User talk:98.235.155.81

Welcome! Last edited: Last edited by: 21:34, 5 October 2025 (UTC) SuperPianoMan9167 (talk · contribs) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your IP address, 98.235.155.81, is registered to Comcast Cable and is believed to be a static address used by only one connection. However, this IP address may represent more than one user, accessing the Internet via several personal computers or devices. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. If vandalism is noted from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Thomas & Friends (series 2)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 21:15, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bruce1ee. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Timeline of the far future have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. —Bruce1ee^talk 14:55, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of the far future. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. jp×g 21:12, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of the far future, you may be blocked from editing. jp×g 21:13, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of the far future. jp×g 21:13, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of the far future. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Bruce1ee^talk 11:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of the far future, you may be blocked from editing. —Bruce1ee^talk 11:46, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of the far future. - AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 11:49, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 13:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template name is short description ({{short description|description}}. By changing it, you are breaking the template. - AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 11:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 15:41, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Windows NT 3.1, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 19:38, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 9 months for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 19:39, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 03:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Please see WP:ANI#Strange IP behavior?.... Magitroopa (talk) 22:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Recession, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:37, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bee Gees, you may be blocked from editing. -Alabama- (talk) 20:28, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:39, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've been starting to improve I maybe want to become anti-vandal to I will keep track of Special:Recent Changes and if I see vandalism I will let users know and I am starting to no longer be competitive. 98.235.155.81 (talk) 22:01, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please appeal my block I won't do that again I request an unblock.

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for fighting against vandalism. May I suggest creating an account? Either way, you really don't need to reply to vandals on their talk page when they are only messing with you. Best thing is to just ignore them and if needed, reporting them to WP:AIV. win8x (talking | spying) 19:59, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why, thank you for kind words I actually used to be a bit of a vandal myself, but I decided to change my ways and become an anti-vandal. You are very much appreciated for your kind words. 98.235.155.81 (talk) 20:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will remember that from now but anyways I still liked those kind words you gave me earlier you are really a kind user you deserve a barn star for that. Congrats! 98.235.155.81 (talk) 20:13, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well it sure is great that you changed. We all appreciate your efforts to combat vandalism. If you like to be a recent changes patroller, you could be interested in WP:RCPATROL. Also thanks for the kind words! win8x (talking | spying) 22:15, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. 98.235.155.81 (talk) 22:15, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 14:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

 Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:12, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please let the bot handle the removal of blocked editors. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:10, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok 98.235.155.81 (talk) 16:10, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You also don't need to respond to the vandal bots posting random accounts. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:10, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, got it 98.235.155.81 (talk) 17:11, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let me be perfectly clear, stop clerking AIV. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:55, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll stop clerking it. 98.235.155.81 (talk) 10:57, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you made these edits to AIV today after being warned by ScottishFinnishRadish yesterday to stop AIV clerking. Seriously, please don't remove the blocked editors listed there and let the bot handle it. ~delta ^{(talk • cont)} 22:48, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will stop 98.235.155.81 (talk) 22:49, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify (I'm not the same editor as 98.235), but I've helped out at AIV too, so I thought I might chime in here as well. The only time I've ever removed blocked users from AIV is if I've reported them myself. Users that other people report can and should be handled by the admins/bot.

The issue is generally that the bot is often really slow at moving these reports (sometimes it takes 10 to 15 minutes when the bot is slowed or down). When AIV gets really clogged up, it can be annoying to see those reports that have already been dealt with at the top of the noticeboard, making the more current reports less visible. With school starting up again, IP vandalism is going to be more and more problematic and AIV will probably start to get busier overtime.

I think the solution is to have more admins readily available to keep an eye on this, and remove the reports manually (if the bot is slowed or down) until the bot can be updated to keep up with the blocks as they occur. 71.59.186.230 (talk) 04:56, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is a good solution indeed, again thank you for helping the wiki with anti-vandalism work. 98.235.155.81 (talk) 21:58, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 98.235.155.81, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Assassination of Umar (644), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 11:42, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know, and encouraging me. 98.235.155.81 (talk) 14:19, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. — Newslinger talk 22:10, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did edit one of those pages, but that is only because I am patrolling, thank you for letting me know. 98.235.155.81 (talk) 22:19, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IP, first thanks for correcting my typo/error. I did revert your removal of the legal threat as it should remain so it's easily accessible. Otherwise, the block does not make sense. S0091 (talk) 17:17, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, your welcome just trying to help out the wiki, reverting personal attacks and vandalism, I also gave the user an ANI notification because there is a discussion going on about his incident. 98.235.155.81 (talk) 17:23, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I understand why you removed it but for this one, I don't think it is helpful. The threat is on their talk page. Had it been made on another editor's talk page or elsewhere, yeah, I can see removing it. I hope that makes sense and thanks again! S0091 (talk) 17:31, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! 98.235.155.81 (talk) 17:32, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you mean. 98.235.155.81 (talk) 20:37, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just letting you know that I reverted this close because I raised some issues regarding the user continuing to be disruptive after the block ends. PS: if you want to reply, you have to do so at my talk page because this page is protected. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 16:12, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I noticed that no one had given you a barnstar for your anti-vandalism efforts yet; you've done so much to help fight vandalism on Wikipedia, and it deserves recognition! Thank you! SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 21:32, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 98.235.155.81. You have new messages at SuperPianoMan9167's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I posted the message on my own talk page since yours is still protected. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 21:34, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]