User talk:AmandaNP/Archives/2013/April

This is an archive of past discussions with User:AmandaNP. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, AmandaNP. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Tito Dutta (contact) 11:42, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

I'll try and reply tonight, but I can't promise it. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 20:37, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

There is no hurry, I have found most of the answers. The more important thing is I can not access the tool for last one hour or so (server error 5xx including 500, 502). I'll go to sleep in next 15 minutes, Please break my reservations (if any).

And reporting from the ACC front, the backlog you mentioned has almost been handled, I hope it'll be less than 30 in next 3 days, though there is a huge CU backlog! Regards! --Tito Dutta (contact) 21:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

For some unknown reason, be it a duff internet connection or a link that doesn't work, I can't access the registration form. Anyway, I'm interested in signing up; what's the current backlog?--Launchballer 23:00, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks for confirming that I am not the only one facing errors (timeout, server errors etc). Try tomorrow. Backlog is almost normal now. Helping hands might be helpful still. --Tito Dutta (contact) 23:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

It's fine. The next time there's a backlog, let me know and I'll help out. I'd still like account creator status though.--Launchballer 23:45, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

The tool is working, try now! --Tito Dutta (contact) 11:55, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

See User talk:174.92.225.67. Best, m.o.p 01:55, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Nevermind. Declined the unblock after this comment. m.o.p 02:01, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

I read the RFC at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics/Archive 48#Native languages in lead and the follow-on archived discussion on your talk page, but I do not understand the assertions and actions by Abhishek191288 in removing indic script native names from their location in the settlement infobox citing WP:INDICSCRIPT. Could you please comment at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#Indic scripts in lead? Thanks. --Bejnar (talk) 08:20, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

I have barely read over it, but I don't see the point in commenting. I've clarified /several/ times before what my thoughts are on the subject, and specifically I said that I did not think the RfC went beyond the scope of the lead. If there is a problem with it, take it back to RfC. I can't explain other people's comments, just comment on how I closed the RfC myself. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 10:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

CheckUsers require a lot of trust from the community; AUSC is one of the ways trust in CUs is built. It is in your own interest to remain at arm's length from the AUSC nominations process. --Surturz (talk) 06:17, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Are you completely sure about this? What about an AUSC that will recommend removal of the tools irregardless of the merits of the complaint? Surely you don't want that, do you? --Rschen7754 06:20, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Besides agreeing with Rschen, you can stop the threat that you will make my life harder if I continue to participate, because I don't really care if you make my life harder. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 06:29, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

I have made no threats of any kind, nor have I expressed a desire for an AUSC that always finds in favour of the complainant. Please restrict yourselves to refuting arguments I have actually made. All I am saying is that if the CheckUser/Oversighters participate in the AUSC community rep nominations process, it hampers the claim that those reps actually represent the community. --Surturz (talk) 07:08, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

So CheckUsers are not part of the community? I completely disagree. And your free to think what you wish though. -- DQ on the road (ʞlɐʇ) 13:32, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Again, please restrict your replies to arguments I have actually made. Nowhere have I said that CUs are not part of the community. I have only said it was unwise for them to attempt to influence the AUSC nominations process. Arbs are members of the community too, but they can - and frequently do - recuse themselves from discussions where there is a potential or perceived conflict of interest. Same principle here. --Surturz (talk) 14:20, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi DQ, I noticed my IP Block exemptions were removed a month and a half ago, I noticed it now, after coming back to college, and finding that one of the IPs was blocked. Do I need to send an email for exemption status again? Several college IPs are blocked, [they use multiple ISPs], and I would like to return to editing. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:15, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I don't have access to CU or my admin account at this time (per the above message), but I'll find a CU who can take care of this for you. -- DQ on the road (ʞlɐʇ) 21:14, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

So I just finished talking to another CU and they say none of the ranges you have been editing from have been blocked. Would you mind dropping me an email with what range is being blocked please? -- DQ on the road (ʞlɐʇ) 21:31, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Further to this post I left on Dennis Brown's talk page, I was wondering if you could help out? Thanks Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 20:18, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

I'll make a full reply tomorrow. -- DQ on the road (ʞlɐʇ) 23:59, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Now that we've had another discussion Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#Indic scripts in lead, I have made a proposal for updating WP:INDICSCRIPT at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#Request to clarify WP:INDICSCRIPT. I'd like to think that this one comes closer to the actual consensus. --Bejnar (talk) 23:31, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Hey AmandaNP/Archives/2013 :). I'm dropping you a note because you have signed up for the Notifications, or Echo, newsletter.

