User talk:Allen3/Archive7

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect (s). Since you had some involvement with the (s) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Jo9100 (talk) 20:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC) Jo9100[reply]

I hear what you are saying however someone had left the page in a re-direct loop and an article really needs writing so I have reduced the confusion rather than exacerbated it(5 syllables!!!!). There were several in the glasflugel section of list of aircraft, the others I left a note in but had finger trouble with glasflugel 604 (talk) 14:21, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On August 13, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sarah A. Bowman, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 08:15, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

I think Cavoliniidae was deleted in err. Please restore it if you can per [1]. I will check for circ. links etc. Many thanks.--Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:53, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am another member of WikiProject Gastropods. Cavoliniidae was a pretty good family article, I think I worked on it some yesterday. Cavolinioidea on the other hand is different, it is a superfamily article which should link to the family article. Now Cavoliniidae is reduced to being only a circular link on the Cavolinioidea page. I think maybe it is possible that User:JoJan, an admin, got rid of it by mistake, based on misunderstanding a note I sent him yesterday on his talk page. Thanks so much if you can restore it. Invertzoo (talk) 20:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have also asked JoJan about this. Invertzoo (talk) 21:15, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, me again. OK. Thank you very much for your kind explanation. I apologize: now it seems I am entirely wrong in thinking there ever was a Cavoliniidae article. I guess it was a false memory. I was doing a lot of editing that day and probably mixed it up with another closely similar superfamily. I am very sorry to have bothered you with what turned out to be a bogus request. Very best wishes, Invertzoo (talk) 23:53, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I did not blank that page, as it was already blank. It contained nothing but a redirect to the same article that linked to it, which is stupid, and far more liable to "confuse" people than mere absence of content. All I did was remove a redundant redirect, which is hardly of the same intent as someone who "blanks" a page. Where the idea that absence of content is "confusing" came from, I don't know, but it's a presumptuous idea, in my view.

Second, you might want to reconsider leaving template warnings to administrators whose editing tenure and edit count is almost the same of yours. Template warnings admonishing against things like page blanking is, as I've been told, intended for newbies, and is considered poor form when given to veteran editors. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 12:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just wondering why cascading protection isn't working for this image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:40, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I am still used to doing things old school. I first learned to perform updates before cascading protection existed and have seen enough reports about cascading protection not working as expected to have fulled abandon my original ways. Worst case, the image has two layers of protection. --Allen3 ^talk 21:49, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Allen3. You have new messages at Mobile Snail's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

MobileSnail 22:22, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. As a contributor to this article, you may be interested to know that I have taken it to AFD for discussion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin M. Emanuel (3rd nomination). Thanks in advance. Robofish (talk) 23:35, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for the rewrite of this article. I originally wrote it long ago (before I had an account even) and so it largely gets shuffled under the stack of paperwork, so to speak .. but it is nice to see it pop up on the watchlist with some good improvements. Good work! Shereth 15:16, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you check the DYK for special occasions, thnx.--23prootie (talk) 22:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to apologize for my overreaching assumption in 2nd Arizona Territorial Legislature. Circeus (talk) 22:28, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I like to troll over at DYK and see what interesting stuff people are working on ^__^. Amongst my own interests are 19th century Quebec scientific history, so I understand exactly where you come from. Circeus (talk) 23:09, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Allen3, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to TTSN has been removed. It was removed by ThaddeusB with the following edit summary '(flag for transfer to wiktionary rather than delete)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with ThaddeusB before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 23:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)[reply]

