User talk:Allen3/Archive4

Your urgent help would be most appreciated here. -- Jreferee 21:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rush Limbaugh, Sr., which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		Thank you. Will 22:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lucceius Albinus, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 05:49, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for archiving the Guide to Science peer review for me. I'm just trying out these more unusual areas of wikipedia and hadn't realised that they were archived on being put forward for FA status. GDallimore (Talk) 12:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a vandal on here who is trying to get me blocked, I don't know why, he is User:Glfootball92.

Southluver 12:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barters 00:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC)How come my article on Waz Ahayer was just deleted?Barters 00:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You recently did a CSD of Ècole Fairview School ... would you please zap Ecole Fairview School as well? Thnx! —72.75.73.158 (talk · contribs) 11:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been expanded to the point where I do not believe it fits any speedy deletion criteria. --Allen3 ^talk 12:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spring Heeled Jack has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Resurgent insurgent 01:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Danielle Taylor, by Zeibura, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Danielle Taylor is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Danielle Taylor, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Danielle Taylor itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am a contributor to wikipedia, every now and then. Well lately I've been updating the LSHS page (because it's my HS) and it keeps getting vandalized. My guess is that the vandals are other students from the school as well. Anyways, just yesterday [May 31] a vandal by the name of JUSTBLAZE13 vandalized the article again. Here is proof: history page. Can you please block him for an appropriate amount of time? Thank you for your time. Squishy Vic 08:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To let you know, he/she [JUSTBLAZE13] vandalized the article [LSHS] again. Squishy Vic 04:29, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very well. --Victor [talk] 22:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have never had a peer review where I did not at least get an automated peer review before. What happened with the Wikipedia:Peer review/Haystacks (Monet)/archive1 peer review? TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 16:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for not making my query clearer. I do not question why you archived my peer review. I question why there was no automated peer review. This was my first peer review that closed without one. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 11:30, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Allen3, I note you archived my peer review request because it was over 1 month old with no reviews being done. Do you know what my next step should be to improve this article? —WikiLen 19:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Allen. A while back you deleted Talk:M.R.M. Parrott, after its associated article's VfD. The talk page, however, was an archived deletion debate of an earlier VfD and is now a red link on Wikipedia:Archived delete debates/Jan to Apr 2004. This comes up as a result of this post at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. We are attempting to restore all the red links in the archived logs. Can you restore the page? Note the archive message at the top of this page as an example, that has been tailored for such talk page archives. Thanks in advance.--Fuhghettaboutit 03:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Allen3 ^talk 08:40, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Thanks.--Fuhghettaboutit 11:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I notice that you, along with others, have deleted the page Fring stating that it is "advertising". Now the page is blocked and cannot be recreated until it is unlocked. I do not know what was written on the page before you, or others, deleted it so I cannot say that what was written wasn't advertising. However, the software itself is redfining the use of VoIP and is a product unlike any other that I have heard of. It is similar to MSN Messenger, Yahoo Messenger, ICQ, Skype and many more (it even incorporates some of those applications into itself) but is a lot, lot more. One of the differences between Fring and those that I have mentioned is that it is completely free. There is no advertising in the software unlike MSN, Yahoo, Skype, ICQ etc so it in itself is not promoting anything that will make it money. If the applications that I've mentioned warrant having articles then surely Fring does considering that it is a completely new application unlike anything else available. Please consider reinstating this page so that it can be written about. Thx. Smaunsell 15:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In a comment you left on a DYK nom, you stated that the article was too short, and that 1500 characters is a preferred minimum. Are you aware of a tool for easily counting characters? I'm continuing to expand the article (there are a lot of sources to cull through!), and would like to keep track of when it gets big enough to meet the requirements. Thanks! AKRadecki^Speaketh 04:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Carl Hayden, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--PFHLai 08:04, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As someone with whom I have reviewed or worked with on an article or talk page, I humbly request your assistance in reviewing the Aggie Bonfire page for Featured Article status. Any/all constructive input is welcomed and appreciated on the FAC nomination page, but please read the instructions for reviewing before you make a comment. Thanks in advance for your assistance. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:58, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Allen3

Please see the article in my talk page on fring and provide help getting it added. Thanx

Goplett 10:44, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx for the help Allen, would you be so kind as to help me edit the article a little, I am suffering to understand the reference thing. Your expertise would be greatly appreciated. I wouldnt like to jeopardize the article just because I was to stupid to do it correctly.

