either ways it does not qualify as spam WP:REFSPAM, WP:SPAM Thanks! Sushant.iiml (talk) 13:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

It absolutely violates WP:RS. If you or your friend continue to promote your SEO site here, it will be blacklisted and your accounts will be blocked. Passive/agressive WP:COI nonsense is a waste of our time. Kuru (talk) 14:17, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

@Kuru: I am not sure about the false claims that you are making and now I am least interested in getting this site out of spam or have a discussion with you. I was trying to have a reasonable conversation but it seems like I am talking to someone getting unnecessarily personal and making accusations without any interest in discussing things or making a sound argument. While I appreciate your efforts to administer content on Wikipedia, this absurdity of marking content and websites that you may not fully understand or have heard of is not just visible here but is also visible in the community marking other Indian sites like yourstory.com as spam. This with due respect to your thoughts indicates the presence of racism. If you are absolutely sure it violates WP:RS please highlight why rather than getting personal with me and threatening me with blocking my account. It'll only educate us about your process and thought. Thanks! Sushant.iiml (talk) 15:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

pickdup.com is 100% an inappropriate site. I'd advise you to stop adding it as well. It's clearly being used to market/spam the course site. If this site is simply presenting stats from other site that we DO consider reliable, then we will simply use the original site. -- ferret (talk) 15:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

@Ferret: Perhaps. But please educate as to why. I read through the entire WP:RS site and I did not find anything that made it inappropriate. If you can share reasons, that'll be great. Secondly how does it get classified as spam. Again nothing in the WP:SPAM documentation suggests this is the case. I only see a trend of mostly Asian sites entering the spam list. Even Techcrunch, which you consider reliable publishes information it sources. It does not produce original information. This information is only released through press releases of the companies that share their data. Thanks! Sushant.iiml (talk) 15:15, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

You guys are clearly exhibiting that you have a vested interest in this site being included in articles, which suggests a conflict of interest. That alone is enough that you should stop adding it. It's your actions that classify it as spam. As for why its not at reliable source, I would point you to WP:RS#Vendor and e-commerce sources to start. This is an e-commerce site that's selling a product. Additionally, WP:RS#Questionable sources. There's no evidence of editorial oversight or a reputation for fact checking. The site doesn't directly reveal where it sources it's data from (Yet you guys know, again suggesting a conflict of interest). The site is unreliable, and the fact that two editors who have spent the bulk of their edits adding it or arguing for it suggest a conflict of interest and deliberate promotional effort. The data is available in already accepted reliable sources or directly from press releases, which also weakens the need to use this site. -- ferret (talk) 15:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

If you truly believe this site is a reliable source, you can ask at WP:RSN for them to review it. I can practically guarantee you'll get the same response though, that's it is unreliable and spam. There's no point in cluttering Anarchyte's talk page with this further. -- ferret (talk) 15:26, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

@Ferret: Going by your logic I should also be exhibiting a vested interest in sharing links of Techcrunch. However you are not accusing me of having a vested interest in promoting Techcrunch or any other platform (since you have heard of them and they are western). On the sources of the site, you can also identify where this site is sourcing its content from by checking the following page http://www.pickdup.com/stats.html. But you've instead chosen to falsely accuse me of knowing the sources and suggested conflict of interest. The sources are clearly mentioned publicly. On me editing content, I think I have disclosed earlier that I found some reliable factual data from specific sources I found to be good (and you never heard of because you are not in India and threatened to blacklist list me). I am not sure about the "we" part but I am just standing up for what I believe is unfair and even racial targeting of Indian people and sites as also reflected in the blacklisting of yourstory.com (and not because I have a conflict of interest). On the e-commerce part, I don't see them selling anything even remotely linked with Pokemon. From that point of view Techcrunch, Facebook, and every publishing platform should be having a conflict of interest with advertising on its site. I believe in standing up for what is fair. However I don't see this discussion leading anywhere and I have nothing to gain out of it. I seem to be talking to people who are doing great work on Wikipedia but have made up their mind on something that may not fully comprehend (and thus even limiting Wikipedia's potential). Thanks! Sushant.iiml (talk) 15:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

