User talk:Akshadev/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Akshadev. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Please see this article regarding infobox club names (fc added or not):

Thimphu City F.C. 93.140.217.166 (talk) 02:50, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Didn't understand what you meant! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 02:56, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Ok please do it with few more clubs, Paro FC (stub note?), Transport United FC, also check edit on Bhutan Premier League (external links, earlier tv edits where youtube was not accepted)... i sometimes want make sure if standard is required in all articles or a stubborn user can do as pleased. soon will be known in these cases, tnx. and check my latest edits if got time. 93.140.217.166 (talk) 03:00, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

You don't have to mention it, it was nothing. Let me know if you have more queries related to the Wikipedia, anything, anytime. Happy editing! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 03:08, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chiangrai United F.C.. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. From earlier comments on this talk page it looks as though you are likely to already have at least some awareness of the policy on edit-warring, but if you are not entirely sure what it says then I advise you to read it now. JBW (talk) 16:10, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

JBW To make things clear, I have warned that IP (of course after reversal!) and there is no point of agreements and disagreements. If something is wrong, should get removed and if something is right, should be there! That's clearly it. I've no regrets of my actions. I did what was necessary to be done! Check that IP's edit summaries (which is mostly empty) and then check mine. I have properly described my changes. I can only assure you of one thing that I will try not to get involved in a WP:WAR. One more thing, kindly do not give me these blockage threats. I have enough maturity and understanding of what Wikipedia is and what Wikipedia is not! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 16:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Now we're talking! This is what I call an administrator's ultimatum! Great job JBW. I only wish that every single adminstrator were like you! Warning on edit warring, Dekimasu. Justice has now been done! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 18:16, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

I have replied on my talk page. Best, Dekimasuよ! 18:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Dekimasu And so did I! Best of the best! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 18:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Please note that I have replied again on my talk. It seems you have not seen the last message there yet, which is pointing out that individual editors should not be asked to close move requests. In addition, I am concerned that the move request behavior that occurred last time there was a problem may be occurring again. Can you verify that you are contributing to the move requests only from this account? Best, Dekimasuよ! 05:32, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

I see, alright then! And yes, I have only one account, the one you have asked the question at! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 05:39, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Spicy (talk) 11:11, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akshadev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Spicy I have not used multiple accounts. This is my only account I make contributions with on Wikipedia. I quite did not get the reason of being blocked! I haven't done anything wrong to be blocked! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 11:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It looks to me very much as though you have been alternating between logged-in and logged-out editing in a way intended to be deceptive. However, even if we give you the benefit of the doubt, and assume you haven't, there is further reason for retaining the block. I see that the edit war I warned you about above was only the tip of an iceberg: you have been systematically edit-warring against the user of the IP range in question, on every article they have edited. If, as I said, we give you the benefit of the doubt about logged-out editing, you should be blocked for persistent harassment. Either way, the block should stay. JBW (talk) 12:21, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The accusation is that you have engaged in WP:LOUTSOCK. I haven't verified this. But you may wish to adjust your unblock request to specifically state whether or not you have recently edited while signed out. --Yamla (talk) 11:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Yamla, I have an account with over a 4K+ edits then why would I log out to edit! Of course I haven't! You can go through my recent edits, they are quite decent as well. This account is precious to me with 2 years full of memories. Don't take it away for god sake! Wikipedia editing makes me happy. This incident will make me suffer severely. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 11:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akshadev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

JBW, After that edit warring incident, I clearly said that I will try not to indulge in an edit war any further. I even had a discussion with Dekimasu (an admin) about that matter and conveyed them the same thing. What do you expect more from a Wikiuser? I let go that incident and continued my work towards Indian football and space research. I really deserve to be unblocked. Thanks! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 12:32, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

"why would I log out to edit" – to create the illusion that different people are supporting your position. Which is exactly what you did, multiple times, on multiple IPs. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 14:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akshadev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have already said I did not! Isn't it visible to you? This block is nothing but an absurd assumption. You all are accusing me how you think but remember Wikipedia is not your personal thought's repository. It's a free encyclopaedia open to everyone. I have only edited using this account of mine. This account is precious to me. I do not need to logout edit when I am having an account with over 4.6K+ edits. I have already conveyed multiple times that the WP:WAR incident was nothing but frustration (on both my talk page and at Dekimasu's talk page. And I'm repeating it here again that I want to be here, I enjoy editing Wikipedia articles. I have always followed fellow editor's suggestion and I would continue to do so. You can go through my recent contributions to check on my work. I hereby urge to the reviewing administrator to give me a chance, 'cause I truly deserve one. Thanks! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 15:05, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I don't know what the checkusers know, but this request boils down to "I didn't do it" which is insufficient with checkuser blocks- and as noted above, there are other reasons for the block to stay. 331dot (talk) 15:08, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akshadev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Then what else am I supposed to do? I'm telling you what's true! And the other reason was edit warring, which I have already covered. Per WP:STANDARDOFFER (courtesy Kashmiri), I accept the following:– 1. Wait at least six months, without sockpuppetry or block evasion; i.e. having made no edit, using any account or anonymously, on the English Wikipedia. N (can't wait for that long!)

2. Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban. Y

3. Don't give people reasons to object to your return. Y – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 15:11, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Decline. There is conclusive evidence of logged-out editing to avoid scrutiny. – bradv 20:01, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Akshadev:: This tone is not very helpful, and please keep in mind that checkuser has confirmed that you edited Wikipedia in an inappropriate manner while logged out. You can either accept the findings, apologise, show that you understand what you did wrong, and hope to convince an admin to unblock you, or you can insult all and everyone. The choice is yours. Please also keep in mind that an indefinite block does not mean "infinite" – blocked editors can be extended a WP:STANDARDOFFER. However, your tone above may make it less likely. — kashmīrī ^TALK 15:13, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

I have already apologised! And I am aware of what Wikipedia is about! It's them who aren't listening! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 15:17, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Also, I don't see anything 'offensive' or 'bad tone' in my unblock requests above. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 15:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

lf accepting it cuts it all then okay! Have it your way! Fine! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 15:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

I don't think issuing statements like "Wikipedia is not your personal thought's repository." is going to get you unblocked. I would suggest you to stop editing for next 6 months and then appeal your block through standard offer,best. Ratnahastin (talk) 04:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

I suggest you to read my recent unblock request. Six months is a too long of time! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 04:33, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Consider it a Wikibreak. It will do you good. — kashmīrī ^TALK 08:16, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

@Akshadev: Does that mean you're admitting to editing while logged out (WP:LOUTSOCK)? Hey man im josh (talk) 15:16, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

No! Not today neither tomorrow. Because I did not. I'll never accept something I haven't done. I'll be back, sooner or later! I stand tall 'cause I know I'm a winner... Sayonara, Signing out... – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 16:30, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Please keep in mind that the block relates to you: you are not allowed to edit Wikipedia. If you continue to edit while logged out, it will make the Standard Offer impossible, on top of leading to a block of your IP range. Consider these 6 months a Wikiholiday. — kashmīrī ^TALK 21:07, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Kashmiri I already took your advice, you do not have to repeat it over and over! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 04:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

would love to see you back on the football related topics 103.249.7.202 (talk) 20:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Oneday I certainly will... – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 04:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Is this just you logged out sending support messages to yourself? Joseph2302 (talk) 15:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Seems like it, check out the IP's block log. – Hilst [talk] 20:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Since I was not able to make this request from my account! 2409:40E3:2B:FFFF:596:3048:F16A:896F (talk) 05:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akshadev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yamla, Will standard offer be enough for me to get unblocked or is there anything else I have to follow (besides not to edit from IPs)? – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 05:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This request is incoherent. Are you asking if just waiting six months without editing is enough to guarantee an unblock? No. Clearly not, this is clearly explained in WP:SO. However, following all of WP:SO is probably the only chance you have. Please note as well that it is inappropriate to abuse the unblock template to ask questions like this. In any case, for the record, six months from today is 2024-07-18, so if you are following WP:SO, I expect zero edits anywhere, including to this talk page, until at least then. Yamla (talk) 10:44, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 Confirmed block evasion today, with another account and earlier, via logged-out editing. --Yamla (talk) 10:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Note if you are caught evading your block any further, you may be banned by the community under WP:3X. You are clearly not operating under good faith. Consider this your absolute final warning. --Yamla (talk) 10:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MintyFresh201 (talk) 23:29, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akshadev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello reviewing admin(s),

I'm requesting an unblock via WP:SO. During these six months, I made sure that I do not violate WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. The reason for my unblock request is as follows -

1. I truly understand that the creation of Aabharan during my suspension was unacceptable per the guidelines, but again, my intentios weren't harmful towards editing Wikipedia. It's just I could not resist myself from editing. Because I enjoy editing and I really wanna be here for the rest of my life :)

2. I'm truly ashamed for my actions of logged-out editing. So whatever I've done here and at SC Bengaluru and SC de Goa, I firmly assure you that it would never happen again in the future, even by mistake.

