For previously archived talk articles, see here.
Hi Aleain, after your work on Malaysia Day, do you think it has enough sources to be added to Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/September 16? There is only one obviously unsourced paragraph, but you may have a clearer picture. CMD (talk) 03:52, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi CMD, thanks for your feedback. I think it's well referenced enough for inclusion, though I've added a few more sources for good measure. I've hidden some parts for now where I could not find solid references, especially the bit about supposed advocates preferring to mark Hari Merdeka on 31 August instead of Hari Malaysia on 16 September on the grounds that Malaya and Malaysia were the same country. Almost all of the Malaysian sources I have come across discuss the differences, but very few mention West Malaysians favouring one date over the other. The stronger voices tend to come from East Malaysians who want Hari Malaysia to be given more prominence. Aside from that, the article looks fine. Aleain (talk) 07:23, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Makes sense, can always readd items if sourcing is found. I've restored the article to the September 16 OTD. CMD (talk) 07:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! just to clarify on your COI tagging on ST Engineering, I am not in the position of interest conflict given that I am not an employee, nor the company is my client in any form. The expansion of the article is solely out of my interest in information sourcing out of my free time. as for flagging of promotional content, by all means and feel free to neutralise it where you see fit. Cheers! :) JohnLim99 (talk) 10:06, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi there, on second thought I do believe you are not affiliated with ST Engineering. That said, the article still comes across as rather advertorial in tone and relies quite a bit on primary sources, with many of the citations being directly linked to stengg.com. Aleain (talk) 16:04, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