The reason no one is badgering the TechCrunch reference is because it's a verifiable reliable source. It has editorial oversight and has writers whom the Wikipedia community have decided are reliable. I suggest you (re-)read the following Wikipedia links: WP:RS, WP:COI, WP:V, WP:SPS. Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

@Ferret:, :@Anarchyte:, :@Ferret: Alright folks. Thanks for your time. Let me share a few facts about your process as highlighted in Criticism of Wikipedia, and Racial bias on Wikipedia. I haven't edited or authored those articles just in case you may feel like accusing me of something I have no relation to. However I can't help it. You are prejudiced by your own views, and exposure to content (and so am I).

Let me quote a few lines from those articles that are evident of the inherent bias (and ignorance) in your editorial process (largely driven by your exposure to media). While it happens as it would for any normal individual, your resorting to threats of blacklisting is not just disconcerting but a validation of documented content. "The standard of debate on Wikipedia has been called into question by persons who have noted that contributors can make a long list of salient points and pull in a wide range of empirical observations to back up their arguments, only to have them ignored completely on the site." "Wikipedia has been criticized for having a systemic racial bias in its coverage, due to an under-representation of people of colour within its editor base." And example being - ""a lot of black history is left out" of Wikipedia, due to articles predominately being written by white editors. Articles that do exist on African topics are, according to some critics, largely edited by editors from Europe and North America and thus reflect their knowledge and consumption of media, which "tend to perpetuate a negative image" of Africa." "The principal concerns of the critics are the factual reliability of the content; the readability of the prose; and a clear article layout; the existence of systemic bias; of gender bias; and of racial bias among the editorial community that is Wikipedia." "Wikipedia is sometimes characterized as having a hostile editing environment. In Common Knowledge?: An Ethnography of Wikipedia (2014), Dariusz Jemielniak, a steward for Wikimedia Foundation projects, stated that the complexity of the rules and laws governing editorial content and the behavior of the editors is a burden for new editors and a licence for the "office politics" of disruptive editors." Thanks! Sushant.iiml (talk) 22:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

You can run with the racism bit as much as you want. I didn't even realize the site was apparently Indian till you kept bringing it up. The fact that it was Indian had no bearing in its removal. It's been clearly explained to you, whether you agree or not, why the source was unsuitable. You've been directed to the relevant policies and to the board where you could seek a second opinion. Continuing to post on an individual user's talk page about your beliefs regarding enwiki's inherent biases isn't really going to get you anywhere. -- ferret (talk) 00:56, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

@Ferret: : Yes! I agree with you. Talking to you (or others on this thread) isn't going to take me anywhere or even give me any benefit. It's tough to hold a reasonable discussion here. Thanks! Sushant.iiml (talk) 06:17, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Hey, I just wanted to say thank you for your review of Viva Pinata and for letting czar know about it while I was gone. I was anxious that it might have been neglected while I was away! JAGUAR  16:55, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

The article Monaco: What's Yours Is Mine you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Monaco: What's Yours Is Mine for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Famous Hobo -- Famous Hobo (talk) 08:41, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:47, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

@Casliber: Seeing as the article already gets over 5,000 views, how would we know if it was statistic page worthy? Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:51, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Hmmm,,,yes I can see that might be tricky...I have no idea other than to see how the pageviews decline over the next few days and see if it fits a curve and the 18th deviates from that I guess....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:48, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi there,

There was an interesting conversation going on the talk page for List of most disliked YouTube videos, where there were contributions as recently as yesterday. However, you archived the page, limiting its visibility. I am not familiar with the archive mechanism. Is it acceptable for me to undo these changes?

