User talk:Allen3/Archive12

On 11 May 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William K. Meade, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that U.S. Marshal William K. Meade organized the liberation of Arizona Territorial Governor C. Meyer Zulick from imprisonment in Mexico? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William K. Meade. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:09, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 May 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William H. Barnes (jurist), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the foreman of a grand jury in the Wham Paymaster Robbery case complained that judge William H. Barnes (pictured) was exerting inappropriate influence on government witnesses? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William H. Barnes (jurist). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Thanks for helping Victuallers (talk) 22:23, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could perhaps go back and review again your rewrite of Wham Paymaster Robbery. I mention this because of the close conjunction of two or three puzzlers:

"suspension" vs. "suspicion"

"prejudges" vs. "prejudices"

"a series of witness"

and there was at least one other small nit, but I've just spent a couple hours on my "wiki-drama" addiction and am too befuddled to remember, having finally backed up to here. Anyway, maybe that paragraph or two was written too late in the wee hours?  :-) Shenme (talk) 22:23, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 May 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wilfred T. Webb, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Wilfred T. Webb delivered Arizona's official 1912 electoral vote certificate a day late because he stopped en route to Washington D.C. to court his future wife? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wilfred T. Webb. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Thanks for helping Victuallers (talk) 22:24, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 May 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Octavius D. Gass‎, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that despite being a Nevada resident at the time, Octavius D. Gass served as President of the Council (upper house) during the 4th Arizona Territorial Legislature? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Octavius D. Gass‎. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:04, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 June 2014, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2014 Belmont Stakes, which you recently nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦C 04:49, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[1] EEng (talk) 14:33, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:ADMINACCT, "Subject only to the bounds of civility, avoiding personal attacks, and reasonable good faith, editors are free to question or to criticize administrator actions. Administrators are expected to respond promptly and civilly to queries about their Wikipedia-related conduct and administrator actions and to justify them when needed." I am questioning your administrative action, and I would like you to respond promptly and civilly to my query about your Wikipedia-related conduct. You recently promoted a DYK to the main page that was problematic. This was pointed out before you promoted the DYK hook on the main page errors section. You had previously said that part of the procedure for promoting DYK hooks was reviewing the main page error section. Did you fail to do that, miss the comment on the promoted hook or decide the comment was not relevant, or something else? Thanks. Hipocrite (talk) 17:46, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let's move this conversation over to my talk page. Normally, the Main Page would have been updated by DYKUpdateBot, which does not currently check WP:ERRORS. The promotion of a DYK set from the queue to the Main Page is fairly mechanical, and it's unconstructive to question "administrative action"s when volunteer admins are simply stepping in for a lazy bot. DYK needs more admin help, not less. Shubinator (talk) 04:36, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shub, Don't pay too much attention to Hipo. This is just part of his pattern of either twisting or manufacturing facts and then using these false claims to pick a fight. In this case he is referring to this comment by me from April 30 (strange how Hipo never provides edit links). As an examination of the comment shows, I did not claim that "reviewing the main page error section" was "part of the procedure for promoting DYK hooks" as Hipo claims. The referenced comment instead discusses an after the fact review of a separate complaint which found no reports at either Talk:Main Page or Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors during a time period in which Hipo claims a problem was occurring. You spotted the other big falsehood in Hipo's message in that I was not "promoting DYK hooks" as Hipo claims but instead manually performing a task normally performed by DYKUpdateBot, a fact supported by the specific actions performed and my edit summaries ([2], [3], [4]). Combining these false claims in Hipo's latest comment with the fact his actions have been previously described as "an attempt at hounding an editor out of an area of the project because of a personal dislike" and "attempting to hound people off the project for doing things you personally dislike" it is becoming increasingly difficult to believe he is acting in good faith and thus Wikipedia:Our social policies are not a suicide pact clearly applies. --Allen3 ^talk 23:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)--Allen3 ^talk 23:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance you could throw together an update or two? You don't need to worry too much about error-checking - I'm doing the error checking as I load them into the Queue. The next update is only three hours away now and the prep area is still empty. Gatoclass (talk) 08:34, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on it. --Allen3 ^talk 08:51, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Gatoclass:, Prep 3 has a completed set. Starting to assemble a set in Prep 4. --Allen3 ^talk 09:13, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Allen - much appreciated :) Gatoclass (talk) 09:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 July 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Winfield Scott (chaplain), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Winfield, Kansas, was named in honor of Winfield Scott in return for his promise to build the town a church? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Winfield Scott (chaplain). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:46, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Yes, I will add more inlined references. I'll start with those two I've been using and then add yours as well. Btw, I wonder is he was related to George Webb Slaughter? Apparently not, even though they were both early ranchers.Zigzig20s (talk) 21:24, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also off topic but I see you are based in Plano--how wonderful. Are you able to take pictures there for Wikimedia Commons? Within the county or not? I love Texas and hope to return soon! Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 21:25, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen that film, so I am not sure what you mean. I have removed the tag now because almost everything is referenced (except for his children, but hopefully I will fix that soon). One reference says he grew up on a Southern plantation, but unfortunately it doesn't look like it would be anything on the National Register of Historic Places listings in Sabine Parish, Louisiana. Perhaps someone at the Museum of the Confederacy would know. By the way, do you know if we could create a succession box for the sheriffs after him? (It looks like he was the first one in the county?) The current sheriff is this guy. It's a detail, but I feel like it helps a lot to get more details and move away from folklore, back to reality, for an encyclopedia.Zigzig20s (talk) 23:04, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also don't have access to the two books you mentioned. And I have moved the paragraph about poker to the talkpage until we can find some references for it.Zigzig20s (talk) 23:13, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, I have no access to those books on Google Books. It's a no-preview affair I'm afraid. I am in Australia at the moment--perhaps that explains why. Do you think the current sheriff should have his own page, or would that get deleted due to lack of notability? I love details, but I know not everyone does. He's also been in the news.Zigzig20s (talk) 23:54, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I raised some concerns at Talk:John Horton Slaughter that I'd like you to look at. Basically, someone added info with inlined references today, and they are also using a reference which looks invalid to me (a travel website). It is dispiriting to see some of my work reversed. Let us know what you think. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 15:32, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Can you please take this to Talk:John Horton Slaughter? I still think his Desert USA link is invalid. It may claim to cite other sources on its website, but it could be completely made up. It's not an academic book or journal article, nor is it a newspaper article, etc. So, there may be grounds to simply delete the paragraph he added on Slaughter as a poker player. I don't mind having this info if we can find good, reliable sources though. It would be very interesting to learn more about the history of poker (which I still need to learn how to play!). But this really needs to be backed up by good sources. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 15:43, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I am Andrew with GameStakers (https://www.gamestakers.com/), a game review website that also interviews game developers. On every wiki page for a video game, there are links to reviews for it. Apparently, permission is needed to post the links. My website is about writing reviews and I would like to link the reviews through the wiki pages for the corresponding pages. Additionally, is it allowed to make a Wikipedia page for GameStakers? It isn't meant to advertise the site, but more to just explain about it.