3. On top of all of these, I understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I'm sincerely committed to adhering to them in the future.

I can't express in words how eagerly and anxiously have I waited for this day. I know I've lost my credibility too much but I guarantee you that this was my last mistake. I genuinely enjoy my time here. So please! For the one last time, let me be here... – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 16:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

At this point I think you're more likely to successfully appeal this block if you start fresh. See my comment below. asilvering (talk) 02:33, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

– 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 16:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

No CU evidence of recent block evasion. That's good, though it's hard to be sure in this case. However, you have four separate instances of sockpuppetry. You aren't quite considered banned by the community but I think you need to better address your years of abuse. --Yamla (talk) 16:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

I beg your pardon but I quite did not get you. It would be helpful if you'll elaborate 'adress my years of abuse.' – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 16:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

@Yamla: I'm assuming your question is 'for how long I have violated WP:SOCK.' Well I don't know was it months long or years long, as I was not aware of it back then when I was using 1st 3 of them. And I have already suffered the punishment for that mistake by being temporarily blocked once. And the latest was Aabharan, which you probably blocked within two or three days.

I have missed a lot of events such as 2023 AFC Asian Cup, 2026 FIFA World Cup qualification, UEFA Euro 2024 and 2024 Copa América. Now I do not want to miss a single one of upcoming events.

Also, I'm working on several new articles about Indian private aerospace startups.

And lastly, I would like to recall that if you want a concrete assurance from me then you have it, because this time or any other time, I'm not gonna repeat these silly mistakes. Please grant me that final chance, because I certainly want to be here and improve the encyclopedia as much as I can. I give you all my words.

I had a hectic day at work and I'm heading to bed. It's 23:05 here in India. So goodnight and best regards! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 17:36, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

@Yamla: Last night I forgot about my very 1st ID (SirSavageOfficial). It was supposed to be my main account but somehow I lost access and since then I never used it. Speaking of that, I never really did anything that falls under WP:SOCK with that perticular ID. You may go through its edit history to confirm the same.

Thanks! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 01:30, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Reviewing admin(s),

I'd like to recall that I'm no longer involved in any act of WP:SOCK. This is and always will be my only account operating at Wikipedia. It's a humble request to unblock me to the earliest.

If there is anything else you would like to ask then go for it!

Thanks and regards! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 08:51, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

I will not be reviewing your unblock request. Hopefully someone else will review it in due time. --Yamla (talk) 15:46, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

@Yamla: Oh, alright! Thanks for your time though. Regards! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 05:12, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Respected administrators,

It's been more than a week and the 'unblock request' is still pending... Pardon me for asking but is there any specific reason for the delay? Please write me back.

Thank you! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 03:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Comment: @Yamla: Sorry to bother you but it seems like no one is going to review my unblock request in 'due time you were talking about'. To be honest here, I don't know exactly how it works, so apologies.

Therefore I am sincerely asking you to make a consensus with the reviewing administrator on my return. Either positive or negetive, I'll happily accept it and see what's next...

Thank you and regards! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 10:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

No. Lots of people have been waiting much longer than you. There's no reviewing administrator assigned, that's not how things work. I see no reason to expedite this request, given your history of abuse. If your request has not convinced anyone to take action, that's your fault; substantially reword your request. Please don't ping me again. --Yamla (talk) 11:21, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

With all due respect, I never said that I have been waiting longer than others. Perhaps you read the comments in a hurry... And I think I have definitely made mistakes may be blunders, but not such that I have started proving the Earth to be Mars. Whatever I have done was bound to happen, sooner or later. I am talking about the 2nd block (just to be very clear).

If no one is feeling comfortable (with my return) or whatsoever, then it is completely okay. Because for the time being, this is all I had to offer.

And lastly, I have no interest in pinging you. The previous one would be the last, very last (no disrespect, raw fact)... – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 16:52, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

It was not an arrogant reply, just a raw one, so pardon if it hurts someone's sentiment. it certainly wasn't my motive. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 16:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello Akshadev, I would note that "whatever I have done was bound to happen, sooner or later" is not likely to have a positive effect on the outcome of this unblock request. Most editors, in fact, do not use sockpuppets or edit while logged out in order to create an impression of support, and at the time you protested quite strenuously that you had not engaged in those things. The need here, as you are aware, is to convince some reviewer that these things will not take place in the future, but it may prove difficult since this was not the first time either socking or logged-out editing took place. Suggesting some positive edits you intend to make, or volunteering to accept some particular restrictions (such as not initiating in or participating in move requests at all, etc.) might be helpful, although there are no guarantees. Dekimasuよ! 00:57, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello there Dekimasu, sorry for saying "What I did was bound to happen", It was totally my bad! I completely agree with your statement, except "volunteering to accept some particular restrictions (such as not initiating in or participating in move requests at all)". Because in my request, I've clearly stated that "I understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I'm sincerely committed to adhering to them" (3rd point). That is a 'firm assurance' rather than a 'misleading' or a 'vague' one (again, with all due respect).

For the time being, I feel that I need some more time so that I can think calmly and firmly about "why I should get that one last chance" and present my point properly. May be a month or more (don't know)... I appreciate your valuable suggestions and time.

Thank you! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 06:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

 Note: This would also be my last statement for now. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 06:57, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello everyone, considering Dekimasu's suggestion, "Suggesting some positive edits you intend to make, or volunteering to accept some particular restrictions (such as not initiating in or participating in move requests at all, etc.) might be helpful." I won't 'participate' or 'initiate' a requested moves. I'd rather suggest one if a perticular article fulfills the criteria for RM. Secondly, I will continue to try to improve Wikipedia. I seek some positive development regarding my bolck. Though I've my credibility too much, I hope I recieve some positive response. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 03:54, 4 September 2024 (UTC)  Note: To get unblocked, I am ready for any kind (not extreme) of restriction. English is not my mother tongue. So I humbly request everyone to try to u know g7nderstand my feelings and not only my words. Please! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 09:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Respected administrators, whatever I said above, 2 I was emotional due to not being able to explain my point to you all and being blocked for such a long period. if wants to impose short term or long term ban (as suggested by Dekimasu some time back) then I am ready to accept and follow those conditions. And I firmly promise you all that if I am unblocked, I will never repeat my past mistakes again in my entire life. If anyone wants to ask something, please feel free to ask.

One more thing I want with this is that this unblock request should end now, because now I have nothing else to say. I don't know whether the decision will be in my favor or not, but I know that whatever you all decide will be right. And I will gladly accept it.

I've probably explained above why I want to return to Wikipedia. Now I have tried to explain to you all why I should be allowed to come back. The final decision is in your hands.

I humbly request you all to think deeply on this unblock request of mine. Even 5 minutes of your valuable time is extremely valuable to me. Thank you! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 14:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

I wrote 'final reply' by mistake in my previous edit summary. Pardon. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 14:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

My phone's touch screen isn't working very well, there are some mistakes in the sentences. So pardon for that as well. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 14:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

I will correct them by tomorrow. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 14:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

I will not tamper the statement. I do not want to put myself in any wrong situation. I'm leaving the sentence as they are right now. It's understandable enough. Thank you! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 10:25, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Struck through my comment, and added this comment as its replacement. Pardon me for this and thanks! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 01:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Lastly, please do write me back, because if there's still anything I need to improve (to get unblocked) then please let me know. I'll try my best. Thanks and best regards! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 02:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello visitors! Someone please add to AgniKul Cosmos' infobox, please, it's a humble request. Thank you! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^🗿 11:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Asking others to edit on your behalf is considered block evasion and will count against you in unblock requests. --Yamla (talk) 11:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

@Yamla Oh, I wasn't aware of it. Thanks for letting me know. Should I undo it? – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^🗿 11:50, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Please don't consider this incident against me. I sincerely apologise for asking others to edit on my behalf. I'm dedicated for my comeback to Wikipedia. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^🗿 12:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

You are welcome to remove this section. :) --Yamla (talk) 12:13, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

@Yamla Am I welcome to Wikipedia again? :( I promise I won't let anyone down and I won't do anything wrong. Please unblock me if possible. :( Sorry if asking for unblock is also illegal. :( – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^🗿 12:18, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Your unblock request has not yet been reviewed. --Yamla (talk) 12:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

May I know why my request is not getting rejected or accepted? My previous unblock request got rejected multiple times and quite immediately, ie. here. Am I being tested for something or what? Please let me know, it's killing me inside, it's been 9 months since I'm blocked so please write me back. For god sake please, count on me for the one last time. I will never violate multiple accounts again, ever. Regards! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 06:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

If there are any conditions or rules, please tell me! I am ready to accept them. I have accepted my mistake many times and still accept it and promise that I will never make such a mistake again. To get unblocked, I am ready to accept Dekimasu's terms.

Just to note, it has been almost 9 months since I was blocked, in this duration I neither used any new account nor did any logged-out editing. I know very well that it is very difficult to trust me but you have the power to punish people for their mistakes. In the end, I would just like to say that I want to remove the stain that has been put on me regarding Wikipedia because of me. Thanks you! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 07:23, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Akshadev, sorry you've been waiting so long. Part of why is probably because admins come to this page, see this giant wall of comments you've written, and decide they could more easily help someone else (there are over 100 unblock requests in the queue right now). Another part is because of the nature of your block - most admins can't lift your block, since you were blocked by a checkuser. Only another checkuser can unblock you, and there aren't that many of them.

I'm going to decline your unblock request. I know that's not what you want to hear, but I think it will give you a better chance of successfully appealing your block. Here is what I think you should do:

1. go back through the conversation you had with Yamla and Dekimasu and re-read their advice about what you should talk about in your unblock request
2. ask me whatever questions you might have
3. write an unblock request, but save it on your device, don't post it
4. leave for a while - a week, or maybe a month, whatever it takes to stop feeling emotional about this
5. edit that unblock request you wrote in step 3, so that it's as short and calm as possible
6. post the unblock request, and wait.

I can't promise anything, but I think you'll have a much better chance with a second try. -- asilvering (talk) 02:31, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

@Asilvering: First of all thank you for your humble reply. Secondly, I am ready to accept the terms of dekimasu, yet I am surprised that I was not unblocked. Your suggestion is right but I am confused what and how much I should write in the next unblock request. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 04:59, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Can you explain what terms have you agreed to? Dekimasu's comment didn't specify any restriction that you must abide in order to be unblocked. Ratnahastin (talk) 05:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

@Ratnahastin, Please read this carefully. Dekimasu had clearly said "suggesting some positive edits you intend to make, or volunteering to accept some particular restrictions (such as not initiating in or participating in move requests at all, etc.) might be helpful." This is what I'm agreed to. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 05:52, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

That message means you should propose the edits that you are willing to make if you are unblocked. That would let us know how good you are at editing. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

@Asilvering Please write me back for my question above. I'm pinging you because of your second point (2. ask me whatever questions you might have). – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 11:31, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't respond to that question myself because Ratnahastin got to it. To summarize, you'll want to concisely explain why you were blocked and what you will do in the future that will not lead to another block. You should explain what kinds of things you want to edit, and come up with an answer to Dekimasu's suggestion - some kind of particular restriction you'll abide by that satisfies the reason why you were blocked in the first place. -- asilvering (talk) 00:08, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

@Asilvering Thanks for being so kind and giving me your precious time. I really appreciate your positive response. My cousin is getting married at 16th November so I'll be a little busy. So I'll look into the unblock process after some time. Again, thanks a lot for responding. Happy editing! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 06:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

@Asilvering I did exactly what you suggested (in my latest unblock request). I'm hoping for the best. Again, thanks for your suggestions.

Regards! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^🗿 07:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Akshadev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello everyone. I was blocked for logged-out editing and abusing multiple accounts. I assure you all that I will never repeat such mistakes again. If I will be given another chance I will continue my contribution in the field of football and aerospace on Wikipedia. At the same time, I totally agree with Dekimasu's suggestion. Just give me a try, I won't disappoint. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^📧 08:24, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Accepted per the standard offer, with the condition that you edit only from this account. – bradv 15:51, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jamiebuba were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Omspace Rocket and Exploration and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 09:28, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Akshadev! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 09:28, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Omspace Rocket and Exploration. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Omspace Rocket and Exploration and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Samtse FC

https://www.flashscoreusa.com/team/samtse/EHsPzVG7/

Nita Football Academy

https://nitafootball.com/

Haryana Football Association

https://www.the-aiff.com/association/506

Meghalaya Football Association

https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=897576142503953

Appreciate if logos can be added, not easy to find people knowing/willing Cenderabird (talk) 08:54, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday! Whether you celebrate Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, Hogmanay, Festivus or your hemisphere's Solstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here. --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 06:06, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Coffee/Holidays}} to your fellow editors' talk pages.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.aeroin.space/about. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

• Draft:Aeroin Spacetech may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:15, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Akshadev! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:15, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Revirvlkodlaku that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 16:47, 30 August 2025 (UTC)