Best,

Jeran Renz (talk) 13:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I have un-archived the 3 discussions that had July responses. I'm confident Anarchyte got them by accident, as they were near the top rather than the bottom. -- ferret (talk) 13:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

@Ferret: Thanks! Jeran Renz (talk) 13:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

@Jeran Renz: My apologies, because newer discussions should be at the bottom, I didn't notice the July posts. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:51, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:02, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, well this is just for ask you if you could help me with the move of this page KC Cassidy to the one I already suppose was being revised [6], so what can I do to complete my request might you please help me? Thanks.TheBellaTwins1445^(talk) 22:37, July 24, 2016 (UTC)

All I did was relist the discussion. In another 7 or so days, it will probably be closed. We can't move it now, we have to wait. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pokémon Go, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes, due to the use of pipes (|) in URLs of the new page views tool, if you try to place the link to page views in a {{Requested move}} template it would cause the template to break and all subsequent text to be removed. The easy solution would be to add the link after starting the RM. If for whatever reason you need to start the entire RM with one edit, you need to replace all pipes in the URL with |. I figured this out a few months ago after trial and error. Thanks, SSTflyer 13:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Fragments of Him has been completed.

I'm glad to see its references have been archived. It seems to be a losing battle to convince contributors to do this so that their articles do not develop "link rot".

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Anarchyte,

I'm having a bit of a struggle with my first Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nucleus_Films#Releases and would be really grateful for your advice.

I'm comparing it to articles on similar release companies but am quite anxious as some seem to have more, and some less, information than mine. May I check with you if I'm now on the right track? Similar companies have both more and less information and I am trying to get the balance right.

I'd be really grateful for any advice you have.

Thanks and best wishes,

RachelGreenInk (talk) 19:53, 28 July 2016 (UTC) RachelGreenInk

Hi RachelGreenInk. Wikipedia runs off reliable sources that are independent of the subject. I suggest you take a look at WP:REFB and source your draft with at least a few reliable references. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:36, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

• You asked for User:Soulbust/sandbox to be history-merged into D.Va. But in User:Soulbust/sandbox I can find no edits about the character D.Va. Which edits do you want me to use? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:58, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

@Anthony Appleyard: I assume you already did the histmerge due to the history of the page, but I'm pretty sure I wrote the times which should be merged in the request. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:32, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Monaco: What's Yours Is Mine has been completed. I must say that, given all of its grammar and other issues, I am surprised that the article met GA standards. I believe that it now does so.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:18, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello Anarchyte. Your account has been granted the "filemover" user right, either following a request for it or due to a clear need for the ability to move files. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:File mover for more information on this user right and under what circumstances it is okay to move files. When you move a file please remember to update any links to the new name as well! If you do not want the file mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Widr (talk) 18:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Re User talk:Σ/Archive/2016/June#Drafts, check out Template:Did you know nominations/Python Package Index. →Σσς. (Sigma) 03:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm 95.49.35.206. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Sandbox have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 95.49.35.206 (talk) 10:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Because you've reverted these edits. 95.49.35.206 (talk) 10:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, what? I was using the sandbox for testing, which is what it should be used for. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:41, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

In the 3 minutes that I accidently saved my unfinished page, ATRIS, which i felt necessary to create in order to reclaim credit for said groups works that have been currently credited to A'tris, a Boston based college band with a name of similiar spelling, it was marked for deletion by you. Please undo if possible so i can fix errors, thank you.Pat6sto (talk) 09:25, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

@Pat6sto: Hi, if the article isn't finished or in an unencyclopedic state, I suggest you use the "Draft" namespace. At the moment, the article falls under WP:A7. I suggest you find some reliable sources that show why the band is notable. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

"Thank you kindly for your speedy response. As stated previously we only want credit for our bands works and I feel have, granted we don't have any arbitrary awards yet but have established ourselves in so many other ways over the years, earned the right to exist on Wiki if only for namesake. We understand the need to protect the site from oversaturation and don't wish to add to any online article clutter. If there is any other avenue that we should explore please point us in the right direction so we can get out of you hair. Again, thank you for your guidance and assistance to otherwise wiki noobs. Best wishes. -pat6sto" Pat6sto (talk) 18:11, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

@Pat6sto: Apologies for the late response. I suggest you check out WP:TEAHOUSE for some guidance from very experienced editors. Also, seeing as you are affiliated with the band, please check out WP:COI. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:58, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