Thanks GameStakers (talk) 17:20, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Allen3,

Could you please direct me to the right person in charge. The point is that I have published an article and it was deleted due to plagiarism reasons <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waste_Conversion_Pyrolysis>. We published such articles at some other sources but the authorship belongs to our Company. That's why I got the publication permission [Ticket#2014081410006267]. How can I recover my publication?

Thanks in advance!

Zhstefanovich (talk) 08:24, 9 September 2014 (UTC)Evgeniya Stefanovich[reply]

Sorry it has taken so long to respond, but when you decide to involve a previously uninvolved admin who had not edited during the five days previous to your message you run the risk that he may not return in a timely manner. I do not have WP:OTRS so I can not confirm if your ticket number provides the needed permissions to overcome the copyright concerns that prompted the original deletion. Looking at the deleted text, copyright considerations are not the only issue with this deleted article. As noted by the second admin to asked to undelete the article, the subject appears to no secondary sources while blurbs such as "We maintain a consistency in power generation because there is never a limit of waste material" make it clear the text was pulled from an advertising blurb and lacks the tone needed for an encyclopedia article. It makes no sense to undelete the article as no longer violating copyright just to turn around and immediately redelete it for one of its other critical flaws (Wikipedia:Spam or Wikipedia:Notability). As a result, I feel I must decline your request. --Allen3 ^talk 11:41, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

people in law
Thank you for quality articles about people in law, for Christmas, for your tireless work and reviewing around DYK, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (26 July 2010)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:50, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were the 242nd recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Allen3! I'm attempting to move my Creepypasta article from the sandbox to the Article space, but it seems that you've protected it in 2013. This was before the Wisconsin stabbings inspired by a story on the Creepypasta Wiki, and since your protection the cultural relevance of creepypasta has skyrocketed and gained notability in hundreds of news publications (both local and major). Thank you! Nozkrov (talk) 21:07, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate it if you could take another look at this article - you deleted it as G4. It has been recreated but as stated on the Talk page it is really close to meeting WP:MMANOT - far different from the case with the original AfD. What I would like to see is the page moved without Redirects to Cathal Pendred. CheersPeter Rehse (talk) 22:48, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@PRehse:. As there appear to be multiple interested parties, I have responded at Talk:'''Cathal Pendred'''. --Allen3 ^talk 23:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Peter Rehse (talk) 23:37, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uhhhhhh, do even know anything about Don Knotts? He's my uncle man, that's first hand accounts. #LittleKnotts — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.122.181.53 (talk) 12:37, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