If all goes according to plan, we should be launching Echo on en-wiki either tomorrow, or next Tuesday - I'll drop a followup tomorrow when we know what's happening. Should the launch succeed, we'll begin the process of triaging bugs and gathering feedback on what features work, what cause problems, and what we should do next; I hope you'll help us out on these fronts by leaving any comments you might have on the talkpage.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:05, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

This is an alt of mine for insecure logins at hotels, cafes, libraries and the like. I was using User:Pharmboy (my original login, all alts are clearly declared) but want to use this most of the time now. Would requesting an IPBE be a good idea for it, knowing it will almost always be used on IPs that are used by a large number of people? I logged into Dennis and Farmer both here at the house today, where I'm editing right now (I also edit from work, as you probably know), and you have my permission to run a check to verify the logs on any account I've ever used. I have some trips planned soon and didn't want to get stuck with no way to edit without using my admin account on insecure networks. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 02:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

It's not a matter of requesting really. We don't really bother or bother with admins giving themselves IPBE, we just trust them. If you want to know if your alt account has previously been adversely affected by a block, then I can take a look for you, otherwise, you can just flag yourself. But there is no way of telling whether you will be blocked, so giving yourself IPBE just in case is fine. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 02:46, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Last time and only time I used the IPBE tool, I got my head bit off and all kinds of stuff I'm not supposed to know about, although in the end it turned out my actions were actually reasonable even if not optimal, hence my reluctance to use those tools without checking with a trusted CU, and you top my list. Thanks. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 02:52, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Oh yes, that. When it comes to yourself, ya no worries, when it comes to other users, check with a CU. That's how it works. And no problem. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 02:59, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Just a reminder of the conditional Account Creator permit you have decided to tentatively approve in the event of an editathon event starting early tomorrow. All the best. Cheers, -T.I.M^(Contact) 18:26, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder, I would have forgotten.  Done -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 19:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

This user whom you CU blocked has e-mailed me with what he believes is an explanation for his activity. I acknowledged, but did nothing else. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:52, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Yep, I did also, I replied and acknowledged, and will look into it a little later. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:11, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

A user banned under Greco-Turkish articles has been making disruptive edits in the Armenia page. His recent edit deleted the Armenian historical and cultural aspects of Mount Ararat and replaced it with a more Turkified rendition by stating it is in Turkey and only visible from Armenia. I believe he is trying to edit outside of Greek and Turkish articles since they will cause his ban while spreading Turkish oriented material in other articles. I believe there needs to be appropriate action taken for this. Thank you. Proudbolsahye (talk) 22:43, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

I do not see any prohibited or unlawful edit. Topics to be banned, serve as evidence that is not true at all. User Proudbolsahye,reverted without a satisfactory explanation.[1]. This is not nothing to do with the topic, consisting of a personal thought. Also, there is no concrete resource specified. "Mount Ararat, which was historically part of Armenia, is the highest mountain in the region" .(It is shown as a mountainin of Armenia). Besides, important information has been removed by the user.See [2]. While this information is very important for Armenia's foreign relations, it was considered unnecessary. Lastly, probably it should be a destructive editing [3].Your help in this matter is very important for me.Regards --Maurice (talk) 09:04, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi DQ. Maurice07 is edit-warring and blanking important and well-known historical facts related to the history of Armenia. For example he blanked the following passage:

Mount Ararat, which was historically part of Armenia, is the highest mountain in the region. Now located in Turkey, but clearly visible in Armenia, it is regarded by the Armenians as a symbol of their land. Because of this, the mountain is present on the Armenian national emblem today.

with the edit-summary: Unacceptable opinion.I would like to remind you that Mount Ararat in the territory of Turkey.Political opinion can not be included here

He calls an important historical fact about Armenia: Political opinion. Which proves that Maurice07 cannot edit these articles due to his strong political POV. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 15:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

