User talk:98.116.128.15

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ~ Destroyeraa🌀 18:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Giraffer. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Bo Jackson seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 16:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Portuguese language have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Portuguese language was changed by 98.116.128.15 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931556 on 2021-02-25T18:42:24+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to University of Lethbridge. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Thermometer, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 18:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Hillelfrei. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Elisabetta Dami seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hillelfrei ^talk 16:31, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Robertjamal12. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Weather of 2018, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robertjamal12 (talk) 13:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- TNT (talk • she/her) 22:03, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- TNT (talk • she/her) 20:59, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Peculiar Undertone. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Petition—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Peculiar Undertone (talk) 18:42, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm LPS and MLP Fan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Drosera have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 17:20, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm GabberFlasted. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tornado outbreak of June 16–18, 2014, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GabberFlasted (talk) 16:26, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Allison Kugel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Deltaspace42 (talk) 16:14, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Allison Kugel, you may be blocked from editing. Deltaspace42 (talk) 16:17, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jake Smith (American football). Hey man im josh (talk) 16:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from November 2021 Pacific Northwest floods into Weather of 2021. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Didn't realize that.--98.116.128.15 (talk) 14:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

98.116.128.15 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

We understand that block evasion has occurred at our school, however an entire school with 1,600 students. Is there any way for our students to be allowed to edit? Or for it to be anon only to allow editing at our school?98.116.128.15 (talk) 16:50, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am not going to grant the request, but I am formulating an answer for you here. Hold on. Drmies (talk) 16:55, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• So, you have a student (?) there who likes to mess around with weather-related articles. The block was made such that that person, and thus everybody else, does not have the opportunity to edit from y'all's IP address or create an account. So editing without an account is not going to be allowed. On top of that, I am not convinced that a school systems operator would be posting this on a Saturday. An official email (that is, one that identifies you as someone who has an official status at your school) to Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee might be a thing you can do--not to appeal, but to identify yourself and ask what can be done for educational projects, for instance. Without any kind of "official" identification, I am loath to go into further detail right now--sorry. Drmies (talk) 17:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

98.116.128.15 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Seriously, no one from our school can edit at all. Contributions history clearly show multiple people on the IP at the same time. We need something to happen because our school IP can’t be blocked for a full year.98.116.128.15 (talk) 12:29, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've been told how to resolve this. Follow the instructions given by Drmies. Yamla (talk) 12:33, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I’m a student. I can’t, our emails are disabled.98.116.128.15 (talk) 12:51, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]