While I never had the pleasure of meeting the man, I am able to follow URLs, perform simple web searches, and read an article's supporting sources. This allows a comparison between the information in published news sources and your vulgarly worded "corrections". You are not fooling anyone. --Allen3 ^talk 13:10, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

why was the site deleted? --Wuerzele (talk) 23:30, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Allen3. Thanks for promoting the DYK nom for The Idolmaster Cinderella Girls. It appears the hook is in prep area 1 right now, which seems like it will be moved to queue 1 and consequently be pushed to the main page on January 8 at 12:00 UTC. I am wondering if you could perhaps consider moving it to prep area 3, so that it will be on the main page on January 9 at 12:00 UTC instead to coincidence with the premiere of the anime adaptation? Thanks! -- クラウド６６８ 22:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cloud668: The reason I choose the hook dealing with Korea instead of the one dealing with the game's commercial relase in Japan is to minimize concerns about WP:NOTADVERTISING. Moving the hook as you suggest undoes most of this consideration and could place the hook in jeopardy of being pulled due to its promotional aspects. As a result, I feel it is better to leave the hook in its current location. --Allen3 ^talk 22:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the prompt reply. I understand your concerns with WP:NOTADVERTISING, but I don't see how having it coincide with the anime adaptation's airing time can be considered advertising, especially if the chosen hook is objectively written and does not pertain to the anime release at all. Personally, I also feel the chosen hook sounds more advertisement-like (to the South Korean market) than the first hook in the nomination regarding the Consumer Affairs Agency, if NOTAD is an issue. -- クラウド６６８ 23:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Albert Franklin Banta, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Albert Franklin Banta served as a member of the 12th Arizona Territorial Legislature under an assumed name? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Albert Franklin Banta. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 20:30, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Dear Allen3

I have just seen that you have deleted my Wikipedia page "World Calorie Currency" because of copyright infringement. But I can assure you, that I am the creator of the original dokument on http://www.scribd.com/doc/253498351/A-New-Money-Exchange-System-The-World-Calorie-Currency-WCC as you can see I got this notification Email below on [email protected], which is also the Email adress of the original domument creator (myself).

Kind regards

Jimmylone (Jimmy Zhou)

Wikipedia Notification Email:

Dear Jimmylone,

The Wikipedia page World Calorie Currency has been deleted on 25 January 2015 by Allen3, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Calorie_Currency.

Editor's summary: G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: from http://www.scribd.com/doc/253498351/A-New-Money-Exchange-System-The-World-Calorie-Currency-WCC

Contact the editor: mail: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/Allen3 wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Allen3

There will be no other notifications in case of further activity unless you visit this page while logged in. You could also reset the notification flags for all your watched pages on your watchlist.