You caught me awake and by the computer. I have offered an alternate hook that addresses your concerns. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 09:43, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This nom had unresolved issues when it was promoted. It's now in queue 3. Could you restore it to the nominations page? Shubinator (talk) 18:23, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will do. On an unrelated note, it's best if you don't verify and promote in one step. Often issues are raised after a nom has been verified, so we usually wait at least a day before promoting (for example, Freeheld is almost all synopsis). Thank you for your help at DYK lately. Shubinator (talk) 18:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Allen. Please so not promote articles to the prep areas or queues that have not been approved with a or , like you did here with Mao Amin. Mistakes happen, and I understand if that is what happened here; I just wanted to be sure that you know. :-) Thanks, —Ed (Talk • Contribs) 04:14, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you go to Template talk:Did you know and put some closure on the two Berreyesa DYK nominations that you commented on earlier? The entries are at the bottom of the page by now, and need somebody to pass final judgment before they fall off into oblivion. Thanks! Binksternet (talk) 08:41, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Allen3. Corrections made to Firearms of Japan. Thanks! PHG ^{Per Honor et Gloria} 19:15, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On August 31, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2nd Arizona Territorial Legislature, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Jake Wartenberg 23:15, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Please see the discussion about the DYK for this article at [2]. Thank you. LiteraryMaven (talk • contrib) 14:47, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On September 4, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 15th Arizona Territorial Legislature, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Jake Wartenberg 17:15, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I just saw a hook for this article come up on my watchlist. Please could you tweak the hook to state that the scissor sisters being referred are the convicted killers? At present, it could cause confusion because it looks as if it could refer to the band of the same name. It might look as though the murders are attributed to them rather than the sisters that are actually being referred to :). Let me know what you think. Seraphim♥ 14:58, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some verbiage that should make it obvious that this is not referring to the band by the same name. --Allen3 ^talk 15:06, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect! Thank-you. Seraphim♥ 15:14, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think the problem that the article of Geumsansa is now fixed. Would you care to look into the DYK nom? Thanks. --Caspian blue 01:13, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Allen. Sorry for bothering you again, but I think the article is fine now since I've expanded and paraphrased some section and the original writer fixed all problems raised. I checked this with a detecting software[3], and it says the article is fine now. Please review the DYK entry again. Thanks!--Caspian blue 12:17, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! When updating a Did you know queue, please remember to upload the image to Wikipedia (if it's stored at Commons) and protect it. Otherwise, it's subject to vandalism. (I've protected this image at Commons.) Thanks! —David Levy 00:53, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Not sure what happened, but I made this change to the preparation area just recently, but I think you were in the process of copying to Q2 already and it didn't get transferred. Pls can you make the change to Q2 to this version as it is protected. As I said in the original e/s, I think an image of a flag will draw more people to DYK than a picture of a person. MickMacNee (talk) 17:55, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(You wrote)
Hello! Your submission of Trzy Korony at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Allen3 ^talk 16:40, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Please see my reply at Did you know#Trzy Korony. I hope it is sufficient. Cheers, Poeticbent talk 18:30, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Make sure there aren't unresolved issues when promoting a DYK article. Here the nominator had only responded to one issue and hadn't addressed the other. Shubinator (talk) 00:49, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Allen3, Hook 7 Q3 just needs a quick tweak to include the mp. Cheers. and thanks for helping out at DYK lately :) Calmer Waters 11:21, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Allen3 ^talk 11:49, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Queue 6 is free? Can it be added there. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:09, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bare urls fixed. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 04:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment here. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This promotion was not appropriate, the article is currently up at AfD and we generally do not feature articles on the main page when they have AfD tags on them (even if the AfD is getting a bunch of keep votes right now); it's better to wait out the end of the AfD. Also, while there's no official rule against it, it's generally best not to verify and promote the same articles yourself unless there's an urgent need for a queue to fill up; rather, you can just leave the on a nom, and someone else will promote it later, that way there are opportunities for people to double-check each other. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 23:30, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On December 3, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mason Brayman, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

SoWhy 20:49, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On December 4, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Baldwin Neil, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 02:49, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I'd like to inform you that I've reviewed some of your NPP activities at Wikipedia:Newbie treatment at CSD/Lankiveil. Happy for you to post any feedback that you might have either there or on my talk page. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:45, 5 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

On December 10, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John N. Irwin, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:21, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Allen, you have previously edited the redirect at Albanian genocide. If you remain interested, please see the discussion at Redirects for discussion. Grsz¹¹ 15:16, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Allen,

I'm Sean Dixon. You deleted my page.

I'm a bit embarrassed to be writing this, but I'll go ahead.

I don't know who set up that page, I did not ask for it or set it up for myself, but I'll confess I was proud of it once I saw it up here, and I was sad to see it taken down.

Whoever set it up seemed to have been prioritizing a novel I wrote a couple of years ago. It's the only achievement that was listed. In fact, I've written more than 15 plays and had them produced here in Canada, all over the country, over the last 20 years. There's plenty of evidence of my career online. I've had several of these plays published as well, been nominated for awards, and I've had some other publications as well. Children's books and such. When I was young, I helped found a theatre company that people learn about in Canadian Theatre history class at various universities here. It's a fact I normally consider to be funny, but in this case I'm trying to use it to prove that, while my page was up, I was a worthy subject for Wikipedia. All my fellow Canadian playwrights of similar status have such pages.