He has also deleted the Armenian name for Diyarbakir without an edit-summary. He is clearly not here to build a better and more neutral encyclopedia. Anyhow, I don't want to clutter DQ's TP. I may have to request to increase his sanctions to ARBAA2. But more importantly, as of now, I believe appropriate action towards his push for a Turkish agenda in an Armenian articles and his disruptive edit-warring is needed. Proudbolsahye (talk) 18:20, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

I have to agree. ARBAA2 is the only option available. DQ, I apologise for the intrusion. Best regards. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 21:09, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

• Hi guys, im actually on the road again today. I'll try andlook at this tonight, but I might not be home soon enough before bed, but I should be able to look tomorrow along with everything else. -- DQ on the road (ʞlɐʇ) 23:44, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

• Thank you very much DQ for your time. Please take as much time as you feel comfortable with. There's no hurry at all. Don't even look at this stuff before at least tomorrow. :) Take care. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 23:48, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

• As usual, biased and aggressive policies by Dr.K. I don't think he is neutral on this issue. This is actually, my contributions follow and wait for the opportunity to take revenge. Mount Ararat with the relevant sentence, a clear violation of WP:VAN.It's not in any way an acceptable jurisdiction by a user. Armenians may have some claims on Mount Ararat but should not imposed the main article of Armenia. I see a reasonable against it, but as long as the violation of the principle of impartiality! The edit of international status of Armenia, again removed. [4]. Lack of good grammar, can not be a reason to remove it. Just create a fait accompli. --Maurice (talk) 11:40, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

• Hi guys, so Maurice is only currently restricted under ARBMAC and not under ARBAA2. And his current sanction does not apply to any of the above as I don't see how Greece is involved in any of these edits. If you guys are looking for sanctions under AA2, I would prefer that this be considered by multiple administrators, and demonstrated clearly via a thread at Arb Enforcement. If you guys do get a thread going, I would be happy to review it then, but I would prefer not to make a ArbCom topic ban in an area I'm not completely familiar with and haven't been following since the last round alone. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 16:13, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

• Thank you DQ, I agree that we have to seek expansion of restrictions under AA2. Meanwhile he removed again the sentence about the historic importance of Ararat to Armenia which was supported by four Google books and he attacked in his edit summary by calling the referenced sentence vandalic. This editor is out of control. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 21:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

• Hi DQ. I just found out checking through his contributions that he has been socking in repeated violation of his Greek topics-related ban. Here is my report to Blade, who is familiar with his socking: Maurice redux. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 00:20, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

I've indeed taken a look, and that looks just like Maurice07 to me. As you're the CU DQ, I'll let you have the last word on this, but those are my thoughts. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 02:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

I have just filed for AA2. Proudbolsahye (talk) 19:54, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

I'll run over this tomorrow night. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 01:27, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi DQ. Blade has blocked Maurice07 for a total of six weeks for violating his topic ban under ARBMAC including today's extension of two weeks for socking. Now we have a wardrobe of rather obvious IP socks all geolocating in the same building in Istanbul and stored here. Is there some course of action you would recommend? Thank you as always. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 23:53, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

So I've looked things over. If he continues to IP sock, feel free to come back to me, and I'll look into rangeblock feasibility. Other than that, you guys are taking the appropriate actions in my view. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 13:06, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Whoever the original sockmaster is, he's operating out of 209.2.61.8 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 174.236.100.141 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) again.—Ryulong (琉竜) 03:13, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

 Done Dealt with as best as I could. For the record, anything related to unblocking Best Buy ranges, is DFTZ but there are some people who think these people might be the same person, but I haven't had the chance to look that deep. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 15:47, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

It's been brought to my attention (see my talk page) that User:Sibekoe is acting somewhat similarly to the apparent "sleeper" accounts you looked into recently. It doesn't seem a clearcut case to me, but you might want to take a look. Thanks, Victor Yus (talk) 06:11, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

At this time, without a second user, I don't see enough of a connection to run a check. I did check for sleepers on the original sockfarm yesterday, and there were none. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 20:56, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi DeltaQuad, just wanted to let you know I hit the 51-account creation mark today and have reapplied at the appropriate page, but as the approving admin in the matter, your word on the matter is what matters. Thank you. Cheers! -T.I.M^(Contact) 19:24, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

 Done. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 22:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)