Your friendly Wikipedia notification system

My nomination of Template:Did you know nominations/List of terrorist attacks in France was passed back on 12 Jan, but it hasn't been touched since then - has it been overlooked or forgotten about? Prioryman (talk) 19:24, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I think overlooked is probably the right diagnosis: the tick was near the end of the comment, and promoters are looking for easily visible ticks at the beginning/left of the line. I've moved the tick to the beginning of the comment where it's supposed to go. With any luck, someone will see it there, and reasonably soon. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:30, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure you're right. Thanks for doing that. Prioryman (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article C. G. W. French, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Arizona Territorial Chief Justice C. G. W. French reunited with and married "the love of his youth" late in life? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/C. G. W. French. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:22, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James P. T. Carter, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that James P. T. Carter was one of "three brave men" who escorted Andrew Johnson from Greeneville, Tennessee, to Washington, D.C. in June 1861? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James P. T. Carter. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:47, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article George U. Young, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that to the displeasure of the vacationing governor, Arizona Territorial Secretary George U. Young (pictured) used his power as Acting Governor to grant clemency to several prisoners? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/George U. Young. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 09:27, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted this page that was pending. We will recreate this again and hope it doesn't cause issues. Please let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abarcelo123 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Allen3. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Top 10 artists with the most number-ones on the U.S. Hot 100.
Message added 09:03, 12 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 — ₳aron 09:03, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sumner Howard, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Arizona Territorial Chief Justice Sumner Howard resigned to ease the appointment of John C. Shields, only to see Shields' nomination rejected by the United States Senate? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John C. Shields, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Arizona Territorial Chief Justice Sumner Howard resigned to ease the appointment of John C. Shields, only to see Shields' nomination rejected by the United States Senate? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Surly" braces? That's a new one on me. Thanks. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:30, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Brackets Curly? Not ill tempered? 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:34, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  My junior high math instructors called them curly braces, so that is the name I know them by. As for my typing skills, that is best left for another discussion. --Allen3 ^talk 13:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Computers have made me faster. But have had the opposite effect on my accuracy. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos Torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos Torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you haven't been promoting DYK hooks for a while (perhaps you joined that mass exodus last summer?). I missed your efficient and no-drama prep set building. Glad you're back! Yoninah (talk) 17:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Yoninah:, thanks for the kind words. It was actually the drama-fest about promoting Christian themed hooks to run on Easter Sunday that led me to cut back for a time. I will need to take a brief break in a day or two however. I have several nominations that have been approved but not yet promoted currently sitting at Template talk:Did you know‎, one in the special occasion requests area for March 17. Combine this with nominations which I have reviewed and it is slowly getting harder and harder for me to build balanced sets without promoting hooks which I have had prior involvement. --Allen3 ^talk 18:07, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of 24th Arizona Territorial Legislature at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:25, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 22nd Arizona Territorial Legislature, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 22nd Arizona Territorial Legislature gave final passage to a women's suffrage bill on St. Patrick's Day 1903? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/22nd Arizona Territorial Legislature. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have reviewed and approved the above nomination. I admire the explanation of judicial decisions in layman's language.

Georgejdorner (talk) 23:21, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Wood Porter, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Arizona Territorial Supreme Court Justice William Wood Porter's most recognizable feature was his nose? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Wood Porter. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I got used to DYK picture suggestions not being taken and normally don't argue, but for St. Valentin I'd like you to consider that a new article was created for a very unusual thing. I understand that we need women in March, - this could wait for April. "Justice suffers in great need" will be true then as it was in the 15th century and is now ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Francis Nichols, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that unlike most of Arizona's Territorial Secretaries, William Francis Nichols did not wish to become governor but instead declined an offer to be nominated? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Francis Nichols. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John H. Campbell, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Arizona Territorial Justice John H. Campbell married the widow of his law partner and fellow Associate Justice, Frederick S. Nave? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Frederick S. Nave, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Arizona Territorial Justice John H. Campbell married the widow of his law partner and fellow Associate Justice, Frederick S. Nave? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Henry C. Gooding, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that after being shot during an attempted robbery, Henry C. Gooding lived for over a decade with a bullet lodged near his heart? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Henry C. Gooding. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Allen3,

How does this special holding areas work? Do I have to remind users who are active at the prep such as yourself to place it on that special date? Or does it automatically do so? Mind you, that I'm specifically mentioning the April 24 article. Thanks. Étienne Dolet (talk) 18:50, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Drat! I've been staying away from prep building due to the Easter hooks, but thought that April 4 was out of the woods. Guess not. I'm just about to finish the set; could we move it to a later prep set when more open up? Yoninah (talk) 21:32, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I reverted the prep set. Do I have to revert all the hooks I promoted, or can you use them at a later date? (I don't plan to be working on DYK during Passover week.) Yoninah (talk) 21:39, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But don't we want all-Christian hooks on Easter Sunday? Yoninah (talk) 21:42, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. All good suggestions. But I just spent an hour building and then erasing a whole set, while neglecting my Passover cleaning. I'll leave it to you or others to build those preps. Thanks again. Yoninah (talk)

Hello,

As you so astutely guessed, the missing reference in the above was indeed Ahern. I have dubbed him in under References. Thank you for catching this omission.