I understand why you took it down. I should have taken the initiative, once it was set up, to make it fully reflect my career. But it seemed self-aggrandizing at the time. Now it just seems like the practical thing to have done.

Any chance it could be restored?

Yours,

Sean Dixon (seandix at gmail dot com) Canada

70.30.138.179 (talk) 17:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure of which article you are referring to. While I did delete the article Sean dixon, the contents of that article ("good person") do not match the article you describe and considering the time between its creation and deletion it is unlikely you would have noticed its existence unless you were notified of the article at its time of creation. A search through logs of my last 12 to 18 months of admin actions show no other articles that come close to your name.

As there does not appear to be a valid article to restore, or even one containing a complete sentence, I see no reason to restore the article I deleted. That being said, there is no reason I am aware of preventing recreation of a new article (preferably with a correctly capitalized name). Please see Wikipedia:Your first article for more information on how to do this properly. --Allen3 ^talk 18:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete this page ? Could not you wait until someone has time to add more content ? Did it not occur to you that page is created few hours ago and might be updated soon ? J J Parikh 23:19, 16 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Parikhjigish (talk • contribs)

Sorry, I filled both preps (except for the leads) and will upload them shortly. Would you like to continue then ? Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 00:48, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the deletion of the "Tad Kepley" page, he is a real person. He is an infamous, provocative person who spends lots of time contacting and getting involved with anarchists and other radicals all over the U.S., and then causing trouble or behaving suspiciously. My personal opinion, having been visited, and hearing about his activities from others, is that he is either crazy, he belongs to an anti-anarchist group of some kind, or he is being paid by someone to collect information on and disrupt anarchist projects. He takes "more extremist than thou" positions, and a sincere extremist would have better things to do with his time, I would think, than visiting people he disagrees with and harassing them. He has a Facebook page and numerous publications on the internet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.161.229.100 (talk) 14:13, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article in question was deleted via an AfD discussion that found no evidence that sufficient reliable sources to produce a verifiable and neutral article existed (that is the primary meaning on non-notable on Wikipedia). Do you have any evidence that new sources have come into existence during the four-and-a-half years since the AFD discussion? --Allen3 ^talk 14:31, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying he is worthy of an article on Wikipedia, but when I followed the link from the Jason McQuinn article, I saw that his page was deleted because there was some question as to whether he was a real or mythical person. My point is, he is a real person, he does publish articles and they are posted on the internet. Just FYI, and you can decide where to go from there.114.161.229.100 (talk) 14:48, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secret Maryo Chronicles (four years ago), you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secret Maryo Chronicles (3 nomination). Tim Song (talk) 07:43, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I just set up a set for DYK in Prep 2

Since you do this fairly often- and this is my first attempt- can you take a look and see if I made any glaring errors? Thanks! Bradjamesbrown (talk) 16:32, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. I'll remember the biography for next time, but, IMO, it's a bit too much work to try and fix at this point. (Restoring one hook to the suggestions, then pulling another out.) Bradjamesbrown (talk) 17:18, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. Don't forget though, that when you change the bot cycle, you also have to change the value in the DYKrefresh template, here. Don't worry about it this time, I've done it already. Gatoclass (talk) 15:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Allen3. You have new messages just for you from Smithers7. Go over to his talkpage and check it out!

---

Once you have read and/or replied to the message, you can take this template down by simply removing the {{user:Smithers7/tb}} from your talkpage.

smithers - talk - sign! 01:15, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Could you please help me, Armenian users keep preventing me to add historical score, when Armenia national football team did lost in 1997, to Georgia, which was their heaviest loss next to Chile game. Big thanks.--NovaSkola (talk) 04:34, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