WP:G8 specifically excludes information for a future article. I have moved it to Draft:Hexx (band) since it appears to meet WP:MUSICBIO#C5.--Launchballer 15:16, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I wonder if would not mind re-opening the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ForgeRock discussion? I believe that it perhaps should have been relisted instead of having been closed. There were two !votes for delete, and two for keep, so I did not yet see a clear consensus. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:16, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

@K.e.coffman: Sure. I believe the sources provided by Northamerica1000 outweighed the arguments, but I'll reopen it and leave my own opinion. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:20, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

FYI, I closed this today. I agree with you as well the sources provided were very good to support the keep votes. There was a concern about my closing it brought to my talk page so I did request an admin review it as well. The result of that review was also keep. -- Dane2007 ^talk 03:12, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello: I've had a look at the sections as requested and have made some minor edits. Do make sure that my edits haven't introduced errors. It's extremely difficult to edit plot/synopsis sections of games one hasn't played. Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:15, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for that, Twofingered Typist. Also, I've added the GOCE tag into the article history template on the talk page, which is why it wasn't there. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:30, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Fallout 4 Nuka-Cola.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:06, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Anarchyte! I've noticed that at some point, you performed a round-robin page move. I have several times before I thought the current move form was tedious. Anyway, I've written a script here (js) that semi-automates page swaps for convenience, and thought you may want to try it out. You'd simply click "Swap" and enter a page destination, the script performs the 3 moves as necessary (saves time having to manually go through the move form 3 times). (It doesn't correct redirects afterwards, that's still manual)

Anyway feel free to adapt this script as you see fit, cheers, and happy moving. :) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 02:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

@Andy M. Wang: Very nice script, I'll try it out in a moment. Just an idea, would it be possible to add it to the "More" menu? (didn't realise, it's already there) Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:01, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fake You Out (song). Since you had some involvement with the Fake You Out (song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:17, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

It's fitting that you were the one to request protection of Anarchism in Australia. Cheers, Airplaneman ✈ 07:12, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clash of Clans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supercell (company). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Fallout 4: Nuka-World at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Josh Milburn (talk) 18:28, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

• 12.148.105.34 (talk · contribs)
  • LeafyIsHere (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:LeafyIsHere (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am requesting a rereview on the page LeafyIsHere because I believe that with almost 5 million subscribers on YouTube, and about 2 million views on each new video, he is relevent enough to be on Wikipedia. Also I edited the article so that there are at least three news websites that I found on the news tab on google. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.148.105.34 (talk • contribs) 23:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place to request that New Page Patrollers be suitably experienced for patrolling new pages. Your comments at New pages patrol/RfC for patroller right are welcome. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:55, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Fallout 4 Automatron.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Dear Anarchyte, I am not sure as to how I ended up adding a deletion tag on my article. I want to thank you for your help, highly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CocoMusic (talk • contribs) 08:51, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

kiera nguyen is the coolest person on earth — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kieranguyen (talk • contribs) 08:57, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

The NPP backlog now stands at 13,158 total unreviewed pages.

Just to recap:

• 13 July 2016: 7,000
• 1 August 2016: 9,000
• 7 August 2016: 10,472
• 16 August 2016: 11,500
• 28 August 2016: 13,158

You naturally don't have to feel obliged, but if there's anything you can do it would be most appreciated. I've spent 40 hours on it this week but it's only a drop in the ocean.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:55, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Oh my goodness. This post prompted me to check Special:NewPages for the first time in years. Special:NewPagesFeed looks new! And more backlogged than I've ever seen. I might try and take a look later today. Airplaneman ✈ 17:40, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Omar El-Banna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sheik. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

hi, how are u?? why this?? for my POV is not are Deaf Valley, but hearing or not?? --SURDUSVII 10:24, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

@SurdusVII: My apologies, but I did not understand your message, but here is an explanation as to why I did the edit you linked. I removed the CSD tag because it's a valid redirect, not an "error page". If you want to delete that page, try using Redirects for Discussion. Some of the references on the target page (Tiger Stadium (LSU)) refer to the stadium as "Deaf Valley"; presumably as a play on words of "Death Valley". Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:31, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

excuse my english which are native italian speakers, actually wanted to point out how the wrong way DEAF.. infact the term has another meaning, and the exact title is this: DEATH VALLEY, ok?? :) --SURDUSVII 10:38, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