Georgejdorner (talk) 17:06, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Allen3, I know very little about what happens with DYK after a nomination is approved, but I see your name around a lot, so I figured you or Mandarax might be one to ask: I recently submitted a nomination for Odubel Herrera, a baseball player who will be making his debut in Major League Baseball tomorrow ... is there any chance it makes the main page at all tomorrow, or am I too late? No problem if not, just thought it would be cool, although I understand it's all last second. Thanks. Go Phightins! 20:08, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Will also ping Yoninah. Go Phightins! 20:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ideasthesia, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:29, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article George Russell Davis, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in Wilson v. Territory of Arizona, 7 Arizona 47 (1901), Judge George Russell Davis found that bad spelling in a court finding was insufficient to overturn a conviction? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/George Russell Davis. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Thank you Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 24th Arizona Territorial Legislature, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 24th Arizona Territorial Legislature made it illegal to employ females in saloons and other establishments that served alcohol? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/24th Arizona Territorial Legislature. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Thanks for your help Victuallers (talk) 12:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(DYK discussion) I noticed you moved my ALT1 hook to prep area 6, instead of the primary hook, which was the hook verified and that was better (the one that mentioned The New Yorker). Could I please get that changed? Thank you. StewdioMACK ^{Talk page} 13:38, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --Allen3 ^talk 14:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eugene A. Tucker, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Eugene A. Tucker was the last Arizona Territorial Supreme Court justice to die? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eugene A. Tucker. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 12:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm really happy that Template:Did you know nominations/Ari Goldwag made the last slot. But this queue is running on Friday night, which is Shabbat in most places, so Orthodox Jews, who are his fan base, are not going to see it. Would it be possible to move it ahead to Queue 2? That would place it on Saturday night in Israel, and for a few hours after Shabbat in New York. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 16:59, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Yoninah (talk) 20:30, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joseph D. Bethune, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Joseph D. Bethune was appointed to the Arizona Territorial Supreme Court after the previous nominee's confirmation sparked a battle within the territory's Democratic party? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph D. Bethune. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Sunday on the wiki looks better with your contribution - Thanks Victuallers (talk) 15:07, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

You deleted my additions to the Mexican American War. I do not revert any edited additions, but I am wondering why. I added the options of the different peoples on both sides during the conflict. I think that is valid. It is definitely controversial, which I understand if it is unwanted, but is that the reason so much content was reverted?

Beliefs acted upon by peoples at the time are historical facts today. 99% of history id Context. I believe the additions were enlightening. Please actually read what I wrote at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mexican–American_War&diff=prev&oldid=657166540

Just want an explanation. I do not protest.

from William Sanderson. History UCLA, current Law Student.

• Rjensen appears to have provided a good summary of the initial set of problems with your edits on your talk page.[5] --Allen3 ^talk 10:10, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reflecting the Gerechtigkeitsspirale!

Did you know ... that a church's 1510 spiral of justice declares: "Justice suffered in great need. Truth is slain dead. Faith has lost the battle"?

The poem ends with "Praise the right thing".