for the DYK update. I know, things that end well usually go unnoticed. Materialscientist (talk) 12:35, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I know it's frowned on to canvass but can I ask for you help in a special circumstance? I made an article today on a 7 year old boy, Charlie Simpson who has been fundraising for Haiti and so far has raised £150,000 ($242,000). I've put it up for DYK today. Is there any chance it could be 'fast-tracked' so that it can appear in the DYK column today to catch the zeitgeist, while it is still a 'hot' story and people are therefore more likely to donate to his cause? If you're not the person to apporach can you tell me where to go? Thanks. Stronach (talk) 15:08, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll head over there. Stronach (talk) 15:29, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The issue with the DYK nomination of The South Butt has been fixed. Can you pass it now? I want to get permisson from the founder and owner of South Butt to license it's logo under CC-BY-SA. username 1 (talk) 14:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Allen3. I tried finding admins to report this, and finally ended up here. My work is primarily based on nuclear related areas in Wikiproject Energy. The same areas where User:Johnfos works in. I have noticed that this user deletes discussions in his/her talkpage. As far as i know, this is not allowed. Could you please look into this (or pass this message on)? Cheers. Will. 119.235.14.140 (talk) 13:44, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As per Wikipedia:User page#Removal of comments, warnings, there is nothing in Wikipedia policy that prevents this type of action. --Allen3 ^talk 15:10, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect LiveDrive. Since you had some involvement with the LiveDrive redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Fsmmu (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please could you explain why you deleted File:Flag of the Commonwealth of Nations.svg? Please could you restore that file or point to its location on Commons? Bastin 00:49, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

It broke a number of templates - please advise what to do. --Pgallert (talk) 07:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion has caused a lot of disruption, why was it deleted? - Highfields (talk, contribs) 16:22, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, just read the messages you left the above - Highfields (talk, contribs) 16:26, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Could you undelete it? This file was deleted on Commons. But you should be able to restore the local copy that was here on enwp. Regards, /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:50, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer. Yes, I would try to fix the information. I had made a modified version of the file, fixing some inaccuracy. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 00:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Allen3. You have new messages at Template talk:Did you know.
Message added 01:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I have responded to your comment. ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ message • changes) 01:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Regarding your edit to Template:Wikipedialang, please note that Wikipedias containing more than 40,000 do not automatically qualify for inclusion; as noted in the template's documentation, "Wikipedias determined to consist primarily of stubs and placeholders are omitted."
Please see Template talk:Wikipedialang#Macedonian Wikipedia. Thank you! —David Levy 23:05, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Allen- thanks for fixing the bibliography at Rehydroxylation dating. I appreciate it. --E2eamon (talk) 01:39, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I'm complaining, but my article on Mimie Mathy appeared on the Main Page DYK twice. I traced the error to this edit, but perhaps it has its roots earlier? Abductive (reasoning) 08:43, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm trying to solve a dispute. An unidentified user keeps changing Noel Gallagher's personal identity from English (which I think is most accurate if you're born in England) to British. The user claims that because Gallagher says he "does not have a drop of English blood" in him, that automatically makes him British. Please help. Thanks.MauriceAgrippa (talk) 16:39, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Allen3, thank you for your assistance. The above note is not accurate--it is Noel Gallagher who states emphatically that he is not "English", I am not trying to "change" him, but rather represent what HIS belief/words dictate about what/how he is represented. The user says " which I think is most accurate", well Noel Gallagher doesn't agree. As much as that may bother those who, I believe, probably have a different preference that might just happen to match their own pov/preference--just a theory.....I've asked this person to also take it to the talk page, yet he/she is close to the 3rd revert

Hmmm, by the way It does seem rather peculiar that the MauriceAgrippa account appears to have been just been set up, and addresses only this particular point?? Odd?? Thank you.173.76.208.66 (talk) 22:13, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Allen3, I was wondering what your thoughts were on publishing the Manatee Palms Youth Services entry in the DYK section... it's based on a youth hospital that has been shut down twice by state officials in Florida for widespread abuse and neglect. Thanks. Tkfy7cf (talk) 18:52, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious why you reordered the hooks I had originally compiled when you moved them from prep 2 to queue 4. I thought the Guangzhou destroying angel hook was a much better quirky hook than the A.C.E. mixture hook. –Grondemar 22:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, links to not overlook:

• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=prev&oldid=361775610
• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&diff=prev&oldid=361779092

--Snek01 (talk) 23:48, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I would like to receive your additional comment on this Template talk:Did you know#Bathynerita naticoidea for progress on this. Thank you. --Snek01 (talk) 14:46, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re. Jan Brewer, unref'd additions, etc.

RealNaturopath (talk · contribs) is new; they asked in help why reverted. I'm sure it is for good reasons, but...I have encouraged the user to start a discussion on the talk page as best-practice, so please look in on it, Talk:Jan Brewer#"Dr." John Brewer - truth about career in Arizona. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  22:34, 13 May 2010 (UTC) ${\displaystyle Insertformulahere}$[reply]

Hi - More careful reading of the Az Auditor report is required. Also, 2 articles from Az Rep confirm earlier statements. For some reason, John L Brewer is not listed on AZ Chiro or Naturo website as having ever been licensed there. Don't know why. Apologies for having offended anyone. First time on wiki and I'm obviously far from a computer wiz. I just can't believe she was made governor. I was personally offended that the years of damage (I mean service) he did to naturopathic profession and to patients especially is not readily available. If the Bio said he was a "successful chiropractor AND naturopath and served on the NP BOMEX Board" I probably would not have pushed it so hard. So, I am done. Unless of course this verifiable info I provided disappears. There is so much more to this story but it is ugly and hurtful to many patients. The bare facts stand for themselves. Best wishes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.144.76.155 (talk) 23:21, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to address your concerns with the hook, hope its sufficent. Calistemon (talk) 02:01, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

for this - I didn't notice that T:TDYK again glitched after my promotion. Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that I should let you know that my source for the Gothic hook wasn't offline. The source used was this (the only non-self published source that I could find with all of the awards). Joe Chill (talk) 22:55, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thought you might want to know, the aero specs missing template isn't a stub template (which would, in the case of the Boeing Phantom Ray article that caught my attention this way, Template:aero-2000s-stub), but a totally different critter that IMHO shouldn't be a DYK problem if it's on an article - since the specs don't count torwards the 1500 characters. :) - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 19:34, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I can understand that completely. :) - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 19:47, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since you participate in DYK a lot, do you think that you can explain to Wilhelmina Will what 5x is?: User talk:Wilhelmina Will# Abraxas sylvata. Joe Chill (talk) 22:29, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It appeared that what I said wouldn't persuade him. Joe Chill (talk) 22:46, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it. Buggie111 (talk) 22:29, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You beat me to it! Good job :)--White Shadows ^{stood on the edge} 00:02, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

well there wouldnt be an edit war if there was an actual discussion on the talk page instead of what is currently there. 67.246.175.103 (talk) 05:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious — was his wife really named "Cathanne", or is this a typo? Nyttend (talk) 13:22, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, okay; I overlooked the fact that your References section included a Google Books link in your references section, so I assumed that it was a print source. What an unusual name...thanks for the reply! Nyttend (talk) 13:36, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On June 27, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Edward A. Stevenson, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On June 27, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article William M. Bunn, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:02, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for finding my mistake at T:TDYK#National Library of Indonesia. I have addressed your concerns at the nomination. Arsonal (talk) 17:15, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You know how it is Allen - updating DYK is the kind of job where nobody says a word about all the times you get it right, but only when something goes wrong :)

I noted that in Prep 2 today, all eight hooks are US-related. I don't know why you did this, but I can't imagine it was at all necessary when you have 100 verified hooks to choose from. We will get complaints if this one goes to the main page, so I will probably substitute a couple of non-US hooks at some stage. Please try to pay a little more attention to this issue. Other than that, thanks once again for your contributions. Gatoclass (talk) 01:45, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! Misread the diffs. Sorry. I forgot that people sometimes shuffle updates around from one prep to another these days. Gatoclass (talk) 03:38, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prep 1 needs moved to Queue 4. Since it has one of my noms in it, I'd prefer someone else do it. Can you take care of it? Thanks. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:18, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article itself has now been modified to assert only what the source states and not require anyone to do any math or look up release and/or filming dates elsewhere. I responded at the Richard Madden entry at Talk DYK with an alternate hook that will not confuse. Thanks much, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:04, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Allen3 has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, and therefore, I've officially declared today as Allen3's day! For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian, enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Allen3! Peace, Rlevse 00:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On July 30, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Henry Kinkead, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. You recently participated in a discussion at WP:ANI regarding the systematic removal of Media Matters for America as a reliable source. I've started an RfC regarding MMfA, MRC, FAIR, Newsbusters etc. Please participate on the Reliable Sources Talk page here. Skoal. Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 12:17, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On August 2, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lyman Enos Knapp, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have proposed an edit for the mainspace of an important Wikipedia policy, the Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources policy. Essentially, I believe that some sources are so partisan that using them as "reliable sources" invites more problems than they're really worth. You've previously participated in the RfC on this subject, or another related discussion indicating that you are interested in this important policy area. Please indicate here whether you support or oppose the proposed edit. The original discussion is here. Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 12:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]