@SurdusVII: I'll reiterate what I said above. The term "DEAF Valley" is used in some of the articles references. I assume it's a play on words with "DEATH Valley". I know they have different meanings. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:41, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

I get it.. all right.. --SURDUSVII 11:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Keep reverting my edits, however, the sources I have provided are more than suitable. Are you honestly telling me that Lehi was not a terrorist organization and that the King of Britain is not a reliable source? Smoking what you are? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orasis (talk • contribs) 04:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Great to have you on board! I noticed some of your work on some of Ritchie's articles and you seem an excellent editor!♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:54, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:FC Basel logo with star.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fragments of Him you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GamerPro64 -- GamerPro64 (talk) 02:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Look where the template is now. That's why I aligned it left. Doesn't look right (no pun intended) to me. Adam9007 (talk) 03:45, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

@Adam9007: Eh, I guess it's just my preference. I've undone my edit. Anarchyte (work | talk) 03:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm pretty sure it's not supposed to be underneath the main infobox. Adam9007 (talk) 03:48, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Amazon Trail II

added a link pointing to The Oregon Trail

Osiris: New Dawn

added a link pointing to Immersion

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Why did you mark this as reviewed without taking any action? It is clearly vandalism and I have tagged it as such. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 11:30, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

@Yellow Dingo: I received an edit conflict when tagging it for CSD. I mark an article as patrolled and then tag it because sometimes Twinkle doesn't mark it as patrolled correctly. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:32, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Makes sense, thanks for the explanation. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 11:32, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

The article Fragments of Him you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fragments of Him for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GamerPro64 -- GamerPro64 (talk) 13:41, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi Anarchyte! I’m reaching out to you because our logs tell us you’re a very active Twinkle user. The WMF Collaboration team is working on new tools that we hope will be useful to people engaged in reviewing recent changes, fighting vandalism or supporting new users. We want to test them for usability with editors who are experienced with relevant wiki work. If you’re interested in helping to shape this new technology—we’d like to hear from you.

The testing should take about an hour, will be conducted online, and will take place during the next few weeks. To participate, please email dchen[at]wikimedia.org with the subject line Twinkle User. Include the following information:

• Username
• Email where we can reach you
• Your city or time zone
• Best time to talk to you
• Your primary use of Twinkle or Recent Changes (e.g., reviewing recent changes, reviewing with a particular focus (specify), anti-vandalism, new-page review, welcoming new users, etc.)

Thanks! Dchen (WMF) (talk) 18:08, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
617		Ford Ka (talk)						Add sources
14		Jisei (video game series) (talk)						Add sources
944		Dennis Prager (talk)						Add sources
17,622		Ronald Reagan (talk)						Add sources
206		Playground Games (talk)						Add sources
4,935		Frozen (2013 film) (talk)						Add sources
10		Codex Alimentarius Austriacus (talk)						Cleanup
229		PCSX2 (talk)						Cleanup
114		Creatures (video game series) (talk)						Cleanup
268		Folding@home (talk)						Expand
42,688		United States (talk)						Expand
9,083		Twitter (talk)						Expand
25		Inherit the Earth (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
50		Bolivian Hairless Dog (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
24		Video gaming clan (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
40		Conrad Wolfram (talk)						Merge
158		Timeline of volcanism on Earth (talk)						Merge
1,064		First-person shooter (talk)						Merge
9,663		Batman (talk)						Wikify
388		Viz Media (talk)						Wikify
105		Holly Springs, North Carolina (talk)						Wikify
2		Shanti Bon, Hojai (talk)						Orphan
4		Greater Raleigh-Durham CSA (talk)						Orphan
5		SoundRenderer (talk)						Orphan
3		Bal, Qasr-e Qand (talk)						Stub
29		Sugar Rush (video game) (talk)						Stub
6		Ioan Mang (talk)						Stub
19		Ministry of Education and Scientific Research (Romania) (talk)						Stub
14		One Safe (talk)						Stub
12		SpoCon (talk)						Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:59, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adelaide High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Advertiser. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Following up from the consensus reached here, the community will now establish the user right criteria. You may wish to participate in this discussion. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:34, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Razer Naga has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:17, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Fallout 4: Nuka-World has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:23, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi Anarchyte, I’ve just been having another look at your entry at WP:ORCP. It may well be time for you to take a serious decision now. Let me know what you think. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello Kudpung. I may take another shot at ORCP, but I'd like to finish of the Fallout articles before I attempt another RfA (assuming the ORCP gets good reception, if not, I'll wait). There's currently a FAC in progress for Far Harbor and I'm waiting on one person in the PR for Nuka-World before I nominate it for GA. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:31, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