Any help would be nice

thanx simon

Goplett 20:50, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[1]

Then I'll wait until the (inevitable) indictment and/or guilty plea. Then I'll tweak the sentence to avoid BLP and re-post it. WhisperToMe 14:27, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=3569089 - A not guilty plea was entered on her behalf. It seems like she has been charged already. WhisperToMe 14:29, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.statepress.com/issues/2007/09/07/news/701640 = The university stated that it will clarify/examine policies regarding Residential Life due to the Harrison/Henderson fiasco. WhisperToMe 19:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Allen, I think you're doing a great work at the DYK. But, please, don't bypass the nomination process as you did here with Kazanowski Palace, which was contested for being not yet ready for the front page. --Camptown 20:40, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This facile attitude to the Main Page articles is indeed striking. I infer there was some IRC discussion endorsing Allen's actions. Otherwise it does not make any sense at all. --Ghirla^-трёп- 12:43, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could we try to be a bit more mature on the PETA talk page? Thank you. 75.3.227.93 03:21, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry that you were offended by this edit asking for a sufficiently detailed citation that it is possible to find the article upon which you claim to base your accusations of criminal conduct. It is easy to understand that the embedded URLs showing the newspaper you said published the article has no stories by the alleged author could tend to cause embarrassment. It was not may intention to humiliate you, only to obtain the enough information to satisfy Wikipedia's requirements for verifiability. --Allen3 ^talk 07:42, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? was updated. On 11 September, 2007, a fact from the article James Jurin, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--++Lar: t/c 23:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Often dates don't get moved to expired immediately after day5. Did you see my query to hold open the date awaiting an AFD?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 00:51, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have never heard of an article making the main page after its date was moved to expired and thought active noms were the ones that have issues being worked out.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 02:17, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the DYK on Alexandru Papana. I really appreciate it. Chris 00:47, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the Sep 11 DYK noms with a live discussion going on about Ross Detwiler. It had been on the main page from 05:00, 18 September 2007 - 09:33, 18 September 2007. It was removed as too short. Thus, it was on the main page for over 4.5 hours. Should its talk page have a DYK tag on it. Should it have been put back on the main page after I added the necessary text on the 18th? Please advise.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 16:57, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really think that picture is the most interesting of the pictured features? I am partial to my own Pavilion pictures, but maybe I am having a tough time being objective.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 14:14, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• ... that a double picture nomination made my day? Thanks Victuallers 14:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying me that a fact I added to the Kallawaya page is on today's "Did you know". I appreciate this very much.Rosiestephenson 17:52, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Missed that -- Samir 00:49, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually User:IvoShandor created or expanded British Band. I wrote the hook. Regards, --Mattisse 01:20, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, guess I looked in all the places it wasn't! Kind regards, Benea 19:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um... I'm flattered that this has been included, but have just realised that I didn't catch an error. Bird's debut was actually twelve years later, in 1946. I got that right in the article, but didn't notice when you posted your previous comment to my User talk page a few days ago. I'm rather embarrassed now! Though I suppose it was probably "eleven-and-a-bit years", since he was likely to have been on the Warwickshire staff until September 1934, and made his Worcestershire debut in early May 1946! Loganberry (Talk) 15:51, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, both for the update and for the pointer to where to report such things in future. Loganberry (Talk) 16:36, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know you archive the old PR requests and figured you'd know what to do about this: Erik Chisholm has two separate peer review requests. Thanks for all your work on Peer Review, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 13:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second request that was originally submitted to Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Peer review has been archived from Wikipedia:Peer review. --Allen3 ^talk 13:50, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of that. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 14:36, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The DYK Medal
		Just a note to thank yoiu for all the DYK updating that you do. It is a largely thankless task that goes relatively unnoticed - no talk page notifications for the updater - but makes all the difference to the article writers and nominators. -- !! ?? 22:07, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the double-DYK nod. But I can't take credit for the Charles B. Thompson article. That's Snocrates who did the good work there. - Tim1965 00:45, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your contribution indeed. CeeGee 18:12, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say thanks. I feel appreciated. athinaios 20:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for picking this article. I was worried that it was an expired nom.. but was in fact a better article than others of mine which have been successful. It would worry me if the articles I thought were good were chosen in preference to puffy stubs. Congrats on deserved DYK award above. Your work is appreciated. Victuallers 20:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Grin, I did think Ebenezer Rhodes was gone and forgotten. I thought he was particularly noteworthy as he had gone bust over his enthusiasm for publishing .... some parallels with wikipedians? Thanks! Victuallers 15:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC) Again some more thanks Victuallers 10:20, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the star on The Kandy-Kolored Tangerine-Flake Streamline Baby, Allen, but all I did on that one was to suggest a reduced-length hook. In fact, part of my suggestion was added to the original hook! I can comment it out myself if you want...  :)

Also, I'm just wondering whether my nomination for Jannie du Plessis will get in. It won't be any skin off my back if it doesn't, but it's been sitting in the "expired noms" for two days now, and no one other than me has commented on it. My comments were to note the length of the hook, and remind updaters that he in fact played in the 2007 Rugby World Cup, which makes the item timely. Also, I haven't see too many other South Africa-related hooks lately. — Dale Arnett 17:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for posting about the Klaus Nordling DYK! Very cool to know! --Tenebrae 12:41, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like I'm not the only one thanking you, but I still want to do it. Seeing "my" article Urania sloanus (I know it's not mine... but I'm still the only contributor) on the DYK this morning was a great suprise! Thank you. Pro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 13:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is a Public Federal Prisoner Institution's postage mailing address included with the said widely publicised criminal considered "personnel? Explaining why a Prisoner's ID is structured in that specific format for a specific individual ( IE random /and Arresting authority) - it that personnel? To arbitrarily just wipe out an edit with a "personnel info" conotation is somewhat ludicrous. Federal Prisoners lose most of their first amendment rights not Vice versa. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.25.48.34 (talk) 09:22, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, I just made a comment on the hook. I had nothing to do with the article itself. Daniel Case 20:52, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are a hardworking guy, thank you very much for your work, it is much appreciated Taprobanus 14:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK is almost 6 hours late! Are you working on this (getting it on the main page)? Mrs.EasterBunny 16:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was working on the thank yous (credits) and did 2 before I started to duplicate your work. Thanks. Mrs.EasterBunny 16:21, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, some of the articles and authors didn't get credited yet but I don't want to cross wires with you. So far: Colombian folklore, Carlos Eugenio Restrepo, Andrew Winch, Coyote Gulch are among those not given the DYK credit yet. Mrs.EasterBunny 16:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your DYK note regarding Origins of Falkland Islanders; please note that the article has been written (and is being further developed) jointly with JacobNapoleon. Apcbg 19:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of municipalities in Lycoming County, Pennsylvania is now at WP:FLC. I was going to try and archive the PR request myself (add {{oldpeerreview}} to the talk page) but then I was unsure what else to do, and reverted it. Thanks for all your work here, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 12:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks, I believe I have archived it successfully. In appreciation for all you do for Peer Review, please accept this barnstar:

On October 30, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Henry F. Ashurst, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:25, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Allen. I'm not sure if you noticed but there's been much discussion at the Wikipedia:Content review/workshop about some reforms to PR. One idea was categorizing the page, which I have raised here. Someone mentioned that you help with archive maintenance on PR, so I thought you might have a comment. Cheers, Marskell 08:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Allen, when you have time, please take a look at this. Thanks Taprobanus 19:44, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was in the process of tagging this page for CSD when you deleted it, and the page got tagged anyways, so it got accidentally re-created. Would you mind deleting it again? lol, thanks. Tiptoety 00:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Tiptoety 00:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Allen, I'm wondering how pages about other indpendently-publshed games such as: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InSpectres http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houses_of_the_Blooded meet the notability guidelines and mine (based on the format of the above) did not? Please advise...? Thanks, Mogwai66 (talk) 13:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Allen, Further to my query - I just read your "Wikipedia:Spam" page and can see why my article was marked for deletion. I obviously got the wrong idea about what Wikipedia was.. Having said that, I'd still like an answer from you on how the abovementioned pages exist given that they are pretty much the same as what I put up.. You can understand my confusion... Cheers, Mogwai66 (talk) 13:27, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to start an article about the band, but noticed that the article had been speedied under A7 by you in August. Googling for some online sources to back up sufficient notability turned up nothing spectacular, but maybe it's still enough to warrant an article now?

• Hornet (Fullerton College news site): Gram Rabbit Hops Back With Unique Third Record
• Fox 6 featured them on Fox Rox[2]
• IGN.com interview with member Jesika Von Rabbit: Gram Rabbit: 11 Questions
• "Press Enterprise" PE.com: [3]
• neumu.com Gram Rabbit's Desert Visions
• "The Sun Runner" thesunrunner.com interview: The exaltation of the Royal Order of Rabbits
• HitSession.com: review of Cultivation album
• various LA Weekly hits, e.g. [4], [5]

I wouldn't want to see the article instantly deleted again, so I'll not created unless you agree those sources are sufficient to warrant inclusion. |dorftrottel |talk |20:19, November 22 2007 (UTC) 20:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks, going to set it up then. I dorftrottel I talk I 23:11, November 22, 2007 23:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the above article per the discussion here contains the following acknowledgment/disclaimer:
"This article incorporates text from the United States National Library of Medicine, which is in the public domain. "
and therefore is not a copyright violation. I would appreciate if you would restore the article. Cheers. Boghog2 (talk) 11:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Allen3 ^talk 12:02, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick response! Boghog2 (talk) 12:08, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that this sentence has three factual errors. I gave it the benefit of the doubt that Ashurt MAY have attended the constitutional convention. The convention was i 1910. It was presided over by George Hunt. Ashurst was not a delegate. Perhaps someone should check their facts before vandalizing edits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WildGooseWest (talk • contribs) 13:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments make it clear that you are confusing the 1910 convention that initially wrote Arizona's state constitution with the 1911 convention that adopted the constitution. It should also be noted that your argument is ultimately not with me but with the publisher of the cited source. If you actually wish to check the New York Times article, the information is located in the first sentence of the second full paragraph in the rightmost column under the picture of Ashurst. If you are unhappy with this one source then a second source that provides the same information is: Johnston, Alva (December 25, 1937). "The Dean of Inconsistency". The Saturday Evening Post 210: 23,38-40. (Look at the last page of the article in the section entitled A Redheaded Rival.) --Allen3 ^talk 20:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The fact remains that the Arizona Constitutional Convention was in 1910; George Hunt was the president of the convention; and Henry Ashurst was not a member. In 1911 the Congress deliberated the constitution. My only sources are the constitutional notes in the Arizona Revised Statutes, Annotated, 2001 and the Minutes of the Arizona Constitutional Convention, 1910, but they seem to agree and are accepted by the Arizona Secretary of State. Neither document is available to the public on the internet, although the annotated ARS is available by subscription to WestLaw. Your comment, “Please stop changing dates and actions so that they differ from the source cited at the end of the changed sentence,” illustrates the major criticism of Wikipedia: Facts are what ever public opinion thinks they are.WildGooseWest (talk) 23:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Allen3. Please consider adding your admin username to the growing list at Classification of admins. Best! -- Jreferee t/c 22:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I posted the the recent Post on 'Charlie-Sloth' Why is this blatant advertising? I have plans to create a page for every UK hip-hop artist who has achieved incredible things in 2007... These artist's deserve to have there details on here when they are successful artist's in there own right.

I have showed were i sourced the info from,please assist me in this problem.

Thanks

Mark —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrinfo66 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As per the message on your talk page and the deletion log, the reason I deleted the article in question was that the majority of the text was a word-for-word copy of the text from a copyrighted web page. For information on the actions of other admins, I recommend you try contacting the admin who actually performed the action in question. --Allen3 ^talk 16:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please add in the Hezbollah milestones that the last peer review is archived on December 4, 2007. Thanks.--Seyyed(t-c) 08:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Miniclip has a page, why shouldnt googlegum

Windrangers (talk) 18:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]