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:50, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you happen to be building prep sets for Preps 3, 4, or 5, would you mind promoting Template:Did you know nominations/A.D. Roy and Template:Did you know nominations/Steeve Briois, per the special request notice on WT:DYK? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 13:50, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I and the other editors who worked on William Hung very much appreciate your prompt, kind, and helpful work! ch (talk) 18:24, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But there is no biography type without an already existing infobox type.--The Theosophist (talk) 13:15, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I notice that the article on Alexander Asher was nominated to appear as a DYK item and that it is scheduled to appear on 7th May. I uploaded the image which is to be used on the front page. I am surprised that this nomination has been successful. I am also surprised given how uninteresting the hook is and that is coming from someone who has a particular interest in the subject of UK politics and past MPs. In the past I have unsuccessfully nominated far more interesting DYKs. I read the nomination discussion and was none the wiser and hoped you might shed some light. Thanks. Graemp (talk) 14:51, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for troubling to explain your own process. I hope the quality of the nominations you sift through improves. Graemp (talk) 17:12, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charles M. Strauss, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Tucson, Arizona Territory Mayor Charles M. Strauss resigned because the city council overturned his veto? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charles M. Strauss. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:40, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is there still some problem with this Template:Did you know nominations/Raghunath Temple which needs further changes?--Nvvchar. 16:50, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 June 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ralph H. Cameron, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Arizona Territorial Delegate Ralph H. Cameron held a contract to operate a toll road inside the Grand Canyon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ralph H. Cameron. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:26, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Allen3, both DYKUpdateBot and DYKHousekeepingBot are down. I've notified Shubinator on his talk page. At the moment, the DYK main page update is about 95 minutes late. If you happen to see this, I hope you can do the update manually—you're the only one I can think of with experience taking care of this. Many thanks. I am about to post to WT:DYK to let people know the current status. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:27, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I love singing and singers but two in one prep is perhaps too much of a good thing ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Crested quetzal. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion, so any further spamming will be regarded as vandalism. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 209.104.250.2 (talk) 17:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to troll Wikipedia regulars, it would help if you performed a little fact checking before picking a template to slap on their talk pages. A check of the edit in question shows I added an internal link to an article detailing information on a technical term and not an external link as you claim. You may also find Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking#What generally should be linked useful in improving your understanding of the situation. --Allen3 ^talk 17:59, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was passing by and looking for anything on Dr. Mark Mayall, once a fairly prominent fellow in UK Conservative circles. I found that you had deleted his page as far back as 2006? I see that when it was put up for comment that all other "deletes" were from North Americans also. Is this not rather strange? Most of us here in the UK would not profess to know sufficient about your politicians or their local importance to call for deletions. Should this not be revisited? Regards, 86.172.58.168 (talk) 18:27, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article at Mark Mayall which I deleted was created by User:Dragqueen.britneyrose and extolled the virtues of "britney rose the pincess of dragqueens"(sic). It showed all the signs of being either a made up story or vanity article and article contents contained no apparent connection to any UK politician. An earlier version of the article, which actually dealt with a person named Mark Mayall, was deleted via this AfD. I was uninvolved with this deletion, but looking through the discussion and at the deleted text, the primary problem was a complete lack of sourcing for the article. Wikipedia policy is clear that the responsibility for locating and providing sources is on the person(s) adding information to the article, so the location of the individuals supporting deletion in the discussion is meaningless. If you are interested in doing the research required to locate appropriate sources then you should have no problems recreating the article via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. --Allen3 ^talk 19:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Allen3. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's articles for improvement, a project dedicated to significantly improving articles with collaborative editing in a week's time. Feel free to nominate an article for improvement at the project's Article nomination board. If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. Thanks for your consideration. North America1000 10:44, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for reviving the moribund prep building process with an outpouring of sets! Your dedication to keeping the DYK process afloat gives all of us hope that the process isn't entirely broken ... Best, Yoninah (talk) 13:56, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Allen3 - echo Yoninah's comment above. However Louis I of Hungary appears to have become a picture hook with no approval. Im just going to be bold and fix it. This is just to let you know what happened. Victuallers (talk) 13:23, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:REFILL may speed up edits like these. sst^flyer 07:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have been using the various cite templates long enough that the automated tool would not save that much time and I prefer to use the proper template instead of trying to force everything into {{cite web}}. --Allen3 ^talk 09:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Allen3. I would like to ask your opinion regarding Template:Did you know nominations/The Creeping Garden. Do you think this is a suitable topic for the upcoming Halloween? If so, should it be put in a holding area? Thank you for your time. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 16:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_9mNQICjn6DibxNr

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance you could check this kind of nomination is actually written in parsable English? The Rambling Man (talk) 19:54, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like we have a final Halloween hook for prep 6 - Template:Did you know nominations/Underworld: Next Generation. Could you do the honours? Prioryman (talk) 14:53, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 October 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Henry Buehman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "even the dead sit for Buehman"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Henry Buehman. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 July I issued a proclamation concerning the 5,000,000 article on Wikipedia. In accordance with that proclamation, I have reviewed the log or new pages created at and after the five millionth article and have determined that you were the first editor to create a page within the scope of the Military History WikiProject. Accordingly, then, I take great pride in issuing the following awards to you for your creation of the article Prosper P. Parker:

		The WikiChevrons
		For your creation of the article Prosper P. Parker, the first Military history WikiProject related article at or past the 5,000,000 article mark, you are hereby awarded the Military history Wikiproject WikiChevrons. Congratulations! TomStar81 (Talk) 13:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		For your creation of the article Prosper P. Parker, the first Military history WikiProject related article at or past the 5,000,000 article mark, you are hereby awarded this WikiProject Barnstar. Congratulations! TomStar81 (Talk) 13:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Biography Barnstar
		For your creation of the article Prosper P. Parker, the first Military history WikiProject related article at or past the 5,000,000 article mark, you are hereby awarded this Biography Barnstar. Congratulations! TomStar81 (Talk) 13:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I take great pride in joining the other Military history Project Coordinators, our editors and contributors in thanking you for helping our project get started on the 5-6 million article range with well sourced, well cited, and interesting military history biography article! For the military history WikiProject, TomStar81 (Talk) 13:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 November 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gustav A. Hoff, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that his support of a women's suffrage bill resulted in Gustav A. Hoff being labeled "Petticoat Hoff"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gustav A. Hoff. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is it too late to get QPQ credit for French destroyer Jaguar? It was my first review and I didn't know about that. Inkwell765 (talk) 17:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 November 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James Henry Wright, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite his service in the Confederate States Army, James Henry Wright was given a military funeral with U.S. Army soldiers marching at the head of the procession? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James Henry Wright. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 November 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lionel M. Jacobs, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lionel M. Jacobs and his brother operated an arbitrage business that exchanged greenbacks for gold coins? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lionel M. Jacobs. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Owen Thomas Rouse at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 November 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article George W. Cheyney, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Arizona Territorial Superintendent of Public Instruction George W. Cheyney (pictured) resigned his office to serve in the territorial legislature? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/George W. Cheyney. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:01, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 November 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hiram M. Van Arman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Arizona Territorial Secretary Hiram M. Van Arman was described as "a man of mediocre ability, a good absorber of whiskey and considered a little 'off' among his acquaintances"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hiram M. Van Arman. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Allen3, Reviewed and gave you a tick. But I was wondering about adding a picture to the nomination? Happy Thanksgiving to you! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:00, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen, thanks for adding an image of the Arizona State Capitol to the article. A group photo of the session members probably exists, but would almost certainly reside in one of the state's archives. Arizona law requires payment of a fee for commercial use of any records or documents created or maintained with public funds. Places such as the Arizona Historical Society and Sharlot Hall Museum are covered by this restriction because they have received public funds in the past. Arizona archives also tend to not provide information about prior publication, so it can be hard determining what images are no longer under copyright. Given the difficulty in finding free images of historical Arizona events, and my personal preference to minimize fair use items, I tend not to even look for suitable images for this type of article. It is nice that you spotted a free image that is appropriate to the article. --Allen3 ^talk 15:20, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was pleased to find it. Too bad we can't get a group picture. Although there might be one on Flickr. User: Doug Coldwell is great at finding that sort of thing. It would be prior to 1923, so there is no copyright question.

The question still perseveres: Do you want to add the present picture to the DYK and amend the hook? 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:24, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1910 Photograph of the 25th Arizona Territorial Legislature members Sharlot Hall Museum, Prescott, Arizona Here is a picture of the 25th Legislature. Given its age, it cannot be in copyright. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:27, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen, actually it can easily still be under copyright. By default, unpublished works in the United States are copyrighted for 120 years from date of creation. Once a work is published the copyright is based upon the date of publication and not the date of creation (there are exceptions for works created before 1978 and not published until after 2002). It is not unusual for images to sit in archives or private collections for decades before their first publication. Based upon Wikipedia:Public domain#Unpublished works, we can not be sure the image you found is in the public domain until after 2047. The only way around this is if you can locate proof of when the image was first published. --Allen3 ^talk 16:07, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Added this: 1910 Photograph of all members of the 25th Arizona Territorial Legislature Sharlot Hall Museum, Prescott, Arizona

OK. Will try to find a source for the publication. Probably some form of state yearbook? 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:10, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 November 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Prosper P. Parker, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after advocating for the bill funding construction of the Arizona Territorial Capitol, Prosper P. Parker was Speaker of the House during the first legislative session to meet there? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Prosper P. Parker. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:02, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 December 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Owen Thomas Rouse, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a post in the Arizona Territory was not the first or even second choice of future Arizona Territorial Supreme Court justice Owen Thomas Rouse? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Owen Thomas Rouse. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, are you available to promote this hook to Prep 4/Queue 4? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 19:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 December 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 25th Arizona Territorial Legislature, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Democratic controlled 25th Arizona Territorial Legislature overrode vetoes to bills creating a literacy test for voters and authorizing segregation of "African" students? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/25th Arizona Territorial Legislature. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2016!

Hello Allen3, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2016. Happy editing, Tito Dutta (talk) 13:14, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

how is the weather in Texas i used to want to live there if there is not already an article about the weather in Texas u should make one plz respond if u want to on my talk page

United kingdoms my home (talk) 14:11, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry to inconvenience you, but none of Rebbetzin Tziporah Heller's thousands of students are going to see this hook because it's running on Shabbat. Would you mind moving it to after January 2? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 00:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! Yoninah (talk) 20:22, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy New Year 2016!
	Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unneccessary blisters.    – Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:00, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2016

peace bell

Thank you for your support, especially on DYK, - thanks with my review, and the peace bell by Yunshui! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:56, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Click on bell for the sound ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:08, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why was in Jordan removed in the Maghtas DYK ? [6] Makeandtoss (talk) 12:07, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Makeandtoss, my best guess is that the reference to your home country was removed because the phrase "in Jordon" is redundant with the rest of the information in the hook. Have you considered asking the person who performed the removal? My ability to mind read is limited and you will probably get better information if you ask the appropriate person. --Allen3 ^talk 12:16, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think that I and the nominator were under the impression this was going to be held in the special occasions area. Is there any reason you moved it to the current prep-building area instead? Thanks, Jolly Ω Janner 18:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:38, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Allen3, could you possibly do the cleanup on the incomplete DYK update? Right now, while the contents of Queue 1 were moved to the main page, they were also left in Queue 1, and Template:Did you know/Queue/Next wasn't incremented to Queue 2, the final two steps in the process (reversed here for narrative purposes).

I've checked the contributions log for the bot, and it looks like the bot died when attempting to mark the image file as having been included on DYK. I don't know whether you'd want to bother doing this as well, but I'm mainly concerned about incrementing Queue/Next and clearing Queue 1. I'm hoping you're around and can do both. This has been mentioned at WT:DYK#DYKUpdateBot malfunction?, so you might want to check there first. Thanks for anything you can do. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:07, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Inviting you to review here.--MaranoFan (talk) 12:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't an invite. It's a request. Does this come under Wikipedia:Canvassing?  — Calvin999 12:34, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, since Allen was never involved with the article in any way, this can't possibly be influencing the end-decision in any way.--MaranoFan (talk) 12:37, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason you would ask someone to review your DYK is so that it appears on the main page faster, providing that Allen3 passes it. Why have you chosen only Allen3, anyway?  — Calvin999 12:41, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the review page has been inactive for many days, might I add, you seem to misunderstand canvassing. It is common practice to ask for feedback from experienced users at the discussions. Provided, I have no previous interaction with them. Read that page again. YOU have also done this in the past.--MaranoFan (talk) 12:45, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the world of Wikipedia. A lot of my DYK noms have taken weeks to get a review, and then several more weeks to be sent to prep. That's the way the cookie crumbles. You really need to learn to be more patient and stop asking people to review your work. Wait and be patient like the rest of us. I've never asked anyone to review a DYK for me.  — Calvin999 12:55, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, is it my fault that Meghan Trainor articles do not attract crazy attention? You generally nominate Rihanna articles for DYK's who is having a four-week run atop the hot 100 chart, whereas Meghan does not have THAT crazy popularity, especially on wiki. Please go and do some positive work now.--MaranoFan (talk) 13:14, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's nothing to do with it. Whoever reviews a nom may or may not have an interest. It's nothing to do with attracting attention. You get that once it's on the main page. That's the whole point of DYK.  — Calvin999 13:52, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing this message to you because you put yourself down as a regular admin at DYK.

Per this AN thread, LavaBaron is given editing restrictions on DYK. Any hook nominated or reviewed by LavaBaron must be reviewed by a second editor before it may be promoted to the main page. The restrictions are reproduced below as follows:

1. A DYK article nomination or hook submitted by LavaBaron must be reviewed and accepted by 2 other editors before it may be promoted.
2. Any DYK nomination reviewed by LavaBaron must also be reviewed and accepted by 1 other editor before it may be promoted.
3. Any additional reviews by other editors, which are mandated by this restriction, shall count towards the QPQ of that editor.
4. (To balance the maths) For each article submitted by LavaBaron to DYK, 2 QPQ reviews by LavaBaron are required, at least 1 of which shall be a nomination that had not yet been accepted by another editor.
5. These restrictions shall initially last for a period of 3 months. At the end of the period, this restriction shall be reviewed.

--Deryck C. 13:45, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors. Please review the issue I have raised with the DYK that was nominated by me ans was promoted by you. Needs immediate attention. Regards, KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 14:05, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this edit. I had a little panic attack just now when it occurred to me the date might have filled up, so I was relieved to see you had moved it. Is this something I should have done myself after I gave the article a tick, or is to be left for an admin to do? The comments at the start of the holding area do not give any instructions on point. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 07:03, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 September 2016, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Dilma Rousseff, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 06:44, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Four years ago ...

people in law
... you were recipient no. 242 of Precious, a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Five years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:58, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 September 2016, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Rose Mofford, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:28, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Allen3. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Allen3, the DYKUpdateBot didn't run today, and the main page update is currently four hours late. I've left a note on Shubinator's talk page, but in the meantime, you seem to be the only admin well enough versed to do a complete promotion from queue to the main page, including all the necessary notifications and such. If you stop by while the bot remains down, please do what you can. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:02, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shubinator fixed it, and we're back in business. Sorry to have bothered you. Hope all is well. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:00, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]