@Kudpung: I've started the ORCP, guess it's time to wait now. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:34, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Template:RMpmc/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:35, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

i am here to talk about shoppingpak with you. dear there are citing about the shoppingpak and its obey all terms of conditions of wikipedia.org. as the organization was started in 2016 its sources are less but verified. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mechengrasim (talk • contribs) 14:22, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fallout 4: Nuka-World you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 22:21, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

The article Fallout 4: Nuka-World you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fallout 4: Nuka-World for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 16:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

The article Fallout 4: Nuka-World you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fallout 4: Nuka-World for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 09:21, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello Anarchyte. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria.

• Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
• Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
• Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator.

 Administrator note You have been grandfathered to this group based on prior patrolling activity - the technical flag for the group will be added to your account after the next software update. You do not need to apply at WP:PERM. 20:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

For a second I was scared at this edit summary, but then I noticed the talk page is still at "Talk:Shadowhunters" and the actual closing statement says "not moved". nyuszika7h (talk) 10:11, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

@Nyuszika7H: My apologies about the misunderstanding. It was a mistype by me, and I'm not even sure how it happened. I typically write it as closed move discussion as "xxx", but in this summary I somehow included the closing quotation mark while missing the "not. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:14, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Tiven2240. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, 10th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Tiven gonsalves 11:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

@Tiven2240: Why? Anarchyte (work | talk) 20:53, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

I was unfamiliar with the topic so I unreviewed it seeking more Wikipedia editors to review it. Sorry for the inconvenience — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiven2240 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

After you changed CoolGames Inc into a redirect to Polygon (website) (thanks, by the way), the creator changed it back. I'm not sure what the protocol is for situations like this. Could you advise?

• @Rasimmons: Check out WP:BRD. I boldly redirected the article, he reverted it, now it's time to discuss it. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:47, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Anarchyte,

Could you please give me some more tips and show parts of the content from my edit which in your opinion are lacking sources? Sandbox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Moherson/G2A Thanks :)

Moherson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moherson (talk • contribs) 14:53, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

@Moherson: Many, if not all of the references you added are unreliable sources. At a quick glance, many are directly from G2A. As for formatting, an article should not have external links in its prose, either turn them into references or put them into the external links section (if they comply with WP:ELNO). Also, I believe that it was written better overall prior to the massive edits. I hope this helps, Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback. Could you please explain what constitutes a “reliable” source? Some examples perhaps? Unfortunately, as G2A is not a listed company, the only place to find certain facts (such as no. of employees) is from their website. Furthermore, the original article is both outdated and lacking in content and I changed this – I believe – without compromising the original style. I will nevertheless update the article with more external sources where possible and amend the formatting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moherson (talk • contribs) 10:52, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

@Moherson: Apologies for the late reply. I suggest you read over WP:RS to learn about the guidelines and what constitutes a reliable source. G2A is heavily videogame based, so take a look at WP:VG/RS for lots of sources that have been vetted by the community to be reliable. Hope this helps! Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:09, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Anarchyte,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.

Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello Anarchyte.

Based on the patrols you made of new pages during a qualifying period in 2016, your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed.

New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

• Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
• Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
• Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

The Challenge Series is a current drive on English Wikipedia to encourage article improvements and creations globally through a series of 50,000/10,000/1000 Challenges for different regions, countries and topics. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are invited to participate.

• Use {{subst:The Challenge series invitation}} to invite others using this template.
• Sent to users at Northamerica1000/Mailing list using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC).